Peoria on My Mind

I’m scrambling to get ready for Peoria, so I need to direct you elsewhere today. I’m thinking about fun story lines for ’08 at Hardball Times and the Top 100 prospects from ’98 at Knuckle Curve. Also, reader LynchMob has taken some short videos from actual spring training games. Sweet!

Lessee, what else have I got? Okay, here’s a question for you: Who will be the biggest surprise among this year’s Padres? Positive, negative, whatever. Give me a name and a reason.

Or talk about whatever else is on your mind. Be excellent…

Gary Gygax and Spring Training TV Schedule

Gary Gygax died on Tuesday. Along with Bill James and the folks who created Intellivision, Gygax was an unwitting participant in my misspent youth. He probably also helped me survive said youth, but that’s another story.

Seriously, we had plenty of ways to waste time before this here Internet thing. My humblest thanks to Mr. Gygax for helping me realize that.

. . .

So, baseball. They’re playing games but I haven’t watched any, so I don’t have much to say. Thankfully that’s about to change. Here’s the Padres spring training TV schedule (times are PT, games on Channel 4SD):

  • Sun, Mar 9 vs White Sox, 1:05 p.m.
  • Mon, Mar 10 vs Rangers, 7:05 p.m.
  • Fri, Mar 14 vs Dodgers (in China), 10:05 p.m.
  • Sat, Mar 15 vs Dodgers (in China), 10:05 p.m.
  • Tue, Mar 25 vs Royals, 7:05 p.m.
  • Fri, Mar 28 vs Angels (at Petco Park), 7:05 p.m.

We’ll fire up our first IGD of the year on Sunday, see if it still works. I’ll be at the game, which reminds me…

I’m heading to Peoria on Thursday. I’ve talked to some of you already, but if I haven’t and you’re planning to be there over the weekend, drop me a line so we can make plans or whatever.

Will I have copies of the book? Not likely. I know, I totally suck. They’re en route — somewhere in Illinois at last check. Worst case, I’ll have my copy that we can pass around like a cheap… er, we can pass it around and then I’ll make sure to get yours to you when we’re back in San Diego.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I need some elixir of waking…

Q&A with MadFriars.com, Part 2

Today we continue our chat with Denis Savage and John Conniff from MadFriars.com about their Padres prospect rankings for 2008. In our first installment we covered player evaluation strategies, Chase Headley, Mat Latos, and more. This time we focus on Kyle Blanks and Yefri Carvajal, among others. Enjoy!

Kyle BlanksDucksnorts: Kyle Blanks is a personal favorite of mine, in part because you just don’t see guys that big on a diamond. What path do you see his career taking?

Denis Savage: This is an interesting question. Honestly, I expected more in 2007 but a 21-year-old — and he will be 21 through the 2008 season — in Double-A is pretty special. I want to see more than 24 homers from him this season. He has the talent to do it and obviously has the power. I felt he sort of loaded up last year in some hitters parks, skewing his stats.

Blanks can be a dominant force but will need to continue to make strides in his power game. His defense has been a disappointment, as he just doesn’t move well around the bag, which is surprising given his athleticism.

For me, Blanks will be around long enough to ensure Adrian Gonzalez is healthy. Then, I would not be surprised to see him traded. He can be a middle of the order bat that hits 30 homers over a season — but his value is tied to first base alone. That limits his ability to thrive in San Diego, as Gonzalez is becoming one of the faces of the franchise along with [Jake] Peavy. I don’t think Blanks becomes a bust and believe he will carve out a healthy career in the bigs — I just don’t feel it will be in San Diego.

John Conniff: I know the Padres thought of putting him in the outfield after the Arizona League a few years ago but they just came to the conclusion that he is just too big to play out there. He’s never going to weigh around 260, which is the weight they thought he needed to be to play out there, so he’s going to be solely at first base. As we know the problem with that is Adrian Gonzalez is at first base so it’s hard to see him in San Diego — but you never know.

If you are just looking at him as a prospect, there are a few things that do concern me some in addition to his rather obvious attributes. One, his conditioning could be a little better and two, he tailed off in the second half, 1.019 OPS to .821. Finally there were pretty big differentials in some of his splits (.370 against lefties, .280 against righties and .317 at home, .287 on the road). San Antonio is a much tougher place to hit than Lake Elsinore, both from a competition and park standpoint. He’ll have his work cut out for him.

Ducksnorts: Headley took a huge jump forward on moving up to San Antone; what allowed him to do so, and can Blanks tap into some of that?

Savage: Headley is in a class by himself. John and I talked about this a lot at the end of the season and we felt he answered the questions we had on him — can he hit for more power? Can he become a more consistent right-handed hitter? Will the extra weight serve him well?

He answered each question with a resounding yes, and if you talk to Headley he was actually disappointed in how he ended the year. Unbelievable character — a guy everyone wants on their team.

Blanks is just a different sort of player for me. He has a more laid back approach, and I would like to see some meanness in him. Growl a little bit — he has the size to be an intimidator and can use that to his advantage. Use that and watch the walk totals rise and his power increase because of better pitch selection.

Conniff: Headley has gotten much stronger than when he first came into the system — he was around 190 lbs and now he’s a pretty solid 215-220 lbs — is part of it, and the other is in San Antonio he started looking to drive balls more when he was in hitter’s counts.

With Blanks I think it has to begin with his conditioning. Also he can become a little too selective looking for the perfect pitch. He may tap into that, but it’s also important to realize that Blanks had his biggest year in terms of power in the Cal League where he set personal records for home runs, extra base hits and slugging percentage.

I think the biggest numbers that people should focus on is what he does post-All Star break, which will indicate if he was serious about getting in shape.

Ducksnorts: Plate discipline is a huge concern right now for Yefri Carvajal. How realistic is it to expect that he’ll tighten up his strike zone as he moves up the ladder? If he does, what kind of player can he become?

Savage: This is sort of a misnomer. Carvajal has what I call “big eyes.” When he gets ahead in the count, he commits to swinging at just about anything instead of continuing his patient approach and waiting for a fastball in his hitting zone. Basically, he gets himself out as a result.

He made tremendous strides in the Padres Instructional League, winning MVP honors. A lot of that had to do with his improved pitch selection. He truly believes he can hit any pitch thrown and gets into bad habits because of it. In Instructs, he became a lot more aware of his own strengths and stuck to them in every count instead of becoming anxious and swinging for the fences.

Carvajal can be the best hitting prospect to come out of the Padres system in quite some time. He has raw power that rivals Blanks and Daryl Jones, has the ability to hit for a high average, has one of the best arms in the system, and profiles as a middle of the order bat that drives in a lot of runs.

If you get a chance, watching him bat is a treat. There is a distinct sound off his bat that only Nic Crosta matches in the system.

Conniff: He’ll have to tighten up his strike zone if he’s going to move up the ladder. His big problem is anything that isn’t a fastball; he has a tendency to chase. He’s very young, has a great deal of promise but is probably going to struggle at first in the Midwest League, which is just a brutal place to hit.

I haven’t seen him play in person yet as opposed to Denis, and I’ve heard he could be everything from another Kirby Puckett to Bill Madlock.

Ducksnorts: Among the prospects not currently in your top 10, which are most likely to be there next year, and why?

Savage: The first shoe-in, to me, is Drew Miller. Power arm that has developing secondary pitches. Injuries prevented him from making that leap last year, but I think a big year is coming.

Southpaw Corey Luebke had a plus fastball from the left side and understands pitch sequencing. He should benefit from time off and really blow the doors off the competition in 2008.

My sleeper is Rayner Contreras. This kid has a lot of talent packed into his strong, wiry frame. He has a chance to be special and injuries cost him some time last year. With solid protection around him, Contreras could excel this season.

Conniff: Two that come to mind are Drew Miller (#11) and Mitch Canham (#14). If Miller is healthy and develops his changeup he’s going to be pretty high. He didn’t have that great a year statistically in Fort Wayne, but when he was healthy he showed a lot of promise.

Canham is a tremendous athlete who is still learning how to play catcher; he was a third baseman in high school. Two things which will really speed his ascent are improving his defensive mechanics, especially his throws, and a few tweaks in his swing which should result in more power to go along with a good batting average and OBP.

Also as a sleeper I’ve always been a Craig Cooper fan, and to me he seems like he’s in about the same situation Chase Headley was last year, someone who hits for average and OBP, but needs more power.

Ducksnorts: As you note, there is very little margin for error with a guy like Josh Geer, and many pitchers with his profile have failed at the big-league level. What separates Geer from those pitchers?

Savage: Geer is the model of the Grady Fuson regime. He throws strikes, attacks hitters by using the corners, is not afraid to go inside, and uses all of his pitches to keep hitters off-balance.

The best Fuson quote of all time was in regard to Geer: “He’s the poster child for what 70 percent of the minor league pitchers need to be; ability to locate, disrupt batters timing, and compete.”

He succeeds because of the aforementioned attributes. His ceiling may not be as high but he legitimately gets the job done.

Conniff: The pitcher who reminds me of Geer on the major league level is Justin Germano and if he will succeed is a very open debate between myself and the former hockey goon (Denis) as demonstrated by our individual rankings (John #10 and Denis #30).

I think Geer can be better than Germano because his best pitch is what he throws the most, a sinker, that he can place anywhere he chooses.

Germano’s best pitches are a curve and change, but until this year when he began to throw a two-seam fastball (more of a sinker) instead of a four-seamer (faster but straighter), he had difficulty getting ahead in counts so he could throw his plus pitches. It’s still his worst pitch, but if his two-seamer is on, Justin will usually have a pretty good day.

Geer’s fastball/sinker’s velocity improved along with his change, and his slider is improving. His biggest asset according to his catchers, Colt Morton and Nick Hundley, is an almost uncanny ability to see things before they occur. Morton told me that he sat on the bench with Geer one night and Geer not only called what the opposing pitcher was going to throw beforehand but where the ball was going to end up. He has a great ability to throw pitches that batters aren’t expecting and keep hitters off balance.

As a reader and fan of Ducksnorts I know there are quite a few of you guys that are very comfortable with a wide variety of sabermetric projections and it’s tough to see someone like Geer having success on the major league level. I’m not sure if he will either, but I do think his best assets, intelligence and competitiveness, are hard to quantify and thus to project.

Guys like Geer are always going to have to put up numbers to get a chance and he should be able to do it again in Portland. It’s an overused phrase, but he does know how to pitch. Finally, as someone who has written that he would struggle in the California League and then the Texas League and was proved wrong each time; I’m getting tired of being beat.

Ducksnorts: Here’s hoping that Geer’s intangibles can make him the exception. Staying with pitchers, Aaron Breit had a miserable 2007, but you still like him quite a bit. How does his upside compare to that of Latos? How about his chances of reaching that upside?

Savage: One thing that often gets lost is what a kid is doing to get better — and the stats are deceiving in many ways. Breit changed his mechanics and instead of going back to his old ways, he stuck with the new way and broke through at the end of the year. His upside remains huge — not Latos-like, but more like Miller. His changeup is still too hard and his fastball hits the middle of the plate too often, but Breit can be a #2 or #3 at the big league level.

I don’t like giving “chances” when projecting a player. I prefer to use what he needs to work on and if he hits “these marks” he will reach that potential. Breit has things to work on — if he hits the marks he can reach his potential. I think we will find that once he does improve, he will begin to move fast. There is no doubt in my mind that he ends up in the majors.

Conniff: Well we liked him quite a bit last year too for the reason there just are not that many guys that have his size and ability to uncork mid-90s fastballs on a consistent basis. His biggest problem right now is strike zone command and learning that he has to do more than simply try to overpower hitters. His best month was his last, and Wally Whitehurst, his pitching coach at Fort Wayne, believes that he has turned the corner.

Ducksnorts: You have Cesar Ramos ranked #20. Who missed the cut because of him, and why?

Savage: The most unpopular decision John and I ever made — Will Inman.

When we first started this roundtable, I mentioned that nothing replaces what we see with our eyes. We saw Inman throw once — and we were not as impressed as we thought we should have been. His velocity was way down. His location wasn’t good. We expected to see more. We admitted it was a bit unfair to count one bad start against him, but it is all we had to go on. Even in a bad outing, certain traits of future success are evident. Inman didn’t have that this time around.

Having said that, I expect Inman to have a tremendous year in 2008. Very reliable people I have spoke with say he was a far different pitcher in the Milwaukee system, and they admit to being surprised at how different he appeared in the Texas League. Unfortunately, we could not weigh what he did in the Milwaukee system fairly without seeing him. Our steadfast rule has always been not to rank any player we have not seen. That is why Nick Schmidt only appears on our All-Injured team and not anywhere in the top 60. Inman will find it again. and we will be there to applaud his efforts.

Conniff: I think it would probably be Jared Wells, Will Venable or Will Inman. Although Wells did pitch well after being converted to the bullpen, there are still some questions about him as shown with his struggles in winter ball and really if he has the makeup to be a quality relief pitcher. There is much to like about Inman, but his numbers above A ball — especially his ERA — cause some concern along with the fact that he really doesn’t have a plus pitch. Venable didn’t have a bad season but doesn’t really have enough of a bat to play a corner outfield slot or enough of an arm to play anywhere other than left. He may be able to show some more power, but right now there are several better candidates, in our opinion, ahead of him.

Ducksnorts: I hope you’re right about Ramos. His numbers are pedestrian, and he didn’t impress me at all the couple times I’ve seen him, but we shall see.

Thanks again, guys, for stopping by and chatting Padres prospects with us!

Q&A with MadFriars.com, Part 1

I recently had the opportunity to chat with Denis Savage and John Conniff from MadFriars.com about their Padres prospect rankings for 2008. Sit back, relax, and enjoy!

Ducksnorts: You mention the challenges inherent in comparing players at different stages of development. What are some of the strategies you use to meet those challenges?

Denis Savage: I feel like Mia Wallace in “Pulp Fiction.” Good question, Vincent Vega!

There are a lot of factors that go into comparing, analyzing and ranking players. It is a combination of projection and stats — but one thing John and I have learned through the years is nothing beats watching a player live. By going to the field four hours prior to the game, we can see work habits, how they hustle when the lights are dim, and what they take into a game. It may seem minute, but pre-game workouts can define a player’s potential and ability to reach that potential.

There is also an eye for scouting involved. Is he flawed mechanically? Can he be taught properly? Does he have the makeup to take a lesson and stick with it, despite having struggles adjusting early on? The prospects who take instruction and have smaller tweaks to make can meet the projections quicker.

Then there is the raw projection. Simon Castro may not be ranked today in the top 20, but he has tremendous tools to be among those we see in the future. Think Jose Ceda — another raw kid who was traded to Chicago and will be in the majors this year.

On the stats side, John and I both weigh them a little more when a prospect is at a higher level in the system. At some point, you have to produce. That isn’t necessarily true in rookie ball but definitely true by the time a prospect is in Double-A. Age also plays a role, and future projection always has a place. There are so many little things we take into account that and blend together to make the most complete and honest analysis.

John Conniff: I think that is one reason, and it hurts my ego to write this, that the best rankings that we do are the ones that combine both Denis’ and my approaches. I tend to be more influenced by what a player is doing at a higher level while Denis places more emphasis on the potential of a player to become a game changer — however, the changes are much slighter than most people may believe.

To answer the question, we both put more emphasis on players that have performed at higher levels because they are closer to the majors; however, guys at the lower levels who have the potential to become a #1 pitcher, such as Mat Latos, or a top flight center fielder, such as Cedric Hunter, we will rank higher than someone as a Josh Geer — as long as there is some correlation between their actual potential and what they are doing on the field. This is especially true if they are significantly younger than their competition as were both Latos and Hunter this year.

Ducksnorts: These lists reflect a moment in time. Do they fluctuate during the season? If so, to what degree?

Savage: Yes and no. If a guy comes out gangbusters over the first half of the year, the natural tendency is to rank him higher. But, the entire season is the true merit of a successful season. If that same player bombs over the second half, what did he really accomplish? There are times when it is clear a prospect has made the strides necessary to move up, regardless of stats. I expect a couple of players missing from the list to be on it next year and some will inevitably fall off. It does, however, take a season of competition to truly regard each prospect on a level field.

Conniff: No, not really. We define Madfriars.com as a “webzine” in that our goal is to attempt to chronicle the Padres minor leagues during the season, which entails providing a write-up of every game in the minors, interviewing nearly everyone involved in the system. Outside of the rankings, which we do individually in November and then our official Madfriars.com ranking in March, we do a player of the month series and a player and pitcher of the year series for each level, and that is about it.

In short, we see ourselves more as reporters/journalists than pundits/gurus.

Chase HeadleyDucksnorts: You have Chase Headley ranked #1 in the system (as do most experts). What current big leaguers does he remind you of, in terms of physical attributes, style of play, the type of production you eventually expect from him, etc.?

Savage: He reminds a bit of Mike Lowell. Lowell was a kid who didn’t hit for a whole lot of power in the minors until he really blossomed in his final year in the minors, showing physical maturity at the same time. Headley has taken the same sort of path. We always knew he had some power but his body needed to catch up. That has happened over the last two years. Both have fantastic makeup and play the game the right way. That is a tremendous asset — and one reason why many believe he can make the transition to left field and still maintain a good average.

I expect him to keep his solid patience at the plate and contribute early on. The power may not be there but a full season of Headley will produce 20-plus homers and an annual flirtation with a .300 batting average to go along with a ton of doubles and solid on-base percentage. Eventually finding a home in the number three spot in the batting order would be ideal since he does so many things well.

Conniff: That is tough because Chase Headley right now is very different player than he was at Eugene and Lake Elsinore. As Kevin Goldstein said in an interview with us last week, I’m not sure many people really believed he would hit for the power that he did last year in San Antonio. The type of player that he could become on a MLB level ranges from Bill Mueller to Chipper Jones, but I do think his future is at third base as opposed to left field.

Ducksnorts: I keep thinking Jeff Cirillo, which is sort of between Mueller and Chipper. Moving on, you note that Mat Latos needs to refine his secondary pitches and learn how to become more of a pitcher. What sense do you get about his “coachability” from observing and talking to people within the organization?

Savage: Latos may be a clown off the field, but he has a switch he flips when he gets between the lines. This is a kid that scrapped a nasty splitter to go with a straight change. People have been writing that off, but it shows how much he believes in what he is being told and what he will do to succeed. When he picks up a ball, everything he does is centered around improving. He listens, fiddles with, and even lends his advice to other pitchers. He is a rare specimen.

There should be no doubt about his coachability. He has the aptitude, and I expect him to take a tremendous leap forward this year to what is already a very bright future.

Conniff: I took a second trip to San Antonio instead of Eugene this year, so Denis may be a better person to answer this question than me — but I will say this. In an interview with both Latos and his coach at Broward Country JC I was struck by how much pride he takes in the development of his secondary pitches and his fastball command. Remember, this is a 19-year-old that is 6’6″ 220 lbs and uncorks a mid-90s fastball with great ease, and he enjoys talking about the art of pitching and setting people up more than blowing people away.

His numbers indicate that he needs to improve his command within the strike zone a little better, but there is just so much to like about Latos — his size, command, the potential of his secondary pitches and most of all he is with San Diego.

Matt AntonelliDucksnorts: Matt Antonelli was drafted as a third baseman, then shifted to second base; now there is talk that he may get some looks in center field. Where do you envision him eventually playing, and how much offensive upside does he have?

Savage: I actually believe his future is in center, but it won’t be this year. This kid is one of the best athletes I have seen come through the system in some time. He has both the makeup and work ethic to successfully make the switch and be pretty good at it. Plus, there are quite a few middle infielder types that profile well at second base at some of the lower levels. I believe one of them forces Antonelli out there (Rayner Contreras, :cough:).

Antonelli provides a lot of things the Padres don’t have. Some speed at the top of the lineup and a guy who will get on base at a solid clip. The former hockey player (always have to get my plug in for hockey) is a .300 hitter waiting to happen with an on-base percentage that will be Brian Giles like (the good years). Plus, he has pop and will steal some bags. He really is a complete player.

Conniff: I have never believed that the Padres saw him as a center fielder. The only way I could see him going there is if [Tadahito] Iguchi had some incredible year, which I don’t see happening. Also Antonelli needs another year playing second full time and not being distracted by another position. The Padres in spring training the other day pretty much said the same thing, that he was going to be at second for the whole year.

Offensively I’m much more excited about him than I was [Josh] Barfield, and I liked Barfield. First and foremost he’s a guy that is going to get on base. Combine that with a near .500 slugging percentage and 28 stolen bases in 37 attempts last year, and the Padres are trying to get him to run more, I really like his value.

Cedric HunterDucksnorts: We both have Cedric Hunter ranked #4 (shameless plug: Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual). What adjustments does he need to make to fulfill his potential?

Savage: Listening and learning — that will come with maturity. There have been whispers that he does not take coaching well, believing he understands his game and what he needs to do to succeed. There is some evidence that this is true, but it may just be that Hunter is figuring out who he is as a 20-year-old. He will, of course, need to heed the advice of the staff and start applying it in games. Hunter really has a sweet swing and should see a lot of benefit from the 2007 season when breaking balls comprised his diet.

Conniff: First get better teammates. Some of the guys that he had playing with him this year — well, he may as well have had you, Denis and I in the lineup, which was about as much protection as he was getting except for the last month of the season when he put up his best numbers.

Seriously, his main thing that I saw was putting in the swing adjustments that he is able to use so well in batting practice into the games to allow him to drive the ball more. He isn’t someone that is going to hit that many home runs, but I do think he can put the ball into the gaps and he has some speed. He’s always had good strike zone judgment and to me he seems like a natural number two hitter. Defensively, he needs to bring a little better effort into the field on a consistent basis and his arm strength, which improved from last year, could be better.

He should be on a much better team in Lake Elsinore this year, with [Kellen] Kulbacki, [Mitch] Canham and some others joining the team from Eugene combined with a year of full-season ball behind him, he should put up some numbers this year.

We’ll finish up tomorrow, with a look at Kyle Blanks, Yefri Carvajal, and more…

I’ll Trade You Box Scores for a Time Machine

Actual games, eh? Nice.

The Padres lost on Friday and won on Saturday. Rookie Chase Headley, bidding for a spot in the San Diego outfield, homered and drove in four runs in the victory.

Be sure to read a lot into that. Hey, I like having box scores to look at again, but seriously, it’s March 2.

Randy Wolf had a “rough start” Saturday, throwing 30 pitches in the process. Friday’s starter, Shawn Estes, threw the same number in his outing.

Why is Estes a candidate for the #5 spot in the rotation? On a related note, has anyone invented a time machine yet? I was pretty good in 1997, too… at something, I’m sure.

Wolf was good this century, so he’s got that going for him.

Over in the Macedonian corner, Glenn Hoffman is working with Kevin Kouzmanoff to improve the young third baseman’s footwork and throwing motion. Observers rate Kouzmanoff below average defensively, while those who haven’t seen him play are even less kind.

Finally, happy birthday to ex-Padre Ron Gant, who turns 43 today. Gant played well in 2002, his only season in San Diego, hitting .262/.338/.489 over 353 plate appearances for a mostly forgettable squad that lost 96 games.

Gant is one of 19 big leaguers to score and drive in at least 1000 runs, hit 300 or more homers, and steal 200 or more bases. Other former Padres in this exclusive and arbitrary group include Steve Finley, Gary Sheffield, Joe Carter, and Dave Winfield.

And if you can get yourself into company with a group that includes Sheffield and Carter… then we probably need to come up with a better grouping system, because one of those guys is a great hitter, while the other just drove in a lot of runs.

Speaking of which, Carter was still active the last time Estes had a good season. And that, my friends, is about as relevant as yesterday’s box score.

OT: San Diego Blogger MeetUp

One of my goals for Ducksnorts in 2008 is to become more involved in the community. Not just the baseball community, where we’ve been active over the past several years, but right here in San Diego as well.

That’s why I’m donating a portion of the proceeds from book sales this year to the San Diego Red Cross. It’s also why I’ve taken to participating in the San Diego Special Edition blog carnival and attending the San Diego Blogger MeetUp.

Sponsored by Matt Browne, and held at Cafe Bassam, the meetup provides a great opportunity for local bloggers to get out of the basement and connect with like-minded folks. I chatted with several talented people from outside my niche (some are even Padres fans!) about writing, time management, industry trends, and more.

We had a great turnout, which unfortunately meant that I didn’t get a chance to speak with everyone. Some of the folks I did meet include Tony Balsamo, Kris Berg, Richie Edquid, Jessica McKimmie, Carole Lane (thanks for the book promotion tips!), and Jennifer Van Grove.

This is a monthly occurrence, so if you’re a blogger here in town or you’re thinking of becoming one, I’d highly recommend heading over to the San Diego Blogger MeetUp site and signing up for the next one. Hope to see you there…

Friday Links (29 Feb 08)

Happy Leap Day. If you haven’t participated in the Opening Day Roster contest, what’s up with that? The winner receives a copy of the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual.

Meanwhile, we’ve got links:

  • SI.com reports that Brian Giles is feeling good. So is his surgically repaired right knee. [Kevin]
  • John Walsh at Hardball Times is searching for baseball’s best pitch. The fastballs of Heath Bell, Chris Young, and Jake Peavy get some love, as do the slider of Peavy and Young (!). [Masticore317]
  • Rich, Sully, and friends are doing their annual Two on Two over at Baseball Analysts. As always, their commentary makes for an entertaining read, and this year’s take on the NL West is no exception. The gem here comes from Rich:

    See I believe San Diego’s offense is nearly as underrated as the pitching is overrated. The infielders can flat out hit. Adrian Gonzalez is perhaps the most under appreciated hitter in the league. He blistered the ball on the road (.295/.358/.570 with 20 HR) and during the second half (.302/.356/.538). Kevin Kouzmanoff improved his OPS from .673 in the first half to .890 in the second half. While a liability in the field, Kouz should rank as one of the best offensive third basemen in the NL this season. Khalil Greene has been needlessly dissed for far too long. Throughout his career, the four-year veteran has hit .228/.288/.370 at home and .280/.335/.515 on the road.

    Whoa, enough of the crazy talk. Someone should write a book with this sort of thing in it. And people should buy that book. Lots of copies, even. [Jim Parish]

  • Baseball America has released its list of Top 100 prospects for 2008. Two Padres are represented: Chase Headley at #32 and Matt Antonelli at #50. [Tom Waits]
  • According to the U-T, Paul McAnulty is getting some work at third base again this spring. Further down, there’s a little blurb on first-base prospect Kyle Blanks, who homered at Petco Park when the Storm played a game there last summer. Punch line: That was Blanks’ first trip to a big-league ballpark. [LynchMob]
  • Jason at sdpadrefan.com examines the spring training position battles. He likes Tim Stauffer as the #5 starter. Gutsy call there.
  • John Sickels compares Padres right-hander Mat Latos and Angels right-hander Jordan Walden. Speaking of gutsy calls, Sickels rates Latos as the 46th best prospect in all of baseball. [LynchMob]
  • Tim Sullivan at the U-T talks about Chris Young’s desire to make greater use of his change-up this year. That’s great, but what interests me is this tidbit from GM Kevin Towers:

    At the A-ball levels, that is the one pitch that we’re adamant about our pitchers learning. It is truly the equalizer. There are pitchers in the major leagues who have a below-average breaking ball — (Greg) Maddux — who win on fastball command and a change-up.

    It’s a difference-maker. Guys who are able to throw a change-up in the big leagues and command their fastball can be successful with those two pitches.

    This shouldn’t surprise anyone who follows the Padres and their emphasis on disrupting a hitter’s timing. I wonder if other organizations are as aggressive about teaching their young pitchers to change speeds? [Phantom]

  • Rookie left-hander Wade LeBlanc is being mentioned as a darkhorse candidate for the #5 spot. You guessed it, he’s got a killer change-up.
  • The guys at MadFriars chat with Matt Eddy, who wrote the chapter on the Padres in this year’s Baseball America Prospect Handbook. Speaking of the MadFriars, I’ve got a Q&A with Denis and John scheduled to run early next week. You won’t want to miss that.
  • Herija Green at Bugs and Cranks thinks the Padres are a “fourth-place” team. How original.
  • Someone in Chicago doesn’t hate Mark Prior. Presumably he’ll be run out of town as well.
  • Don’t look now, but the Padres have a tough interleague schedule. We’ll see what impact this has on the race.
  • Former Padres shortstop Bill Almon has been nominated for the College Baseball Hall of Fame. Almon was the first pick overall in the 1974 draft, when the Padres took him ahead of Dale Murphy (#5), Garry Templeton (#13), and Lance Parrish (#16), among many others.
  • Tom Krasovic at the U-T takes a good look a the Padres left field situation. Krasovic gets extra bonus points for working in a Bill James reference.
  • I’m rooting for Jody Gerut to make the club. From a recent U-T article:

    Gerut majored in history at Stanford, with an emphasis on Russian history in the 20th century. “My thesis was on Soviet patent law, which is a contradiction in terms.”

    I’m pretty sure “expertise in Soviet patent law” qualifies as an intangible.

  • Brock for Broglio interviews Tom Tango. Closer to home, MB at Friar Forecast chats with Padres front office staffer Chris Long. Good stuff.

Catch even more links at del.icio.us.

Enter the contest.

Buy the book.

Dup dor a’az Mubster.

Contest: Guess the Padres’ 2008 Opening Day Roster

In honor of the Padres’ first Cactus League game (a charity event against the Mariners @ 12:05 p.m. PT, XM 180), and to celebrate the release of the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual, it’s time for the second annual Ducksnorts “Guess the Padres’ Opening Day Roster” contest. Here’s how it works:

  • Submit your guess via the handy contact form or leave it in the comments. Identify the 25 players you think will break camp with the big club.
  • Include the name of the player you think will score the Padres’ first run of the 2008 season; this will be used in the event of a tie. If the tie still cannot be broken, my wife will pick names from a hat. I know it’s not the most scientific method, but I want to keep this simple and get as many people involved as possible.
  • Entries are due by Sunday, March 9, 2008, 11:59 p.m. PT. There is no fee; anyone is welcome to play. One submission per person, please.
  • Results will be tabulated on opening day; whoever gets the highest percentage of correct names wins a copy of the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual.
  • I’ll be participating for fun. If I should win, the book goes to our first runner-up.

Any questions? If not, start sending your guesses and we’ll go from there. Have fun, and good luck!

Surrender

Our name was going to be “Drop” — something to do with Madonna dropping a baby, I think; I never asked — but this is when every band in San Diego had a one-word name, so we went with “Ten Ton Pug” instead. Then every band in San Diego had a three-word name, and we were hosed.

Our singer had photocopied a movie poster for Attack of the 50 Foot Woman and superimposed a photo of a pug onto it. He was slick that way, and I used to run his artwork in the zine I published back then.

So, the 50 Foot Woman’s pug weighed, you guessed it, ten tons. I think technically he was her “Wonderpug Snookie,” but you can’t really call a band “Wonderpug Snookie.”

I dunno, maybe you can. Maybe we should have, but we didn’t. Our singer wrote lyrics about people suffering from AIDS, I quoted the Tao Te Ching. Yeah, we were totally connected.

Nobody cared. We were young and dabbling at disaffection. We ate unbalanced meals, sat on cliffs overlooking the beach, and lamented things we thought we understood.

We had no clue.

I’ve told you about our first show (although now I’m thinking it may have been at Granny’s, and not the Boiler Room). After I bought the Marshall, we landed a gig up at a place called Surf ‘N’ Saddle in Solana Beach. It’s still there, though I haven’t been inside since we played.

Some friends made promotional fliers, which riffed on Spinal Tap — a quote from “Sex Farm Woman,” as I recall. We showed up at the appointed time and watched workers pull apart the floor in front of the stage.

We set up our equipment. My mid-’70s Gibson Les Paul Studio and the spankin’ new Marshall, complete with Lt. Commander Data action figure on top for good luck, maybe some Mardi Gras beads. Basically whatever I could find that seemed like it might bring good luck.

Then the workers left. We didn’t know if they had gone on break or were done for the night. Either way, they’d left stacks of linoleum between us and the stage.

Someone asked the bartender what was going on, but he seemed as enlightened as we were, which is to say not at all. We stood around and stared at each other, wondering what to do. Our friends drank. I got quiet, because I always got quiet before a show, and turned to the television in the corner.

The Padres were playing the Rockies at Coors Field. Bob Tewksbury worked six strong innings and left with a 9-2 lead. Then this happened:

Bryce Florie pitching:

  • Vinny Castilla, groundout
  • Andres Galarraga, hit by pitch
  • Jayhawk Owens, single
  • Quinton McCracken, single

Ron Villone pitching:

  • John VanderWal, single
  • Eric Young, walk
  • Walt Weiss, single

Willie Blair pitching:

  • Ellis Burks, double
  • Dante Bichette, intentional walk
  • Castilla, grand slam
  • Galarraga, hit by pitch

Glenn Dishman pitching:

  • Owens, single
  • McCracken, flyball
  • VanderWal, walk

Tim Worrell pitching:

  • Young, single
  • Weiss, strikeout

The Rockies sent 16 men to the plate, and 11 of them scored. They now held a 13-9 lead.

Scott Livingstone launched a three-run homer in the top of the ninth to make it close, but the Padres lost, 13-12. I’m assuming we took the stage sometime between Villone’s outing and Blair’s, because I distinctly recall being infuriated with the former but not the latter.

The only other thing I remember from that night is that we played Cheap Trick’s “Surrender.” By the time we got to the last verse, I’d pretty well figured out what had happened to this season’s losers of the year…

I’ve Got Nothing

I’m fried. We still have a few openings in the second Ducksnorts fantasy league. Let me know if you’re interested and I’ll send an invite. [Update: All spots have been filled. Thanks to everyone who expressed an interest and sorry we couldn't squeeze more of you in here.] Otherwise, feel free to talk about whatever and be excellent to one another. Oh yeah, buy the book.