In-Game Discussion: Padres @ Twins (18 Jun 2005)

Sat, Jun 18, 2005Ballhype: hype it up!
by Geoff Young

first pitch: 4:10 p.m., PT
television: Channel 4
matchup: Brian Lawrence (3-6, 4.76 ERA) vs Brad Radke (5-5, 4.13 ERA)

Friars try to avoid getting their arses handed to them yet again by some team from the midwest. The rest is details. I’ll be eating airplane food tomorrow, so it’s probably best that I won’t be able to watch the game. Mmmm, plastic biscuit.

Picking up where last year's version left off, the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual provides in-depth analysis of and commentary on the San Diego Padres. Get your copy today.

Possibly Related Posts

158 Responses to “In-Game Discussion: Padres @ Twins (18 Jun 2005)”

  1. hank Says:

    initial impressions, Klesko got us started..Giles is still struggling leaving Nevin to lead off an inning..

    Lawrence seems to have his good sinker today, we need it..

    Current score: 0
  2. Richard Says:

    If Nevin can get beaned more often…

    Current score: 0
  3. Richard Says:

    64% odds of coming away with at least one run.

    Current score: 0
  4. Richard Says:

    Excellent. 41% odds of getting at least one more.

    Current score: 0
  5. Richard Says:

    Should be probability rather than odds.

    Current score: 0
  6. hank Says:

    anyone realize that giles is 1 for his last 20..

    Sweeney comes through and Sean drives in Nevin.

    Current score: 0
  7. Richard Says:

    Sweeney deserves more playing time. He’s been amazing this year.

    Current score: 0
  8. Richard Says:

    62.5% probability of winning.

    Current score: 0
  9. Richard Says:

    75% probability of winning. 3-0, Padres.

    Current score: 0
  10. hank Says:

    clutch two out hit by Greene..wtg

    whats wrong with these Padres?

    Current score: 0
  11. Richard Says:

    I’m getting the useless numbers from BP’s Expected Win Matrix.

    Current score: 0
  12. Richard Says:

    The probability of scoring 1 or more runs at the beginning of every inning is 28.1%. Torii Hunter leads off the bottom of the second…

    Current score: 0
  13. Richard Says:

    Probability of holding the Twins scoreless this inning following the HBP: 57.5%.

    Current score: 0
  14. hank Says:

    I wondered about that. Sweeney is having a fine year and he had a fine one last year. He can continue to have success if Bochy doesnt overuse him. If he is overused, his weaknesses will be exposed and he will probably revert to his norm(.250 or so)

    Current score: 0
  15. Richard Says:

    Hunter was out by a mile!

    Current score: 0
  16. Richard Says:

    The second base umpire just cost us. Prob. zero runs if he gets the call right: 83.6%, since he got it wrong: 37.9%. That sucks.

    Current score: 0
  17. Richard Says:

    That flyball drops it from 37.9% to 33.3%, but reduces the likelihood of hanging a crooked number. And a sac fly brings him home. Probability of holding them to one: 93.2%.

    Current score: 0
  18. Richard Says:

    WOW! Dave Roberts makes a tremendous catch against the wall in deep center!!!

    Current score: 0
  19. Richard Says:

    Probability of winning: 74%.

    Current score: 0
  20. hank Says:

    perfect example of scoring without a hit, but good job by Lawrence to limit the damage.(with a little help from his defense)

    Current score: 0
  21. Richard Says:

    They were, of course, given a huge assist.

    Current score: 0
  22. Richard Says:

    They also managed to get a runner on second with no outs despite being caught stealing.

    Current score: 0
  23. Richard Says:

    I didn’t think the “assist comment” went through. Sweeney needs to come up big again.

    Current score: 0
  24. Richard Says:

    There was only a 27.8% probability of scoring with runners on first and third with two out.

    Current score: 0
  25. Richard Says:

    67.6% probability of winning, now.

    Current score: 0
  26. Richard Says:

    I hate that umpires have an effect on games.

    Current score: 0
  27. hank Says:

    what was the reason giles didnt score on Nevin’s single to right?

    Current score: 0
  28. Richard Says:

    Shutout no longer a possibility, but no-hitter still intact as the Twins come up to bat in the third.

    Current score: 0
  29. Richard Says:

    The third base coach held him there. He had forever to get home, too. Ford bobbled the ball.

    Current score: 0
  30. Richard Says:

    83.6% probability of keeping the Twins off the board this inning.

    Current score: 0
  31. Richard Says:

    40 pitches already for B-Law…

    Current score: 0
  32. Richard Says:

    Next two pitches are outs, though. 42 pitches through three innings.

    Current score: 0
  33. Richard Says:

    Lawrence: 3.0 IP, 0 H, 1 R, 0 BB, 1 K (1 HBP)

    Current score: 0
  34. Richard Says:

    14 pitches per inning, 73.8% strikes.

    Current score: 0
  35. Richard Says:

    Maybe Radke’s walk totals are low because he gets so many damn called strikes…

    Current score: 0
  36. Richard Says:

    Khalil is having a pretty good plate appearance. And he walks.

    Current score: 0
  37. Richard Says:

    Everything borderline that Radke throws is called a strike.

    Current score: 0
  38. Richard Says:

    Expected Win Matrix says: 65.8% win probability

    Current score: 0
  39. Richard Says:

    Sure seems like the Twins are fouling everything off.

    Current score: 0
  40. Richard Says:

    First hit of the night for the Twins. (I counted and there have been 15 foul balls hit by the Twins…)

    Current score: 0
  41. Richard Says:

    Every single batter Lawrence has faced, he’s gotten out. He hit Hunter, but then Hunter was thrown out at second (called safe, but he was thrown out damnit). And the Twins’ first hit of the night was erased on a double play.

    Current score: 0
  42. hank Says:

    there goes the no hitter…lol

    at least we got the dp ball right after

    Current score: 0
  43. Richard Says:

    Lawrence: 4.0 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 0 BB, 2 K, 0 HR (1 HBP)

    Current score: 0
  44. Richard Says:

    Radke just got mildly squeezed twice in this PA. Fick absolutely hammered that pitch foul…

    Current score: 0
  45. Richard Says:

    Fick hit another one pretty hard to the gap, but Ford cut it off and held him to a single.

    Current score: 0
  46. Richard Says:

    Bob does a good job of staying back on the ball.

    Current score: 0
  47. Richard Says:

    I love to watch Fick play. He goes from first to second on a Klesko single.

    Current score: 0
  48. Richard Says:

    I love to watch Fick play. He goes from first to third on a Klesko single.

    Current score: 0
  49. hank Says:

    70 percent chance of giles hitting into a dp

    Current score: 0
  50. Richard Says:

    Damn. I wish that “first to second” comment hadn’t gone through.

    Current score: 0
  51. Richard Says:

    15.2%, not 70. :-P

    Current score: 0
  52. Richard Says:

    87.2% probability of scoring here.

    Current score: 0
  53. Richard Says:

    That pitch may have been low, but it was SO close.

    Current score: 0
  54. Richard Says:

    65% probability of scoring following that horrendous AB by Phil Nevin.

    Current score: 0
  55. hank Says:

    well he got out of it, he walked…

    I knew he wasnt getting a hit..

    what the heck was that from Nevin?

    Current score: 0
  56. Richard Says:

    Two walks by Radke tonight. That makes six for the year.

    Current score: 0
  57. Richard Says:

    It was a swinging bunt from Nevin. Mark Sweeney just struck out. 29.2% probability of scoring, now.

    Current score: 0
  58. hank Says:

    well so much for sweeney’s hot streak..

    come on sean

    Current score: 0
  59. Richard Says:

    Radke gets out of the bases loaded, no outs jam. Anyone care to guess why? Phil Nevin’s swinging bunt on the first pitch. It wouldn’t have even been a strike. Nevin shouldn’t be in the order against right-handed pitchers…

    Current score: 0
  60. hank Says:

    geesh! two nubbers and a strike out with bases loaded. we are snakebit!

    Current score: 0
  61. Richard Says:

    Nevin has a .293 OBP against right-handers this season.

    Current score: 0
  62. Richard Says:

    66.4% probability of winning…

    Current score: 0
  63. hank Says:

    eh? radke has a total of 5 walks for the season. why take a strike in an rbi situation?

    Nevin already singled and hbp..

    Current score: 0
  64. Richard Says:

    Average number of runs scored with the bases juiced and none out: 2.3444.

    Current score: 0
  65. Richard Says:

    Hank, I said it wasn’t a strike. Also, why take a strike? Because you don’t swing at pitches you can’t hit hard. It’s just plain stupid to swing at a ball you can’t hit hard no matter what the situation.

    Current score: 0
  66. hank Says:

    btw, he also has 38 of his 47 rbi vs right handers

    Current score: 0
  67. Richard Says:

    Lawrence gives up his first walk of the evening after strike three is called a check swing.

    Current score: 0
  68. Richard Says:

    Hank, RBI’s don’t mean anything.

    Current score: 0
  69. hank Says:

    who are you to say what pitches nevin can and cant hit hard. he was there, u werent

    Current score: 0
  70. hank Says:

    i tell u what rbi mean, it means someone scored a fucking run and right now that is sorely lacking from the padres offense

    Current score: 0
  71. Lance Says:

    Just got to the office after my son’s football game. The good guys lost. Hopefully the Padres can hold this lead so I’m not 0-for-2 today.

    Current score: 0
  72. Lance Says:

    Hank and Richard
    sittin’ in a tree
    K-I-S-S-I-N-G.

    Why don’t you two lovebirds get a room?

    Current score: 0
  73. Richard Says:

    Base hit, DR. I imagine he’ll be running…

    Current score: 0
  74. Richard Says:

    Hank, the RBI is highly batting order dependent.

    Current score: 0
  75. Richard Says:

    Roberts just got picked off of first. That’ll happen when the pitcher balks.

    Current score: 0
  76. Lance Says:

    Richard, you’re right about not swinging at balls you can’t hit hard. But RBI’s do mean SOMETHING. Not as much as people think, but more than nothing.
    And Hank, the reason Nevin’ RBI’s are mostly against RHP’s is because he’s faced more RHP’s, and the hitters in front of him are mostly left-handed, and as such are on base more frequently against RHP’s.

    Current score: 0
  77. Richard Says:

    BP Basics: Measuring Offense

    http://www.baseballprospectus......cleid=2562

    Current score: 0
  78. Richard Says:

    True, they do mean something. From the BP Basics series:

    The thing to understand about counting stats is that, absent supporting information, they’re really only useful at the margins. That’s to say, it’s hard to rack up 140 RBI and somehow stink. Conversely, it’s difficult to log a season’s worth of plate appearances, total 40 RBI and somehow be any good.

    Current score: 0
  79. Lance Says:

    Richard, RBI’s are quite batting order dependent, but the reason some hitters have the good fortune of all those RBI opportunities that come in the 3-4-5 slots is because they’re good hitters. All of them except Phil Nevin, of course.

    Current score: 0
  80. hank Says:

    that is why you need BOTH types of hitters. those that get on and those that drive them in.

    Ideally, you could have one player do both, but those superstars are hard to come by.

    Current score: 0
  81. Richard Says:

    Lawrence: 5.1 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 1 BB, 2 K, 0 HR (1 HBP)

    Current score: 0
  82. Richard Says:

    That’s true, Hank. You need high-OBP guys and high-SLG guys. Phil Nevin is neither.

    Current score: 0
  83. Richard Says:

    He used to be a high slugging percentage guy, but he isn’t any longer.

    Current score: 0
  84. hank Says:

    actually, you are inferring that the only reason that Nevin leads the team in rbi is because he gets more opportunities. That is incorrect. Giles actually lead the team in PLATE APPEARANCES with runners in scoring position. but too often, he takes the walk, leaving someone else to drive in the runs.

    Current score: 0
  85. Richard Says:

    You know how a guy like Phil Nevin ends up in as a 3-4-5 hitter. He started there and so he has RBI’s and then they look at RBI’s to see who is good, so they can decide who is a 3-4-5 hitter. It’s circular logic. Of course, circular logic is still a step up for Bochy.

    Current score: 0
  86. Lance Says:

    Hitters whose primary skill would appear to be “getting on” will drive in a surprising amount of runs when batting behind other players who reach base frequently.
    Honus Wagner, Ty Cobb, Frankie Frisch, Joe Cronin, and more recently Tommy Herr, Willie MaGee, Keith Hernandez, Rod Carew, and Tony Gwynn all had 100 RBI seasons in this manner.

    Current score: 0
  87. Richard Says:

    I’m not saying it’s just because he’s getting more opportunities. It’s also because most of his hits have come with runners on, which is simply chance. By that, I mean Nevin over his career has not been consistently better with runners on.

    Triple to left field by Robert Fick!

    Current score: 0
  88. Richard Says:

    Oh and as anecdotatl evidence, if Nevin had walked in his last at-bat, he would have notched an RBI.

    Current score: 0
  89. Richard Says:

    Make that anecdotal.

    Current score: 0
  90. Richard Says:

    Fick scores on a misplayed pop fly.

    Current score: 0
  91. Lance Says:

    Come on now, Richard, Nevin didn’t have 31 and 41 homer seasons because he “started there.” He attained those numbers because he was a VERY good hitter. That may or may not still be true, but anyone who hits 41 homers is a valuable player, unless he does absolutely NOTHING in addition.
    Lost in the lights!!! 4-1 Pads!

    Current score: 0
  92. Richard Says:

    Lawrence has only thrown 13 pitches per inning (73% strikes).

    Current score: 0
  93. Richard Says:

    This year, Lance. I already said he WAS a good hitter.

    Current score: 0
  94. Richard Says:

    63.9% probability of scoring at least one run with runners on first and second with none out. Looks like we’re about to beat the odds.

    Current score: 0
  95. Richard Says:

    Nevermind. Ignore my pessimism. Sean Burroughs just got his first hit of the game.

    Current score: 0
  96. Lance Says:

    I said it may or MAY NOT still be true.
    He has never appeared to be a hitter who would age well. I see him in the mold of Gaetti, Brunansky, McReynolds. You know, white guys who around the age of 31-34, wake up one morning unable to get around on a good fastball.
    Sean Burroughs, RBI MACHINE!!!

    Current score: 0
  97. Richard Says:

    Twins failed to cover first base, but Giles got caught off third base on the play. Reminiscent of Ramon Hernandez and his inability to count to three.

    Current score: 0
  98. Richard Says:

    94.3% probability of winning, now.

    Current score: 0
  99. Lance Says:

    Richard, should we continue to ignore your pessimism?

    Current score: 0
  100. Richard Says:

    Probably.

    Current score: 0
  101. Richard Says:

    Speaking of Phil Nevin failing to age well, I really hope Towers doesn’t re-sign Ramon Hernandez for more than two years and/or $12 million.

    Current score: 0
  102. Richard Says:

    Twins just got their second hit of the night. Lawrence is tough to hit when he is on…

    Current score: 0
  103. Richard Says:

    Uh-oh. Just got their third hit of the night and second of the inning.

    Current score: 0
  104. Richard Says:

    On the pitch that Hunter hit, Lawrence matched Radke’s pitch total for the night.

    Current score: 0
  105. Richard Says:

    Lawrence had a double play ball, but it got to him so fast, Greene wasn’t to second base yet.

    Current score: 0
  106. Lance Says: