League Offensive Levels for Padres Affiliates, 2007
Wed, Dec 5, 2007
by Geoff Young
Yesterday we were talking about Rookie-league numbers and reader Didi asked about something I hinted at but didn’t delve into as much as I might have. I wasn’t being coy, so much as I was being… disorganized.
In discussing the motivation behind providing comparable players for Padres minor leaguers, I noted that:
Cedric Hunter hit .282/.344/.373 in the Midwest League, which seems really low until you consider how much his league suppressed offense in 2007.
Didi then asked:
Is it possible to describe the league (as you mentioned the number of games played and league average numbers) to add a bit more detail?
Yes, it is absolutely possible. It also is absolutely necessary:
| MLB | PCL | TEX | CAL | MWL | NWL | AZL | DSL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistics are courtesy of Baseball-Reference and ESPN. | ||||||||
| R/G | 4.80 | 5.13 | 4.63 | 5.59 | 4.34 | 5.13 | 5.66 | 4.65 |
| BA | .268 | .279 | .264 | .271 | .255 | .259 | .264 | .238 |
| OBP | .336 | .346 | .338 | .344 | .324 | .344 | .350 | .338 |
| SLG | .423 | .437 | .407 | .426 | .372 | .386 | .377 | .320 |
| BB/SO | .500 | .494 | .503 | .477 | .417 | .456 | .464 | .542 |
| ISO | .155 | .158 | .143 | .155 | .117 | .127 | .113 | .082 |
As you can see, higher levels are at left. The stats should be self-explanatory. ISO is SLG - BA. Bear in mind that this represents output from 2007 only.
I find it interesting that the Padres’ farm teams (above the statistically unreliable short-season squads) alternate between leagues that favored hitters last year and those that favored pitchers. The Midwest League proved unforgiving to hitters in ‘07, while the Cal League was a haven. The same holds for the Texas League and PCL, respectively, albeit to lesser extremes.
Assuming that these levels remain roughly constant over time (quick check reveals that in 2006, the Midwest League averaged 4.35 R/G, while the Cal League averaged 5.32; in ‘05 those numbers were 4.93 and 5.75 — this probably deserves further study), what can we learn? Well, for one thing, we can learn to cut Kyle Blanks some slack for hitting .292/.382/.455 in the Midwest League as a 19-year-old in ‘06 when the league as a whole hit .253/.325/.365. When you’re young and you produce like Nick Swisher in a league of Jack Wilsons, you do not, as Baseball America suggested prior to the 2007 season, “need to re-establish [yourself] as a prospect.”
Going forward, we can apply this same logic to Cedric Hunter. Remember how excited everyone was about Hunter after his 2006 debut in the Arizona League? We were right to be excited, because he’s a fine talent, but we shouldn’t have gotten so hung up on his Rookie-league numbers. Only in light of his AZL showing does ‘07 appear to be a disappointment.
Hunter won’t dominate the Cal League when he gets there, as Blanks did, because Hunter isn’t as good of a hitter. Then again, why would we expect a center fielder to hit like a first baseman? If he did, Hunter would be the second coming of Ken Griffey Jr., but I digress.
The larger point comes back to context. When we’re looking at minor-league numbers, we need to ask ourselves — as with any other numbers, really — what was the environment in which these were created? In addition to the league averages we’ve just examined, we also need to consider age relative to league, park factors, and probably some other stuff as well.
The moral of our story? Same as always: When in doubt, ask more questions.
Winter Leagues
- Azucareros 3, Escogido 0 (box). Vince Sinisi, batting third and playing left field, singled twice and walked.
- Mochis 4, Hermosillo 2 (box). Marshall McDougall, batting third and DH’ing, went 0-for-3 with a sac fly in a losing cause. Who batted behind him? Vinny Castilla.
- Mazatlan 7, Navojoa 1 (box). Oscar Robles, batting second and playing shortstop, was hitless in three trips to the plate. Luis Cruz, in the #7 hole and playing center field, went 1-for-3 and scored his club’s only run. On the other side, Brian Myrow went 0-for-2 with two walks while batting fifth and playing first base. Who backed Myrow? Why, it’s the greatest left fielder in Padres history, Miguel Ojeda.
Now back to your regularly scheduled waiting to see which rumors turn out to be true…
Picking up where last year's version left off, the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual provides in-depth analysis of and commentary on the San Diego Padres. Get your copy today.
December 5, 2007 at 8:17 am
Interesting stuff from Krasovic today:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/.....adres.html
Padres are willing to guarantee 3/30M for Fukudome. I think the Cubs will go higher but he mentions that Aki recommended San Diego to Fukudome so maybe he’ll take the discount. It sounds like KT has him pegged for RF though: “I’m sure he’s probably more comfortable in right field. We know he has played center field.” Not exactly a resounding endorsement of the guy as a centerfielder.
Also: The Astros want Nick Hundley for Luke Scott. What do you guys who know our prospects think about that one?
Geoff Jenkins wants a multi year deal and we’re close to signing Glendon Rusch (start printing those playoff tickets!).
Milton Bradley gets a jump on spring training by losing 15 pounds. No mention of whether he’s in the best shape of his career.
If Bradley’s knee is healing and he really lost 15 pounds he might be a good fallback option for CF, along with Giles/Hairston in LF and Fukudome in RF.
December 5, 2007 at 8:24 am
I would be shocked if Bradley is back before July, if he was going to be ready by ST the Pads would have offered him arbitration.
December 5, 2007 at 8:51 am
According to Ken Rosenthal:
Free-agent outfielder Milton Bradley, recovering from surgery to repair a torn ACL and MCL, received an encouraging report after visiting Dr. Tim Kremchek on Monday.
Bradley is expected to be ready by either Opening Day or April 15, and figures to land a one-year contract after some of the more prominent outfielders are signed.
December 5, 2007 at 9:51 am
Given the Guillen deal(3/36, damn Royals) I think the market for Cameron and Fuckodome is probably going to be more expensive then the Padres first thought.
It is upsetting to hear that they don’t have the cash to sign both of them….so does Bradley then again become an option?
To me, it would seem so, however an outfield of Bradley/Fuckodome/Giles isn’t good enough defensively in Petco. They are in a tough spot.
Mark
December 5, 2007 at 9:55 am
It depends on what the Pads payroll is next year, their base right now is floating around $50M if they are willing to go up to the 70’s then they could easily afford Fukudome, but if they want to keep the payroll in the mid 60’s again then it will be tight.
December 5, 2007 at 9:59 am
I think they’ve been very clear that they plan on signing at least 1 legit outfielder…probably soon.
Even in the mid 70’s I don’t think they have the room to sign BOTH Cameron and Fuckodome.
Mark
December 5, 2007 at 10:01 am
Re: 6 I agree I was looking only at Fukudome.
December 5, 2007 at 10:09 am
1 … Hundley for Scott would be a good trade, imo … I like Hundley, but realisticly he seems a long shot … I know Padres don’t have many alternatives … Canham exceded my expetations in his brief pro play last year but he still seems an even longer shot than Hundley …
re: Bradley … I’ll be happy if Padres resign him …
4,6 … you need to watch your spelling, Mark!
December 5, 2007 at 10:15 am
Re: I agree on Hundley, it looks like the Pads are leaning more towards Morton anyways.
December 5, 2007 at 10:17 am
re: Ojeda … it’s fun what you can see in a single box score (thanks for the link, GY) … Ojeda’s .211 BA looks frightening on the surface, but his OPS of .796 was 2nd only to X in the lineup that day … otoh … Burroughs was in the 7-spot that day with a .325 BA but only a .768 OPS … ug … and then as if to make the point clearer, it shows Ojeda with a double … and Burroughs with a GDP … classic!
http://www.baseball-reference......5020.shtml
Also, I’m not much of a Bud Black fan … but it’s box scores like this (with Ojeda batting 5th and playing LF) that make me not miss Bochy ….
December 5, 2007 at 11:23 am
From ESPN.com’s winter meetings blog:
1:57 p.m., from Jayson Stark
After Kosuke Fukudome signs, one potential backup plan for teams that lose out is free agent Milton Bradley. Bradley was last seen tearing his ACL in that bizarre tangle with his manager (Bud Black) in September. But teams that have kicked the tires on him report they’ve been told that doctors expect him to be able to play again sometime in April, if not opening day. His most recent team, the Padres, remains interested. Outside of Barry Bonds, Bradley is the only current free agent who had a .500 slugging percentage and .400 on-base percentage last season.
December 5, 2007 at 11:23 am
10: Kentera found a way yesterday to rant again about the Pads’ mishandling of Burroughs. He kept harping on his .298 season and that the Pads focused too much on his lack of power. Big dude, lack of power doesn’t properly describe Burrough’s offensive weakness. He had trouble hitting the ball farther than 120 feet.
Oh, and he said he has “no problem with Juan Pierre. He’s a good table-setter. … I love those guys who can run.”
Gosh, he would be a frightening GM; prolly a big Ned Colletti fan.
December 5, 2007 at 11:28 am
I don’t think the Padres are willing to give up Hundley for Scott since Hundley has the potential (and it’s a longshot obviously) to be a starting catcher while Scott is probably more of a platoon outfielder (although his splits aren’t terrible against left-handers). Scott also turns 30 next season so his best days are probably behind him. He also has no place to play next season if the Astros are serious about playing Bourn everyday in CF (Lee in LF, Pence in RF) so I think Towers was hoping to pick him up for close to nothing.
I also thought I read somewhere earlier this offseason that the Astros were thinking about non-tendering Scott — although that doesn’t make a lot of sense to me since he only made $382k last season, he can’t make much more than that next season. I might be confusing Scott with another Astros player though.
December 5, 2007 at 11:34 am
I wish Kentera put his ramblings in print just so firejoemorgan could get a hold of it.
December 5, 2007 at 11:40 am
I have a good idea for the next DS poll:
Who’s the bigger ignoramus (a.k.a ‘baseball genius’) on XX?
1) Werndl
2) Kentera
3) All the above
December 5, 2007 at 11:42 am
Why stop at XX why not add Hacksaw and Ello in there, SD sports talk does not do a good job with its baseball coverage.
December 5, 2007 at 11:45 am
12: Juan Pierre OBP the past three seasons are .326, .330, .332, hardly a table-setter. I’m sure even the Dodgers would love to get rid of him were it not for his contract.
December 5, 2007 at 11:46 am
16: Ello is OK. He’s just too negative at times.
December 5, 2007 at 12:10 pm
18 - exactly! Ello attended a BP pizza feed (I was there as well) a few years ago (2003?) locally… So he is obviously at least a little statistically savy.
Werndle is bad, but he’s bad because he makes conclusions without looking at the data. Coach is the worst BY FAR. He’s consistent with his opinions and they’re just wrong.
December 5, 2007 at 12:33 pm
OT … heads up! BA’s Padre Top 10 comes out tomorrow (12/6) …
http://www.baseballamerica.com.....op10/2007/
December 5, 2007 at 12:57 pm
OT … I find the last comment on the brief look at “The Sleeper in the Marlins-Tigers Deal” to be very interesting …
http://www.baseballprospectus......red/?p=692
ie. this is the kind of guy that the Padres need to “find” on draft day.
December 5, 2007 at 1:09 pm
Geoff I enjoyed your analysis of the Padres minor leagues but on Hunter not being able to hit as well as Blanks next year in the Cal League I’m not sure that will be the case (1) Hunter was on the worst hitting team in the Padres’ system - yes, even compared to Portland. (2) For most of the year he was hitting in the #3 hole and trying to do a little too much - he was much better when he stopped trying to yank everything out.
I think Hunter will hit much better in the Cal League than he did last year in Fort Wayne for the following reasons: (1) as you pointed out its a league much more conducive to hitting - better weather, harder infields and a much better hitter’s park at the Diamond compared to the Castle (2) most guys play better in their second full year league knowing better how to prepare and finally (3) if Hunter is surrounded by better talent next year, such as Kulbacki, Canham and Baum he will hit much better in his more natural slot as a #2 hitter. When the Padres put some of the better 2007 picks into the Fort Wayne offense he hit .317/.395/.471 in August- which was by far his best month
Also he his arm has improved since last year, lingering effects of being a high school pitcher and he makes quite a few catches look easy with his speed.
Blanks had a good year last year, but it was much more in the first half than the second. Conditioning is going to be a big concern for him.
December 5, 2007 at 1:12 pm
Re 21: I don’t trust MiLB pitchers w/ K/9 rates below 7 K/9…
http://www.thebaseballcube.com.....hern.shtml
December 5, 2007 at 1:13 pm
Re: 22 Kulbacki, Canham and Baum will all start the year with the storm?
December 5, 2007 at 1:14 pm
20. At Madfriars.com we’ve been running ours individually - Denis, David Jay and myself with a special guest contributor Peter Friberg. If you have a subscription you may want to check them out.
Peter’s
http://padres.scout.com/a.z?s=.....p;c=707758
John’s
http://padres.scout.com/2/701077.html
Denis’
http://padres.scout.com/2/698151.html
David Jay
http://padres.scout.com/2/703181.html
We will have a free combined Top 20 wich we will release around March 1 - and hopefully another interview with Ducksnorts on the release day.
BTW - When can we expect to see Ducksnorts Top Prospect list?
December 5, 2007 at 1:16 pm
24. It looks like it. Fort Wayne was a bad team last year and the Padres last year promoted several guys right from the Eugene team to Lake Elsinore - Antonelli, Huffman, Cooper and Buschmann.
With the amount of picks they had in the 2007 draft and how bad the Fort Wayne team was it wouldn’t surprise me if they had even more.
December 5, 2007 at 1:22 pm
Do you know where Sogard will prob start the year next year?
December 5, 2007 at 1:31 pm
23: Me either.
26: I think that should be their approach with most of their college picks. If they’re going to keep drafting polished 21 and 22 year olds, why have them spend a year in the Midwest League? Freeze your behind off in April, melt in July and August, deal with every airborne allergen known to man, and at the end of the year it’s still “Yeah, but he was 22 in the MWL. Let’s see what he does next season.”
December 5, 2007 at 1:31 pm
#22: Totally agree that Hunter is a great bet to improve next year at Elsinore. I’ve only seen him play once and I’m looking forward to watch him more regularly in ‘08.
#25: I haven’t done one in years, but if folks are interested, I can put something together with the huge caveat that — with all due respect to the fine work that you and others are doing — I don’t place a great deal of stock in lists per se. Is there interest?
December 5, 2007 at 1:37 pm
29: Geoff, I’d read your grocery list if you published it.
Jorge Cantu was released by the Reds. I’m not advocating him as a 2b, just throwing the name out there.
December 5, 2007 at 1:56 pm
30 … LOL … I’d prefer GY’s prospect list … but, I confess that I, too, would read his grocery list …
re: Cantu … I remember I picked him up a year or 2 ago mid-season in one of those roto pool thingy’s … and he did well … so it does seem like a name worth exploring …
22 … who is Baum? That’s not a name I recognize …
December 5, 2007 at 1:58 pm
Cantu is interesting. He would have the A-Gon and the Mexico connection going.
Anyone interested in Chris Lubanski or brian Barton in the Rule 5 Draft tomorrow? I read earlier they are looking at relivers but it seems like this is a team that could afford to take a flyer on one of these 2 guys.
December 5, 2007 at 2:00 pm
ESPN Rumor is that Jose Guillen, through the player’s association and MLB are currently negotiating a suspension for HGH and steroids. “Kansas City — Driving up the price for other drug enhanced center fielders.”
“Guillen and the Royals reached an agreement on a $36 million, three-year contract Tuesday. The 31-year-outfielder batted .290 with 23 homers and 99 RBIs for the Seattle Mariners this year. Seattle declined its $9 million option and Guillen turned down a $5 million player option, receiving a $500,000 buyout.”
Citing business records, the Chronicle reported Guillen bought more than $19,000 worth of drugs from the Palm Beach Rejuvenation Center between May 2002 and June 2005. He played for five teams during that span: the Diamondbacks, Reds, Athletics, Angels and Nationals.”
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/.....NHeadlines
December 5, 2007 at 2:08 pm
Re: 32 I dont think Barton will be there when the Pads pick and I have no intrest in Lubanski.
December 5, 2007 at 2:12 pm
34.
The Rule 5 is different becuase you can sell or trade picks so it’s possible the Padres could move up (I’m not sure if you can have 2 picks in the rule 5 though if they do intend to snag a pitcher).
December 5, 2007 at 2:15 pm
34.
Lubanski is a guy I would love to make a trade for. I think he may still have a bright future but he realistically needs a season or 2 more of minor league ball. I would not be interested in the Rule 5 really but I think at 22 or 23 years old the kid could still have reall potential.
December 5, 2007 at 2:21 pm
Re: 35 The rays said they are not going to pick him because they need bullpen help so you have to figure he will go to the Marlins at #2. I think they will select him and then try to trade him like the cubs did with hamilton.
December 5, 2007 at 2:22 pm
31:
Question: Who is Baum?
Answer: http://www.minorleaguebaseball.....pid=518441
December 5, 2007 at 2:23 pm
Re: 36 I agree he would not be bad to have in AAA this year but there is no way he makes the 25 man roster.
December 5, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Apparently KT and I think alike. Haha then again I’m sure every GM in baseball would have loved to land that kid but still it’s nice to see that he’s after legit guys because it seems like all we hear about are the McClouth or Luke Scott types.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/.....ville.html
December 5, 2007 at 2:51 pm
I hear Josh Hamilton is out there. Anyone outside of Headley (if they are even interested in him) they would want from us?
December 5, 2007 at 2:53 pm
Re: 41 Hensley would work if he was healthy
December 5, 2007 at 3:13 pm
38 … that doesn’t tell me how/when Padres acquired him … nor any “scouting report” … ie. why would John Coniff mention him in a comment here, but then he doesn’t make PF’s Top 30 prospect list?
re: Top 30 … I think I’d have to include Sinisi in my Top 30 … not high in my Top 30 … but he’d be on there … I think he’ll make a contribution to the Padres in 2008 … and that’s more than can/will be said for several folks on most Top 30 lists no matter how long we wait …
December 5, 2007 at 3:17 pm
RE: 43 He was drafted in the 7th round in this years draft.
December 5, 2007 at 3:19 pm
re: Prospect Lists … Here’s a Top 50 list that has Antonelli @ #27 and Headley @ #29 overall … nice …
http://www.minorleaguebaseball.....p50/y2008/
December 5, 2007 at 3:21 pm
Will Carroll said Fukudome will sign tonight, but it does not say with who.
“jbacow (NYC): Are there any baseball related health issues for Lester? (And what will Bucholz grade out next year on the THR?)
Will Carroll: Not that I’m aware of on Lester - it’s one of the things I’ve been trying to run down. Buchholz — guessing he’s yellow on age.
BREAKING — looks like Fukudome will decide today. Someone made a big offer. My guess? Cubs.”
http://baseballprospectus.com/.....chatId=390
December 5, 2007 at 3:26 pm
I hope it’s anyone but the Cubs (Padres, please!) - I’m sick of the big market media focus.
December 5, 2007 at 3:41 pm
wow hacksaw is killing me, the guy really does not have a clue…
December 5, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Some caller just called Hacksaw and asked… ” I think the Padres should call up Tampa and trade for Jorge Cantu” Hacksaw said “I don’t know how interested in trading Cantu Tampa would be”.
How do you host your own show and especially talk about how much of an authority you are when you don’t even know Cantu was released today by the REDS?!?!?!?! What a freaking idiot. Sports radio in this town kills me.
December 5, 2007 at 3:43 pm
48.
Read my mind Steve!
December 5, 2007 at 3:45 pm
47:
I would not be suprised if the Cubs signed him for 3 years 45. (speculation)
December 5, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Re: 49 thats the call that set me off
December 5, 2007 at 3:49 pm
It was also reported that the Red Sox had some intrest in Fukudome. I could see how they might if they include Ellsbury in a deal for Santana.
December 5, 2007 at 3:57 pm
i dont - they would just start coco in his place, no?
December 5, 2007 at 4:05 pm
Why start Coco if you have unlimited budget and can sign someone better?
December 5, 2007 at 4:32 pm
Well, with that theory, the Red Sox could sign everyone on the market. But Crisp was their center fielder last season, and they won the World Series. This season, he would just be playing behind Santana.
December 5, 2007 at 4:45 pm
56 … well, obviously “unlimited budget” is an exageration … but it seems to me that a key reason that the the BoSox don’t “sign everyone on the market” is that “everyone on the market” is *not* “better” than what they already have (the criteria of SteveC’s it seems like you missed).
December 5, 2007 at 4:54 pm
True. I understand. But I’m just saying Crisp is compotent, and they will have a lot invested in their star players and then Santana. No reason to trade for him unless there is a big extension.
December 5, 2007 at 4:55 pm
Talks between the Chicago Cubs and San Diego Padres over right-hander Mark Prior have apparently cooled. Meanwhile, other clubs haven’t shown interest.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/ru.....=mlb,56309
December 5, 2007 at 5:56 pm
Here’s a perspective on Wolf from WC @ BP …
Hal (Montreal): What do you think of Randy Wolff in San Diego? Is he healthy enough for 160 innings? Great park for his pitching skills?
Will Carroll: Good situation, but he’s going to be a gamble. The Pads have enough that they can afford to take this chance, so it’s all upside.
December 5, 2007 at 6:18 pm
29. You should do one, along with a few other who post here regularly such as Tom W and Lynch. The key to making the list is to come up with a definition of why you ranked players where they are - is it on projection, performance or more likely what type of blend. For example Josh Geer may have a ceiling of around a #4 or #5 MLB pitcher - but he’s much closer to being a productive MLB pitcher than Simon Castro is - who has tremendous potential, but can’t find the plate right now.
Put some comments by each name - and it should be pretty interesting.
43. Baum is a nice player who just missed my Top 30 - which doesn’t mean that he can’t move up, but the Padres system overall improved in depth.
December 5, 2007 at 9:28 pm
“Third-base prospect Chase Headley was at the Winter Meetings on Wednesday, relieved to hear the Padres have essentially no intention of trading him. He said he’s put on 15 pounds of muscle this winter and is up to 230 pounds. Headley will take fly balls at PETCO Park next month in anticipation of playing the position to some degree in Spring Training…”
http://sandiego.padres.mlb.com.....mp;c_id=sd
December 5, 2007 at 9:56 pm
#30, 31: I’ll get right to work on that grocery list.
#61: Okay, there seems to be enough interest. To answer your original question, then, I’m aiming for Tuesday or Wednesday of next week.
December 5, 2007 at 10:07 pm
62: 15 pounds must be the magic number. Milton Bradley lost 15, Miguel Cabrera lost 15, Headley gained 15. 6′2″ 230 sounds like a power hitting left fielder to me.
December 5, 2007 at 10:08 pm
Dodgers sign Andrew Jones 2 year 36 million. I sure hope last year wasn’t a fluke bad year. I wonder if we even made an offer.
December 5, 2007 at 10:09 pm
Sorry here’s the link: http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb......mp;c_id=la
December 5, 2007 at 10:10 pm
Jones signed with the Dogs. 2/36!!
December 5, 2007 at 10:12 pm
I have to say that I am now officially disappointed. The Dodgers have just signed Andruw Jones… for 2 years/$36M. How could we not consider that type of deal? Does the extra year really make that big of a difference, especially with money coming off the books after the 08 season? *sigh* I really want to lock up Fukudome now, but that’s 50/50 at best. I am not feeling the vibe of a LF platoon, Cameron, Giles OF.
December 5, 2007 at 10:15 pm
I’m glad the Padres didn’t make that offer to Andruw Jones.
December 5, 2007 at 10:23 pm
65: Jones doesn’t even project as a $15M/year player the next two years.
December 5, 2007 at 10:27 pm
I don’t know how the Dodgers will handle their OF, but they’re better off treating Pierre as a sunk cost and playing Ethier-Jones-Kemp. But I doubt they’ll do it. Jones is a HUGE improvement over Pierre, but he’s not THAT much better than Ethier or Kemp… I still think the Dodgers are more likely to finish 4th than 1st (most likely they’ll finish 3rd or maybe 2nd). Despite the Dodgers’ lack of power they scored a decent amount of runs in the second half. It was their pitching that failed them. And the pitching staff hasn’t gotten better.
December 5, 2007 at 10:29 pm
To be honest… I think the Andruw Jones deal is a genius. That is the exact number I thought the Padres would offer and wouldn’t be able to sign him for. I can’t believe that we wouldn’t give Andruw an extra year. In 2 years Hunter might be ready or the FO could have 2 years to look elsewhere. If Andruw bounces back the deal is amazing and if he doesn’t you only have a 2 year commitment and you still get great defense and probably 25-30 HR’s. They better have something up their sleeve or they will take a ton of SH!T for this.
December 5, 2007 at 10:45 pm
I think it’s reasonable that we’ll have a Headley-Fukudome-Giles or Fukudome-Cameron-Giles OF next year… I think the Padres want Fukudome bad enough that they’ll sign him whether or not Cameron is back in CF for us next year…
December 5, 2007 at 10:48 pm
69-72: I agree that this is a great deal for the Dodgers. I do wish that we had gotten out on Fukodome and gotten in on Andruw at this price point for just 2 years. He murders the ball in PetCo and now he’s going to be here every other weekend wearing blue…yuck. This is the rarely seen astute baseball move by Colletti.
December 5, 2007 at 11:02 pm
73.
I would love it if we land Fukudome but at this point from what I hear I seriously doubt that we will have the winning offer. He has interest froma lot of teams. Do you think the Padres will go 3 years $45 million on him? I don’t and I bet that’s about what he gets.
December 5, 2007 at 11:22 pm
re: 72
That is a severe over-reaction.
December 5, 2007 at 11:27 pm
76: Agreed. As for everyone saying, “But, but, but, why didn’t we…”
How in the hell do you know that we didn’t? Even given Andruw’s track record in Petco, if you’re a FA slugger trying to rebuild value and you get comparable offers from SD and LA, where are you gonna sign?
As others have pointed out, whos to say that 07 isn’t indicative of what Jones is now? Also, I just read on MLBTR that we may be buying the first pick from the Rays so we can get Barton.
Before everyone goes all “the FO is cheap” lets please remember that it’s been less than a week since we reached an agreement with the second best pitcher in the world to a reasonable 3-year extension that constitutes some serious spending of money.
And, by the way, if you think that Jones will help out the veterans vs. youngsters problem that plagues the Dodgers, you haven’t been paying attention. Anyone catch how Jones abused their young LF when he was here? It was ridiculous…
December 5, 2007 at 11:34 pm
Another thing: If that’s the best contract Boras could get for Jones, doesn’t that mean many teams, including the Padres, were being cautious.
Two years, $36 mil from the free-spending, stupid Dodgers. That probably means 1 year for $9-12 mil was about right.
December 5, 2007 at 11:35 pm
Anyone here about the potential trade for the first pick in the rule 5 draft tomorrow … http://www.baseballamerica.com.....cts/?p=680
Looks like they’d take Brian Barton … I’d like that move quite a bit, at first glance.
December 5, 2007 at 11:43 pm
I think Jones is going to kill us for the next two years but it’s not the end of the world. The Dodgers will screw it up by sticking Pierre in LF and trading one or more of their young studs.
The Barton rumor is interesting to say the least, he put up some nice .400+ OBPs in the minors. Is he our centerfielder next year? Or insurance in case Fukudome can’t handle CF in Petco? With his engineering degree he might be the one guy on the team that can hang with Chris Young intellectually. And Coach Kenterra will love him if he has speed. Speed shows up every day you know, unlike power and on base percentage.
December 6, 2007 at 12:02 am
79: er, that should be “hear” … gettin’ late, I guess.
80: My take is he’ll be a 4th outfielder type, but I really have no idea. I like the move though (if it happens), picking up a pretty legit player in the Rule 5.
December 6, 2007 at 12:12 am
Wow, the Dodgers spent the money for Jones? Curious move.
Hmm….I’m really worried that they’ll get Bedard now or Haren.
The signing may indicates that Kemp/Ethier is going to be traded. I don’t see Pierre being the veteran that gets cut/traded.
Sure hope that they will trade away two/three of their young studs.
December 6, 2007 at 12:16 am
Love the Brian Barton move if it is true. let’s hope his knee is cool.
76, 78
How do you figure that’s an over reaction. Do you not think the Padres will get killed by the media and the fans if they don’t have a good CF option up their sleeves? This is the type of crap we are going to have to hear fans bitch about on the radio for years. Every letter to the editor section in the UT is going to go on on about this for months and it is going to drive me off the deep end (that’s really why i’m pissed).
At the end of the season they were talking about a 1 year offer of $18 mil for Jones. Lets keep in mind that he is a future HOF’R that is like 30. I’m sure the market for him was down but when Tori Hunter is signing for $90 million and Aaron Rowand is looking for $65 or more a 2 year deal for a guy that has produced more (by leaps and bounds) and is younger than both of them.
I am not one to say the Padres don’t spend any money and all that. I understand their philosophy on long term contracts and all that jazz. So when we don’t go after pricey long term investments I get it and I don’t get broken up about it. It’s just that this seems like the type of deal that the Padres were talking about going into the off-season. Saying we will offer him a year or two and see if he will take it.
Truthfully I’d rather have someone younger with better hitting discipline. I’d much rather have a good OBP guy that hits 15 HR’s than a guy that hits 30+ hr’s and strikes out swinging on nearly every other at bat. It just seems like the Padres through an idea that they never thought would happen out and then their biggest rival came in and gave it to him and he took it.
December 6, 2007 at 12:27 am
79: I guess the FO is pretty high on Barton to move up like that. OTOH, it probably not the only move to get a CF for the Padres’ next season. I hope that’s the case.
Interesting name on that list is Evan Meek who used to be with the Twins and then the Padres picked him up and traded him to the Cubs. How he ended up with the Devil…oops…Rays, I don’t know. His numbers used to be pretty good. Must have turned out to be not as good for the Rays to expose him.
December 6, 2007 at 12:27 am