Obligatory and Somewhat Awkward Year-End Summary

I’m supposed to write something about baseball here. That’s my recollection, anyway.

First, a quick programming note: The long, once-a-week pieces from last year are done. Turns out they required a lot of work, and I’m lazy, so no mas. I’ll be publishing more frequently this year and the articles will be shorter.

If 2009 was Coltrane and Monet, then 2010 is Cohen and Mondrian. That’s a horrible analogy, but it will have to do.

So, baseball. The Padres. We still have a team in San Diego, right?

On Stuff That Has (or Hasn’t) Happened

Bullet points already? Brilliant…

  • The hiring of Jed Hoyer as GM — Beyond my disappointment in seeing Kevin Towers leave, I am devoid of opinion on this move. There are no data points on Hoyer as GM, so I’m withholding judgment until I see something. Yeah, that makes me a lousy blogger. I’ll live with it.
  • The loss of Henry Blanco to the Mets — Hank White is a solid backup catcher who does all those things I can’t quantify (good luck disproving that). We’ll see if newly acquired Dusty Ryan can do the same. No disrespect to Nick Hundley, who is better than he gets credit for, but I like the idea of having a veteran presence to work with kids like Mat Latos, Wade LeBlanc, and whoever else sticks. This year’s pitching staff should be better than last year’s (Walter Silva?), which is more of a threat than a compliment, but it’s going to need help. And I’m still expecting 85-90 losses out of these guys, which means that the emphasis needs to be on developing Latos, LeBlanc, Gallagher, Poreda, whomever.
  • The loss of Drew Macias to the Diamondbacks — Damn politics. By rights, this guy should still be in San Diego, but his name isn’t Gwynn. The stupid thing is, Macias isn’t even that great. It’s just that teams like the Padres aren’t in a position to discard him. It would have been nice to see them at least convert Macias into another spare part.
  • The loss of Brian Giles to… somewhere — He wasn’t Jason Bay, but neither was Bay when he played here. Giles had a nice run in his hometown and he carried the ’05 team into the playoffs. I won’t miss the ’09 version, but I will miss the guy that was a vital part of the offense from late 2003 through 2008. It stinks that he leaves on such a down note.
  • The hiring of Dick Enberg to work TV play-by-play — Love it. Enberg is an iconic figure from my youth. He’s right there with Vin Scully and Chick Hearn in my mind. I only hope that Mark Neely remains an integral part of the team. He had huge shoes to fill when Matt Vasgersian departed, and although Matty V. is impossible to replace, Neely held his own. I enjoyed watching games that he called, which I cannot say about everyone (sorry, FOX, did I offend?).
  • The Adrian Gonzalez trade rumors — Whatever. If/when something happens, I’ll form an opinion. Until then, I couldn’t care less.
  • The Kevin Kouzmanoff trade rumors — Same thing. Heath Bell, too.

Shorter. More frequently. I should shut up now. If I’ve missed something, let me know; we’ll talk about it later.

Is This Thing On?

I’m still kicking the tires, but Ducksnorts appears to be back in business. With luck, I’ll have something interesting to say next year. Happy, happy…

Site Non-update

Last month my web hosting company apparently went out of business without telling anyone. Repeated attempts to contact them have been unsuccessful, but if you’re interested in the sordid details, a fellow refugee has documented the situation.

Apart from the drama, this is where we stand:

  • I managed to back up my database a few hours before the server went down for the last time. Thanks to the tasty goodness of XAMPP, I can view Ducksnorts on my own machine and confirm that no content has been lost. I got lucky.
  • Some files (mostly graphics, I suspect; still need to do a proper inventory) have gone astray. Before the advent of publishing software, when posting to Ducksnorts meant FTPing static HTML pages to the server, I was meticulous about keeping a mirror on my local machine. I’ve been lax in that area since then, and although I’m reasonably sure that I have copies of all these files, I don’t know exactly where they are. This isn’t crippling by any stretch, but it is irritating.
  • I cut ties with the old host (conveniently located halfway ’round the world) and signed up with a new one, which is headquartered less than an hour from my house. I have started migrating domains, and my vanity site is already up and running. Ducksnorts, PadreBlogs, and whatever the heck else was on the old server are more complex and will take more time to restore in a new environment.
  • Everything will be back online at some point, although there is still no timetable. I need to familiarize myself with the new environment and do some testing before I flip the proverbial switch. With the holidays fast approaching, I’m not sure when I’ll have time to do that. Restoring Ducksnorts is on my list of things to do, but it’s not at the top.

Until then, here’s where I’ll be:

I’ve also got contributions to two upcoming books that you should buy because they rock:

There you go. More as it happens… whenever that might be.

Broken

Hi there,

Ducksnorts is broken. I’m working to fix it, but there is no timetable. With luck, we’ll be back up and running by the end of the year.

In the meantime, you can read my stuff at The Hardball Times and Baseball Prospectus.

Thanks,
Geoff

Death of a Gunslinger

As you doubtless know by now, the Padres have fired GM Kevin Towers. It’s taken me so long to write about this because it is difficult for me to articulate my feelings. His departure hits me harder than those of Bruce Bochy, Trevor Hoffman, Sandy Alderson, or Jake Peavy.

Towers was the primary architect of the best team (’98) in franchise history as well as of the most successful multi-year run (’04-’07). He isn’t the sole reason for the Padres’ success during his tenure, but a lot of good things happened under his watch. What he wasn’t directly responsible for, his hires and charges were. Towers was undeniably the most successful GM in club history, and I hate to see him go.

Was jettisoning Towers the right move? Without having a firm grasp of Jeff Moorad’s vision for the future, I cannot answer that. Perhaps Moorad will find someone who is a better fit going forward. Whether that person (Tom Krasovic mentions some names) can execute as well as Towers typically has over the years… anything is possible, but I’d hate to be the guy or gal trying to fill those shoes.

As for Towers, it’s hard to imagine he’ll be out of work for a moment longer than he desires. The formerly longest-tenured GM in baseball is known for being a tireless networker who has the respect of his colleagues. There’s an opening in Toronto. I don’t know if Towers has any interest in leaving the West Coast, but that could be a good fit.

My great fear is that the Giants will tire of Brian Sabean’s penchant for old players and snatch up Towers (although it sounds like a Sabean extension is in the works). For as upset as I would have been had Towers landed the Arizona job in 2005, I’ll be doubly so if the Giants hire him. Same division, with a team I’ve disliked since I was a kid? Yeah, that would crush me.

Context Is Everything

David Pinto, whose work I greatly admire, offers a disappointingly shallow analysis of Towers’ career in San Diego:

It took Towers nine seasons to put together a team that could post a winning record four years in a row… About the only clear-cut great move he made in recent years was bringing in Adrian Gonzalez.

The first point neglects context and lacks proper appreciation of just how awful the Padres were before Towers arrived:

With or Without You
  Years Winning seasons Playoff appearances
Before Towers 26 6 1
With Towers 14 7 4

As for the second point… no and no. This doesn’t even account for turning two pieces of scrap into Heath Bell, or getting a year-and-half of solid (130 OPS+) production out of Scott Hairston before flipping him for three power arms. Heck, even Khalil Greene for Luke Gregerson is looking pretty lopsided in the Padres’ favor at this point.

Going back further, Towers brought Kevin Brown to San Diego. Although it meant giving up Derrek Lee, without Brown, there is no World Series in ’98. Without the World Series, there likely is no Petco Park and the Padres are still playing at that football stadium… or in some other city.

Towers has done some excellent work here. His trade record is unbelievable (the story that “he once traded a fringe catcher to Cleveland to obtain a used treadmill” is cute even if it never happened — which I’ll address shortly at Unfiltered).

I don’t mean to suggest that Towers is without his faults. The Randy Myers waiver claim in ’98 was a disaster. Ditto long-term contracts to fringe guys like Wiki “Clank” Gonzalez, Kevin “Wiplash” Jarvis, and Bubba “I Don’t Need a Snappy Nickname Because My Name Is Bubba” Trammell, although then-president Bob Vizas deserves some “credit” for those.

Towers’ draft record? Spotty, at best. The most famous and spectacular failure occurred in 2004, when the Padres tabbed local shortstop/misfit Matt Bush with the first pick overall to save a few bucks. Part of that was due to ownership’s reluctance to spend money, although Towers has publicly assumed blame for not pushing harder in favor of Stephen Drew or Jered Weaver.

Towers’ obsession with the Rule V draft has driven me crazy over the years (although it looks like he finally snagged a keeper in Everth Cabrera), as has his extreme candor with the media. I actually find the latter somewhat endearing, except for the fact that many people are ill equipped to receive such candor. As anyone who caught Towers at one of the Baseball Prospectus events in recent years can attest, the man speaks his mind.

Local Voices

Meanwhile, 619sports features a couple of invigorating articles. In the first, Craig Elsten focuses on the club’s performance in the second half of the 2009 season. Although the Padres and Towers should take pride in what they managed to accomplish (75 wins from a team that had four legitimate big-league pitchers on its Opening Day roster is nothing short of remarkable), such accomplishment is separate and distinct from the task of guiding the franchise forward according to Moorad’s vision (whatever that may be). There are solid reasons for disliking the firing (e.g., the fact that Towers is good at his job), but the club’s performance over the past three months isn’t one of them.

New Media Roundtables
The good folks at 619sports also have invited me to do a couple of podcasts with them. The first reviews the 2009 season, while the second looks ahead to 2010.

The second article comes from John Conniff, whose thoughts on the subject largely echo my own. It’s worth a full read, but here is the crux of John’s argument (and man, I wish I’d been able to summarize it as well as he has):

In the three areas where the Moorad group was evaluating Towers, draft, development and the major league club; he excelled at one and his contributions in the other two were questionable.

As good as Towers was at swinging deals and finding low cost bullpens, for some reason despite an extensive scouting background he never was able to put in place an effective development program.

So, yeah, what John said. Seriously, go read the full article; he hit it out of the park.

Elsewhere, Paul DePodesta shares his thoughts:

As difficult as this week is for many people around the game, the good news is that we’ll be rooting for other past colleagues, friends and peers in the coming weeks as they chase that feeling of high achievement. The part of us that empathizes with the sadness this week will also be able to relish in the glee later this month, and that humanity makes this a great game.

Amen.

The Big Picture

Stepping back a bit (careful, don’t fall off!), now is probably as good a time as any to clean house. San Diegans just “aren’t that into” the Padres (attendance was down by more than 6000 per game this year as compared to 2008), so why not make some moves that might meet with greater resistance were people paying closer attention?

(This is why a trade of Adrian Gonzalez within the next calendar year wouldn’t surprise me in the least. When 20% of your paying customers disappear, you might as well do whatever it takes to build a competitive club; who’s left to alienate?)

On a more general note, has there ever been a more dynamic period in franchise history? Consider some of what has happened over the past 5+ years:

In a relatively short period of time, the Padres have purged themselves of the only ballpark in franchise history, as well as their most successful manager, reliever, owner, starter, and GM. Throw in the departures of Matt Vasgersian, Khalil Greene, and Sandy Alderson, and it’s been a bumpy ride over the past 12 months. Those clamoring for change have gotten it in spades (and aces).

What I like is the fact that good no longer is viewed as good enough. Whether they hit their mark or not, the Padres are reaching for something bigger and better than what they’ve been. It’s hard to fault that intention — unless it turns out Moorad is clueless, in which case we’re all hosed. (It’s worth noting here that Moorad has enjoyed considerable success in the business over the years. This is no guarantee that all of his decisions will be brilliant, but it’s enough to suggest that maybe he deserves the benefit of the doubt.)

I don’t know how this is going to end. I’d be lying if I said I had no concerns. I have no idea how one goes about replacing Towers; I’m glad this is Moorad’s problem and not mine. I hope he knows what he’s doing. The good news is that he’s the one paying the bill, so presumably he has a tad more at stake than you or I do.

As always, we shall see…

Chase Headley and the Art of the Comp

Reader TexPadre recently posed the following question:

When will Chase Headley show a decent amount of power? Or will he ever?

Headley, you may recall, was the subject of much hype in spring training 2008. He had just come off a monster season (.330/.437/.580) at Double-A San Antonio and people got a little silly, mistaking him for a future star rather than what he is — a solid support player. Headley is what I would call a classic #6 hitter on a championship team — not enough on-base skills for the top of the order, not enough power for the heart of the lineup, but enough of each to be useful in the bottom third.

This got me thinking about process and approach as it relates to the evaluation of individual players. It’s the type of thing baseball executives have to do all the time. The basic process is to gather inputs, analyze data, and reach tentative conclusions — always leaving room for adjustments as conditions change, new information is gleaned, etc. Then, based on this knowledge (which is necessarily imperfect; we are talking here about probabilities, i.e., likely outcomes), they must make decisions that involve large quantities of money and affect the future direction of the organization.

More recently, similar questions have become “important” to aficionados of fantasy baseball, which over the past quarter century has transformed itself from a hobby for ubergeeks into a lucrative industry. Careers have been made on the basis of projection systems that make various claims which sound impressive (my incredibly unsophisticated IVIE system, for example, promises to be “comatosely accurate,” whatever the heck that means) but which are basically educated guesses. Convince people that your guesses are good enough to be worth paying for, and you make money… but I digress.

So, we’re talking about Headley. We’re talking about projections and comps. Methodology and what-not. Okay, wait, before we get there, I want to show you one more thing. Here is what we (you and me) projected for Headley this year versus what he has actually done so far:

Chase Headley, 2009: Projected vs Actual
  PA BA OBP SLG
Statistics are through games of September 27, 2009, and are courtesy of Baseball-Reference.
IVIE 550 .270 .345 .448
Actual 591 .264 .342 .399

We were a little optimistic on the slugging percentage, but everyone will agree that this qualifies as comatosely accurate. If you don’t agree, kindly adjust your reality to conform.

Getting back to the original question, I responded as follows:

I could see Headley topping out in the 20-25 HR range, but yeah, he’s more of a doubles guy. If he tightens up his strike zone a bit, I’m envisioning a Kevin Millar/Lyle Overbay type of hitter, which is pretty valuable at third base.

Reader Tom Waits stepped right up (three for a dollar) with some thoughts of his own:

Corey Koskie is my current fave comp. He was consistently in the 115-120 OPS+ range in the AL, against a league average of 100; Chase looks to be headed for the 110 range against a league average of 94.

Koskie is another solid comp, and I especially liked the fact that Tom explained his reasoning. Because from where I sit, a well-considered thought process is at least as important as the ability to utilize a particular technique.

I don’t know how Tom came up with his comp, but I will tell you how I arrived at mine. I often forget to explain my process because these patterns of thinking become so ingrained in who I am that it’s hard to go back and break it all down into bite-sized steps. But maybe you will find my process interesting and/or useful; worst case, you will know that when I spout names of comparable players, some actual thought went into it.

And the reason I got into projections earlier is that — no matter what anyone might want to believe — there’s at least as much art here as science. There can be tremendous value in developing and deploying complex algorithms that take massive amounts of data and consolidate it into something manageable and useful.

It is important, however, to recognize that such algorithms provide us with a starting point, not an ending point. We use these tools to help us better understand the world around us, to begin an inquiry into something that sparks our curiosity.

Even the best algorithms cannot synthesize information and make judgments based on it. Algorithms are tremendously hard workers but they are stupid; they are tools (is this why we call stupid people “tools”?). Once the necessary data has been extracted using these tools, actual people must step into the process and decide what to do with it all in a way that makes sense and, with luck, adds to the greater body of knowledge and understanding.

Forgive me if this seems obvious, but folks screw it up all the time. You’d be surprised by the things people claim to know on the basis of what a computer told them. It doesn’t work that way. Somewhere along the line, you have to interpret the data.

Back to the discussion at hand, in seeking out comps for Headley, I first examined his entire minor- and major-league records to date. I won’t bother reposting all of that here (try the Internet), but the salient point is that in the context of Headley’s overall body of work, his 2007 campaign appears to have been an outlier. This doesn’t mean we discard that season entirely (after all, it happened), but using it as a baseline creates unreasonable expectations.

Next, I made a couple of assumptions:

  • Headley’s past performance is indicative of his likely future performance, inasmuch as the same holds true for any player, which is to say… somewhat
  • There is an adjustment period on reaching the big leagues; most players don’t dominate on arrival

I revisited Headley’s record and noticed a couple of things:

  • Wherever he’s been, he’s hit a ton of doubles (in the 31-43 range in every full professional season)
  • His strike-zone judgment has deteriorated as he’s moved up the ladder:
    Year Level BB/SO
    2006 A+ .771
    2007 AA .649
    2008 AAA .477
    2008 MLB .288
    2009 MLB .443

This latter finding should come as no surprise. The theory is that as a player advances, he faces better competition. Nobody exists in a vacuum. A guy doesn’t hit .330/.437/.580 simply because he wants it to be so. Other guys are trying to prevent him from doing just that, and those at Double-A tend to better at it than those at A-ball. Don’t get me wrong: The fact that Headley tore it up at Double-A is cause for excitement, but only in the larger context of his output. In other words, this excitement should have been tempered a little by knowledge of his performance at Lake Elsinore a year earlier.

We’ve seen Headley’s plummeting BB/SO ratios, but it’s not like he didn’t gain anything as a result. His ISO jumped more than 100 points from 2006 to 2007, and it held at the new level (around .250) in Triple-A the following year. That’s a good sign, but at some point, the grip-and-rip approach loses effectiveness. It’s that whole “other (more skilled) guys trying to prevent him” thing again.

Although Headley’s plate discipline fell apart when he first arrived in San Diego, he managed to hold his own as a rookie, hitting .269/.337/.420 despite playing a position where he was visibly uncomfortable (well, I was uncomfortable watching him; it is possible that I’m projecting my own feelings onto him, but I doubt it). That checks in as a 108 OPS+ (not the most sophisticated metric on the market, but a reasonable enough barometer for our purposes — if we had to base millions-dollar decisions on our findings, then we might want to reach for something a little more precise), which isn’t too shabby for a 24-year-old kid facing big-league pitching for the first time.

So, remember the bit a few paragraphs ago about an adjustment period? That’s what Headley is going through now. I’d feel a lot better if he were experiencing it at his natural position so he wouldn’t have to make two adjustments (one to big-league pitching, one to playing left field) at the same time, but what are you gonna do.

What I like about Headley’s 2009 campaign is that his overall line isn’t all that different from what he did as a rookie but he’s tightened his strike zone in the process. Yeah, the home run rate is down, but it’s worth recalling how Headley achieved his early homer binge in ’08. Here’s a chart that ran in the Ducksnorts 2009 Baseball Annual:

Chase Headley’s Plate Discipline, 2008
Dates PA BA OBP SLG HR BB SO
6/17/08 – 7/11/08 88 .276 .284 .506 5 0 27
7/12/08 – 9/28/08 280 .266 .354 .389 4 30 77

Do you think Headley could have sustained any amount of success with the approach that led to his initial power spike? Here’s a hint: No friggin’ way. Don’t believe me? Ask Rolando Roomes.

If we look at those first 88 plate appearances as sort of a “Hey, I’m here but I don’t really know what I can do yet” transition period, we can see the latter part of his rookie season as a more accurate representation of his ability as it existed at that point in time. In other words, here is a kid that hit a little, drew some walks, and showed flashes of power (though typically not manifested as home runs). We have the starting point for a young player that figures to improve — incrementally — as he gains experience… which is exactly what has happened this year.

Headley is making strides in both the plate discipline and power areas. They are very small strides, but he’s 25 years old and still playing (for the most part, until Kevin Kouzmanoff’s recent injury) out of position. Aside from the fact that some people bought into the misguided notion that Headley is a star in the making, there is absolutely no cause for panic. He is developing into what he will eventually become: A prototypical #6 hitter on a championship team.

Shoot, I keep forgetting to talk about Millar and Overbay. Again, this is at least as much art as it is science, so bear with me. The process I followed in coming up with those comps for Headley involves answering a series of questions and goes something like this (your specific questions and answers may vary; that’s fine as long as you have a process that works):

  1. Based on what you’ve seen of Headley so far, what do you think his current level of production is?
    This is easy because his first two seasons have been nearly identical. I think he’s a .265/.340/.405 hitter with improving plate discipline.
  2. Based on his age and experience, do you expect him to improve in the future? To what degree?
    Yes, but not by a lot. He is 25, which suggests additional growth may be possible but not as much as we might expect from a 22- or 23-year old.
  3. Are there mitigating factors?
    Petco Park hurts his offensive game. Headley hit one out to dead center in Pittsburgh the other night that would have been a fairly routine fly ball in San Diego. Also, he is playing out of position, although it is not certain how much offensive gains he would make if he moved back to third base full time.
  4. Given the above information, what do you expect his peak to be and how long will he play at that level?
    Well, he won’t make huge strides but if he continues to improve his plate discipline and learn his strengths and weaknesses as a hitter, he should do a little better than what he’s doing now. I’ll say 4-5 years of .280/.350/.450 production, give or take.
  5. Are there other players in recent history that have put up similar numbers?
    A quick check of Baseball-Reference’s indispensable Play Index tool (I alluded to this method in my recent Everth Cabrera article at Hardball Times) reveals that there are several such players.
  6. Which of these are best fits for Headley, in terms of position, “shape” of skills (e.g., ISO, BB/SO), etc.?
    I’m eliminating anyone with batting average higher than about .290 or lower than about .270. That weeds out guys like Al Oliver at the high end and Nick Swisher at the low end, cutting my list from 41 players to 21. I’m looking at guys in the Hal McRae/Michael Cuddyer range now.
  7. Can the list be further refined?
    Carlos Guillen, Cal Ripken, and John Valentin spent a lot of time at shortstop… Bill White retired 40 years ago, and conditions have changed since then… Ryne Sandberg was a second baseman, Cesar Cedeno stole a boatload of bases… Jeff Conine isn’t a bad comp… Neither is Millar… Or Ken Caminiti, or Michael Cuddyer.
  8. Hey, what about Overbay?
    Okay, when I made my original response and did this exercise the first time, I came up with some peak numbers for Headley in my head that generated a list which included Overbay. I have since forgotten what my original parameters were, but he can’t be far off my list (and now I see that Overbay has a career .363 OBP; my upper limit this time was .360 — I must have given Headley a few extra OBP points earlier).

Well, let’s stick with Millar and Overbay since those are the names I committed to originally, and since Overbay’s numbers are within shouting distance of my current parameters. Those guys didn’t establish themselves at the big-league level until age 27, so they aren’t perfect comps (there are no perfect comps; that would involve cloning), but they’re good enough to give us a rough idea of what Headley’s future might look like.

I hem, I haw… I’m not one of those people that are comfortable pretending to have knowledge they do not have. I use qualifiers not because I doubt myself but because I doubt everything.

So, I look at the career numbers of Millar and Overbay:

Kevin Millar and Lyle Overbay, Career
  PA BA OBP SLG OPS+ HR
Statistics are through games of September 27, 2009, and are courtesy of Baseball-Reference.
Millar 5367 .273 .357 .451 110 169
Overbay 3815 .279 .363 .450 111 101

Millar is 37 years old, Overbay is 32. If you told me that Headley’s numbers would look something like that at those ages, I’d find it to be eminently reasonable.

How about their peaks (conveniently, both men did their best work at age 29):

Kevin Millar and Lyle Overbay, Peak
  Year PA BA OBP SLG OPS+ HR
Statistics are through games of September 27, 2009, and are courtesy of Baseball-Reference.
Millar 2001 495 .314 .374 .557 140 20
Overbay 2006 640 .312 .372 .508 125 22

The batting averages seem a little high, and Millar had quite the power spike in ’01, but anything can happen in a given season (if Aaron Hill can hit 34 homers one year, then I see no reason why Headley can’t hit .314; we’re not talking about what is likely, but what is possible). Yeah, I could see Headley putting together that kind of line once or twice in his lifetime. I wouldn’t expect it on a regular basis, but he’s demonstrated — even if it was an outlier at Double-A (an outlier can happen more than once, eh?) — that he’s capable of hitting the ball with authority over relatively short periods of time (a single season is fairly long, but it is a subset of the larger unit called “career”).

Now we have some idea of what Headley’s career might look like. And we arrived at this picture by following a roughly defined process (sort of like composing a song — it has a definite structure, but leaves room for improvisation) that makes a fair amount of sense.

Could we devise a better process? Probably, and it’s good to remember this as we start asserting our new-found “knowledge” about Headley and his possible future career paths. Actually we should bear a couple things in mind:

  • There is always a better mousetrap waiting to be built
  • Despite what I have just demonstrated, Headley is not Millar or Overbay; he is Headley

Don’t become overly attached to these comps. Yeah, a lot of work went into deriving them, but this isn’t the type of exercise you do once and then let rest. What if Headley goes Aaron Hill on us next year? Then we have to feed this new information back into the system and recheck our assumptions, possibly adjusting our expectations. (For example, at various times, I have compared Adrian Gonzalez to the likes of David Dellucci, Brad Fullmer, and Chad Tracy. Last I checked, none of them ever hit 40 homers in a season.)

Ask questions. Search for answers. Wash, rinse, repeat. If you feel like you’ve got something nailed, you don’t. Go back and dig deeper. Eventually you will come to understand that you don’t know squat.

This is a good sign. It means the real fun is about to begin.

Hey, I Can See the Off-Season from Here

I’ve been busy. Part of the reason is that I’ll be contributing to two forthcoming books: The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 (due out in November) and John Burnson’s Graphical Player 2010 (due out in December). I can’t go into a lot of detail just yet because — well, I’m not done writing — but be sure to purchase those two fine tomes when you have a chance.

Meanwhile, I’m still watching the games and I do have some thoughts. They are more fragments than sentences, so today we’ll do the dreaded (eh, mon!) bullet points:

  • I don’t know what disturbs me more: that Adrian Gonzalez laid down a sacrifice bunt in Tuesday’s game or that in the process, he did something that Tony Gwynn Jr. twice failed to do a day earlier.
  • I could say more about Gwynn’s performance, but I said I’d leave him alone for now, and so I shall. I’m biting my tongue so hard that it’s bleeding. C’mon, man, suck it up; weak grounders to second can be fun.
  • Returning to Adrian for a moment, he could do something pretty crazy this year. As of this writing, he has 38 homers; the next three guys behind him have 39 (Kouzmanoff, 17; Chase Headley, 11; Will Venable, 11).
  • I offered my thoughts on Everth Cabrera over at Hardball Times a couple of weeks ago. He promptly went into a slump. I take full responsibility because I have control over such things. That and the weather. Sorry it’s been so friggin’ hot lately, especially for all y’all in the east county. Santucky represent.
  • Speaking of Kouz, there’s been talk that he deserves consideration for the Gold Glove award. Yes and no. If Rafael Palmeiro can win the thing while playing DH, then everyone deserves consideration. As for Kouz, his case rests on the fact that he has committed just three errors this season. Don’t get me wrong, that is some kind of freakish, but as Myron notes, a shiny fielding percentage doesn’t make Kouz a great third baseman. For my money, Kouz is a slightly above-average defender at third (which is better than he was when he got here; among other things, his throws don’t tail nearly as much as they once did) who has good hands and who comes in on the ball very well, but who doesn’t have a lot of lateral range. Also, he doesn’t hit enough to win the Gold Glove, but that’s another story.
  • I should say something about Kyle Blanks, whose season ended prematurely due to a foot injury. First off, how many guys can hit a ball over the 434-foot sign in dead center at whatever the ballpark in Miami is called despite not being able to plant on that back foot? That is just sick. Second… well, let me commandeer some words from a post that was supposed to happen a couple of weeks ago but that never quite materialized:

    Blanks got off to a strong start at Triple-A Portland, then struggled around the same time he started seeing action in left field. He came up to the big club in mid-June and, after a slow start, punished baseballs. Blanks sometimes has trouble making contact, but when you put up a 137 OPS+, all is forgiven; besides, he’ll work his way through that — he’s already making adjustments against pitchers, and the more he sees, the better he’ll get.

    Blanks also looks surprisingly comfortable at both corner outfield spots. Assuming the foot injury doesn’t have long-term implications, Blanks should continue to progress at the big-league level and be a serious force within the next few years.

    (Unrelated, but fun: Jason at IIATMS recently visited San Diego and had lunch with Blanks.)

  • If Eliezer Alfonzo is back in 2010, so help me. Dude makes Ruben Rivera’s swing look controlled.
  • Daniel likes what Kevin Correia has done for the Padres this year. So do I, in a Kevin Jarvis 2001 kind of way. I like that this team will have much better options for the pitching staff headed into next season. Some of these guys may take their lumps, because that is what happens to young players, but at least the talent is there.
  • Heath Bell blew a couple saves. Closers do that sometimes, you know.
  • I like the idea of giving Edward Mujica a few starts. He may not end up in the rotation next year, but flexibility is good. Mujica’s home run rate is high (as it was in Cleveland), but he is young, has good stuff, and throws strikes. Most teams can use a guy like that.
  • Whenever I see Luis Perdomo’s name, I think “perdido,” which means “lost” in Spanish. Before Perdomo appeared in a September 13 victory over Colorado, the Padres had been 2-28 in games in which he pitched. Prior to that game, he hadn’t been in a winning game since May 16 — and then, only because it lasted 16 innings. The Padres are now 4-30 in Perdomo’s appearances, as opposed to 64-52 when he doesn’t pitch. <logic=”faulty”>Imagine how good this team would be without him.</logic>
  • I’ve enjoyed watching Wade LeBlanc throw strikes. Bad things happen — like Eric Byrnes smacking a ball off the second deck facade of the Western Metal Building — when LeBlanc misses, but when the young southpaw works ahead in the count, he can bust out the nasty change-up and do damage. Some people gave up on LeBlanc based on his earlier trials, but with all the power arms now in the system, I kind of like him as an option at the back end of next year’s rotation to give opposing hitters a different look. He has little margin for error, but so have other successful pitchers. A lack of overwhelming velocity hasn’t kept, say, Doug Davis from having a career.
  • In The Hardball Times Season Preview 2009, I predicted that the Padres would win 75 games this year. I need them to go 7-5 the rest of the way to make me look smarter than I am. Hey, they’re 26-20 in August in September; it just might happen.

I’m out of bullets. That’s okay; I’m pretty sure it’s dead already.

Olive Pudding

It’s great to see the Padres sign all their top draft picks this year. First-round pick Donavan Tate (whom I was fortunate enough to meet last week, but we’ll get to that in a moment) took batting practice with the big club Tuesday night and impressed the veterans with his “respect and humility.”

Tom Krasovic provides terrific coverage of the signings. Much of it focuses on Jeff Moorad’s willingness to deal with Scott Boras, which is an aspect of the new ownership group that pleases me.

Mouth, Meet Money

I’d wondered whether Moorad’s previous experience as a player agent might give him an advantage in that regard. As I noted in my Padres season preview at Hardball Times, “The fact that Moorad has been involved in the business as an advocate of players presumably gives him additional insight into how they operate.”

So far, so good. If this year’s draft is any indication, Moorad’s perspective is helping.

Meanwhile, Ben at Friar Forecast thinks the draft process is broken and wonders whether it can be fixed. I don’t have enough space or time to formulate coherent thoughts on the subject, but my general feeling is that the whole system borders on socialism, if not outright communism. But then, many things about the business side of baseball baffle me, e.g., the antitrust exemption.

I sometimes hear people complain about what top amateurs get paid to sign despite their lack of experience. I assume these same people gladly accepted less than market value when they came out of high school or college and entered the work force.

Investment in a known quantity is always a smarter option, right? When the Seattle Mariners signed Adrian Beltre to a 5-year, $64 million deal before the 2005 season, that money was better spent than the $3 million the Washington Nationals blew on Ryan Zimmerman in June of that year, right?

So, yeah, from a certain angle, the draft is necessarily flawed. But it’s what we have, and I like how the Padres operated within its confines this year. Their draft builds on the foundation laid by the previous regime but is even more aggressive (I feared they would take Mike Minor at #3).

Pretzel Logic

The U-T’s Bill Center, on the other hand, expresses doubts about the Padres’ haul:

Even if the Padres sign outfielders Donavan Tate and Everett Williams and right-handed pitcher Keyvius Sampson, it doesn’t mean they have turned the corner on a suspect draft history.

This is true. You know what else is true? We could replace “have” in the previous sentence with “haven’t” and still be right. We have no way of knowing which condition (“have turned the corner” or “haven’t turned the corner”) is true until well after the fact. Center’s statement introduces doubt into the reader’s mind without telling us anything useful.

Alternate histories?

Okay, I’ll get into Center’s discussion of the 2008 draft a little. He is critical of the Padres’ choice of Allan Dykstra in the first round. I wasn’t crazy about the pick either, but I’m curious to know who Center wanted. In the interest of full disclosure, I had my eye on Anthony Hewitt, who has been a disaster (340 PA, .210/.256/.356, 16/125 BB/K, .830 FPct at 3B) for the Phillies.

I won’t get into his discussion of the 2007 and 2008 drafts (“some early signs are not good”; again, the opposite is also true), but here’s a fun snippet:

The bigger question than signing the three is: Can they play?

No. If you don’t sign your picks, the question of whether they can play becomes irrelevant. The Padres selected Todd Helton in the second round of the 1992 draft but did not sign him. Turns out Helton can play, but that meant nothing to the Padres once he turned down their offer and attended college instead.

Drafting and developing players is a multi-tiered process that follows a tested and predictable hierarchical pattern. It goes something like this:

  1. Identify — Scout to find the best talent
  2. Select — Draft the best available players
  3. Procure — Sign the picks
  4. Develop — Turn them into big leaguers

Each step builds on the one that precedes it. Although the Padres have a spotty track record in all of these areas, the consensus among experts is that Tate, Williams, and Sampson can play. This doesn’t mean they’ll turn into big leaguers — the path from prospect to contributor is fraught with risk and there are no guarantees — but at least they have a chance. And now that they’ve signed, we’ll see what happens.

At some point you have to place a certain amount of faith in the scouts and player development folks (or replace the lot of them and hope you don’t end up with something worse). You also have to acknowledge that sometimes the best laid plans of mice and men go awry.

I guess that’s the pisser. You can do everything right and still have it not work. (Hi, Sean Burroughs.)

Learning Isn’t Always Fun

Reader Steve C raised a great point regarding Mat Latos’ recent rough outing at St. Louis:

Latos was due for a good shelling. I actually think that it’s good for him and it will be interesting to see how he responds in his next start.

This is one of the reasons I don’t mind seeing him and some of the other kids promoted so aggressively. These guys will struggle at some point at the big-league level. That’s what young players not named Albert Pujols do. They fail.

No problem, we all fail. But not everyone responds to failure in the same way, and you never know how an individual will before it happens. It’s sort of like that Mighty Mighty Bosstones song:

I’m not a coward, I’ve just never been tested
I like to think that if I was I would pass
Look at the tested and think there but for the grace go I
Might be a coward I’m afraid of what I might find out

Awkward syntax aside, the speaker has a point. If you’ve never experienced failure, how do you know how you’ll respond? Billy Beane famously had trouble dealing with failure during his playing career, but that didn’t become evident until he turned pro because he’d always succeeded as an amateur.

So now someone like Latos, who flew through the minors, gets pounded at the big-league level. What next?

Well, in this case, he gets pounded again. But after the second loss, Latos offers the following:

I didn’t control myself and didn’t control my actions. That’s not something I should have done, and in letting it happen, I let down my team.

These are only words, which according to a certain homily don’t speak as loudly as actions, but they’re good ones to hear from a 21-year-old kid. It would be easy for him to blame the world for whatever problems he experienced that night. Heck, that’s what I did at his age.

I don’t want too read to much into this stuff, but inasmuch as Latos had to say something, I like the words he chose. They show a level of self-awareness and personal responsibility. He knows what the problem is and he wants (this part isn’t stated, but is strongly implied) to correct it.

Of course, now he has to back those words up by taking care of business — or at least the part of it he can control. We’ll see how that goes. The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.

Mmm, pudding…

If there’s one good thing to come out of the fact that fans have stopped attending games and there are no expectations of this team, it’s that when the kids struggle, they’ll have a chance to work through it under less scrutiny than there otherwise might be. I have no idea whether this makes a difference in terms of long-term development, but intuitively, it seems like it might.

That would be an interesting study. What, if any, impact does a player’s initial struggles in the big leagues have on his long-term value?

Hangin’ with the Boss

On Monday night, I had the pleasure of being an invited guest of Padres COO Tom Garfinkel at Petco Park. It was like what the guys at Gaslamp Ball experienced but without their zany antics.

Among other things, I met several members of the front office, as well as closer Heath Bell, first-round pick Donavan Tate (minutes before the signing was announced), and owner Jeff Moorad. I could tell you what we discussed, but then I’d have to subject you to an infinite loop of Ruben Rivera baserunning gaffes, and neither of us wants that.

In seriousness, I didn’t go there to conduct an interview. We just hung out in much better seats than I’m used to and chatted.

I will share one anecdote. Tate and his family sat down the row from us during the game. When the signing deadline hit, everyone wanted to know whether Stephen Strasburg had signed with the Nationals. One of Tate’s party was a Scott Boras representative, so Moorad asked him, but the guy hadn’t heard anything yet. A couple minutes later the Boras rep gets a phone call, then walks over to us and tells Moorad that Strasburg signed. So, I learned of Strasburg’s signing from Boras, which was kind of a trip.

Anyway, I had a blast and am grateful that I got to meet so many folks in the organization. I recognize that many bloggers (or fans) would kill for the kind of access I had on this evening.

How will hobnobbing with the bigwigs affect my coverage of the Padres? Well, I don’t know. I imagine like anything else in the world, this experience will color my perception in some way. I don’t live in a friggin’ bubble.

That being said, my work doesn’t depend on behind-the-scenes access, so while I appreciate that the Padres have been supportive and gracious, their approval isn’t the driving force behind what I do. I don’t break news stories, I don’t provide inside information. I typically look at stuff, think about it, study it if needed, and then present findings.

If my mother had a basement, I could totally do my job there. Until she kicked me out, of course…

* * *

The game? Yes, it was a dandy. Typical Petco Park experience. No score until the Cubs tally a single run in the eighth.

In the ninth, after Everth Cabrera makes the first out attempting to bunt for a base hit (diving into first base probably cost him), David Eckstein draws a walk, bringing up Adrian Gonzalez, who hits a weak fly to left on closer Kevin Gregg’s first pitch. (Reader Didi notes that Adrian isn’t faring well this year in RBI percentage — he’s at 12.42% as of this writing.) Chase Headley then works the count full and slams a double to left-center, plating Eckstein.

With first base open, Cubs skipper Lou Piniella wanders toward the mound for no apparent reason and then elects to walk Kevin Kouzmanoff to have Gregg face Kyle Blanks. A gentleman in our section, who has been following the Padres for a very long time, expresses surprise and gratitude — as do I.

Blanks promptly whacks a 1-1 pitch from Gregg into the left-center field seats for a walk-off homer. The collective groan of the many Cubs fans in our house is beautiful.

I was quiet and dignified for most of the night, but I let loose after that blast. A couple of Cubs fans sat right in front of me, and they stood during the entire ninth inning. It was very annoying, although not as annoying as my yelling after Blanks’ home run.

The Value of an Olive Branch

I have come to believe that I’ve underestimated what Tony Gwynn Jr. means to the Padres. I still don’t think he’s much of a player, but as I noted in a recent interview, “bringing [him] to San Diego is a nice gesture for fans who needed a nice gesture.”

By virtue of his last name, Gwynn adds unique value to this organization. He wouldn’t be worth as much anywhere else, but in San Diego, he provides long-time fans with a connection to brighter days.

I feel bad that Drew Macias may see his career McAnultyed, but as long as Gwynn doesn’t obstruct talents greater than Macias, we’ll be okay. As for Macias, he isn’t great but he’s good enough for a big-league bench. I hope that if the Padres decide they have no use for him, they’ll try to find another team that does.

To the original point, sometimes you acquire talent, sometimes you acquire goodwill. I get it, and I can live with it. We’re all aware of Gwynn’s capabilities and limitations; I’ll leave the kid alone now and let him be the olive branch he was meant to be.

Odds and Ends

  • Padres games are no longer being televised in Mexico, which is awesome because this is one of the few areas in which they can expand their fan base. Seriously, how did that happen and how soon can it be fixed?
  • The Padres signed second baseman David Eckstein to an extension for 2010 worth $1 million. He is an offensive zero at this stage of his career who plays solid defense and sets a positive example for the kids. In terms of on-field production, he doesn’t offer much more than his predecessors, Marcus Giles and Tadahito Iguchi, but the leadership… I can’t prove that it adds value, but you can’t prove that it doesn’t.

    I’m sure the Padres hoped Matt Antonelli would be ready by now, but Antonelli hasn’t hit (759 PA, .209/.325/.327) in two seasons at Triple-A Portland. Maybe something will click and he’ll have a career — I’m pulling for him. Meanwhile, the Padres needed someone to play second base for them next year, and now they have Eckstein. If Antonelli re-establishes himself (or Eric Sogard continues to progress) and the Padres find themselves out of contention again come July, I imagine Eckstein might fetch a little something on the trade market; even if you don’t believe in intangibles, many contending teams do.

  • There should be a third thing. Isn’t there usually a third thing? Eh, I’m drawing a blank.

* * *

Modified Box Scores

Your weekly dose (explanation)…

Positives: Blanks goes off; Hundley shows signs of life.
Negatives: Second worst overall week since the All-Star break.

Mon, Aug 17 vs ChN
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 0 0 1
Headley 1 1 0 2
Blanks 1 1 1 3
Totals 3 2 1 6

Venable and Hundley are in the starting lineup, but neither logs four plate appearances.

Tue, Aug 18 vs ChN
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 1 1 3
Headley 1 0 0 1
Blanks 1 1 1 3
Hundley 1 0 0 1
Totals 4 2 2 8

As I quipped on Twitter, “Not an earthquake, just a Kyle Blanks inside-the-park home run.” What a crazy play. Melvin Nieves wants to know why Milton Bradley wasn’t backing up Kosuke Fukudome, although Lou Piniella doesn’t seem to have a problem with Bradley’s effort.

Having watched Bradley up close for a few months in 2007, I find it hard to believe that he is capable of “dogging it.” If anything, most of his problems stem from trying too hard.

After the game, Steve Quis asked Blanks several questions, all variations on, “What were you thinking when you hit that ball?” Blanks’ refrain was, “Gotta go. Gotta keep running.” Those weren’t the exact words, but that was the gist of it; he reduced the game to its simplest form. There was no thought of what Fukudome was doing, it was just, “Gotta go.”

Blanks is striking out too often, but that will change as he gains experience. Already you can see him making adjustments, which is encouraging.

Also, Cesar Carrillo earned his first big-league win.

Wed, Aug 19 vs ChN
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Headley 1 1 0 2
Totals 2 2 0 4

Tough outing for Latos; Venable and Blanks start but fall shy of the requisite PAs.

Thu, Aug 20 vs StL
  PA OB TB Tot
Headley 1 0 0 1
Blanks 0 0 1 1
Cabrera 0 1 0 1
Totals 1 1 0 3

Blanks, Hundley, and Cabrera all fail to log four PAs; that happens when your team doesn’t put runners on base. Blanks hits his third homer of the homestand; six of his nine home runs this year have come at Petco Park.

Fri, Aug 21 vs StL
  PA OB TB Tot
Venable 1 1 1 3
Hundley 0 1 1 2
Totals 1 2 2 5

Hundley and Venable finally make an appearance; Blanks and Cabrera also start but miss the PA requirement.

In the second inning, Hundley — who hasn’t done anything since returning from the disabled list — slams a 3-2 hanging slider from Kyle Lohse off the Western Metal building to give the Padres a 3-0 lead. Clayton Richard and three relievers take care of the rest.

Richard works six strong innings, although as has been his custom since coming to San Diego, he starts to falter toward the end. With two out in the sixth, he walks Matt Holliday and then serves up a blast to Ryan Ludwick that takes Gwynn to the wall in dead center.

For some reason, Black sends Richard out to start the seventh. Richard issues a leadoff walk. He keeps missing high. “He’s done,” I say. “He’ll throw over to first.” Luke Gregerson is warming up in the bullpen and sure enough, Richard throws to first… twice.

Black comes out with the hook. It’s the right move, but how did Ludwick’s drive to end the previous inning not provide Black with all the necessary evidence?

Earlier in the contest, Hundley makes the play of the night. With Brendan Ryan at second and Pujols at first, Holliday strikes out looking at a 3-2 pitch for the first out of the fourth inning. The runners are moving and Hundley cocks his arm to fire. Then Ryan stops and retreats to second, which he now shares with Pujols.

I always enjoy seeing youngsters play smart, which Hundley does here. Instead of throwing the ball, he runs directly toward second base. Nobody moves, so he keeps going until he gets there and tags both runners. (Eckstein points at Pujols, but at one point Ryan takes his foot off the bag, so Hundley swipes at him as well.) Pujols is called out.

Ah yes, the good ol’ K-2 double play. When is the last time you saw a catcher tag out a runner at second base?

My favorite part, though, is the way Pujols throws Ryan under the bus after the game:

[Ryan] should have gone. There’s nothing else to talk about. I did my part, and he didn’t do his part.

Pujols is right, but damn.

Sat, Aug 22 vs StL
  PA OB TB Tot
Headley 1 0 0 1
Venable 1 1 0 2
Blanks 0 1 0 1
Totals 2 2 0 4

The Cardinals launch three mammoth home runs, demonstrating yet again that Petco Park does not suppress offense if you have the right pitching staff, which unfortunately the Padres do. Blanks makes a terrific diving catch in left field. Luis Perdomo inexplicably strikes out Pujols twice — both swinging.

Chris Carpenter tosses seven shutout innings for St. Louis, lowering his MLB-best ERA to 2.16. Carpenter is living proof that it’s possible for a pitcher to overcome serious arm injuries and thrive. Here’s hoping Chris Young, who recently underwent shoulder surgery, can follow a similar course.

Sun, Aug 23 vs StL
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Headley 1 0 0 1
Venable 1 1 1 3
Hundley 1 0 1 2
Totals 4 2 2 8

Hundley homers again, first pitch fastball to straightaway center.

Individual Totals
  8/17-8/23 Since ASB
  PA OB TB Tot B% PA OB TB Tot B%
Blanks 2 3 3 8 .750 23 15 9 47 .511
Hundley 1 1 2 4 1.000 3 1 2 6 .500
Venable 3 3 2 8 .625 23 14 8 45 .489
Cabrera 5 3 1 9 .444 34 18 5 57 .404
Headley 6 2 0 8 .250 32 18 2 52 .385
Macias 0 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 2 .000
Totals 18 11 8 37 .513 117 65 26 209 .435
  End Eff Pwr Tot End Eff Pwr Tot
Latos 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 8

 

Weekly Totals
  Week Since ASB
  G PA OB TB End Eff Pwr Tot T/G G Tot T/G
7/16-7/19 4 12 3 1 0 1 0 17 4.25 4 17 4.25
7/20-7/26 7 21 8 4 1 0 0 34 4.86 11 51 4.64
7/27-8/2 7 22 13 7 1 1 0 44 6.29 18 95 5.28
8/3-8/9 7 24 12 5 2 1 1 45 6.43 25 140 5.60
8/10-8/16 6 20 18 1 0 0 0 39 6.50 31 179 5.77
8/17-8/23 7 18 11 8 0 0 0 37 5.29 38 217 5.71

Youngsters and Salary Dumps

We’ve been tracking a few key young players since the All-Star break using Modified Box Scores (explanation). Let’s see how these kids are doing as measured by more conventional metrics. Bear in mind that we’re talking about 31 games, a tiny sample. First, the Padres as a team:

Padres Offense, First and Second Half
  PA BA OBP SLG R/G
First half 3344 .233 .311 .370 3.80
Second half 1182 .268 .340 .427 4.10

And select youngsters:

Padres Individual Hitters, First and Second Half
  PA BA OBP SLG
Blanks 99 .289 .404 .578
Venable 97 .295 .361 .523
Headley 118 .328 .407 .462
Cabrera 134 .287 .374 .478
Gwynn 118 .252 .310 .299

I included Tony Gwynn Jr. here so you can see what “regressing to the mean” looks like. It took a while because of his hot start, but Gwynn’s OPS+ for the season has fallen below 100. Since the U-T’s Chris Jenkins worked himself into a lather over Junior after the latter’s first 21 games with the Padres, Gwynn is hitting .261/.320/.320, which is basically David Eckstein in a bad year or, going back a little further, Darren Lewis.

Meanwhile, we know how hot Kyle Blanks and Will Venable have been, but without much fanfare, Chase Headley steadily has settled into a comfort zone. And Everth Cabrera still isn’t playing like a Rule V draftee.

Anecdote time: In one of the St. Louis games (Friday or Saturday), Cabrera slid into first trying to beat out a grounder for a base hit. Ordinarily I hate that play, but sometimes it’s appropriate, such as when trying to avoid a tag, which is exactly what Cabrera was doing. He slid to the outside of the bag and almost snuck past Albert Pujols. It is only one play, and it may not count for a lot, but it suggested an understanding of the game beyond what we might expect from a kid fresh out of the South Atlantic League.

I’m kind of smitten with Cabrera. Does it show?

That reminds me, Cabrera has performed much better this year batting lower in the order:

Everth Cabrera, Top and Bottom of Lineup
  PA BA OBP SLG
Batting 1st 107 .185 .286 .272
Batting 8th 74 .344 .425 .516

I can think of at least two reasons this should not deter Bud Black from leading him off:

  1. Small sample
  2. Cabrera’s future lies at the top of the order; he might as well get comfortable there now, when the games don’t count for much

Returning to the Padres’ recent offensive onslaught, I should note that it coincides with the installation of Randy Ready as hitting coach. Well, sort of; Ready didn’t arrive on the scene until August. This month, the team is hitting .296/.367/.449, although the usual small sample caveats apply. Also, I say that the surge coincides with Ready’s arrival because all we know is that two events occurred at the same time. We don’t know why or if there is any causal relationship.

That said, here’s something I’ve wondered about for some time: What, if any, effect does a change in hitting coaches have on young players? We saw a similar second-half surge in 2006, when Merv Rettenmund replaced Dave Magadan. In the case of Adrian Gonzalez, he continued to improve even beyond the initial boost; in the cases of Josh Barfield and Khalil Greene, not so much.

This is anecdotal evidence, though, and not a proper study. I’m not sure how you even go about answering such a question. Beyond the sample size issues (how confident are we about a player’s true level of ability after so few plate appearances?), there is the matter of isolating the “change in hitting coach” variable versus, say, an increase in playing time, natural development, and a variety of other factors.

In other words, Barfield’s improvement in the second half of 2006 might have been related to Rettenmund’s arrival as hitting coach. Then again, he might have blossomed under Magadan as well. We will never know.

* * *

Should it bother me that Luis Rodriguez ranks third on the team with 30 walks?

* * *

I’ve been thinking about this year’s trades, er, salary dumps. Okay, Cla Meredith for Oscar Salazar was a straight swap of spare parts, but every other move has been made with the intent of trimming the payroll. Interestingly, the Padres haven’t taken a performance hit in the process:

Khalil Greene for Mark Worrell and Luke Gregerson (December 4, 2008)

Greene (StL): 164 PA, .211/.290/.366, 73 OPS+
Gregerson (SD): 52.1 IP, 3.61 ERA, 105 ERA+

This also opened the door for Cabrera.

Jody Gerut for Tony Gwynn Jr. (May 21, 2009)

Gerut (Mil): 68 PA, .177/.235/.226, 23 OPS+
Gwynn (SD): 305 PA, .279/.350/.357, 97 OPS+

Scott Hairston for Ryan Webb, Craig Italiano, and Sean Gallagher (July 6, 2009)

Hairston (Oak): 133 PA, .262/.293/.459, 100 OPS+
Webb (SD): 7.1 IP, 7.36 ERA, 51 ERA+

This also gave more playing time to Blanks and Venable.

Cla Meredith for Oscar Salazar (July 19, 2009)

Meredith (Bal): 12.1 IP, 5.11 ERA, 91 ERA+
Salazar (SD): 27 PA, .240/.269/.480, 99 OPS+

Jake Peavy for Clayton Richard, Aaron Poreda, Adam Russell, and Dexter Carter (July 31, 2009)

Peavy (ChA): minor-league rehab
Richard (SD): 21.0 IP, 4.71 ERA, 80 ERA+

Chad Gaudin for PTBNL or cash (August 7, 2009)

Gaudin (NYA): 3.1 IP, 5.40 ERA, 82 ERA+

Here’s the aggregate of what these players have produced since their respective trades:

From SD: 365 PA, .224/.281/.374; 15.2 IP, 5.17 ERA
To SD: 332 PA, .276/.342/.367; 80.2 IP, 4.24 ERA

I won’t claim that these deals were made to improve the on-field product, but at the same time, you have to look at the evidence. If I’m Kevin Towers and someone calls me to task for dumping salary, I’m pointing to the scoreboard… and hoping nobody notices that Peavy hasn’t pitched yet for his new team.

* * *

Modified Box Scores

Here are your boxes…

Positives: Cabrera, Headley, and Venable all had solid weeks; Hundley came off the DL.
Negatives: Latos got shelled in St. Louis; too much Gwynn, not enough Blanks.

Tue, Aug 11 at Mil
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Headley 1 1 0 2
Venable 1 1 1 3
Blanks 1 1 0 2
Totals 4 4 1 9

The Padres knock 22 hits — second most in franchise history. They’ve had 24 in a game twice (April 19, 1982, against the Giants; August 12, 2003, at the Braves). Adrian Gonzalez leads the charge with a 6-for-6 showing.

There have been 23 individual five-hit nine-inning games in Padres history. Two came this past week in Milwaukee. This marks the third time the Padres have had multiple five-hit games in a season: they had four in 1993 (one by Tim Teufel, three by Tony Gwynn) and two in 1996 (Craig Shipley and Steve Finley).

Adrian Gonzalez is the first and only to collect six hits (Gene Richards, Joe Lefebvre, and Gwynn all have accomplished the feat in extra innings). Here is the complete list of Padres who have knocked at least five hits in a nine-inning game:

  • Leron Lee
  • Mike Ivie
  • Dave Winfield (x2)
  • Gene Richards
  • Kevin McReynolds
  • Tony Gwynn (x6)
  • Benito Santiago
  • Tim Teufel
  • Craig Shipley
  • Steve Finley
  • Wally Joyner
  • Ryan Klesko
  • Brian Giles
  • Mark Loretta
  • Josh Bard
  • Adrian Gonzalez
  • Kevin Kouzmanoff

The six most recent instances have come on the road. Gwynn was the last to do it at home (April 28, 1998, against the Cubs), although Loretta had five hits in a 15-inning contest against Arizona almost exactly seven years later.

Wed, Aug 12 at Mil
  PA OB TB Tot
Headley 1 1 0 2
Venable 1 1 0 2
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Totals 3 3 0 6

Caught the tail end of this one. Yet another blown call, this time by first base umpire Dana DeMuth on a ball hit by Craig Counsell up the middle. Eckstein makes a terrific backhanded stab and throws to first for the final out of the seventh. DeMuth calls Counsell safe and the inning continues, with the Brewers scoring two more runs.

The key blow comes on a drive off the bat of Prince Fielder. He “doubles” over the head of Headley, who breaks directly across from left toward center field but forgets to go back, where the ball is hit. Headley jumps at the last moment, which proves as hilarious as it is ineffective.

Mike Adams and Heath Bell quell late threats to preserve the 6-5 victory. Bell gets Mike Cameron to pop out to third base on his third full-count fastball with a runner at third to end the game.

Thu, Aug 13 at Mil
  PA OB TB Tot
Headley 1 1 0 2
Blanks 1 1 0 2
Hundley 1 0 0 1
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Totals 4 3 0 7

Hundley makes his first start since June 17. Cesar Carrillo makes his big-league debut, and it isn’t pretty. He serves up three homers. My thoughts after each:

  1. Well, okay, that’s Prince Fielder; he does that.
  2. Mike Rivera? As in the guy that couldn’t even serve as Gary Bennett’s backup in 2003, when the Padres lost 98 games?
  3. I’m following along online; are we sure that’s not Josh Geer out there?

It’s only one start, but his minor-league numbers weren’t good this year either, so I’m not holding out much hope. As always, I would love to be wrong.

Still, there are some positives from this game:

  • After falling behind, 9-0, the Padres send the tying run to the plate (Venable) in the eighth. They end up losing, 12-9, but it’s good to see some fight.
  • Kevin Kouzmanoff goes 5-for-5. He finishes 11-for-13 in the series. I hope other teams noticed.

On the downside, Trevor Hoffman finally solved Gwynn. A little late there, buddy.

Fri, Aug 14 at StL
  PA OB TB Tot
Headley 1 1 0 2
Venable 1 1 0 2
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Totals 3 3 0 6

And then you face a playoff-bound team. Sven Jenkins at Hardball Times predicted Latos would struggle against patient Cardinals hitters, and that is exactly what happened.

Sat, Aug 15 at StL
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Headley 1 1 0 2
Venable 1 1 0 2
Totals 3 3 0 6

I missed all but a few innings of the series in St. Louis. It depresses me to see a city support its team like that. On the bright side, I walked 3 1/2 miles along Mission Bay without any knee pain.

Sun, Aug 16 at StL
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 0 0 1
Headley 1 1 0 2
Blanks 1 1 0 2
Totals 3 2 0 5

The Padres lose on a walkoff homer, but reader Pat passes along this postgame quote from Heath Bell that is just money:

Bell took a ground ball off his right leg earlier in the inning on a comebacker by Mark DeRosa but wouldn’t use that as an excuse.

“Yeah, it was throbbing but I blocked it out pretty good,” Bell said. “I was surprised how big it was when I took my pants off.”

Uh… So, how’s the leg?

Individual Totals
  8/10-8/16 Since ASB
  PA OB TB Tot B% PA OB TB Tot B%
Blanks 3 3 0 6 .500 21 12 6 39 .462
Venable 4 4 1 9 .556 20 11 6 37 .459
Headley 6 6 0 12 .500 26 16 2 44 .409
Cabrera 6 5 0 11 .455 29 15 4 48 .396
Macias 0 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 2 .000
Hundley 1 0 0 1 .000 1 0 0 1 .000
Totals 20 18 1 39 .487 99 54 18 171 .421
  End Eff Pwr Tot End Eff Pwr Tot
Latos 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 8

 

Weekly Totals
  Week Since ASB
  G PA OB TB End Eff Pwr Tot T/G G Tot T/G
7/16-7/19 4 12 3 1 0 1 0 17 4.25 4 17 4.25
7/20-7/26 7 21 8 4 1 0 0 34 4.86 11 51 4.64
7/27-8/2 7 22 13 7 1 1 0 44 6.29 18 95 5.28
8/3-8/9 7 24 12 5 2 1 1 45 6.43 25 140 5.60
8/10-8/16 6 20 18 1 0 0 0 39 6.50 31 179 5.77

If Your Heart Never Breaks, You Aren’t Doing It Right

It’s not the memory of her that lingers, it’s the memory of wanting and not having. The years have transformed her into a song character, a reminder of a former life. These are gifts beyond anything I could have imagined.

I was less interested in baseball then. It always hovered at the edge of consciousness, but I had a world to discover, which meant that baseball would wait until after I had exhausted everything else.

Being 20 years old, I almost never exhausted else. Besides, I wasn’t the first to abandon religion (I claim baseball as a religion, just as I claim “irritated” as a political affiliation) for a girl.

Stars and advancing clouds
Wires humming an electrical tune

She liked me because I wanted her in the worst way. I liked her for the opposite reason.

The fog rolled in late at night. All was quiet but for the power lines overhead and the surf — which we’ll get to in a moment.

Baseball? I grew up rooting for the Dodgers and hadn’t yet decided on San Diego as a home. Inasmuch as I had loyalties, they were to my Rotisserie League teams.

My ideal player then was a left-handed hitting outfielder who could hit 20 homers and steal 20 bases. The Kirk Gibson phase had passed by now, so I’m guessing my hero was Von Hayes, although I may have moved on to Andy Van Slyke.

I finally got around to recording the song in late 2003 or early 2004. I was playing guitar every day, doing the cover band thing, but I always had originals swimming through my head, so I bought a little Tascam 4-track to sketch out ideas.

I studied composition informally, leaning heavily on Jimmy Webb’s Tunesmith. I thought I knew how to structure a song and longed to test that theory.

Bluffs above the sea
Rolling, hypnotic waves

The song is called “Del Mar” because that is where we were. Just south of the old train station.

I started writing lines in the early-’90s, when I lived beneath the flight path in a room with hardwood floors, a radiator, and no bed. I’d tried to write a novel about her, but it didn’t fly on account of the fact that I had no clue how to write a novel.

Still, I benefitted from the discipline of working on it. Every night I would crank up Joe Satriani’s Flying in a Blue Dream or J.S. Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos and write for an hour or two. I had a lot to say, although most of it turned out to be jibberish.

The only worthwhile material comprised maybe a dozen lines and took as many years to distill. Not the most efficient process. Like making diamonds or solar systems, except that nobody but you cares.

She slipped away like time
She slipped away like time
She slipped away like time
She slipped away, let her go

If the verses are subtlety and nuance — full of rich seventh chords and juicy metaphor — the chorus is a hammer. The progression is driving, as are the words. It’s the musical equivalent of banging your head against a wall, which captures the experience of me trying to figure out what went wrong.

I never solved the puzzle, but eventually realized it didn’t matter. “Let her go” is a reminder to myself (“buy some cheese” also fits but is less appropriate).

I needed that reminder for a surprisingly long time. Now I just see two kids on a cliff staring down at the ocean. She disappears, and so does he…

She is always 20 years old, unbearably beautiful, and elusive. He is awkward and filled with pain, which is a wonderful state to be in at that age, although none of us recognizes it at the time.

Now the connection is lost. There is only a song.

Train tracks and laughter
Pink hat and a smile

We had gone ice skating or done some similarly stupid thing that young men think will impress the objects of their desire. I cannot swear to the pinkness of her hat, but whatever the color, it suited her, as did the laughter.

I love her as much as I love the Dodgers of my youth, which is to say not at all. I love the memories that linger. It’s the same with Gibson, Hayes, and Van Slyke. Wherever life takes me, I cannot forget them.

The beautiful thing is that if you pay attention, these moments will occur again. Just this week I saw Kyle Blanks drive a ball into the beach beyond the right-center field fence at Petco Park. I didn’t know a right-handed batter could do that. I also saw Everth Cabrera show bunt, draw in Chipper Jones at third, then slap a ball past him down the line and race around the bases for a triple.

Be ready. She may laugh. You may smile.

Wind through the pine trees
Whispers forgotten names

These lines didn’t come until I sat down to record. Years of perspective helped. The pine trees were real, as was the wind. After that, it gets fuzzy.

I am back on the precipice of youth, watching two foolish kids, and it fills me with a sense of utter, hopeless impermanence. The tide rolls out, the salt water heals our wounds. The ocean is vast, and we are small.

I write to remember. She is not to be solved, but accepted. I have let her go, and she returns the favor. We visit only in metaphor, sharing again the pain and awkwardness of long ago for a few moments before saying goodbye once more and getting on with life.

On the one hand, that seems like a lot of trouble for three minutes of music. On the other, what else are you gonna do?

* * *

“Del Mar” was part of a project tentatively titled Gets Along Well with Self that probably never will be completed because, frankly, it is easier to plant my ass on the couch and watch TV at the end of the day. Fires burn less brightly than they once did.

There were a dozen or so original songs — most recorded, some forgotten. One of the forgotten pieces centered on Cathy Gale, Honor Blackman’s character in The Avengers:

Everyone remembers Emma
She’s the one they all adore
But it was Cathy Gale who saved the day
Who paved the way for Mrs. Peel

Some things are forgotten for a reason.

There were also a few covers. A punk/industrial version of The Bee Gees’ “Stayin’ Alive” got recorded, as did an old Cole Porter song from the ’20s for which no music survives (I recast it as a three-chord rocker). Others remain on the waiting list:

  • Tom Waits, “San Diego Serenade”
  • The Beatles, “Savoy Truffle”
  • mashup of They Might Be Giants’ “Ana Ng” and Alice Cooper’s “Eighteen”
  • blues version of Britney Spears’ “Baby One More Time”

Alas, these things require effort. Some other lifetime.

* * *

I am to singing as Martin Short is to swimming. Still, if you are bold enough to venture forward, here is the recorded version of “Del Mar.”

* * *

Modified Box Scores

Here are your boxes (explanation) for the week. I sort of forgot to talk about baseball up at the top, so we’ll have more detailed commentary than usual this time. Enjoy…

Positives: Venable caught whatever Blanks had last week.
Negatives: Blanks forgot to keep some for himself.

Mon, Aug 3 vs Atl
  PA OB TB Tot
Venable 1 1 0 2
Headley 1 0 0 1
Blanks 1 0 1 2
Totals 3 1 1 5
End Eff Pwr Tot
Latos 1 1 0 2

Venable collects three more hits; Cabrera starts but bats eighth and gets only 3 PA. I’ve told you about Blanks’ home run to right-center. Count Tom Krasovic and Paul DePodesta among those who have waxed poetic about Blanks’ power.

Tue, Aug 4 vs Atl
  PA OB TB Tot
Venable 1 1 1 3
Headley 1 1 1 3
Blanks 1 0 0 1
Totals 3 2 2 7

Venable, Headley, and Cabrera (only 3 PA again) combine to go 4-for-9 with two doubles, a triple, a homer, and two walks; everyone else goes 0-for-22 with one walk (by Blanks).

Adrian Gonzalez sits for the first time this season. Those who don’t follow the Padres ask, “Why?” Those who do ask, “What took so long?”

This snaps Adrian’s consecutive games streak, but I couldn’t give you a number because I don’t care. Being in the lineup every day is a meaningless goal that pales in comparison to playing at the highest level possible.

Elsewhere, USD alum Brian Matusz makes his big-league debut for the Orioles against Detroit. We’ve been following Matusz since his freshman year, so congrats to the left-hander. Go Toreros!

Wed, Aug 5 vs Atl
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Venable 1 1 1 3
Headley 1 1 0 2
Blanks 1 0 0 1
Totals 4 3 1 8

Venable knocks his fifth homer in seven games.

Thu, Aug 6 vs Atl
  PA OB TB Tot
Venable 1 0 0 1
Headley 1 1 0 2
Cabrera 1 0 0 1
Totals 3 1 0 4

Our heroes don’t do much, but the Padres notch their 7th win in 10 games. Clayton Richard continues to surprise me with his velocity. He works consistently in the low-90s.

Now that I’ve seen him twice, I’m a little more comfortable making some observations. In both starts, he has worked very quickly and thrown strikes early before losing the plate around the fifth or sixth inning.

I like his confidence on the mound, but I worry about consistency and endurance. His repertoire isn’t deep, and I suspect that he may end up in the bullpen, although he could have a few productive years as a starter before then.

As long as people don’t get carried away in their expectations, they should be pleased with Richard in a John Halama/Scott Schoeneweis kind of way. He’s a cog, but he’s got a legitimate big-league arm.

Tony Gwynn Jr. misreads a fly ball off the bat of David Wright with two out in the first but recovers and makes a leaping catch of what should have been a routine out. Gwynn kicks a grounder in the sixth, takes his eye off the ball trying to come up quickly and make a throw home.

I recognize the value of sticking a guy named “Gwynn” in the lineup. I’ve resigned myself to the fact that he’ll be there more often than not, slapping ground balls to second and weak fly balls to left, and running curious routes in center.

Venable is a better player, and he’d have more value as a center fielder, but the name on the back of his jersey doesn’t tug at the heart strings of San Diegans, which has to be a consideration right now. Unfortunately there isn’t a lot of goodwill toward the front office in this town, so decision makers must make concessions to appease the ticket-buying public.

I suggested in the Ducksnorts 2009 Baseball Annual that Venable could have a Gary Matthews Jr. type career, and that still seems about right, although Venable might be a better hitter. As for Gwynn, I’d rather see the best players on the field, but as long as the front office acknowledges internally that his presence is a public relations move and he is not considered a long-term solution, then I’ll just gear myself for some cringeworthy defense and hope that a sexier prospect than Drew Macias (why is the U-T’s most informative article in weeks written by an intern?) is ready for the big leagues sooner rather than later.

Off the field, the Padres trade Chad Gaudin to the Yankees for a PTBNL or cash considerations. The breakup of this year’s rotation continues, and I couldn’t be happier.

Also, manager Bud Black signs a contract extension that will keep him here through 2010. The more I observe the game, the more I come to believe that in-game tactics is an overrated aspect of a manager’s job.

Like his predecessor, Bruce Bochy, Black appears to have a terrific rapport with his players. As someone who has worked with many different bosses, I can’t stress enough what a difference that makes.

Fri, Aug 7 vs NYN
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 0 1 2
Headley 1 0 0 1
Blanks 1 0 0 1
Venable 1 1 0 2
Totals 4 1 1 6

Cabrera makes up for strikeouts in each of his first three plate appearances and a costly first-run error with a walk-off grand slam against Francisco Rodriguez, who is a great closer — if a tad more expensive than Mets castoff Heath Bell, who picks up his fourth win of the season.

Before the game, the Padres honor Rickey Henderson. He wears a white suit, and thanks the crowd and the Padres for the opportunity to play in San Diego. Jeff Moorad, Tom Garfinkel, and Tony Gwynn present Rickey with a commissioned piece of art commemorating his breaking the all-time runs scored record and collecting his 3000th hit.

Fans receive a postcard-sized version. It’s great to see Henderson again (first time for me since his days with the Surf Dawgs), although as has been the case all season, I wish more of us were present.

Sat, Aug 8 vs NYN
  PA OB TB Tot
Headley 1 1 0 2
Venable 1 0 0 1
Blanks 1 1 0 2
Cabrera 1 1 0 2
Totals 4 3 0 7
End Eff Pwr Tot
Latos 1 0 1 2

Latos works six strong innings. The only run he allows results from a hanging changeup in the first that Alex Cora (!) launches into the Petco Porch…

If I’m going to rip the Padres for continuing to stick Gwynn in the lineup, it’s only fair that I point out when he plays well. He does in this one, working two walks, knocking a single, and making a terrific running catch in right-center while leaping over a sliding Venable…

I can’t recall ever hearing a crowd boo an umpire like they did Saturday night at Petco Park. In the fifth inning, on a sharp single to right by Gwynn, Cabrera beats the throw home from Jeff Francoeur, slapping the plate as he slides past. It’s a beautiful play, with the only problem being that home plate umpire Lance Barksdale doesn’t see it and calls Cabrera out.

Black, bless him, bolts from the dugout to keep Cabrera away from Barksdale. Black gets tossed, which is the best outcome we can hope for because the Padres skipper lacks authority to eject Barksdale from the game for not paying attention.

I’m being overly harsh. There were two possible outcomes on the play. Barksdale had a 50-50 chance but guessed wrong. If only he’d been standing right next to the play when it happened, he might have had a better chance. Oh wait…

Anyway, we all booed Barksdale the rest of the night. I don’t make a habit of booing, but the guy needed to know that he failed. With luck, the league will review the play and get some answers regarding how he missed such an obvious call.

Barksdale can be thankful that this happened in San Diego, where folks generally won’t be bothered to think about baseball. Fans in other parts of the country might not have been so kind.

The Padres benefitted from a similarly blown call at the plate a night earlier, when Kyle Blanks was erroneously ruled safe by Marvin Hudson. Neither play affected the game’s outcome, and I understand that mistakes happen, but if these umpires cannot perform their job with a certain degree of competence, then why are they out there?

This isn’t the minor leagues. Players and fans deserve a better effort than that.

Sun, Aug 9 vs NYN
  PA OB TB Tot
Cabrera 1 0 0 1
Headley 1 0 0 1
Blanks 1 1 0 2
Totals 3 1 0 4

Tim Stauffer pitches well again; he keeps nudging himself into next year’s plans.

Individual Totals
  8/3-8/9 Since ASB
  PA OB TB Tot B% PA OB TB Tot B%
Blanks 6 2 1 9 .333 18 9 6 33 .455
Venable 6 4 2 12 .500 16 7 5 28 .429
Cabrera 5 2 1 8 .375 23 10 4 37 .378
Headley 7 4 1 12 .417 20 10 2 32 .375
Macias 0 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 2 .000
Totals 24 12 5 41 .415 79 36 17 132 .402
  End Eff Pwr Tot End Eff Pwr Tot
Latos 2 1 1 4 4 2 2 8

 

Weekly Totals
  Week Since ASB
  G PA OB TB End Eff Pwr Tot T/G G Tot T/G
7/16-7/19 4 12 3 1 0 1 0 17 4.25 4 17 4.25
7/20-7/26 7 21 8 4 1 0 0 34 4.86 11 51 4.64
7/27-8/2 7 22 13 7 1 1 0 44 6.29 18 95 5.28
8/3-8/9 7 24 12 5 2 1 1 45 6.43 25 140 5.60

Progress. Can you dig it?