Shameless plug time. Ducksnorts has been nominated for Best MLB Blog of 2005 over at Red Reporter. The polls are now open. You know what to do.
As always, thanks for your support.
Shameless plug time. Ducksnorts has been nominated for Best MLB Blog of 2005 over at Red Reporter. The polls are now open. You know what to do.
As always, thanks for your support.
The buzz this morning, of course, is about the Adam Eaton trade. So, what better time to look back at his 2005 season? Eaton and Woody Williams review below, trade analysis and discussion here, add yourself to Frappr! here. Okay, ready?
[Previous entries in this series: C | 1B | 2B | 3B | SS | LF | CF | RF | SP (1) ]
IP/GS | ERA | ERA+ | WHIP | H/9 | BB/9 | SO/9 | HR/9 | BA | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 6.12 | 4.18 | 100 | 1.323 | 9.16 | 2.75 | 6.22 | 0.95 | .262 | .322 | .424 |
2005 | 5.70 | 4.85 | 79 | 1.409 | 9.81 | 2.87 | 5.97 | 1.35 | .275 | .329 | .463 |
Stats courtesy of ESPN. Color key: green, positive trend; red, negative trend. |
Expectations
From my season preview over at Baseball Think Factory:
Williams essentially replaces David Wells as the veteran presence to help guide the young pitchers on the staff. His numbers last year were down from the past few seasons, but they weren’t too far off his career line and don’t represent much of a drop from what Wells did last year.
Positives
Negatives
Outlook
If the Padres are lucky, Williams won’t slip any further and can at least eat some innings and keep the club in games. But 2005 was the worst of his career, and at his age, this may well be the beginning of the end. Barring a trade, Williams will be in the rotation again next year. Much as it pains me to say this, because he’s a fave of mine, it would be unreasonable to expect much in the way of actual production.
IP/GS | ERA | ERA+ | WHIP | H/9 | BB/9 | SO/9 | HR/9 | BA | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 6.04 | 4.61 | 87 | 1.284 | 9.21 | 2.35 | 6.91 | 1.26 | .266 | .318 | .435 |
2005 | 5.76 | 4.27 | 90 | 1.430 | 9.79 | 3.08 | 6.99 | 0.98 | .275 | .335 | .440 |
Stats courtesy of ESPN. Color key: green, positive trend; red, negative trend. |
Expectations
From my season preview over at Baseball Think Factory:
The big tease. No Padres pitcher has a greater disparity between ability and results. Eaton’s repertoire is outstanding and he’s fully recovered from 2002 Tommy John surgery, so what’s the problem? In a nutshell, consistency. Eaton will cruise along for several innings during a game and then start leaving hittable pitches out over the plate for no apparent reason. Pitching coach Darren Balsley is working with Eaton this spring to shorten his stride and tighten his breaking ball. The hope is that smoother mechanics will help improve his command and also reduce the chances of further injury. Eaton’s stuff is top shelf ― easily as good as Peavy’s ― but so far he hasn’t been able to turn it into anything more than average results. Eaton is young, intelligent, and coachable so there’s still breakout potential here.
Positives
Negatives
Outlook
The Padres have traded Eaton to the Texas Rangers. Eaton lives high in the strike zone and despite improvements last year has been susceptible to the gopher ball throughout his career. He continues to have the talent to be a frontline starter, but injuries and inconsistency have kept that from happening. Moving from Petco Park, a pitchers’ haven, to the Ballpark in Arlington, one of the toughest pitching environments in all of baseball, hardly seems like a catalyst for the breakout we’ve all been waiting for. Eaton turned 28 in November, so there’s still plenty of time for him to step up his game a notch or two. But it may not come in 2006, in that ballpark.
The Padres have dealt Adam Eaton, Akinori Otsuka, and Billy Killian to the Rangers for Chris Young, Adrian Gonzalez, and Terrmel Sledge. [Update: Tip o' the cap to Nick G. for breaking this one in the comments to Tuesday morning's post.]
Understand that Aki is one of my all-time favorite Padres. And I still think Eaton could blossom into a frontline starter.
But I’m positively giddy about this trade. Why?
Well, Aki slipped quite a bit in his second run through the North American big leagues. His ERA more than doubled in slightly fewer innings, and most of his peripheral numbers deteriorated as well. Aki turns 34 next month, so it’s not like he was part of the core. Seriously, I love the guy but from an on-field perspective, he was expendable.
Eaton apparently wasn’t thrilled with the way the Padres were dealing with him this winter. Quoth Eaton: “I saw how they treated (Brian) Giles and (Trevor) Hoffman in negotiations, and it was disgusting. It doesn’t speak very well of them.” As opposed to dissing your employer in the media, I suppose.
There’s no doubting that Eaton has talent; what isn’t known is whether he’ll ever be able to stay healthy for an extended period of time and finally get that ERA under 4.00. His track record on both counts suggests no, but he’s still young. That said, I don’t like his chances in Texas.
What about Killian? On the one hand, he was ranked #14 by Baseball America coming into 2005. On the other, he’s an A-ball catcher in an organization that features bright prospect George Kottaras as well as lesser lights Nick Hundley and Colt Morton. Hey, Killian might turn out to be a good player someday, but it’s going to be at a position where the Padres are relatively deep and it’s not going to be real soon. No great loss there.
On the other side, Young is a former third-round pick of the Pittsburgh Pirates. He eventually made his way to the Rangers via a stop in the Montreal organization (the Bucs dealt him to Les Expos for former Padre Matt Herges ― a trait Young shares in common with fellow rotation candidate Clay Hensley) and put together a very respectable 4.26 ERA as a rookie last season in one of the toughest pitching environments in baseball. Young’s hit prevention was just okay, but his K/BB ratio was a tick over 3-to-1, which is outstanding.
(BTW, if you’re thinking that Young will benefit hugely by moving out of Arlington, be aware that his home/road splits were almost non-existent. The upside, of course, is that anyone who can post an ERA near 4.00 in Texas must be doing something right.)
Another point working in Young’s favor is that he is very inexpensive. According to Hardball Dollars, Young is slated to make $500k next year and $600k the year after that. Given that his performance hasn’t been any worse than that of a guy who acts offended at the prospect of earning many times that amount, this is a no-brainer.
Honestly, I’d be okay if there weren’t any more to the deal than these first four players. But it gets better.
Gonzalez is a former first pick overall (Florida Marlins, 2000) who just rakes. He hails from Chula Vista, which fits in with the m.o. of acquiring hometown players. In the Baseball America Prospect Handbook 2005, Gonzalez is compared favorably to Doug Mientkiewicz, who actually has had a better career than you might realize. Also this came before Gonzalez busted out with a .223 ISO at Triple-A last season, finally showing some power at the ripe old age of 23.
As for the third player coming to San Diego, aside from having one of the coolest baseball names ever, Sledge is a solid fourth outfielder type who could provide some left-handed pop off the bench. It’s like that commercial: He doesn’t make the deal; he makes the deal better. A 29-year-old outfielder with a career 5.37 RC/27? Yes, please.
Reaction around the blogosphere? Nobody seems to understand why the Rangers would make this deal. You can count me among them. I don’t get it, but I’m glad they did it.
I have to eat dinner. I’ll update the comings-and-goings table when I return.
Pos | Out | In |
---|---|---|
P | Brian Lawrence Chris Oxspring Ricky Steik Adam Eaton Akinori Otsuka Rudy Seanez Chris Hammond |
Dewon Brazelton Seth Etherton Steve Andrade |
C | Ramon Hernandez Billy Killian Miguel Olivo |
Doug Mirabelli |
1B | Mark Sweeney (RF, LF) Robert Fick (C, RF, LF) |
Adrian Gonzalez |
2B | Mark Loretta Damian Jackson (SS, OF) |
Mark Bellhorn |
3B | Sean Burroughs | Vinny Castilla Geoff Blum (2B, SS) Bobby Hill (2B) Justin Leone |
OF | Xavier Nady (1B) | Mike Cameron Jack Cust Terrmel Sledge |
[Update Dec 21, 2005 at 9:00 AM: Reaction from MSM: Baseball America, U-T, NCT]
So, I’ve been playing around with this Frappr! tool. Feel free to add yourself to the map so we can see how far the Ducksnorts empire stretches.
Okay, there you go. Add yourself to the Frappr! Ducksnorts map if you’re so inclined. Read 2005 in Review – Starting Pitchers, Part 1 if you haven’t already. Part 2, featuring Woody Williams and Adam Eaton, runs tomorrow.
Brian Lawrence and Jake Peavy were the only pitchers to start 30 or more games for the Padres. Woody Williams and Adam Eaton each started more than 20, with Tim Stauffer and Pedro Astacio being the only others to break double figures. We’ll look at Lawrence and Peavy today, Williams and Eaton on Wednesday, and Stauffer and Astacio on Friday.
The remainder of starts were split among Chan Ho Park, Darrell May, Tim Redding, Dennys Reyes, and Clay Hensley. The latter will be part of the reliever discussion, the rest stunk and there isn’t really anything to say about them beyond that.
[Previous entries in this series: C | 1B | 2B | 3B | SS | LF | CF | RF ]
IP/GS | ERA | WHIP | H/9 | BB/9 | SO/9 | HR/9 | BA | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Padres starting pitchers | 5.78 | 4.49 | 1.361 | 9.30 | 2.95 | 6.52 | 1.01 | .265 | .326 | .429 |
MLB rank | 23 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 9 | 16 | 15 | 16 |
Stats courtesy of ESPN. Color key: green, top 10; yellow, middle 10; red, bottom 10. |
For the most part, Padres starters were middle of the pack, which isn’t too complimentary given their home park. I don’t have the home/road splits for starting pitchers exclusively, but overall the Pads had a 4.79 ERA away from Petco Park and a 3.52 ERA at home. The one thing Padres starters really didn’t do well was work deep into games. Only Jake Peavy averaged more than six innings per start. The two areas in which the Friars excelled were strikeouts and homers allowed. Thank Peavy for the first and Petco Park for the second.
IP/GS | ERA | ERA+ | WHIP | H/9 | BB/9 | SO/9 | HR/9 | BA | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 5.97 | 4.12 | 97 | 1.384 | 10.02 | 2.44 | 5.36 | 1.15 | .287 | .336 | .460 |
2005 | 5.93 | 4.83 | 80 | 1.370 | 9.71 | 2.62 | 5.01 | 0.83 | .273 | .329 | .420 |
Stats courtesy of ESPN. Color key: green, positive trend; red, negative trend. |
Expectations
From my season preview over at Baseball Think Factory:
Doesn’t keep the ball on the ground or in the park as well as he once did, nor does he miss as many bats (not that he was ever a power pitcher). Concerns that Lawrence might suffer from the departure of Gary Bennett (3.20 ERA with Bennett behind the dish in 2003, 7.02 ERA with others) thankfully proved unnecessary. He’ll never be at the front of a rotation, but a guy like Lawrence, who can soak up innings and keep his club in the game, is a valuable member of any pitching staff.
Positives
Negatives
Outlook
Traded to the Washington Nationals for Vinny Castilla, Lawrence will play the last year of his contract in another pretty good pitchers’ park. He’ll continue to soak up innings at the back of a big-league rotation.
IP/GS | ERA | ERA+ | WHIP | H/9 | BB/9 | SO/9 | HR/9 | BA | OBP | SLG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 6.16 | 2.27 | 177 | 1.196 | 7.90 | 2.87 | 9.36 | 0.70 | .236 | .305 | .359 |
2005 | 6.77 | 2.88 | 134 | 1.044 | 7.18 | 2.22 | 9.58 | 0.80 | .217 | .271 | .363 |
Stats courtesy of ESPN. Color key: green, positive trend; red, negative trend. |
Expectations
From my season preview over at Baseball Think Factory:
Since 1980, only five pitchers under age 25 have recorded a sub-3.00 ERA while striking out more than a batter per inning:
Player Yr Age IP ERA SO/9 Gooden,Dw 84 20 218 2.60 11.39 Perez,Ol 04 23 196 2.98 10.97 Prior,Ma 03 23 211.1 2.43 10.43 Fernandez,Si 85 23 170.1 2.80 9.51 Peavy,Ja 04 23 166.1 2.27 9.36Gooden followed up his season with a Cy Young Award in 1985, Prior got hurt, Fernandez turned into a league-average pitcher, and we don’t know about Perez. Which path will Peavy follow? Who knows. But I will say that if he stays healthy, he’ll get more than the zero Cy Young Award votes he got last year.
Positives
Negatives
Outlook
With the exception of ERA, Peavy’s numbers actually were stronger in 2005 than the previous season. His dominance and command are improving, as is his ability to work deep into games. There aren’t many better pitchers in all of baseball, and he doesn’t turn 25 until May 31. The scary thing about Peavy is that, health permitting, the best may be yet to come. Appreciate him every time he takes the mound; guys like Peavy don’t come around very often.
Okay, here’s the plan. This week we’ll be looking at starting pitchers.
Mon: Brian Lawrence and Jake Peavy
Wed: Woody Williams and Adam Eaton
Fri: Tim Stauffer and Pedro Astacio
Next week we’ll wrap up the 2005 in Review series with the relievers.
Other stuff on the horizon:
And some links:
To recap: Starting pitchers this week, relievers next week. Vote for Ducksnorts at Red Reporter starting Tuesday through Jan. 1. Ducksnorts: Best of 2005 available for free/donation mid- to late-Jan.
Now back to your regularly scheduled weekend…
Won’t they stop already? Just catching up on the latest flurry. New and improved chart at the end.
The Padres have sold the contract of RHP Chris Oxspring to the Hanshin Tigers of the Japanese Central League for a reported $550k. On the one hand, I’m real sorry to see Oxspring leave without getting a chance to show the Padres what he can do. On the other, he’ll be 29 years old in May and probably will make a much better living over in Japan than he would have on this side of the Pacific. Oxspring was one of my favorites during his time at Elsinore, and I’m happy for his opportunity.
LaForest has played parts of two seasons with the “big-league” Devil Rays, hitting .170/.223/.241 in 112 at-bats. He was Tampa Bay’s #11 prospect according to the Baseball America Prospect Handbook 2004 after having been listed at #16 in the previous year’s edition.
From the 2003 book:
Signed as a third baseman, LaForest has made significant strides during his conversion to catching but remains far from a polished product behind the plate… LaForest’s greatest improvement has come with the bat. He makes solid contact and is able to drive the ball.
And from 2004:
He has good power from the left side and draws a good amount of walks… LaForest has a big swing and strikes out a lot, the main reason he never has hit better than .275 at any of his stops in the minors… He might be better suited to be a DH/first baseman/backup catcher than a regular backstop.
Executive summary: Upside is maybe a poor man’s Matt LeCroy? Don’t expect much.
According to the U-T, it’s a 1-year deal for $2.25M. With the acquisition of Mike Cameron, Roberts moves to left field, where he is a pretty good defender. His lack of arm strength won’t be as much of a liability in left as it was in center, and with less ground to cover, maybe he can stay away from those nagging leg injuries and become a good base stealer again.
The Padres needed someone to bat leadoff, and Roberts did a capable job in that role last year. If he can duplicate that effort ― admittedly a big “if” given his age and how completely out of line his 2005 numbers were with anything he’d done since 2000 at Triple-A Buffalo ― Roberts will continue to be a valuable contributor.
The potential for decline, possibly precipitous, is undeniable. But I’ve doubted Roberts before and he proved me wrong in a big way this past season. I am hopeful that the move to a less demanding position will help him assuage my doubts once more.
The big downside is that we may not get to see what Ben Johnson can do this season. Then again, with Xavier Nady gone, we have to clamor for the Padres to free someone, right?
The Padres drafted Steik in the 7th round of the 2004 draft out of Golden West College. Beyond that, I don’t know a lot about Steik, but he didn’t show up on any of the Padres prospects lists I’ve seen. That happens with 21-year-old middle relievers in Low-A ball.
Baugh was selected 11th overall by the Detroit Tigers in the 2001 draft. Unfortunately he was ridden extremely hard at Rice and missed the entire 2002 season due to labrum surgery.
Prior to the injury, Baugh had been the Tigers’ #4 prospect in the Baseball America Prospect Handbook 2002. In the accompanying writeup, Baseball America said of Baugh, “He’s the frontrunner to be the first player from the 2001 draft to reach the majors.” Of course, he had the setback and still is waiting for the call.
In 2003, Baseball America ranked Baugh the Tiger’s #17 prospect, and the following year, he climbed to #10. In the 2005 book, he dropped all the way to #24. From that edition:
Baugh’s velocity got back to 88-91 mph last year, enough to get by because he commands an average curveball and changeup. The key for him is to stay on top of his pitches, because his fastball and curve flatten out when he drops down.
I dunno, can he be any worse than Ismael Valdez was a couple years ago? Baugh essentially takes over Oxspring’s role as a guy who the Padres can bring up from Portland to make the occasional spot start if needed. And of course, he didn’t cost much. So the net is that the Friars gave up a Low-A reliever to free up half a million bucks. From a baseball standpoint, this series of moves is the equivalent of treading water. From the business side, though, it’s pretty slick.
For grins, here’s how Baugh and Oxspring fared at Triple-A last year:
Age IP ERA H/9 BB/9 SO/9 HR/9 Baugh 26 165.1 3.38 8.66 3.27 5.82 0.71 Oxspring 28 160.2 4.03 8.29 2.35 7.00 0.84
Reaction from the Tigers blogosphere is lukewarm: Detroit Tigers Weblog, Tiger Tales, TigerBlog.
According to MLB.com, the deal is worth $850k for 1 year. I hate to see Fick leave because he’s such a gritty player. On the downside, his ISO had dropped every year since 2001. Last season’s .100 wasn’t nearly enough for a corner infielder/outfielder (Neifi Perez even managed an ISO of .108). So I’m sorry I won’t get to watch Fick play next year, but I understand that he can be replaced.
The deal is reported to be 4 years for $27.5M. That’s not quite the 4 years for $34M I predicted in March but it’s still wacko money for a 30-year-old catcher who has missed 114 games the past two seasons.
As with Fick, I’m sorry to see Hernandez leave. But I’d hate to be the Orioles right now or, say, in 2008. You think Phil Nevin was tough to move. Heh.
Okay, technically this one hasn’t happened yet, but I’ll be damned if I’m going to dedicate an entire entry to Doug Brocail when it does. Reports are that the deal will be 1 year for $1M.
Brocail, you may recall (or not), was the Padres first-round pick in the January regular phase of the 1986 draft. Yep, he was around when there was a January phase of the draft. He played for the Padres before Trevor Hoffman ever came to San Diego. He was part of the December 1994 deal that brought Ken Caminiti and Steve Finley to the Friars. Two of the players in that trade have passed on. Dude has been around a while.
Brocail also isn’t a bad pitcher. At least he wasn’t before last season. Brocail did a decent job for the Rangers in 2004, but his best years came in Detroit, from 1997 to 1999.
Brocail will be 39 this season and he’s coming off a down year. At his age, it’s hard to know whether that was a blip or the beginning of the end. For $1M, the Padres are about to find out. Have I mentioned lately that this was a good winter to be a free agent reliever?
Pos | Out | In |
---|---|---|
SP | Brian Lawrence Chris Oxspring Ricky Steik |
Dewon Brazelton Seth Etherton Steve Andrade Kenny Baugh Doug Brocail |
C | Ramon Hernandez | Doug Mirabelli |
1B | Mark Sweeney (RF, LF) Robert Fick (C, RF, LF) |
- |
2B | Mark Loretta Damian Jackson (SS, OF) |
– |
3B | Sean Burroughs | Vinny Castilla Geoff Blum (2B, SS) Bobby Hill (2B) Justin Leone |
OF | Xavier Nady (1B) | Mike Cameron Jack Cust |
Thanks to Richard B. Wade for the heads-up in Monday’s comments that Baseball America‘s Padres Top 10 prospects list is now available. I’m preparing a lengthy post for Wednesday morning that has nothing to do with this, so I can’t comment much other than to say these names look a lot better than what we’ve seen in a while.
Here’s the list:
Interesting that Rule V draftee Steve Andrade has the best slider. Anyway, head on over and check out BA’s coverage. Kevin Goldstein will be doing a live chat at 11 a.m. PT Wednesday. I may not be able to participate, so go represent.
I stumbled across the Padres 2006 calendar at the mall the other night. Each month features a different player. Of the 12 players represented, only 6 are current Padres. I thought of offering half price, with an option to buy the 2007 calendar at full price if a certain percentage of players slated for inclusion remained with the club through its publication, but I suspected that the store clerk would neither understand nor appreciate the joke, so instead I put the calendar back on the shelf. Fortunately for the Padres and their fans, one of the players who did remain is featured prominently in today’s installment.
[Previous entries in this series: C | 1B | 2B | 3B | SS | LF | CF]
BA | OBP | SLG | BB/PA | ISO | SEC | RC/27 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Padres right fielders | .290 | .411 | .466 | .172 | .176 | .401 | 7.03 |
MLB rank | 4 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 2 |
Stats courtesy of ESPN. Color key: green, top 10; yellow, middle 10; red, bottom 10. |
FPct | RF | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Padres right fielders | .984 | 2.26 | |||||
MLB average | .980 | 2.10 | |||||
Stats courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com. Color key: green, above average; red, below average. |
Thanks to the exploits of Brian Giles, right field was one of the true strengths for the Padres in 2005. Only three players in the NL had a higher Offensive Winning Percentage than Giles (.766), and only two had more than his 32 win shares. Giles accounted for a tick under 84% of the Padres innings at the position last year, with the remainder coming from among Xavier Nady, Ben Johnson, Robert Fick, Mark Sweeney, Miguel Ojeda, and Damian Jackson.
Summary
BA | OBP | SLG | BB/PA | ISO | XBH/H | RC/27 | OPS+ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | .284 | .374 | .475 | .125 | .191 | .364 | 6.34 | 126 |
2005 | .301 | .423 | .483 | .182 | .153 | .372 | 7.41 | 148 |
Stats courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com. Color key: green, positive trend; red, negative trend. |
FPct | RF | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Giles | .987 | 2.22 | ||||||
MLB average | .980 | 2.10 | ||||||
Stats courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com. Color key: green, above average; red, below average. |
Expectations
From my season preview over at Baseball Think Factory:
If he can get back to the .300/.400/.500 levels that used to be the norm, Giles will be a valuable member of the lineup. If not, he’ll still be useful but disappointingly so.
Positives
Negatives
AB | BA | OBP | SLG | BB/PA | ISO | XBH/H | AB/HR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home | 559 | .277 | .377 | .454 | .142 | .167 | .368 | 34.94 |
Road | 595 | .306 | .417 | .501 | .160 | .195 | .368 | 27.05 |
Stats courtesy of Baseball Musings Day By Day Database. |
Note that the percentage of hits that go for extra bases is identical (actually it’s about 4/1000ths higher on the road) both at and away from Petco Park, but there are pretty large discrepancies in ISO and AB/HR. I haven’t looked at a chart of where Giles hits the ball, but with the fences in right-center moving in around 10-12 feet, it’s not unreasonable to think that some of those doubles to the alley might reach the seats next year.
Outlook
Giles tested the free agent market this winter for the first time in his career. Fortunately the Padres were able to sign him through 2007, with an option for 2008. Although many of the traditional offensive numbers aren’t eye popping, especially compared to what he did in his prime, the Offensive Winning Percentage and win shares demonstrate that Giles still is capable of producing runs with the best of them.
Giles should continue to be the centerpiece of the Padres offense for the duration of his new contract. With all the other roster shuffling that has transpired this off-season, re-signing Giles is the one move ― from a purely baseball standpoint ― that the Padres had to make.
I’ve been profiled over at Bill Ferris’ BaseBlogging. Check it out if you’re so inclined.
Recent Comments