Cal League Tour 2004: Phase III

You may have noticed that Ducksnorts won the NL West in the World Series of Blogs. To all of you who got me to the NL finals, I say thanks. Now I need your help again. We’re getting spanked pretty hard by the Cardinals (’96 flashback, anyone?), so spread the word and help get Ducksnorts to the World Series!

In case you missed it, Jeff and I have been touring the Cal League this summer.


The story so far…

Ducksnorts

Syntax of Things


Gone were the days of 2- to 3-hour jaunts up the I-15, gone the days of slick new ballparks. Now it was time to get serious.

We left San Diego a little after 8 AM Saturday to catch a 7 PM game at Stockton. The map sites say it’s about a 7-hour trip. Expecting LA traffic and not wanting to arrive late after driving all day, we took no chances.

Remarkably enough, we sailed through Los Angeles and didn’t make our first stop until Magic Mountain. Burger King for a cup of coffee-flavored water. Hamburger for me, cancer stick for Jeff. You decide which is worse.

After spending most of the morning talking about our respective jobs, we started in on the tunes. Kings of Leon, Tindersticks, and a fascinating band called The Decemberists.

Jeff always hooks me up with good music. Left to my own devices I’m either listening to jazz or practicing songs that I "sing" with the band. So it’s reassuring every now and then to hear new stuff that, shall we say, doesn’t suck.

Good tunes and convo helped make the long drive go by quickly (although not quickly enough to escape the unbelievable stench of cattle that hit us somewhere between Avenal and Los Banos), and soon we had arrived in Stockton.

In deference to a levee that had just broken in town and tied up several roads, we avoided SR-4 and instead took a circuitous route that introduced us to some interesting parts of Stockton. We quickly made our way out of those parts of Stockton and toward downtown.

On our last trip, we stumbled onto an awesome Asian buffet within walking distance of our hotel in Rancho Cucamonga. This time I figured it would be better to come prepared and not rely on good fortune. So I did what any self-respecting geek would do. I entered stockton asian buffet into Google. Check the third entry. Any domain with "fanboy" in it is going to give you the dirt on good, cheap Asian food. I got directions to the concisely named "China Buffet" and on our way through town we scoped out the joint. It was in a shopping center that had at least two Vietnamese restaraunts in it. A very good sign. Reminded me a little of the area around El Cajon and Euclid in San Diego, on a much smaller scale.

We figured we’d hit that on the way out of town in the morning. But now the priority was finding a place to stay. After a few minutes, we checked into a chain hotel on March Lane, which seems to be where all the chain hotels are in Stockton.

From there it was off to the ballpark. A few things to know about Billy Hebert Field:

  • It is owned by the city and sits in the middle of Oak Park.
  • It was built in 1947 and feels nothing at all like the newer structures sprinkled throughout the southern stretches of the Cal League. Watching a game here is an entirely different experience.
  • It is named in honor of a baseball player who was Stockton’s first casualty in World War II.

History (because it’s a neat story) and pix (because some nameless dolt left his camera in the hotel room):

I’ve grown accustomed to the newer parks in Elsinore and Rancho, and on balance I find them more comfortable. But there is a history, a vibe, at the older venues that can’t be duplicated. If you’re a musician, it’s like the difference between tube amps and solid state. The latter is technically superior, but the former gives tones that cannot be achieved by any other means.

The one real complaint I would have about the park, although it didn’t affect me too much as a fan, is the lighting. As the sun sets over the left field fence, shadows emerge. Large shadows. Not optimal playing conditions.

I’m sure Jeff will mention the fine concessions, so I won’t spend much time on ‘em (hot dog, fries, and a soda for $6.50). As for the game itself, the only guys who really stood out for me were Stockton’s Vince Sinisi and Ben Kozlowski. Sinisi. a former standout at Rice, hit an absolute bomb to right. He also drew a walk or two. Like High Desert’s Conor Jackson, Sinisi just doesn’t have bad at-bats. At least he didn’t that night. Very advanced approach for that level. Did a great job of getting into good counts and either hitting the ball hard or taking a free pass.

Kozlowski, a former Brave farmhand who is returning from off-season TJ surgery, didn’t appear to have much velocity. But his stuff moved and he located the ball well on both sides of the plate. Batters went back to the dugout baffled by his sequences. To take nothing away from Kozlowski, who showed he has an idea of how to pitch, it was clear that some of these kids had never seen a skillful finesse pitcher. In their defense, such an animal is hard to find in A-ball.

[I think I've gone on long enough for one sitting. Modesto will have to wait another day or two.]

Other Stuff
  • Royals facing several hurdles (ESPN). "So, if the Sean Burroughs-Xavier Nady-catcher for Beltran and Joe Randa doesn’t work…" Stop right there. It won’t work. Three guys who aren’t going anywhere: Sean Burroughs, Khalil Greene, Jake Peavy. They’re young, they’re cheap, they’re good, and they’re staying put.
  • Draftee Killian another Jason Kendall? (U-T). Updates on Tagg Bozied (hitting .330/.385/.716 at Portland), Brad Baker (1.80 ERA, 16 SV, 38 SO in 30 IP at Mobile), and Tim Stauffer (1.71 ERA, 27 SO in 42 IP at Mobile).
  • Conversation with Mobile’s Tom Nichols (PDX Beavers). Another of Jonathan’s outstanding interviews, this one with the radio voice of the BayBears. Nichols’ thoughts on Josh Barfield and Dennis Tankersley are interesting. Some folks may have jumped off the Barfield bandwagon after his slow start this year, but I’ll take a 21-year-old second baseman with a 732 OPS in the Southern League any day of the week. And he’s only getting better.

Okay, remember to vote for Ducksnorts and help us win it all. How ’bout a little love and respect for the Padres. Yo, dig it.

Frustration and Hope

First off, let’s get this out of the way: That was a horrible, horrible way to lose a game yesterday. One out from a shutout of the Yankees on their home turf. Boom. Boom. So much for that.

My hope for the Pads on this road trip was that they would win at least one game in each venue. They did that. But, as on their their last trip, they could have done so much more. Except for the Curt Schilling game in Boston, the Padres had a chance to win every game. They went 2-4, but could have gone 5-1.

But they didn’t. You keep giving great teams chances to win, and most times they will. And that’s exactly what happened. How does Trevor Hoffman lose home plate with two out in the ninth? No clue. Yankees probably don’t know either. But they sure knew what to do when he started falling behind in the count and serving up meatballs.

Coupla things we learned (or relearned), though, on this trip:

  • The Padres are a talented ballclub. They’re good, but not great. Good teams put themselves into situations where they can win most of the time. That’s the Pads. Great teams put themselves into those same situations and then bury the opposition. That’s the Yankees and the Red Sox. Sure, they’re forking over a lot of money to make their teams great (nothing wrong with that, IMO), but they still get things done where it counts–out on the playing field.
  • The Padres can play with anyone. They weren’t able to put away the Yanks and the BoSox when they had their chances, but I guarantee you the Pads gave those teams a much tougher fight than they or their fans expected. Johnny Damon isn’t the only guy on the East Coast who doesn’t know squat about the Padres. I’m sure there are a bunch of folks shuffling around Boston and New York right now wondering what’s wrong with their team and why they didn’t dominate the Pads.

The Padres outscored the Yankees and Red Sox, 28-22, on the road trip. They held the two best offenses (through games of June 12) in the AL to less than four runs per game:

          G  BA OBP SLG  R/G
Red Sox  60 270 354 444 5.28
Yankees  61 264 356 457 5.47
Padres   61 270 339 386 4.52

Check out the starting pitching:

             IP  H ER HR BB SO
Wells       5.2  6  0  0  0  2
Lawrence    5.0  5  0  0  0  5
Valdez      4.0  6  6  2  2  3
Eaton       7.0  4  2  1  3  4
Tankersley  5.0  6  3  0  1  3
Wells       7.0  5  0  0  0  4

total      33.2 32 11  3  6 21 2.94 ERA

Four stellar performances, one decent, one not so good. And of course, the Pads’ best starter is on the shelf.

No question, the Pads can hang with anyone. The next step is learning to put teams away when they have a chance.

A few other things worth noting before we call it a day:

  • Kerry Robinson has got to go. It sure was fun to watch him fly around the basepaths on Friday, but even with three hits in that game (as DH, no less!), his OPS now stands at 609. Adam Eaton, who started Friday’s game, has a 633 OPS (lower batting average, same number of walks, three times as many extra-base hits in half as many plate appearances). But twice on the trip Robinson was caught stealing in crucial situations. His defensive reputation is vastly overstated, and he’s not terribly effective at utilizing the one legitimate tool he possesses. Of course, those three hits on Friday probably extended Robinson’s Padre career by three months (or more). Easier to remember him scoring from first on a stolen base attempt than badly misjudging flyballs or getting thrown out trying to steal late in games.
  • Phil Nevin is swinging the bat very well. Looks like he’s recognizing that junk down and away and starting to lay off it again. Also, those homers he hit on the trip were absolute bombs. Sure would be nice to see him get on a tear for a week or three.
  • Ramon Hernandez also is quietly putting up some numbers. He isn’t setting the world on fire, but I’ll take .259/.339/.414 out of my catcher any day.

Overall, not a horrible road trip. Definitely could’ve been better, but it gives the Padres a good gauge of where they are and what they need to do to get to the next level. Sometimes a few painful losses can be a good motivator.

Stuff I’ve Been Meaning to Mention

That’s all for now, more as it happens…

Three Years of Blogging

Pads got spanked. Curt Schilling vs Ismael Valdez; you were perhaps expecting some other outcome? Right.

Anyway, it says here that I’ve been blogging now for three years. Egads. I’m not a big anniversary kind of guy, but this does give me an excuse to throw out some props to everyone who reads, links, talks about, or otherwise supports Ducksnorts. Some of you I’ve had the pleasure to meet personally, many more I’ve exchanged e-mails with. But the vast majority of you I do not know, and it blows me away that you keep coming back for more. Our readership has nearly tripled in the last year alone. Big thanks to all of you for making it happen. Your support keeps me going.

The three folks I have to single out are my wife, the guys at Fanstop, and Baseball Think Factory. How my wife puts up with this, I haven’t a clue. But I’m beyond grateful that she does. As for Fanstop, the folks on that board have such a passion for the Padres and the game of baseball. Even though I can’t always participate in the discussion as much as I’d like, I try to follow along every day. And every day, I learn something from them. Finally, Baseball Think Factory (formerly Baseball Primer) has given me a chance to reach a much wider audience, and I appreciate that.

Okay, we’re starting to get maudlin now. Suffice to say, thank you. A real posting (hopefully about Stage III of our Cal League tour) will appear in this space Monday. Meantime, here are few “nuggets” from the past three years:

  • Tuesday, June 12, 2001 — A monster is born. Thoughts on Jake Gautreau (spelled with an “x” at the end; what, there are two of him?), ESPN’s center field camera, and the mercifully inimitable Ray Knight.
  • Sunday, June 23, 2002 — Jake Peavy’s big-league debut; Oliver Perez vs the Yankees.
  • Thursday, January 2, 2003 — The beginning of a new year, the beginning of our study of John Sickels’ prospect rankings and win shares. Keep reading up the page for the whole series.
  • Friday, May 9, 2003 — 10 Reasons to Love/Hate La Jolla. Pretty much speaks for itself, I think.
  • Thursday, August 28, 2003 — First game of the Brian Giles era in San Diego.
  • Monday, September 29, 2003 — Farewell to the Q. We don’t really miss it, but there was a sadness to this day.
  • Monday, December 1, 2003 — One of our better mailbag sessions. Thoughts on the Billy Wagner to Philly trade, the meaning of the term “ducksnort,” and Gary Bennett’s value to a pitching staff.
  • Monday, March 1, 2004 — Petco Pix. The single most popular item ever at Ducksnorts. Almost too popular, heh.

Gotta run. Let’s see if we can take one from the Yankees this weekend…

Educating Damon

Does anyone know who plays for San Diego?
–Johnny Damon

Now that Mr. Damon is a folk hero in these parts (thanks for the motivation, dude), I thought it might be helpful to give him a brief primer on who plays for San Diego.

Sorry, make that first place San Diego.

  • Brian Lawrence – He’s the guy who struck you out twice last night.
  • Phil Nevin – He’s the one who hit the ball out of the park, well over your head and to your right. It was a bomb, I’m sure you remember it.
  • Ramon Hernandez – He also hit a ball over your head and off the wall. You might know him from the A’s.
  • Jay Witasick – You hit that clutch solo homer off him last night in the eighth to cut the Pads’ lead to 7-1. Way to go.
  • Mark Loretta – He’s the guy who fielded your grounder and threw you out at first to end the game.

There are others, but this should suffice for now. We’ll give you more names some other time.

Dennis Tankersley has been pushed back to the New York series, so it’s Curt Schilling vs Ismael Valdez tonight: 4 PM, Channel 4.

Buzzkill

Don’t shoot the messenger, but the recent track record of high school shortstops taken in the first round isn’t real encouraging. Check this out (stats are for 2004 unless otherwise noted):

Name             Tm Yr No Status
Burrus,Josh     Atl 01 29 .310/.366/.474
                          in A-ball,
                          moved to OF
Cameron,Troy    Atl 97 29 .232/.288/.379
                          in Indy ball,
                          moved to 3B
Espinosa,David  Cin 00 23 .313/.416/.526
                          in Double-A,
                          moved to OF
Halloran,Matt    SD 96 15 out of baseball
Lawrence,Joe    Tor 96 16 reached bigs in 2002,
                          hit .180/.262/.247
Lopez,Felipe    Tor 98  8 .232/.299/.369
                          over parts
                          of three seasons
Montanez,Luis   ChN 00  3 .215/.292/.354
                          in A-ball,
                          moved to 2B
Moore,Scott     Det 02  8 .218/.344/.379
                          in A-ball,
                          moved to 3B;
                          Tigers #7 prospect
Myers,Corey     Ari 99  4 .357/.471/.429
                          in Triple-A,
                          moved to 1B
Santos,Sergio   Ari 02 27 .288/.342/.451
                          in Double-A;
                          Snakes #2 prospect
Smith,Corey     Cle 00 26 .219/.319/.393
                          in Double-A,
                          moved to 3B;
                          Tribe's #13 prospect
Wood,Brandon    Ana 03 23 .263/.348/.438
                          in A-ball;
                          Halos #7 prospect

Kind of a mess, but the gist of it is this:

  • Of the 12 high school shorstops drafted in the first round over the period 1996-2003, only two have reached the big leagues (Lawrence, Lopez); neither has had any success at the highest level.
  • Only two remain at shortstop (Santos, Wood), and there is talk that Santos will outgrow the position.
  • Only four rank among their organization’s top 30 prospects according to Baseball America (Moore, Det #7; Santos, Ari #2; Smith, Cle #13; Wood, Ana #7).
  • The only one who really projects as an impact player at this point is Santos, although Wood and possibly Moore could move into that category.

The past obviously is not a certain indicator of the future, and there have been some brilliant counterexamples to the dim picture painted above (some guy named Rodriguez comes to mind). But two things are pretty clear:

  1. Pedigree notwithstanding, it’s a lot easier and more common for a player not to develop into a star than to do so.
  2. Moving a kid off shortstop at some point is almost a given.

But hey, it’s early. Way too early to jump to any meaningful conclusions. I just throw this stuff out there as food for thought. Every case is different, and the fact that recent history indicates one thing doesn’t necessarily make it true in every specific example. So for now, let’s just see what Bush can do. Recognize that the chances of success are small, don’t build up lofty expectations for the kid before he even sets foot on the field, and just maybe something good will happen.

Elswhere, the Pads spent their 23rd round pick on SDSU first baseman Rielly Embrey. The upside there is that Embrey, who hit the first ever home run at Petco Park, won’t need any convincing that it’s possible to hit the ball out of his home yard.

Oh, and the Padres lost at Fenway yesterday, 1-0. The good news is the Blue Jays beat the Dodgers, thus keeping San Diego tied for first. A solid outing from David Wells on his return from the DL is also encouraging. Justin Germano was optioned to Portland, which means that Dennis Tankersley remains in the rotation. Tank works Thursday against the team that drafted him. He’ll draw Curt Schilling in the series finale.

Tonight it’s Brian Lawrence vs Bronson Arroyo. Game starts at 4 PM and is on ESPN. You expect to lose against Pedro Martinez, but tonight’s is a winnable game. Let’s do it…

Blindsided

The first day of the 2004 First-Year Player Draft is complete. We didn’t talk about Matt Bush at all in the days leading up to the draft, because we didn’t realize he was on the radar. All eyes were focused on the triumverate of Stephen Drew, Jeff Niemann, and Jered Weaver.

After last year’s draft, in which the Padres didn’t tap their first high school player until the 26th round, the thought of their taking one with the first pick overall never crossed our minds. But that’s just what Bill Gayton and company did. In fact, the Pads’ first three picks were all high school players.

So what do we know about Bush? A few things:

  • He came relatively cheap at a reported $3.15M. In a culture that often equates price with quality, some may feel that John Moores was not willing to pay for the best available talent. This may or may not be the case. What we do know is that he was not willing to pay for the most expensive talent. There was no Mark Prior or Joe Mauer in this draft class, no Rickie Weeks or Delmon Young. Why overpay for a comparatively inferior talent? So the thinking goes. And there is something to be said for exercising financial restraint. Spend too much and you’re supporting a dysfunctional system, spend too little and you’re not doing enough to help your team. What to do…
  • He has a terrific arm, sporting a mid-90s heater as a pitcher. Check out Josh Boyd’s report on Bush from last year’s Area Code games.
  • At 5’10″, he’s a little on the short side. He also isn’t real fast. These are two characteristics he shares in common with current Padre shortstop Khalil Greene.

Although Bush wasn’t viewed as the premier talent in the draft, he wasn’t that far from the top. Baseball America had him as the eighth best prospect, third among position players.

My general feeling is that, given the paucity of true studs available, the Padres did okay in taking Bush. I’m more puzzled by the pick than anything, because it goes against their philosophy from a year ago. But I’m not disappointed.

One interesting consideration is this (I haven’t heard anything specific, just speculating): With an established shortstop, having paid less than slot money for Bush, and having saved money they would have had to spend on a second-round pick, could the Padres be gearing up for a run at Carlos Beltran or Freddy Garcia? The extra cash could be used to help ink a potential newcomer to a long-term deal. And the addition of Bush could increase the Pads’ willingness to include Josh Barfield in a trade.

Who knows what will happen. I’m just trying to think along with the decision-makers here.

Here is the entire first day for the Pads (links on names go to school bios; thanks to the guys at Fanstop for pointing me to those!):

  1. Matt Bush, ss, Mission Bay HS, San Diego. BA rates him #8 overall in the draft class. Best arm strength and best defensive player among high school prospects according to BA. "…A legitimate talent and easily the best player in San Diego… His presence, instincts and makeup are also unquestioned… He’s more of a contact hitter than a power hitter, but scouts say he should be better with wood than aluminum." (BA)
  2. (choice to Yankees as compensation for David Wells)
  3. Billy Killian, c, Chippewa Hills HS, Stanwood, MI. BA’s #95 prospect. Second best strike-zone judgment among high schoolers. Top rated player in Michigan. Son of Pads area scout Bill Killian. "…Baseball rat with solid tools and the athleticism to play any position on the field… If not for his slight 6-foot-1, 180-pound frame, he might even have been a first-round candidate." (BA)
  4. Daryl Jones, 1b, Westchester HS, Los Angeles. BA has him at #23 among SoCal prospects.
  5. Sean Kazmar, ss, CC of Southern Nevada. BA’s #13 prospect in Nevada.
  6. Jonathan Ellis, rhp, The Citadel. BA’s #20 prospect in South Carolina.
  7. Ricky Steik, rhp, Golden West (Calif.) JC. BA’s #31 SoCal prospect.
  8. Vern Sterry, rhp, North Carolina State U. BA’s #11 North Carolina prospect.
  9. David O’Hagan, rhp, Stanford U. BA’s #13 prospect in Northern California.
  10. Chris Kolkhorst, of, Rice U. BA’s #53 Texas prospect.
  11. Matt Varner, rhp, U. of Houston. Opponents hit .298 against him this year.
  12. Mike Ekstrom, rhp, Pt. Loma Nazarene (Calif.) U. BA’s #28 SoCal prospect.
  13. Jake Vose, rhp, U. of Nevada-Las Vegas. BA’s #10 prospect in Nevada.
  14. Matt Montgomery, rhp, Okaloosa-Walton (Fla.) JC. BA’s #44 prospect in Florida.
  15. Brandon Thomson, lhp, Gilbert (Ariz.) HS
  16. Ben Krosschell, rhp, Highlands Ranch (Colo.) HS. BA’s #2 Colorado prospect, #189 overall. BA identifies him as a potential draft-and-follow candidate.
  17. Clayton Hamilton, rhp, Penn State U. BA’s #15 prospect in Pennsylvania.
  18. Michael Moon, 3b, U. of Southern California. BA’s #87 SoCal prospect.

Yeah, I don’t know what any of this means either. But all things considered, I’m okay with the pick of Bush at #1. It definitely has me thinking of trade possibilities involving young infielders. As for the rest of the draft, who knows at this point. Killian sounds intriguing. So does Krosschell, but he’s committed to the University of New Mexico.

MLB’s Draft Tracker includes scouting reports. Check out the Pads’ first day. They’ll be back at it again today.

That’s all for now, more as it happens…

WTF?

No time today. Good finish to the homestand, gives the guys some momentum heading into the belly of the AL East.

But the big news is Matt Bush. In a bizarre twist, the Padres nabbed local shortstop Bush (Mission Bay HS) with the first pick overall and have already signed him for $3.1M. This according to Baseball America.

Fascinating stuff, folks. More tomorrow…

Mailbag

I don’t have a stupid little story to lead in with today, so let’s get right to the letters. Seems we touched a few nerves in the May 24 entry. This makes us very happy.

From Jeff #287:

Damn, Geoff. You hit the nail on the head with every one of your points. I couldn’t agree more with [Kerry] Robinson, Tank [Dennis Tankersley], and the frustration. This is a takeable division, but the Padres will have to be smart to take it. I still expect [Dodgers' GM Paul] DePodesta to go get himself some middle infield talent that will make the Dodgers a force.

And that aside, even if we can just fumble along, and take the division without much thinking involved from management, we’ll get our asses handed to us come the playoffs. This team has shown the inability to close out good teams, and that’s what makes it to the postseason.

But the thing that has me most worried right now is Jake Peavy. If he goes down, our season goes down with him. My fingers are crossed.

The Padres, obviously, are much improved over last season’s squad. But as you say, they’ll need to take advantage of every opportunity that comes their way. The Pads can’t afford to be blowing six-run leads in Pittsburgh and scoring four runs in three games against the Rockies if they expect to contend. People who don’t follow the ballclub very closely are surprised at how well the Padres are doing this season. People who do follow them are disappointed that they’re not doing even better. The talent is there. Right now the Pads are just treading water. If they can get everyone healthy and solve their apparent mental block over hitting at Petco, this team could be dangerous. It would be nice to see that happen sooner rather than later.

As for Peavy, any time you lose the league leader in ERA for 4-6 weeks, that’s not good. But in this division, where anything is possible, I’m not willing to concede the season. Tankersley did a nice job in his first start at Milwaukee, and hopefully he can build on that tonight against the same uniform. Not that he can replace Peavy, who really is a special talent, but guys picking up their game a notch when needed is another sign of a contending team. I’m sure we’re all hoping that Peavy and Ryan Klesko can come back and contribute as soon as possible, but I do take some solace in the fact that the Padres haven’t lost any ground since those guys landed on the DL.

From Bill Robens:

…[Brian] Buchanan does almost everything better than Robinson. The play Robinson made on a flyball in Pittsburgh (I think?) was one of the most ludicrous things I’ve ever seen. He went back on a slow flyball, leapt as if trying to rob the guy of a homerun, and the ball landed behind him and two feet to his left. Buck may well have caught that. Buck’s also a good baserunner, and while he’s not as quick as Robinson, he’s generally less bone-headed. Buck had as many steals last year (6 with one more CS) as Robinson with the same playing time.

Among all relievers who have at least one save in the NL, the only left-handers are [Billy] Wagner (injured), Steve Kline, Wilson Alvarez (now starting) and Franklyn Gracesqui (now in the minors). So if we’re down 3-2 in the ninth and we need a homerun, you’re most likely going to hear “Now batting, Kerry Robinson.”

Yeah, that was a brutal play in Pittsburgh. Buchanan may or may not have been able to get to the ball, but I’m pretty confident he wouldn’t have looked so bad in the process. What kills me is that you know if Buchanan (or Klesko) hadn’t been able to track that one down, we’d have heard about their defensive shortcomings. With Robinson, we chalk it up as "just one of those things" and have a good chuckle. I’m all for cutting a guy some slack, but it seems to me if much of your value to a team derives from your defensive skill, it’d be best not to look that clueless in the field.

Regarding the NL relievers, I have to believe that Terrence Long would get a shot before Robinson in that situation. Not that Long is great, but at least there’s a chance he’ll do some damage.

From Anthony Trifiletti:

Nice breakdown of the Padres personnel situation. Every time I look up and see Kerry Robinson at bat with men on base it drives me nuts. Buck is just wasting away on the bench while the kid strikes out or pops up. But hey, he can run. I propose a new nickname for Kerry, Ryan’s Glove. Unfortunately, Bochy seems to be falling for the hype that the team needs to manufacture runs in Petco so Robinson is probably going to stick around awhile.

Do you think the Padres might be showcasing Tank and [Justin] Germano for a possible [Royals' outfielder Carlos] Beltran trade? Maybe they can find a taker for Klesko while they’re at it.

As much as I love Aki [Otsuka] I’m worried he’s going to break down. He pitched only 43 innings last year, 42 the year before. At this rate he’ll be over 40 by the All Star break.

Ryan’s Glove. Yeah, that’s nice. I don’t mean to pile on Robinson. The guy is trying to do the job he’s been asked to do. It’s not his fault he’s on the roster. But I sure wish management would wise up to the fact that Robinson is not a big-league hitter, at least not at this time. The best I can say is that he’s probably a better option than Kory DeHaan. Probably.

As for a Beltran trade, anything is possible. But I honestly believe that the Padres are running Tank and Germano out there because they believe those guys give the team the best chance to win while Peavy and David Wells are on the shelf. Personally, I don’t think Germano is quite ready for the Show just yet. Nothing wrong with that, he’s very young. What I’m hoping is that Tankersley pitches well again tonight and sticks around in Peavy’s spot when Wells returns. I would really love to see Tank establish himself in the Pads’ rotation for the rest of this year and beyond.

Regarding Otsuka, the workload is a concern. I’m hopeful that the return of Rod Beck will take some of the pressure off him going forward. Aki sure has been a treat to watch so far. And check this out:

          IP  H HR BB SO  ERA BB/9  SO/9
Otsuka  25.1 12  0  9 28 1.42 3.20  9.95
Sasaki  20.2 10  0  5 28 0.00 2.18 12.19

Geez, Sasaki was pretty darned ridiculous in his first two months over here. Wow. Well, anyway, here’s an amazing stat for you: right-handers are hitting just .089/.180/.111 off Otsuka so far. Five total bases, 20 punchouts.

And finally, from the well-traveled Anonymous:

I liked your blog thoughts on Tankersley…however, I think probably as the old Earl Weaver saw goes, the best place for a young pitcher is in middle relief. Tank seems to be one fo those guys who desperately needs to experience some sort of major league success before he can move into the starting rotation. I hope he can do it.

The point may be moot since Tank is now in the rotation, but I just wanted to clarify something here. I don’t have any problem breaking in a young pitcher by having him work in middle relief. But the eighth inning of a one-run game is no place for a middle reliever, in my book. That’s setup man territory. I want my top relievers working in that situation, not a guy just up from the minors who pitched the day before and who is not acclimated to the role. Last year, when the Padres were busy losing 98 games, it might’ve made sense to audition a kid from the minors to see if he might be a part of next year’s puzzle. But this year, when each game actually means something, I’d just as soon see the veterans work the last two or three innings if it’s close.

Getting back to Tankersley, I’m sure we all hope he can step up and help the Padres. His expedited development at the big-league level would be a tremendous shot in the arm (pun intended) while the rest of the rotation gets healthy. We should have a better idea of where he’s at after tonight’s game…

Well, we didn’t get to all the letters today. We’ll hit some more in a couple of weeks. Thanks to those of you who did write in; I always enjoy hearing from you.

Brewers are in town for the weekend. I’ll be out wandering around California. Don’t be surprised if there’s no entry on Monday as I recover from the drive back from Modesto. There will be plenty to talk about next week, so rest up.

Let’s win some games…

Drafting a Plan, Planning a Draft

Four runs in three games against the Rockies doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence, but at least the Padres managed to avoid being swept. Brian Lawrence looked terrific. Unfortunately he made the mistake of surrendering a run, which cost him a shot at the win. Shawn Estes had no command (60 strikes, 57 balls; six walks in as many innings) and really had no business allowing just one run over six. Even the one run came on a double play with the bases loaded and nobody out.

The outcome was good, but the game itself was frustrating. Brian Giles went 0-5 with a strikeout and three (!) double plays. In his defense, two of those DPs were absolute smashes that Todd Helton managed to smother. Xavier Nady, in his return to San Diego (replacing the injured Brian Buchanan), was hitless in three at-bats and left five runners on base. Nady played left field and batted sixth. His presence pushes Jon Knott into Buchanan’s former role of–wait, Buchanan didn’t have a role, never mind.

On the bright side, Sean Burroughs knocked two more hits and scored the game-winner in the tenth after being hit by a pitch from Brian Fuentes. Burroughs had some outstanding at-bats yesterday. He singled to left on the ninth pitch from Estes to lead off the bottom of the first. (Lawrence needed just nine pitches to retire the side in order in the top half.) And in the tenth, after falling behind 0-2 to Fuentes, Burroughs worked the count even, fouled off three pitches, and then took one for the team. Two nine-pitch at-bats against lefties in the same game. Gotta like that.

The curious decision by the Rockies came later in the deciding frame. After Mark Loretta sacrificed Burroughs to second and a Giles grounder advanced the runner to third, Phil Nevin stepped to the plate. The Rockies had a right-hander, Vladimir Nunez, ready. But instead of bringing Nunez in to face Nevin, they had Fuentes intentionally walk him. Then they summoned Nunez to go after Jay Payton.

The move didn’t make any sense to me at the time, and it still doesn’t. Payton followed with a sharp single to right, game over. Who knows why the Rockies didn’t pitch to Nevin, and frankly, who really cares. All I know is the Pads won, and I ain’t complaining.

No Really, We’re Talking About the Draft

Sorry ’bout that, it was an exciting game. Also exciting is the prospect of having the #1 overall pick in the upcoming draft, which starts this coming Monday. Long Beach State right-hander Jered Weaver has long been rumored to be the most likely candidate to be taken with the top slot, but increasingly there is talk of Florida State shortstop Stephen Drew, brother of former first rounders J.D. (Phillies, Cardinals) and Tim (Indians).

The thought seems to be that hitters are less risky than pitchers. With Khalil Greene firmly establishing himself at shortstop and Josh Barfield on the way at second, there is the obvious question of where Drew would play. But talent is talent, and these things have a way of working themselves out. Of course, there’s always the possibility (pure speculation on my part here) that Barfield could become part of a package for the Royals’ Carlos Beltran. Whatever the case, middle infield depth rarely is a bad thing.

We won’t know for sure what the Padres decide to do until Monday morning, but I’m hoping that if they don’t opt for Drew, they go for Rice right-hander Jeff Niemann rather than the more ballyhooed Weaver. No disrespect to Weaver, but his main selling point is that he’ll be ready for the big leagues very soon. The Padres already have a guy like that in Tim Stauffer. These guys are mid-rotation types. Nothing wrong with that, but Niemann has a chance to be something more. His flame-out risk is much higher than Weaver’s. Meantime, I worry that mainstream folks have latched onto Weaver’s Nintendoesque college numbers this year and maybe placed unrealistic expectations on the kid. Comparing him to Mark Prior really isn’t fair to anyone. If it gets him a few extra bucks at the negotiating table, good for him. But wouldn’t it stink to end up as a solid #2 or #3 starter and be considered a disappointment?

Not that my opinion amounts to anything in the eyes of the decision makers (exactly how much money am I investing in this?), but I’m torn between Drew and Niemann. I think I slightly prefer Drew because of the lower risk, but it’s close. Without having seen him pitch, and relying solely on the judgments of those who have, I’d like to see someone else pay for the Weaver hype.

Those are my thoughts. Here is what some others have to say:

And player bios:

Padres are off tomorrow before opening a three-game series against the Brewers Friday night. In lieu of game coverage, we’ll see if we can get to some of that reader mail that’s been filling my in-box next time.

May Recap

I’m more than a little disgusted after the last two games against Colorado. Adam Eaton actually pitched pretty well Monday night. One mistake to Jeromy Burnitz did him in. But two runs combined against Jason Jennings and Aaron Cook? Another bases-loaded, one-out situation that results in zero runs? Justin Germano and Khalil Greene looking like rookies. Greene has spoiled us, so it was surprising to see him commit two errors on the same play. Then again, it might be nice to give him a day off every now and then. Too bad Kerry Robinson can’t play shortstop. And where is the vaunted 800-run offense we were told to expect? Ugh…

Anyway, we were talking about May. The Padres finished the month with a 13-14 record. Fortunately, the Dodgers hit the skids and ended May in a virtual tie for first with the Pads. Unfortunately, the Giants started winning and turned the NL West into a three-team race.

So what happened? Take a look at those keys we talked about last month:

       G   IP  H HR BB SO  ERA
Wells  3 20.0 18  3  2  9 3.15
Eaton  6 32.0 42  8 10 28 8.16
Peavy  4 24.2 26  2  8 29 2.19

Nothing wrong with Wells and Peavy, but both landed on the DL. Eaton was healthy but completely ineffective. This is sobering. The Padres played 27 games in May. Eaton and Ismael Valdez combined to start 12 of those (44%). Here is how they did:

  IP  H HR BB SO  ERA W-L
63.0 89 15 21 41 7.57 1-7

The rest of the staff:

   IP   H HR BB  SO  ERA  W-L
174.0 157 18 67 156 2.84 12-7

Damn.

The bottom of the order was another key we identified. How did they do in May?

           AB  BA OBP SLG BB SO
Payton     82 354 432 537 11  5
Hernandez  65 277 338 508  5  7
Greene     91 220 308 319 11 24

Wow, Payton very quietly had a terrific month. Hernandez did just fine as well. The league appears to have adjusted to Greene. Such is the nature of rookies. Overall, no real complaints on this front.

There’s also been talk that Petco Park might be getting into some of the hitters’ heads. Let’s take a look at some splits:

                 home              away
           AB  BA OBP SLG    AB  BA OBP SLG
Burroughs  89 348 389 427   107 318 348 374
Loretta    85 224 287 365   118 381 420 525
Giles      81 272 372 519   106 292 406 491
Nevin      79 228 337 354   111 324 374 495
Greene     68 265 367 368    99 263 321 404
Payton     64 234 329 313    87 356 436 540
Klesko     55 273 349 382    60 250 352 333
Hernandez  54 167 237 259    77 299 389 481

Padres    709 238 320 350  1013 296 358 427
opponents 765 271 321 397   941 261 327 436

                 OPS
           home away  dif (h - a)
Burroughs   816  722  +94
Loretta     652  945 -293
Giles       891  897   -6
Nevin       691  869 -178
Greene      735  725  +10
Payton      641  976 -335
Klesko      731  685  +46
Hernandez   497  869 -372

Padres      669  785 -116
opponents   718  762  -44

Interesting. I’d figured Klesko and Nevin would be the biggest victims of Petco, but maybe I was giving too much weight to their public complaints. Of the eight regulars, four guys are relatively neutral, while four have astronomical splits. The sample still isn’t that large, but those differentials–particularly for Loretta, Payton, and Hernandez–are alarming.

If it were just one or two hitters, or if there were a guy with significantly better numbers at home, I might be more inclined to write this off as a fluke. But it sure looks like there is something about Petco that the Padre hitters don’t like. My suggestion, which isn’t terribly helpful, is that they get over it and learn how to hit at home.

Then there’s the question of pitching. Padre hurlers have a 3.98 ERA at Petco, 3.87 on the road. Odd to think that maybe the Pads’ home park is helping neither their hitters nor their pitchers, and yet they are in contention.

May was largely a month of disarray for the Padres. They lost two members of their rotation to the DL, while two others stunk up the joint. Their #5 hitter, unproductive for much of the year, also landed on the shelf. The club showed a frustrating inability to win games within its reach and did not separate from the pack in the NL West. The flip side is that the Pads didn’t lose any ground in May. Treading water at this point, waiting for guys to get healthy and hoping that the kids filling in for them can give the club just enough to keep things interesting.

Going forward, the Pads need Brian Lawrence to prove that May (3.19 ERA) is closer to his true level than April (5.64). They need Eaton and Valdez to get back on track, and Wells and Peavy to get healthy. And wouldn’t it be nice to see a Justin Germano or Dennis Tankersley step up and make a contribution.

The hitters need to solve Petco. Whether the park effects are real or imagined makes no difference. As a group, these guys need to find a way to put the ball in play and make things happen. Chicks may dig the long ball, but fans dig wins. The Padres have been outhomered this year, 52-34, but still have a winning record. If the big boppers in the middle of the lineup can stay focused on making solid contact and not worry so much about what effect the lack of homers will have come negotiating time, results will follow.

The decision makers need to make better use of available resources. The Padres moved in the right direction in May by jettisoning the likes of Eddie Oropesa and Jason Szuminski. The good news is that the only useless piece remaining on the ballclub is Robinson. The bad news is that the folks in charge don’t seem to realize how useless he is. Not a knock on Robinson as a human being. I’m sure he’s a perfectly nice guy. But right now, I’d send Eaton up to pinch hit for him if the opportunity arose. There is no room for a guy like that on a big-league team that considers itself a contender.

Lest we end on a negative note, here’s a little historical context. How this year’s team stacks up against other great Padre teams of the past:

             May               season
Year   W  L  Pct  RS  RA   W  L  Pct  RS  RA
1984  10 13 .435  93 101  92 70 .568 686 634
1996  17 10 .630 129  87  91 71 .562 771 682
1998  16 14 .533 142 115  98 64 .605 749 635
2004  13 14 .481 120 123  ??????????????????

First weekday afternoon game at Petco. Lawrence vs Shawn Estes. 12:35 PM, no television. Let’s not get swept by the Rockies. Not to sound desperate, but after the Rox, it’s three against Milwaukee and then off to Boston and the Bronx. Wins now would be real nice…