Jake Peavy
The line from Peavy’s start Saturday night looks okay, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. Although he allowed just one run over six innings, Peavy was working out of jams most of the game. He didn’t dominate the way he has much of the past two seasons. In fact, we haven’t really seen vintage Peavy yet in 2006. It’s only seven starts, so way too early to panic, but check this out:
Year | H/9 | K/9 | P/PA |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | 7.90 | 9.36 | 3.87 |
2005 | 7.18 | 9.58 | 3.89 |
2006 | 8.74 | 6.15 | 4.32 |
One of the problems is that he hasn’t been missing as many bats as in the past. I first noticed this in his April 25 start against Arizona, where hitters were fouling off pitches like crazy. Usually guys wouldn’t even be making contact on a lot of those. Note the number of pitches per plate appearance in the above table.
Again, beware of the small sample size. We’re not making conclusions yet, just tracking a trend. Peavy apparently has been working with pitching coach Darren Balsley on smoothing out his delivery, so hopefully that will pay dividends. If you’re looking for optimism along those lines, you could do worse than recall that Peavy and Balsley have been working together since both were at Class A Lake Elsinore in 2001.
Woody Williams
I have to admit, I didn’t think Williams had anything left in him. It’s unreasonable to expect a guy to bounce back like this at age 39, but there he is doing it.
In Sunday’s start against Chicago, Williams struggled early, allowing three runs on six hits over the first four innings. But he finished strong, blanking the Cubs over the final four frames on just two hits.
Williams is starting to mix in the knuckleball a bit more. And although Aramis Ramirez hammered an errant knuckler into the left field bleachers on Sunday, Williams also struck out Todd Walker on the pitch. It isn’t a show-stopper, but the knuckleball can be an effective weapon for Williams, and it’s fun to see him gaining confidence in his ability to throw it.
Rob Bowen
I am still baffled by the fact that teams exposed this guy to waivers. I’ve liked Bowen for a while, but the early returns are even better than I’d expected. He looks like a good handler of pitchers, and so far he’s delivered quality at-bats.
We know about the walk-off homer to win Saturday night’s game, but he hit a ball even harder in his previous at-bat when he flied out to center in the seventh. And then on Sunday, Bowen drew a walk in his first trip to the plate after falling behind in the count, 0-2. He beat out a chopper to third his second time up (showing surprisingly good wheels), and then doubled deep into the gap in right-center before finally being retired in his final plate appearance.
It amazes me that something of value has to be given to get a stiff like Doug Mirabelli, but that a kid like Bowen can be plucked off the waiver wire. Hey, we’ll take it.
Josh Barfield
Yes, the plate discipline is an issue. We’ve known that for a long time. But the defense is better than advertised, and Barfield is doing some things that aren’t showing up in the box score (pardon the cliche, but in this case it’s true):
On Friday night Barfield drove in the game’s only run on a single to center in the 11th inning. The part I like (aside from winning the game, of course) is what Barfield said afterward about his at-bat against Cubs reliever Scott Williamson:
He was throwing that slider. It was his best pitch. I was looking for the slider.
Tim Flannery was going nuts over this on the postgame show, and I think with good reason. It doesn’t seem like a lot of rookies would (a) have the awareness to know what Williamson’s best pitch is and (b) have the confidence to sit on something other than a fastball in that situation. It’s only one at-bat, I know, but damn.
The other thing Barfield did that impressed me happened in Sunday’s contest. In the top of the first, with Dave Roberts on second, Barfield lined a single to right. Right fielder Jacque Jones airmailed a throw home (BTW, if it isn’t already, the book on Cubs outfielders should be to run early and often against them). Barfield correctly read that it would miss the cutoff man and easily cruised into second. Then, after a Brian Giles sacrifice fly scored Roberts, Barfield scampered to third on a passed ball that didn’t get more than 10-15 feet away from Cubs catcher Michael Barrett.
I have been so impressed with Barfield’s presence out on the field. Sure, he’s got things to work on, but he’s also got things to work with. And if the progress he’s made defensively at second over the years is any indication, Barfield is capable of improving as needed.
Khalil Greene
The batting average is low (.226 after going 4-for-4 on Sunday), and he’s striking out a lot. But I believe that Greene’s more patient approach at the plate will pay dividends in the long run, as he starts to drive more of the good pitches he sees as a result of working the count.
The first step was to make pitchers work harder, and he appears to have mastered that. His 4.22 pitches per plate appearances is good for eighth in the NL, ahead of guys like Jason Bay, Albert Pujols, J.D. Drew, Miguel Cabrera, Luis Gonzalez, and others. It’s also well above the 3.75 pitches per plate appearance Greene saw in 2004 and 2005.
We’re seeing an increase in walks (17 in just 30 games this year vs 25 in 121 last year) and walks per plate apparance (.138 in 2006, up from .053 in 2005). But we’ve also seen a lot more full counts to Greene. Last season he worked the count full just 41 times (.086 per PA); so far this season he’s done it 25 times (.203 per PA). That’s greater than the difference between Mike Matheny (.083 full counts per PA over 2003-2005) and Jim Thome (.187 over the same stretch).
Phase two of the strategy involves making solid contact after working the count in his favor. Greene hasn’t been doing that with consistency yet, although he doubled twice and singled twice in four at-bats on Sunday. Both doubles, incidentally, came close to leaving the yard.
The bad news is that Greene has more strikeouts (26) than hits (24) this year. The good news is that despite a batting average that is 30 points below his career norm, his OPS is just about the same as always. This suggests that if he continues with a more disciplined approach and is able to make more consistent contact, Greene should be able to return to 2004 levels or possibly exceed them.
If Greene can add a new dimension to his offensive game without losing anything from what he’s already got, he could be a force. It’s still early, and he hasn’t done it yet, but I’m excited about the possibility. If nothing else, it’s fun to watch him spit on “decent” pitches in the knowledge that he’ll probably get a better one to hit later in the at-bat. Guys still can be aggressive at the plate, they just need to make the pitcher work a little before unloading.
Recent Comments