I’m a little behind in my links, so some of these might be oldish. Hey, better late than never…
- Organization free of bad contracts and long-term financial obligations (San Diego Union-Tribune). Good stuff from Tom Krasovic:
The Padres certainly are familiar with toxic player contracts… The low-revenue Marlins and Twins almost never made such mistakes, but the mid-revenue Padres, compromised by an underachieving farm system and ballpark construction delays, made a habit of it.
If anyone wonders why I remain optimistic about the Padres during these challenging times, it’s because they don’t shoot themselves in the foot as often as they once did.
- Top 50 Prospects for 2009. MLB.com unveils its top 50 prospects for 2009. The Padres’ Kyle Blanks checks in at #47. Nice to see folks finally getting wise to the big kid from New Mexico.
- San Diego Padres Top-15 Prospects of 2009, No’s 1 – 5. Alex Eisenberg at Baseball Intellect has posted his Padres top 15 prospects. He’s got Kellen Kulbacki at #1, which is a gutsy call. I adore Kulbacki, but I couldn’t bring myself to push him ahead of Kyle Blanks. Alex’s 6 – 15 can be found here. I like that he hasn’t given up on Matt Antonelli. Smart move. [h/t Steve C]
- The THT interview: Terry Kennedy. Steve Treder chats with the former former Padres catcher.
- Golden Baseball League Makes Rickey Henderson $1M Hall of Fame Offer. This is awesome. I loved watching Rickey play for the Padres and the Surf Dawgs. [h/t Gaslamp Ball]
Khalil Greene Trade Reaction
- Enigmatic shortstop appears to be a victim of his lofty ambitions (SDUT). Tim Sullivan pens a nice piece on Khalil Greene. Quoth Greene’s former skipper, Bud Black: “I wish he would let go and enjoy how good he is. But for whatever reason, he can’t do it.”
- Greene acknowledges feeling frustration at letting the team down. Khalil Greene, as quoted in the U-T: “I felt like I let the team down and wasn’t doing what I needed to do, and that was hard.”
- Trade will be Judged on Greene’s Ability to Bounce Back (There are Better Deals in August). Daniel offers his take.
- Scout.com: Greene ships sails a year late. Is it safe to say that Denis Savage is no great fan of Khalil Greene? Yes, I believe it is.
From the Ducksnorts Archives
- Why the Rumored Nevin for Griffey Deal Made No Sense
This was in December 2002. Just for the record, here’s how Griffey and another outfielder the Padres actually acquired have fared from 2003 to 2008:
Brian Giles vs Ken Griffey Jr., 2003 – 2008 PA BA OBP SLG OPS+ $M Statistics are courtesy of Baseball-Reference. Brian Giles 3915 .287 .393 .456 128 53.5 Ken Griffey Jr. 2774 .267 .355 .503 119 64.7 Yeah, I know Giles didn’t come to San Diego till the end of ’03 (and neither did they pay most of his salary that year), but you get the idea. Be sure to thank Phil Nevin for exercising his veto power on that one.
New/Updated Blogs in the Blogroll
Go say hi to these folks:
- TinCaps Blog. The Fort Wayne Wizards are now the Fort Wayne TinCaps, and Lamond Pope has them covered.
- Raise the Jolly Roger!. It’s all about the Pirates. Aargh!
- BaseballGB. This site describes itself as a “hub for the best British baseball writing.” I know we’ve got readers here from all over the world, and it’s always great to see folks catch baseball fever regardless of geographic location. Plus, they have really good beer over there; helps make up for the food, I suppose.
That’s the fact, Jack. More links are available at the Ducksnorts delicious page, which I update as often as practical.
Cheeseburger in Purgatory
by Geoff Young on Dec 12, 2008 (31) Comments
Jake Peavy isn’t going to the Cubs… for now. And just when I was starting to like the names being mentioned. Did you notice how the rumored packages went from being awful, to decent, to pretty good? At the very least, Kevin Towers deserves credit for not jumping on any old deal, like some folks seemed to assume he would. (Of course, it’s his job to refrain from making lousy trades, so how much credit he deserves is open to debate.)
Still, we’re left with the question: Now what? Well, holding onto Peavy remains an option. Actually, given his lack of potential suitors and questionable desire to accept a trade, it remains a pretty likely option.
The downside is that if the Padres really trim their 2009 payroll to $40 million, then 27.5% of that is tied up in one player. For a little perspective, consider that the Yankees had a payroll last year of roughly $209 million. If they were to pay one guy as much as the Padres will pay Peavy this year proportional to total outlay, the pricetag would be $57.4 million. The Yankees’ most expensive player, Alex Rodriguez, made $27 million in 2008.
Yes, you read that right. If the Padres are at $40 million next year, Peavy at his current price will cost double, proportional to overall payroll, what A-Rod cost the Yankees last year. Is Peavy worth more than twice as much as the highest paid player in baseball? To a team that is coming off a 99-loss season?
More importantly, will the Padres be able to compete with Peavy still on the roster? Ironically, he may actually hurt their chances because the team is now limited in the other moves it can make to shore up holes (and you may have noticed there are a few). When soon-to-be-42-year-old Omar Vizquel is mentioned as a possible replacement for Khalil Greene at shortstop and a 21-year-old who played in Low-A last year is plucked in the Rule V draft (comparisons to Rafael Furcal are fun; comparisons to Donaldo Mendez, not so much), it’s hardly cause for celebration.
Meanwhile, the ownership situation continues to be murkier than Mission Bay after a heavy rain. I keep telling myself that I should be upset by all of this, but instead I just find it fascinating. Like, how much worse can the situation get? And the answer is none. None more worse.
(Incidentally, the comments in that last linked article are hilarious. I considered joining the discussion but balked at the clause in the Terms and Conditions that requires users to “acknowledge that I am a complete moron and agree to clutter this space with words and thoughts that only other morons will understand and appreciate.” I just couldn’t abide by that. Fortunately they don’t seem to need my help.)
So where does this leave us? Pretty much the same place we were before the Winter Meetings — too much money tied up into one (very talented) player who doesn’t want to be traded and whom nobody is anxious to acquire, too many holes elsewhere that will be difficult to fill without funds, and an ownership divided.
Really, with this kind of excitement, who even needs a season?