IGD: Padres vs Reds (30 Jul 2005)

first pitch: 7:05 p.m., PT
television: Channel 4
matchup: Pedro Astacio (2-9, 5.84 ERA) vs Aaron Harang (6-9, 3.97 ERA)
previews: ESPN | Padres.com

Padres have fallen below .500 for the first time since May 3, when they were 13-14. Thanks to their NL West cohorts in suckitude, San Diego still leads the division and has a 63% chance of reaching the playoffs.

Once again, I’ve run out of things to say about this [expletive deleted] team. Talk amongst yourselves, I’m going to the movies.

123 Comments

  1. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Rumor Central: Padres trade Brian Giles to St. Louis for Jason Marquis and (please God) something else.

  2. Posted July 30, 2005 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    My head may explode if the Padres deal Giles for Marquis.

  3. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Don’t know if you have a Baseball Prospectus subscription but it’s supposedly included in Will Carroll’s column there. I heard it mentioned in the Giants broadcast a few minutes ago.

    And Wes Helms just hit a 3-run pinch-HR to make it 7-1 Brewhas over the Giants.

  4. Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    I do and BP is free this week even if I didn’t.

  5. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    And the Giants picked up OF Randy Winn from Seattle for C Yorvit Torrealba and minor league P Jesse Foppert.

  6. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:21 pm | Permalink

    In that case, here’s what Will says: “The Cardinals continue to work on a deal for an outfielder. The latest discussions involve Brian Giles coming to the Cardinals in return for Jason Marquis. That part would be easy enough, so if this deal gets held up, it will be over minor details of money and additional prospects.”

  7. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    That would be an awful deal for the Padres. But Giles is a free agent who is probably going elsewhere, so …

  8. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    If you were a FA power hitter, why would you ever play 81 games in Petco when there are so many better hitters parks out there?

  9. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Because San Diego is the best place on earth? The Padres do need to build around pitching and defense.

  10. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Unless you’re Adam Dunn and you’re facing Padres pitching, that is.

  11. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, I would like Dunn to play for the Padres.

  12. Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    You don’t get “nothing” when you don’t resign a free agent. I’m tired of seeing that. You get picks. (See: Cesar Ramos)

  13. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Where did you see it?

  14. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    True. But everyone wants to win now. The man does have a point though.

  15. Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    I’m hearing and seeing that particular statement a lot of places. People think you “get nothing.”

  16. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:42 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps they mean nothing immediately (as compared to a trade).

  17. Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    It’s usually been phrased as, “If you don’t trade them, they leave at the end of the year and you get nothing.”

  18. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    What should the team do in the next 17 hours, Rich?

  19. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:48 pm | Permalink

    If the Reds win tonight, it will be their first 4-game winning streak of the season.

  20. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    Which, to the vast majority of fans, is true. You don’t get anything immediately. You get to wait until the following year’s draft to select a guy who (at best) won’t be in the big leagues for another two to three years. That’s a looong wait in exchange for a player good enough to sign elsewhere as a FA. To most fans, it equates to nothing.

    But I see your point.

  21. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    Cincinnati native Nick Lachey is in the house. I know: Who cares?

  22. Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    I can see why they come to that incorrect conclusion, but it’s still incorrect. Also, the organization needs to think longer term.

    As for what the Padres should do, the only thing I’d advocate would be firing Bochy instituting my platooning suggestion. Aside from that, nothing. We just don’t have the information the front office does as far as what is available on the trade market.

  23. Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    On another note, Chuck Lamar has to be the absolute worst GM in baseball.

  24. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    This ump needs to learn: If Giles doesn’t swing, it’s not a strike.

  25. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    What did he do now?

  26. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:01 pm | Permalink

    “The Devil Rays overplayed their hand, insisting on Hanley Ramirez, according to most triangulations of the deal.” – Will Carroll

    Towers made it clear at the Pizza Feed that Lamar is impossible to deal with. It’s stupid crap like that he was talking about.

  27. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:02 pm | Permalink

    On yet another note, baseball terminology is confusing. The announcers (Vasgersian) still haven’t figured it out. A walk is not a great “at bat.” It’s not even an “at bat.”

  28. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

    They have some serious young talent though, don’t they? Maybe he will screw it all up.

  29. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    It’s a nice plate appearance.

  30. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    We got Dunn out.

  31. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    The trivia question was, “Who was the last Red to win a Cy Young Award?” Has a Red ever won it? I didn’t think they had.

  32. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    That is a true nitpick.

  33. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    Gwynn, Bochy and Flannery is the answer to the trivia question, if anyone is watching the Reds feed.

  34. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Did Seaver win it with them?

  35. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Towers also addressed the young talent saying that when you have the first pick in the draft every year, you’re going to end up with some good young players.

  36. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

    Oh, true, I wasn’t saying Lamar was great because they had great talent.

  37. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    I know Soto didn’t. Rijo didn’t. The Nasty Boys didn’t. The Big Red Machine didn’t have great pitching.

  38. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    That possibility hadn’t even crossed my mind. Nobody could think Lamar was great.

  39. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    The trivia question on the Reds feed is: What three Padres players were on all three playoff teams as either players or coaches?

  40. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    “The only thing that keeps this organization from being recognized as one of the finest in baseball is wins and losses at the major-league level.”
    –Devil Rays GM Chuck LaMar

    And Sean Casey who hits like Sean Burroughs just hit a home run.

  41. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    The Reds have no Cy Young Award winners. Just looked it up.

  42. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    That is a hell of an obstacle to overcome — wins and losses at the major league level.

  43. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    Seaver finished 3 pts behind Valenzuela in 1981. See if they give that little nugget, Rich.

  44. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    k, assuming they haven’t already given the answer while I was making my dinner.

  45. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    I win. No Red has ever won the Cy Young. woo

    And they didn’t share “that little nugget.” It’s a Ducksnorts exclusive.

  46. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    That’s the kind of stuff you get only here. I, of course, got the Padres question.

  47. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    LaMar on the Manny talks: “We have had discussions with both teams, not only in a combined deal, but separate deals with each one of those teams. It’s hard enough to make a real good trade [with two teams]. When you start adding a third team, there are a lot of logistics.”

  48. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    BOSTON — The Red Sox acquired outfielder Jose Cruz Jr. and cash considerations from the Arizona Diamondbacks on Saturday night in exchange for minor league infielder Kenny Perez and minor league right-hander Kyle Bono.

  49. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    David Ross’s first hit as a Padre.

  50. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Sickels rated Bono a C+ prospect and Perez didn’t make the book.

  51. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    You don’t want to walk guys in front of Dunn…

  52. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    He walked in a run. Walked it in.

  53. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    Four walks this inning for Astacio, tying K-Rod’s from earlier today.

  54. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    I like how Bochy waited until Astacio put the game out of reach before he took him out.

  55. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    Lots of boos at Petco lately.

  56. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:49 pm | Permalink

    That’s a combination of poor play and people who aren’t really Padre fans.

  57. Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    When a guy walks in a run, couldn’t that be seen as a good time to yank him?

  58. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    If Park starts this week (after Astacio), that will be 40 percent of the Rangers rotation from earlier this season. Not a good sign.

  59. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    Amazingly (almost disapointingly at this point), no double switch.

  60. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    I agree on the boos, Rich. Boston fans booing Manny was insane too. The walk would have done it for me too, as far as taking him out.

  61. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Are you guys getting up to watch Coleman tomorrow?

  62. hank
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:56 pm | Permalink

    Astacio went 95 pitches or so before losing it. What does Bochy expect from him. He did pretty well until that point.

    The fact is, the Padres cant SCORE…nothing else matters!

  63. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 8:59 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, scoring has been the issue during the past month.

  64. hank
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Yep, thats why you trade your biggest right hand bat for a washed up pitcher.

    I just have to shake my head and wonder who is running this asylum?

  65. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:11 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think big bats slug .400

  66. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

    Manager Bruce Bochy said LF Ryan Klesko might start taking groundballs at 1B. “Wherever they want me, I don’t care,” Klesko said. “It may take a few days or a week or so to get used to grounders. The arm angles and then bending over for the course of nine innings, is the difference.” Klesko played first until being moved to the outfield in spring training 2002. … RHP Adam Eaton, on the DL since June 16 with a finger injury, threw a simulated game and could be activated on Tuesday. He’ll probably pitch from the bullpen at first in order to build his arm back up.

  67. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    SEATTLE (AP) — The Seattle Mariners traded center fielder Randy Winn to the San Francisco Giants on Saturday night for backup catcher Yorvit Torrealba and minor league pitcher Jesse Foppert.

  68. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Double swtich alert! Whoever had the 7th inning in the pool, collect your door prize.

  69. hank
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    I know what he WAS doing this year, but who, on the Padres team, has the potential to carry this team offensively?

    remember he spent most of June and July on the d/l or playing with injury.

    You think the offense would take off if nevin started hitting .300/350/.550? You think its possible that Nevin could post those numbers?

    Even tho he has been crappy this season, its still entirely possible because he has done it before as recently as last season.

  70. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    “Yep, thats why you trade your biggest right hand bat for a washed up pitcher.

    I just have to shake my head and wonder who is running this asylum?” – hank

    How do you maintain your spectacular disconnect from reality and still manage to function? Are you doing this merely to provoke or do you actually believe what you’re typing?

  71. hank
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    you think trading nevin for park is going to take the padres to the playoffs this year?

    I certainly dont, in fact I feel this trade has sealed a non playoff spot for this team this year.

  72. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    hank, it’s just not possible. Phil’s bat speed is gone. He’ll never be the player he once was (and he was very good). He may hit in Arlington, but even Soriano hits in Arlington.

  73. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    Trading Phil Nevin for a bag of balls would have improved their playoff chances. Actually, it might have been a better trade than the one for Park.

  74. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Hank, why do you think nobody wanted Nevin? Why do you think Towers was unable to unload him despite trying for years?

  75. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Just got back from Fantastic Four. Good movie, and Jessica Alba is awfully easy on the eyes. Now it’s back to the Not-So-Fantastic Twenty-Five. Blecch…

  76. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    Even when Nevin was a hell of a hitter, Towers was trying to unload him because of his attitude. Now, he can’t hit, and he’s not going to. It’s over.

    Trading Nevin for nothing would have been better because it would have freed up money. Park’s contract is ugly.

  77. hank
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    lots of people wanted Nevin, they just didnt want his contract. Why do you think 4 seperate trades were arranged for Nevin..certainly not because nobody wanted him. There were a couple of others also that never went anywhere because of the no trade provisions..seattle and boston both wanted him.

    even soriano hits in Texas? what kind of reference is that. In my memory, soriano also hit in New York.

  78. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    Exactly, Kev. Exactly.

  79. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Soriano Home: .322/.353/.678
    Soriano Away: .240/.275/.410

  80. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Also, Soriano is probably the most overrated player on the planet. I might be missing someone, but I think that’s accurate.

  81. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    The Padres have thrown two guys out at home, now.

  82. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Wow, you should send those stats to the 20 teams trying to get him. I even saw the Padres on that list at one time.

  83. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    The difference between his home and away splits is equal to more than half a run per game.

  84. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Padres acquire Miguel Olivo for…?

  85. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Mateo.

  86. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Trade announced: C Miguel Olivo for C Miguel Ojeda.

  87. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Mateo w/Double-A
    52.7 IP
    39 K
    15 BB
    2 HR

  88. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Olivo’s DT Batting Line: .151/.179/.284
    Olivo’s Career DT Batting Line: .211/.261/.372

    And we also got rid of Ojeda.

  89. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    If you can’t get one good catcher, corner the market on mediocre ones?

  90. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    Was that trade even worth the long-distance charges it took?

  91. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    Olivo is 26. He doesn’t hit for average. He has poor plate discipline. He has some pop. He’s below average defensively.

  92. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    I’d rather have Olivo than Mateo and Ojeda, but this trade accomplishes little other than possibly freeing up Fick for pinch-hitting.

  93. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Is this just shuffling deckchairs on the Titanic?

  94. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Olivo actually hits lefties well, though. Line of .306/.339/.578 over the last three years (180 ABs).

  95. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t it better to have Fick in the lineup than Ross, or am I missing something?

  96. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    Soriano’s home-away splits for 2002-04 are about even. I know that’s only one season in Texas, but still.

  97. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    This is 1999-2000 bad right now. Guys aren’t executing.

  98. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    What was the line… What do you think about the execution of your team? I’m all for it.

  99. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    That was John McKay, btw…

  100. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know how many average to bad pitchers we have helped to look great in the last month or so, but Harang is the latest. Bad stuff.

  101. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    9-1 Reds.

  102. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    Harang’s pretty good, actually.

  103. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, the old Bucs coach. “We didn’t tackle, but we made up for it by not blocking.”

  104. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    5th HR for the Reds in two games.

  105. Posted July 30, 2005 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    So, can we get an apology from Ray Kroc? This is some dreadful baseball. How come other teams’ players can hit homers at Petco?

  106. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:01 pm | Permalink

    Rich, shouldn’t we start Fick over any of these guys?

  107. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, the Reds make this park look small.

  108. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    If you believe Clay Davenport’s metrics (and I tend to), Fick costs the team .23 runs compared to an average fielding catcher every game he catches.

  109. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Good news, Geoff. Eric Milton and his 7+ ERA go tomorrow.

  110. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Hernandez this season was only costing the team .03 runs per game compared to an average catcher.

    Nevin in his extremely limited sample was .01 better than average.

    Ojeda had cost the team .14 per game.

    In what I’m fairly certain is a sample size fluke, Dave Ross had been worth .24 per game above average with Pittsburgh.

    Olivo had been .05 below with the Mariners.

    I’ll try to crunch the numbers on offense tonight or tomorrow morning.

  111. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    I see. So who is going to watch Coleman tomorrow? Will they televise his part of things?

  112. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    Do you think Eric Milton can continue to give up home runs even at PetCo which last season was good for cutting home runs by something like 35-40%?

  113. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    If it’s on, I’ll be watching.

  114. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

    In 2004, Olivo approached being a league average hitter.

  115. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Brian. I’d feel better about Milton if we’d been able to do anything against Luke Hudson and his 8.83 ERA.

  116. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    I knew you’d catch the sarcasm.

  117. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of Hudson, what happened to him between this year and last? He was excellent last season.

  118. hank
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    I prediict that milton will give up no more than 1 run tomorrow. and zero homers..

    in fact, it is just my natural optimism that makes me think we will score even one run..

  119. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    I fear hank is right.

  120. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    The Padres received $6 million from the Texas Rangers in the trade that got them RHP Chan Ho Park for slugger Phil Nevin. … Park will join the Padres in Pittsburgh on Tuesday.

  121. Brian G.
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    But most importantly, how many double switches will we pull off?

  122. Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    The over/under on double switches by Bochy in a game is probably 1.5, right?

  123. Kevin
    Posted July 30, 2005 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    yeah, i think so. definitely, double switches.