IGD: Padres @ Cubs (15 May 08)

Thu, May 15, 2008Ballhype: hype it up!
by Geoff Young

Greg MadduxPadres (15-26) @ Cubs (24-16)
Greg Maddux vs Ryan Dempster
11:20 a.m. PT
no television
AM 1090, FM 105.7, XM 183
MLB, B-R

The Padres showed some good fight at the end of Wednesday evening’s game. Unfortunately they spent much of the early part digging themselves into a deep, dark hole. Still, I liked the matchup of Brian Giles against Kerry Wood with the bases juiced in the ninth. Too bad it didn’t work out for us this time. Oh well, we turn the page…

* * *
The Cubs have signed Jim Edmonds and he will be in uniform for Thursday’s game. He looks as done as anyone this side of David Wells, but maybe it was just a matter of coming back from injury too soon. With the Padres’ luck, Edmonds will return to 2004 form and cause us all to second guess our second guessing…

Love the blog? Buy the book!
The Ducksnorts 2009 Baseball Annual provides the most comprehensive analysis of and commentary on the San Diego Padres available anywhere... featuring a foreword by Padres Executive Vice President Paul DePodesta.

Possibly Related Posts

188 Responses to “IGD: Padres @ Cubs (15 May 08)”

  1. JP Says:

    Nothing at all wrong with a split against the red hot Cubbies. I like the way this team has been swinging the bats lately —I’ll be watching this game, cheering when good things happen and complaining on the Ducksnorts Blog if things unravel.

    Current score: 0
  2. Phantom Says:

    Can anyone else think of a reason that Luke Carlin shouldn’t be getting the majority of starts right now? Bard seems really burned out to me. I didn’t see the pitch that K’ed Lilly but got by Bard, but was it catchable? Would Carlin have gotten it?

    Current score: 0
  3. JP Says:

    #2@Phantom: Crucial play in the game too. Cost the Padres 3 runs. Bob Brenly (the Cubs TV guy and former ML catcher) said that Bard should have had it, commenting that Bard’s effort to stop it was “lackadaisical”

    Current score: 0
  4. Phantom Says:

    #3@JP: Interesting that even the Cubs announcer would hang it on Bard like that. I’ve been incredibly impressed with Carlin and would love to see him get the majority of the starts for a while. It’s not like Bard is setting the world on fire with his bat right now.

    Current score: 0
  5. PM Says:

    Whats with all the trade Maddox rumors? Who would replace him in the rotation. Estes had a nice start but can he be consistent. The pitching staff is the one area thats working for the Pads, to trade Mad Dog would hurt our chances even more then the slow start.

    Current score: 0
  6. Ryan Says:

    I had the good luck to be at the game last night at Wrigley. My hands are still numb this morning from the cold but - putting aside that the Padres came up on the short end - it was an entertaning game.

    As mentioned in earlier comments the Bard mishap was the key play of the game but I was wondering what people thought about Black’s decision to pinch hit for Peavy in the top of the 5th. Seemed a dubious decision to me at the time, for one because Peavy was only at 83 pitches (and had pretty good stuff other than a few mistakes to Soriano and Fukudome), and also because, as was borne out, the Padres didn’t have the group of relievers capable of holding the Cubs scoreless over the five remaining innings.

    What did others think?

    Current score: 0
  7. LynchMob Says:

    #5@PM: I believe Maddux trade value is at a “local maximum” … in other words, my guess for the thinking behind the trade rumors (which doesn’t necessarily mean it’s what the Padres are thinking) is that Maddux is worth a decent prospect now … but is at risk for putting up a few bummer starts which would reduce his percieved trade value … so the “conventional wisdom” (from folks who don’t care about “human factors” nor about what state it leaves the Padres team in) would be to “trade him now” …

    In this case, I’m inclined to go along with this line of thinking … assuming they can get a “prospect” in return that will play for the Padres in 2009 …

    Current score: 0
  8. Steve C Says:

    #5@PM: I think the rumors are coming from the Braves and Cubs more than the Pads. If the Pads continue to be 10 games out at the ASB both of those teams prob think that they will be able to get him on the cheap.

    Current score: 0
  9. LynchMob Says:

    #6@Ryan: I’ve chastised Bud for staying with his starters too long … so I’m not going to put him into a “can’t win” situation …

    I was not watching nor following the game real-time last night … perhaps the cold weather factored into the decision also …

    Current score: 0
  10. LynchMob Says:

    #8@Steve C: Either that or KT is making it look that way … trying to get the Cubs and Braves to bid up Maddux’ trade value ;-)

    Current score: 0
  11. Phantom Says:

    #6@Ryan: I wasn’t able to see the game last night, so I can’t speak to Peavy’s stuff. I think taking him out there isn’t the worst decision in the world as Ledezma has in general pitched fairly well.

    As others have noted, it appears that the pitch to Lilly pretty much changed the entire game. So it was a makeable play?

    Current score: 0
  12. Steve C Says:

    #10@LynchMob: I dont know if they trade Maddux at this point then we know that they have given up on the season. The would have a rotation of Peavy, Young, Wolf, Estes and Germano.

    Current score: 0
  13. Field39 Says:

    #5@PM: Trading Maddux is the white flag going up on the season. Who you replace him with is not nearly, as important as the prospect you get in return.

    Current score: 0
  14. Tom Waits Says:

    Another Hayhurst diary:

    http://tinyurl.com/6g8at3

    Current score: 0
  15. PM Says:

    10.5 out and the worst record in the majors. Padres don’t seem that bad lately, but the numbers don’t lie. Maybe trading Maddox is a good move if out standing doesn’t improve by June 1st.

    Didn’t see the Bard play but if his hitting is a none factor (I think it is) and the other guy can throw out guys, seems a no brainer. I recall Bochy always playing the team he thought he could win with. Black seems to have another agenda at times.

    Edmunds and Petco are a bad match. He might enjoy Wrigly a wee bit more. I know he’s enjoying that 4 million we are paying him.

    Current score: 0
  16. PM Says:

    That is $153,846 a paycheck, BTW, plus what the Cubs are paying.

    I feel small and insignificant at this moment.

    Current score: 0
  17. Pat Says:

    #3@JP: I could care less what Bob Brenly has to say about anything.

    Current score: 0
  18. Tom Waits Says:

    Dirk Hayhurst has another diary up at Baseball America Dot Com.

    Current score: 0
  19. Steve C Says:

    #18@Tom Waits: can you post the link tom?

    Current score: 0
  20. Tom Waits Says:

    #19@Steve C: I tried. Even as a tinyurl, the filter ate it.

    It’s right on the front page, titled “Working 9 to 5.”

    Current score: 0
  21. Geoff Young Says:

    #20@Tom Waits: Thanks for the heads-up, got it! (See #14.)

    Current score: 0
  22. Steve C Says:

    #18@Steve C: n/m I found it:

    http://www.baseballamerica.com.....66115.html

    Current score: 0
  23. Geoff B Says:

    #4@Phantom: Peavy was wild last nite. Don’t just blame Bard. I still don’t understand why the Pads don’t bring up Hundley instead of Carlin and Morton.

    Current score: 0
  24. Steve C Says:

    #20@Tom Waits: Wow TW GY’s spam filter must have your IP adress flagged or somthing.

    Current score: 0
  25. Phantom Says:

    #21@Geoff Young: Good lord. I can so completely sympathize with the Black Friday madness. After having worked in MiLB for about a month and a half now, I definitely can give voice to how little those guys make and how much they appreciate the little gestures like passing the hat.

    Current score: 0
  26. Geoff Young Says:

    #24@Steve C: The thing gets wonky every now and then. I know this isn’t what you were saying, but just to be crystal clear, it’s never anything personal. Continue to let me know when stuff gets eaten and I’ll restore the missing comments asap. Thanks! :-)

    #25@Phantom: It’s kind of insane. Always drop something in the hat, seriously.

    Current score: 0
  27. LynchMob Says:

    #16@PM: PM, it’s my understanding that in situations like Edmonds’, teams like the Cubs will pay him major-league-minimum, and that ammount will be deducted from what the Padres owe him, by contract. Anyone know for sure?

    Here’s a view of the Edmonds signing and how they expect to use him from the Cubs POV …

    http://tinyurl.com/4zkzqz

    … part time player who has to earn a job? Why didn’t the Padres think of that? (j/k)

    Current score: 0
  28. Tom Waits Says:

    #26@Geoff Young: Oh no, THIS TIME IT’S PERSONAL!

    Current score: 0
  29. Geoff Young Says:

    #28@Tom Waits: Oh yeah, I meant except in your case. ;-)

    Current score: 0
  30. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #9@LynchMob: Why not? You can chastise him for pulling a guy at 4 as well as leaving someone in through 6.2. There is a happy median, its called 5 or 6. You dont pull your ace when he had a bit of bad luck and had the only hit in the game and struck out 8 through 4 innings. Have him lay a bunt down with no outs if you want, but let him pitch at least 5. His start wasnt that bad.

    Current score: 0
  31. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #11@Phantom: You can watch the play on mlb.com i think, its hard to tell if it was a makable play it looked like a very hard biting slider in the dirt that bounced away from him. i dont know if it was lackadaisical or if it was even makable.

    Current score: 0
  32. KRS1 Says:

    #23@Geoff B:

    Because they want Hundley to play everyday and get better. He isn’t likely to do either of those here.

    Current score: 0
  33. Tom Waits Says:

    #30@SDSUBaseball: Ledezma had been throwing well recently, and while Jake has looked good at the plate this year, he’s never going to hit as well as almost any position player. Down 4-0, that’s a good decision. It just didn’t work out. Jake gave up 7 hits. He wasn’t only unlucky.

    Current score: 0
  34. Tom Waits Says:

    And here we go with the getaway-day swings.

    Current score: 0
  35. Coronado Mike Says:

    Interesting…Soriano gets an off-speed pitch, breaking back over the plate to start the game and he still gets a solid, up the middle base hit…really, how do you pitch this guy?

    And nice Ham-n-Eggs infield.

    Current score: 0
  36. Coronado Mike Says:

    What was that, 4 pitches?

    Nice work Mad Dog

    Current score: 0
  37. Field39 Says:

    A four pitch inning for Maddux. nice

    Current score: 0
  38. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #27@LynchMob: Apparently he didnt have to earn his job. He is starting today

    Current score: 0
  39. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #33@Tom Waits: No its not a good decision. Not in the 4th inning. Ledezma had been throwing well but the cubs line-up eats up lefties. I dont see anything right about that decision. He gave up 7 hits, but he also struck out 8. You have to have more confidence in your ace than that. In my opinion it was just another poor decision by bud this year. If peavy bunts, thats a more productive out than Edgar made. If your going to pinch hit for Jake at least pinch hit with a better hitter than Jake.

    Current score: 0
  40. Field39 Says:

    I wanted to listen to some of the game on the radio, during lunch. It might be over by then.

    Current score: 0
  41. SDSUBaseball Says:

    16 pitches through 2 innings for Dempster.

    Current score: 0
  42. Tom Waits Says:

    “Ace” is just a word that doesn’t reflect how a pitcher is throwing on any one night. Jake had been struggling all night with his command. He’d already thrown 87 pitches. Minimizing a scoring opportunity when you’re down 4 on the road would be bad. All to get 1 more inning out of him? Why not “you’ve got to have more confidence in your bullpen than that?” Makes just as much sense.

    The hypothetical Peavy bunt wouldn’t have done anything. Both Bard and Huber scored anyway.

    If Gonzalez hits a HR, which he’s far more likely to do than Jake, we’re within one run. If he gets on, which he’s also more likely to do, we might have come out of that inning tied or ahead.

    If you really think that Jake is a better hitter than Edgar Gonzalez, then we should just stop talking about this.

    Current score: 0
  43. Phantom Says:

    Nice strategy on the Wild Pitch for Maddux.

    Current score: 0
  44. Coronado Mike Says:

    I will take a WP bounce like that.

    Edmonds wrapping a single in his first AB as a Cub…gotta love/hate it. I hope Maddux picks him off.

    Current score: 0
  45. Tom Waits Says:

    #43@Phantom: I figured something odd was happening, since GameDay was idle for so long.

    Current score: 0
  46. Coronado Mike Says:

    Are any of you hearing the story about Maddux warming up?

    When he warms up, he often throws 10 or 15 pitches against a side wall, trying to make them bounce back to the catcher as a strike…it is not challenging enough to just throw normal strikes, he has to practice bouncing them off the wall too.

    Current score: 0
  47. Coronado Mike Says:

    GERUT WITH THE CATCH!!!

    Edmonds circa 2001 makes that grab too…Edmonds circa April 2008 does not and the Pads fall behind.

    Current score: 0
  48. Phantom Says:

    #47@Coronado Mike: Precisely

    Current score: 0
  49. JP Says:

    #39@SDSUBaseball: c’mon - Peavy is not as good a hitter as the position player Gonzalez ?

    Current score: 0
  50. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #42@Tom Waits: Ya lets stop talking about it because obviously neither of us will agree and it seems to often play devils advocate with anything I say haha. I dont think it was the right decision and there are too many “if’s” going on.

    Current score: 0
  51. Coronado Mike Says:

    Nice play Kouz!

    Current score: 0
  52. Coronado Mike Says:

    Another nice play Kouz!

    Current score: 0
  53. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #49@JP: I was reaching there. No Jake isnt as good a hitter. he has developed into a good hitting pitcher. I just think if its that important to PH for him there, do it with a better hitter than Edgar.

    Current score: 0
  54. Kevin Says:

    Did Maddux skip Young in the rotation?

    Current score: 0
  55. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #54@Kevin: They did that a few weeks ago and it has stayed like that since.

    Current score: 0
  56. Phantom Says:

    #54@Kevin: A long time ago, I think.

    Current score: 0
  57. Tom Waits Says:

    #53@SDSUBaseball: Like who, versus a LHP? Hairston and Huber were already in the game. Clark doesn’t hit LHP very well and is a huge DP threat. The only other options were a left-handed hitter like McAnulty or Gerut or Carlin, and nobody burns their backup catcher in the 4th.

    Probably the other option is Clark, and Gonzalez has been swinging better than him recently.

    Current score: 0
  58. Kevin Says:

    From Elias Sports Bureau:

    Edgar Gonzalez made his major-league debut for the Padres on Tuesday night, starting at third base, across the diamond from his brother, Adrian. Over the last 30 years, only three other pairs of brothers started in the same infield: Cal and Billy Ripken (439 times, 1987-1996 Orioles), Aaron and Bret Boone (47 times, 1997-1998 Reds), and Barry and Stephen Larkin (once, for the Reds, on Sept. 27, 1998).

    Current score: 0
  59. Coronado Mike Says:

    I love watching the padres hitters watch strike three…just something so heart warming about their appreciation for pretty pitches.

    Current score: 0
  60. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #59@Coronado Mike: Giles seems to enjoy it the most. He must really see the art in a called strike.

    Current score: 0
  61. Coronado Mike Says:

    #58@Kevin: There is something so cool about brothers starting together on the same team. My brother and I each played different sports (me volleyball and baseball…him football and basketball), but I can imagine it would be a really neat feeling.

    Current score: 0
  62. Steve C Says:

    From MLBtraderumors…

    “One anonymous executive says that the Padres are a good candidate to start selling off pieces, sooner rather than later.”

    Maybe there is some fire to the smoke surrouning the maddux trade rumors…

    Current score: 0
  63. Kevin Says:

    I’ve got the game on DirecTV, but I guess that’s not what you guys were talking about when you said it’s not on TV.

    Current score: 0
  64. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #57@Tom Waits: If your gonna pitch Ledezma against a line-up the feasts on LHP, then why not pinch hit a lefty? I forgot Huber was in the game, but if you dont really have a that hitter coming off the bench (I dont think Edgar is that hitter), then I dont see the point in PH after 4 innings. I guess thats fine if you see it as a good decision, but there is a difference between understanding why it was done and thinking that it was a good decision.

    Current score: 0
  65. Coronado Mike Says:

    6-4-3

    Best digits ever.

    Current score: 0
  66. SDSUBaseball Says:

    Nice DP to get out of the inning.

    Current score: 0
  67. Steve C Says:

    There you go Jimmy way to earn that 4+ mil the Pads are still paying you!

    Current score: 0
  68. Pat Says:

    I love this from Hayhurst!!!

    “There is no shame in a man working. Yet it seems as if the work a man chooses will dictate how he is treated…. It’s amazing the things people assume based on job title. I am, after all, the same garden variety, run-of-the-mill human being, regardless of my costume or who signs my paycheck.”

    That is beautiful!

    Current score: 0
  69. Tom Waits Says:

    #64@SDSUBaseball: You can only measure a decision by what the manager knew at the time, not what happened after. Ledezma has been throwing well and he was the best option in the pen to go 3-4 innings. He got hit. It happens. Jake had given up 4 himself by that point. Sometimes a good decision doesn’t work out. Sometimes a bad decision doesn’t hurt you.

    Why would you pinch-hit a player like Gerut or McAnulty? Both have exactly 1 at-bat in the majors this year versus a lefty. Gerut didn’t hit them well in AAA; Gonzalez crushed them.

    Current score: 0
  70. Coronado Mike Says:

    Isn’t it time for Kouz to hit a bomb? He is due.

    Maybe later today.

    Current score: 0
  71. Tom Waits Says:

    Is that Kouzmanoff putting up the first fight of the day? And I jinx him.

    Current score: 0
  72. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #69@Tom Waits: That doesnt mean it was a good decision. I understand why he thought he did it, I dont think it was the right choice. We saw bad decisions not hurt Black all year last year. They are starting to hurt this year and I think this was one of them. I wasnt measuring it by what happened after. I was unhappy when he made the decision and the events that followed happened as they did. I was fine with keeping Ledezma ready, and obviously he is really your only option out of the pen, but Jake looked like he could go another inning, and then you can distribute one less inning to your relievers and you can pitch your better relievers. Its over now though, we lost. i didnt agree with it, you did. Doesnt really matter now.

    Current score: 0
  73. Coronado Mike Says:

    A RBI knock for the pitcher…quality.

    Current score: 0
  74. Tom Waits Says:

    Maddux up in the zone all inning.

    When the Cubs come to town, let’s try throwing a first-pitch to Soriano that is well out of the zone.

    Current score: 0
  75. Kevin Says:

    CHICAGO — San Diego Padres pitcher Mark Prior was in Birmingham, Ala., on Thursday to have his surgically repaired right shoulder examined by Dr. James Andrews.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/.....id=3397861

    Current score: 0
  76. Tom Waits Says:

    #72@SDSUBaseball: Well, if you’re basing it on “send up a better hitter than Gonzalez,” but there weren’t any, then what’s the criticism?

    Current score: 0
  77. Zagz Says:

    Here come the wheels off the bus.

    Current score: 0
  78. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #76@Tom Waits: Not to pinch hit Jake in the first place.

    Current score: 0
  79. Pat Says:

    Boy, wheels are coming off in a hurry.

    Current score: 0
  80. Coronado Mike Says:

    Crap…we are now 4 runs down.

    that is okay…we can still come back.

    Current score: 0
  81. Foster Brooks Robinson Says:

    Holy Cow, look at that sombrero!

    Current score: 0
  82. Phantom Says:

    When it goes, it goes quickly.

    Way to wait for us to be down 4 before making a move, Bud!

    Current score: 0
  83. Tom Waits Says:

    #82@Phantom: No no no. You’ve got to have more confidence in your 350 game winning 1st ballot hall of famer than that.

    Current score: 0
  84. Zagz Says:

    Henn in, about to get real ugly I bet.

    Current score: 0
  85. Phantom Says:

    #83@Tom Waits: Not the way he’s been hit today. After 3 straight singles, there’s no reason for him to be pitching to Lee with men on 1st and 2nd if we’re down by 2.

    Current score: 0
  86. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #83@Tom Waits: Ha ha ha… funny

    Current score: 0
  87. Marsh Says:

    85: No reason to think he couldn’t have thrown another double play…

    Current score: 0
  88. Phantom Says:

    #85@Phantom: D’oh, sorry I couldn’t perceive the sarcasm.

    Current score: 0
  89. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #85@Phantom: He was being sarcastic

    Current score: 0
  90. Marsh Says:

    88: he had only thrown 60 pitches at the start of that at-bat.

    Current score: 0
  91. JMAR Says:

    Geez, Maddux wasn’t exactly fooling them today. That’ll lower his trade value in a hurry.

    I didn’t realize Dempster was doing so good this year. 30 hits allowed in 54 IP. Wow. That’s amazing. I doubt we stand much of a chance to come back on this guy.

    Current score: 0
  92. Kevin Says:

    There were four straight singles, then a sac fly, then the double by Lee. Maddux shouldn’t have pitched to Theriot.

    Current score: 0
  93. SDSUBaseball Says:

    So Dempster looks like he has enjoyed being converted from closer to starter this year…

    Current score: 0
  94. Kevin Says:

    #90@Marsh: That’s like the 80-pitch mark for anyone else.

    Current score: 0
  95. Coronado Mike Says:

    A little OT, but thought interesting…did y’all see Jason Stark’s comments today?

    • EYES ON SAN DIEGO: Here’s one AL executive’s nomination for a club that could go into early selling mode: The Padres. “The vibes we’re getting is that they already know it’s not happening for them this year,” the exec said. “So they may be the first team that tries to be opportunistic.” Among the Padres the shoppers figure to keep their eye on: Khalil Greene, Kevin Kouzmanoff (to open third base for Chase Headley), Randy Wolf and any bullpen arms the Padres would talk about.

    Current score: 0
  96. Coronado Mike Says:

    Comment of the day by the cubs broadcasters…

    “Dempster did not fall over running down the line, he just started his dive way too soon.”

    Current score: 0
  97. Coronado Mike Says:

    Nothing like having the first runner in scoring position showing up in the 7th inning.

    Current score: 0
  98. Tom Waits Says:

    #95@Coronado Mike: Wouldn’t surprise me. Timing is the hard part. Wolf may need to rebuild some value, Greene is not looking too attractive, Kouz has done nothing this year to inspire desire by other teams. Even Maddux, with his resume, is not necessarily going to jump off the lot for what we want for him.

    Current score: 0
  99. Coronado Mike Says:

    Tom…I am a big fan of Kouz, but his power outage is very discouraging. I think, as you point out, the biggest problem is not whether or not we should move them, but rather what is the value? Not much right now seems to be the correct answer.

    Current score: 0
  100. Coronado Mike Says:

    Slider down and away…KG K’s…shocker.

    And Phil Donahue singing during the 7th inning stretch…really? They are hurting for “celebrities”.

    Current score: 0
  101. JMAR Says:

    #95@Coronado Mike: Here are the three guys with decent trade value that I think the Padres would deal if the right offer was on the table: Kevin Kouzmanoff, Khalil Greene, and Chris Young. Gonzalez, Peavy, and Bell obviously have the most value, but they’re all staying put, in my opinion. Here’s my analysis, if anyone cares.

    http://www.sdpadrefan.com/trad.....part1.html

    Wolf and Maddux are back of the rotation starters. I don’t think we would get much for them. Remember, the Cubs traded Maddux for Cesar Itzuris. And that was two years ago. I wouldn’t expect much in return from either guy. Giles is another guy that teams would look at, but that $3 million dollar buyout makes him less desirable. Tad Iguchi would bring back two fringe prospects. Anyone else I’m missing?

    Current score: 0
  102. Coronado Mike Says:

    JMAR…probably not anyone. Maybe P-Mac for a fringe minor leaguer…

    Could you imagine the way this team would look w/o Kouz, KG, CY, and Maddux? Would be like the early 90’s all over again…well, probably not that bad, but for the casual fan it might be.

    Count me as one that thinks it is the wrong move to put Headley in the OF…either move him to another team or move Kouz…decreasing the value of your best prospect by moving him to LF makes no sense to me.

    Current score: 0
  103. Coronado Mike Says:

    Wow, where did that ball four pitch to fuku miss? Outside? A little low?

    At least we have Jimmy Edmonds coming up…how about a nice 4′6′3 DP?

    Current score: 0
  104. Phantom Says:

    #100@Coronado Mike: CM, he went from 0-2 to a full-count and fouled off a few pitches. Why don’t you get all over Adrian for waving at sliders?

    Current score: 0
  105. Coronado Mike Says:

    Phantom - Cause he does not do it with the frequency of KG and does not make the amount of outs KG does.

    Current score: 0
  106. Geoff B Says:

    So, at what point do the Pads bring Headley up and send P-Mac back to Portland? (or Huber?) Does his BA have to dip below .200? .185?

    Current score: 0
  107. Phantom Says:

    #105@Coronado Mike: But what’s the point in relishing his K there? That was a damn good AB from him. To get down early 0-2 and make Dempster throw as many pitches as he did is helpful. It’s not like Khalil is the only person to fail at the plate today against Dempster. We’ve got a couple guys that have K’ed against him twice today, and Khalil only K’ed once.

    Current score: 0
  108. Coronado Mike Says:

    #107@Phantom: I am not arguing with you on that…I am just saying it is fairly predictable that he would flail at a slider down and away…

    Why any pitcher would throw ANY pitch middle in to KG baffles me.

    Current score: 0
  109. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #102@Coronado Mike: I agree. Keep Headley at 3rd. He is probably a plus defender there instead of below average in LF and he is more valuable to the team and to other teams at 3B.

    Current score: 0
  110. JMAR Says:

    #102@Coronado Mike: That’s why I don’t think they’re going to do much unless someone makes an offer for one of those guys based on last year’s performance, not the first 40 games of this season. If a GM really believes that KG or Kouz would be a 30-homer guy if taken out of Petco, they might offer some good talent in return. Or if a GM remembers how dominant CY was before last year’s injury and thinks he could be that guy again, they might offer something worthwhile. Whatever they do, the Padres just cannot afford to leave a hole at SS or the #2 spot in the rotation.

    Current score: 0
  111. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #108@Coronado Mike: Exactly. Throw him 3 pitches down and away every AB. They dont even need to be in the zone.

    Current score: 0
  112. Coronado Mike Says:

    JMAR…you are dead right…

    Current score: 0
  113. Phantom Says:

    #108@Coronado Mike: Better to wave at the slider or watch a called third strike?

    Current score: 0
  114. SDSUBaseball Says:

    11 Ks by Dempster. I think Lilly had 11 yesterday too. We are making this Cubs staff look awfully good.

    Current score: 0
  115. Coronado Mike Says:

    #111@SDSUBaseball: I am so frustrated with KG…I know, everyone is shocked…he has a .259 obp and k’s 20% of the time. AGon is k’ing 20% of the time as well, but he has 9 bombs and is getting on at a 345 clip…that is why I am more tolerant of his bad ab’s.

    Current score: 0
  116. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #113@Phantom: both are bad, especially when the sliders he normally flails at are out of the zone.

    Current score: 0
  117. Phantom Says:

    #116@SDSUBaseball: As were the sliders that Kouz, Iguchi, Adrian, and Carlin flailed at. Yet it’s not a routine pile-on when they K.

    It just gets old guys. You think he sucks. We get it.

    Current score: 0
  118. Coronado Mike Says:

    #113@Phantom: Phantom…that is a great question…for KG, I think I would be equally upset.

    Current score: 0
  119. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #115@Coronado Mike: I agree, I feel your frustration. He hasnt looked good at the plate all year. he had a mini streak earlier this week, but nothing like his normal streaks where he hits like crazy for 10 games.

    Current score: 0
  120. Kevin Says:

    #106@Geoff B: about two months

    Current score: 0
  121. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #117@Phantom: The whole team has looked bad the last 2 games. They are all flailing, but KG has done it all year. If pointing out his K’s gets old, how old do you think defending his k’s with “it was a good AB though” gets. He still makes more outs (lowest OBP) than any regular on the team right now.

    Current score: 0
  122. Steve C Says:

    come on guys al we need are 3 bloops and one blast!

    Current score: 0
  123. Tom Waits Says:

    #110@JMAR: I don’t think they’d trade Young unless they were getting a lot of good young pitching back. He may not be durable, he may not even really be a top-of-the-rotation starter, but he’s above average and signed for a great deal.

    Wolf, Maddux, Kouz are all replaceable. Wolf and Maddux would need to be replaced next year anyway. Khalil….that’s harder.

    Current score: 0
  124. Phantom Says:

    #121@SDSUBaseball: Having good ABs is better than swining at 3 straight balls. Having good ABs shows that there might be some promise.

    Emphatically piling on whenever he Ks is useless. Please tell me who you think we could plug in at shortstop. You guys obviously want him out of town. So please, come up with a credible solution for maintaining the level of defense and improving our offense.

    I’ll wait.

    Current score: 0
  125. Steve C Says:

    #123@Tom Waits: He may be the only peice they have that will get them a good young CF…

    Current score: 0
  126. Coronado Mike Says:

    I have to say, I am enjoying watching OG play this season…he is a bright spot and I have always enjoyed his humor.

    With the possibility of the Pads playing at a little better clip (they have won 3 of 5 coming into today, right?), I am still so happy to be a Padres fan.

    And Phantom…KG’s D has been consistantly good since last season. I feel much better these days with him out there with the glove.

    Current score: 0
  127. Tom Waits Says:

    #113@Phantom: Watch the called 3rd strike, if, like Giles, you’ve proven for years that you know the strike zone.

    Do you really see people piling on Greene? I think the reaction to what has been an atrocious season at the plate has been fairly muted.

    Current score: 0
  128. Geoff B Says:

    Another K with RISP for AGon. Talk about getting old.

    Current score: 0
  129. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #123@Tom Waits: I think CY should be dangled out there, but he wouldnt need to bring good value back. I think he is replaceable, but we would need to get enough in return for him. Teams at the deadline may overvalue him and the Padres should definitely listen. I have no problem keeping him if they cant get a decent haul for him though.

    Current score: 0
  130. Coronado Mike Says:

    #124@Phantom: we have gone over this a number of times…there is no credible replacement…if we want to up the Offense, we could go with just about anyone out there, but the sacrifice of D would be bad.

    The only thing I can say at this point is even Jack Wilson has a higher career OBP than KG…and a better glove.

    Current score: 0
  131. Phantom Says:

    #127@Tom Waits: It seems that he gets a disproportionate amount of the angst. He’s not the only person on the team struggling this year, and yet his offensive woes are pretty consistently the only one’s cited. As I said, it gets old.

    Current score: 0
  132. Geoff B Says:

    Here is a chance for KG to show something. A hit against Kerry “Mr. DL” Wood.

    Current score: 0
  133. Tom Waits Says:

    #125@Steve C: I believe they can find a CF without using Young, and I doubt they’d make that move if it were true. A good young CF that costs you the only above-average starter we have besides Peavy isn’t a net win.

    DeJesus still looks like a good fit, if they can find something that KC wants.

    Current score: 0
  134. Phantom Says:

    #133@Tom Waits: I would agree that DeJesus is probably a good call. I’m not familiar with KC, so I have no idea what their needs could be.

    Current score: 0
  135. Geoff B Says:

    Nope, just another K for KG.

    Current score: 0
  136. Tom Waits Says:

    #131@Phantom: Come on now, Phantom. Just in today’s threads people have lamented a lot of woes. People have pointed out Agon’s propensity to swing at balls. Edmonds was a daily topic of derision.

    He’s not the only one struggling, but he’s struggling the most. Of course people are going to talk about it more.

    Current score: 0
  137. Coronado Mike Says:

    Wood missed location bad on that pitch he k’d Greene with…if he throws it middle in like his catcher wanted, I bet it is a different story.

    Current score: 0
  138. Steve C Says:

    #133@Tom Waits: I don’t think it would be a straight swap, maybe a CF and a younger starting arm. I guess it depends on if Carillo and Le Blanc will be ready by 09.

    Current score: 0
  139. Geoff B Says:

    And, another K for Bard. So, another L for SD.

    Current score: 0
  140. Tom Waits Says:

    14 K’s, you’re not going to win many of those.

    Current score: 0
  141. Steve C Says:

    and thats game…

    Current score: 0
  142. Coronado Mike Says:

    Well…maybe we can take 2-of-3 against Seattle this weekend…

    Current score: 0
  143. JMAR Says:

    I’m counting five Padres on pace to strikeout over 120 times. Edmonds would have made it six. That is freakin’ brutal.

    Current score: 0
  144. Marsh Says:

    142: I’m sure that our “natural rival” will bring the best out of us…..

    Current score: 0
  145. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #131@Phantom: I think it only seems that way because he is your favorite player. It gets old because he has the same struggles every year and this year so far it has been magnified.

    Adrian has struggled, but he is still being productive that might be why you hear less on him. People have been talking about Bardo all year, Edmonds got a ton of flack, so did Kouz during the whole month of April.

    Current score: 0
  146. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #133@Tom Waits: Do you think Gerut is a capable CF. He has looked good in the field and at the plate so far. If he performs throughout the year is he an option?

    Current score: 0
  147. Phantom Says:

    #136@Tom Waits: That’s one day worth of thread. And good on people for criticizing Adrian for K’ing 3 times today.

    Look, I’m not saying the guy is off to a great start. He’s not. But he’s not our only problem offensively. There are several people who have looked more or less useless at the plate this year, and especially more recently. However, he is still seen to be the litmus test for the offense, for some reason.

    In my eyes, it’s just like Schlom bringing up Estes sucking or Kyle Lohse on a daily basis. I understand your (in the group sense, not singling you out) perspective, but routinely bitching about it doesn’t do anything for the discourse. I get it. A lot of you don’t think he should be on the team. I’ve yet to see a reasonable solution to that issue though. In that way it’s a lot like bitching about Kyle Lohse. We didn’t get him and there’s nothing we can do about it. Until someone comes up with a credible solution for the perceived KG problem, what’s the point of continually pointing out that he can’t hit a slider or that he strikes out a ton?

    FWIW, he’s got a ridiculously low BABIP this year in the .240s.

    Current score: 0
  148. Tom Waits Says:

    #138@Steve C: I don’t see the Padres taking the risk that either of those kids is even average, let alone good, in 2009. They still need 5 starters and they’ve been burned by a lack of depth the last few years.

    It would not shock me if a hot topic in the Padre offices these days is whether to move Antonelli to CF. Or even shortstop.

    Current score: 0
  149. Phantom Says:

    Anyone else heading to Seattle this weekend? Anything in particular I should check out at Safeco?

    Current score: 0
  150. Tom Waits Says:

    #147@Phantom: He does have the low BABIP, but his BABIP has always lagged behind the norm compared to his LD rate because he hits so many fly balls and strikes out so much.

    Current score: 0
  151. Tom Waits Says:

    #146@SDSUBaseball: With his knees I’d feel more comfortable with him in a corner. He does seem to be hitting balls hard and having good at-bats.

    A 2009 OF of Gerut/DeJesus/Giles, with OG going to left if Gerut can handle RF, seems like a good way to win more games.

    Current score: 0
  152. Phantom Says:

    #150@Tom Waits: Even so, his BABIP is much lower than its usual .265 range. His LD rate is also the second highest of his career. So it seems like this could turn the corner at some point.

    Of course, he would have to make contact for this to happen.

    Would anyone do this move (would KC do it?): CY & corner OF propsect (Veneable?) for Bannister and DeJesus?

    Current score: 0
  153. Coronado Mike Says:

    #149@Phantom: I wish I was going to Seattle…one of my favorite cities. Plus, I would love to catch a game with you.

    While at Safeco, see if you can watch them open/shut the roof…that is pretty cool. I really like that ballpark. It has good sight lines, fans similar to SD, and is very pretty.

    While you are in Seattle, try to grab a meal at “The Brooklyn”, especially if you like Salmon or Oysters…

    Current score: 0
  154. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #147@Phantom: Its hard not to get upset in the IGD when Greene strikes out. I dont think it is brought up as much in regular discussion. He is not the only problem with our offense so far, but he has been the biggest. But you are right, if we want a better bat we will probably lose some with the glove.

    Current score: 0
  155. Phantom Says:

    #153@Coronado Mike: I don’t recall off-hand where our seats are for both games, but I think we have damn good seats for tomorrow night’s affair.

    I wonder if they’ll do like AZ and keep the roof open till just before the game to keep the temperature nice. Of course, it’s not routinely 100 degrees in Seattle.

    I know we’re gonna hit the fish market and the Space Needle. The big stop I insisted on was dinner at the Pyramid Ale House before the game tomorrow.

    Current score: 0
  156. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #151@Tom Waits: That assumes that the FO wont make the mistake of making Headley the starting LF. I wouldnt mind that OF. If thats the case, at least you know Gerut can play CF if DeJesus needs a day or gets hurt.

    Current score: 0
  157. Tom Waits Says:

    #152@Phantom: Bannister worries me way too much. He’s obviously bright as all get out.

    I’d do any two of these pitchers (LeBlanc, Geer, Garrison) and Venable or Meredith.

    Current score: 0
  158. Steve C Says:

    #156@SDSUBaseball: Thats what I was thinking> I don’t think Giles will be a Padre in Sept 08 let alone April 09. I think the FO would rather pay Guret and Headly league minimum than pay Giles 9 mil.

    Current score: 0
  159. Phantom Says:

    #157@Tom Waits: I know that Bannister has some pretty ugly peripherals, but he seems to get the job done. I don’t think we’d be able to pry away a guy like Greinke, especially since he’s shown signs of life this year.

    So you’d go 3 for 1 to get just DeJesus?

    Current score: 0
  160. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #155@Phantom: Seattle is a fun town, its nice to just walk around if the weather isnt bad. Pyramid is definitely a good call.

    Current score: 0
  161. Corey Brock Says:

    149. Plenty of options in Seattle … assuming we’re talking drinks here? As a native Northwest guy I would recommend: Black Bottle in Belltown, Tiny Bigs near Seattle Center, Pesos (good foot, drink and scenery) near Seattle Center. Coffee at Cafe Ladro. Elysian Fields just north of the stadium on first is a good place to go after the game, much better than Pyramid.

    Current score: 0
  162. Steve C Says:

    Do you guys think Inman will get a look in 09? he should be headed up to PDX in June or July if he continues to do well could he fill the Pads 5th starters spot in 09?

    Current score: 0
  163. JMAR Says:

    #152@Phantom: I don’t think the Royals would do that one. I’m guessing they would feel Bannister for Young would be a wash so it would basically be DeJesus for Venable, which I’m not sure is an equal trade at this point. What if they offered DeJesus for Venable and LeBlanc or Inman?

    Current score: 0
  164. Phantom Says:

    #163@JMAR: I would probably do it for LeBlanc. Not so sure about Inman, as he seems to have more upside than anyone else in Portland at this point.

    The biggest problem I have is that I really am wholly unfamiliar with KC’s system. I’ve got no concept of what their needs are.

    Current score: 0
  165. JMAR Says:

    #164@Phantom: I was hoping the Padres would be able to pry away Nate McLouth from the Pirates. They have a need at 3B (Jose Bautista is currently their 3B, we have two good 3B’s) and they have depth in CF (Andrew McCutchen is one of their top prospects). Unfortunately, McLouth’s value is skyrocketing and Kouz’s value has taken a dip, so that’s not happening.

    Current score: 0
  166. PM Says:

    Gees, when did the Cubs pickup Don Drysdale, Sandy Kofaux and Rolli Ringers. I missed that.

    Current score: 0
  167. Tom Waits Says:

    #159@Phantom: I don’t see Geer having much real value to the Padres, and if he’s the surcharge to get a starting CF for the next 3 seasons, no problem.

    It’s 2 marginal / replaceable players (Venable, the pitchers besides LeBlanc including the reliever) and 1 real prospect for 3 years of a player who has been an above-average CF. Yeah, I make that deal.

    Current score: 0
  168. Phantom Says:

    #167@Tom Waits: Works for me. I know that the org is “high” on both LeBlanc and Veneable, but I’m also curious to know what their actual assessments of them are. In other words, I don’t know how much of the love thrown their way is legit.

    Current score: 0
  169. JP Says:

    Our outfield situation still scares the crap out of me. Get Headley up here, now ! Let’s see what the kid can do.

    Current score: 0
  170. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #167@Tom Waits: I’d be fine with Geer and Venable for DeJesus. Venable and Meredith/Leblanc would be harder for me to do, but I would probably do it. I’d really like to see Leblanc make a ML start for the Padres though.

    Inman is tearing apart AA this year.

    Current score: 0
  171. JP Says:

    Gerut is perfect for a 5th outfielder role, but are we really going to watch this guy get 40 to 50 starts in center ? Can it get much worse than this? McAnulty, Huber and Hairston as the other guys platooning for the other spots…..can it get much worse ? The Giants basically ran a try out camp in 2007 for their young guys…we need to do the same.

    Current score: 0
  172. JP Says:

    #170@SDSUBaseball: I would like to see Venable get a decent size “look-see” this year.

    Current score: 0
  173. Steve C Says:

    #171@JP: Ha 40 to 50? prob more like 100 unless the Pads plan on trading for someone.

    Current score: 0
  174. SDSUBaseball Says:

    Is Kouz not capable of playing the OF…? I mean if we will throw Russell Branyan and Blum in LF, why cant we try Kouz out there. Headley is more valuable at 3B and I would rather not see him join the ML club as an OF. If we are going to convert an IF to an OF shouldnt we keep the better 3B at 3B because both would probably be equally below average defensively in the OF.

    Current score: 0
  175. SDSUBaseball Says:

    #171@JP: I think Gerut could be a could CF/LF. I dont see the point in bringing up Headley to play the OF. If Venable is healthy, I wouldnt mind seeing him.

    Current score: 0
  176. JP Says:

    #173@Steve C: Yeah Steve. Sad ain’t it ?

    Current score: 0
  177. JP Says:

    #175@SDSUBaseball: Small sample, but seeing Gerut play has made me a little more of a believer in him as a legit. major league backup. but very soon it will be very embarrassing for the org. to see him penciled in as the center field on a daily basis.

    Current score: 0
  178. JP Says:

    I have NEVER in 35 years of watching the game -seen such a punchless team strike out so much.

    Current score: 0
  179. JP Says:

    I can’t see how the Padres cannot call up Chase Headley within the next week.

    Current score: 0
  180. JP Says:

    Gerut made a damn good catch robbing Blanco and saving a run. Chicago announcers both agreed that it was the best catch they have seen this year at Wrigley. I think it is safe to say that Gerut does not embarass himself in center by any means.

    Current score: 0
  181. malcolm Says:

    Edmonds 7LOB 1st game as a Cubbie. Didn’t have that problem in SD.

    Current score: 0
  182. JP Says:

    It’s been quite well documented on this blog but just having gone through the junkyards (rosters) of what has been AAA Padre baseball - Portland 2002-2007 — it almost makes me sick. I think that it should not surprise us that the well has run dry.

    Current score: 0
  183. jay Says:

    Well, it looks like our future is going to be getting strategic PT to guys for next year. The only way this team competes next year is some of our talent develops to expectations, Kouz develops, and they pony up some big dollars on two key FA for next year. If that happens we could be competitive next year.

    We don’t have the talent to do the DBacks where the team is very good, built on young, cheap talent without almost any FA types. I mean who is drafting for those guys and why can’t we get them?

    The farm is going to give us some pieces, we have some pieces but we are going to have to buy the rest. I just hope the team does not think it can be the next Dbacks, therefore askew big FA deals in favor of trying to do everything homegrown. That will take too long.

    Current score: 0
  184. JP Says:

    #183@jay: Great analysis. We can play it ‘half way’ - develop a few from the Farm and sign some strategic FA’s.

    Headley hit another blast tonight.

    Current score: 0
  185. JP Says:

    Myrow. Don’t you almost have to get him up here as well or move him. I mean, the guy is brutalizing PAC League pitching…..

    Current score: 0
  186. Oside Jon Says:

    This continues to be a crappy season. That’s all.

    Current score: 0
  187. Oside Jon Says:

    Having said that, I’m still excited to see how this season ends up.

    Current score: 0
  188. Kevin Says:

    #179@JP: Towers said last week they aren’t anytime soon, so they aren’t.

    Expect him in about two months.

    Current score: 0

Leave a Reply

Your comments are welcome and encouraged. However, they are subject to moderation, which means that only the best will be published. By submitting comments, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to abide by the Ducksnorts Community Guidelines and Moderation Policy.