IGD: Padres vs Cardinals (28 Jul 2005)

first pitch: 12:35 p.m., PT
television: none
matchup: Tim Stauffer (3-5, 4.81 ERA) vs Chris Carpenter (14-4, 2.26 ERA)

The Padres are now 51-50. That’s insane. Or maybe just awesome and innovative. Don’t worry, I don’t know what I’m talking about either. Breaking an eight-game losing streak will do that to a guy. It’s like speaking in tongues, or dancing with wolves, or stumbling for metaphors.

Stauffer gets the rubber game against the Cards, in an afternoon affair that isn’t televised. Among other things, Stauffer has found Petco Park to his liking so far. Opponents are hitting just .268/.307/.401 against him at home. One trouble spot for Stauffer comes when runners get on base:

              AB   BA  OBP  SLG
Bases empty  185 .222 .276 .362
Runners on   117 .350 .421 .564

On the flip side, Carpenter has been amazing this year and is a legit Cy Young contender. Also, he’s completely destroyed right-handed hitters (.192/.221/.258 in 260 AB); figure Mark Sweeney will get the start at first. Check out Carpenter’s numbers since June:

G   IP  H R ER HR BB SO
9 73.2 44 6  6  3 13 71

He allowed half of those six runs in one start. In no other start did he allow more than a single run. Ridiculous.

Other Stuff

  • Interview with Bob Scanlan (Mirl.com). Brian Wilmer talks to the current Padres broadcaster and former big-league pitcher “about steroids, the future of the game, and his rather unusual workout routine.”
  • Burk’s Beaver Tales. Portland Beavers announcer Rich Burk joins the blogosphere. It’s great to see someone in a more “official” position getting into this. I look forward to reading Burk’s tales.
  • Surgery for Hernandez (Padres.com). Ramon Hernandez will undergo surgery on his left wrist Friday and is expected to miss 3-6 weeks. Robert Fick and Phil Nevin will split time behind the dish in Hernandez’ absence.
  • Here’s a stupid internet trick. Why not.

Breaking the streak was nice. Taking the series would be even nicer. Go Padres!

49 Comments

  1. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    St. Louis Cardinals:
    At this point, their biggest worry may be drawing some afternoon playoff games. We mentioned their nighttime proficiency a few weeks back, but when the sun shines, the Cards are a very mortal 18-18 and their ERA is 4.39, more than 1 1/2 runs higher than under the stars.

    Carpenter stat for day games:

    57.2IP 56H 25R 24ER 3HR 14BB 55SO 2CG 3.81 ERA

    Without the 2 complete games shutout:

    39.2IP 46H 25R 24ER 3HR 13BB 40SO 5.51 ERA

  2. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    Oh, the Cardinals comment above was from Sports Illustrated Power Rankings.

  3. Posted July 28, 2005 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Was that a Van Halen reference? If so, what do I win?

  4. Posted July 28, 2005 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Didi: Thanks for the day/night splits on Carpenter and the Cardinals. There’s hope for us yet!

  5. Posted July 28, 2005 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Indeed, it was. You win a chance to view this fabulous photo of Sammy Hagar:

    http://www.born-today.com/Today/pix/hagar_sammy.jpg

  6. Iced Coffee
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    When Tim Stauffer sails through the first inning, he has problems.

    When Stauffer struggles in the opening stanza, he simply excels.

    Stauffer brings a 3-5 record and 4.81 earned run average into this afternoon’s game against Albert Pujols and the St. Louis Cardinals.

    In five of this 13 career starts, Stauffer has retired the opposition without allowing a run. In those five starts, Stauffer is 0-4, with a no decision last time out in the Padres’ eventual loss to the Phillies, and a 7.67 ERA.

    In the eight starts Stauffer has allowed the opposing team to score in the opening frame, he’s 3-1, with four no decisions, and a 3.26 ERA. Overall, San Diego is 6-2 in these games.

    Five Starts With Scoreless Firsts
    W-L-ERA-IP-H-R-ER-BB-SO
    0-4-7.67-27-35-23-23-12-12

    Eight Starts With First-Inning Woes
    W-L-ERA-IP-H-R-ER-BB-SO
    3-1-3.26-49.2-47-20-18-15-33

    Five Scoreless Firsts (0-4, 1 No Decision, 7.67)
    H-R/ER-BB-SO-TP-Strikes-Balls-BF
    3-0/0-1-2-89-52-37-21

    Eight Nervous Firsts (3-1, 4ND, 3.26)
    H-R/ER-BB-SO-TP-Strikes-Balls-BF
    17-12/12-10-1-213-120-93-48

    Also, in the five games where Stauffer’s thrown a scoreless first, he’s allowed the opposing team (Seattle, Chicago Cubs, Dodgers twice, and Philadelphia) to score a total of seven runs (on 11 hits and one walk) in the second inning. In these five outings, Stauffer has a 12.60 ERA in the second inning.

    In the eight outings when Stauffer has allowed the opposition to score in the first inning, he’s given up only one second-inning run, Michael Cuddyer’s leadoff solo home run on June 17. Overall in these eight games, Stauffer has a 1.25 second-inning ERA.

    Lastly, Stauffer’s first-inning ERA matches his sixth-inning ERA, 8.31 in each frame.

    Stauffer has reached the sixth inning of each of his 13 starts, but failed to make it out the stanza six times (Seattle, Cubs, Minnesota Dodgers June 22, Giants July 3, and Philadelphia). In a total 8.1 innings pitched in the sixth stanza covering 13 starts, Stauffer has allowed 12 hits and 10 runs – eight earned – with five walks and nine strikeouts.

    In six starts, Stauffer departed before recording the third out in the sixth inning. In these instances, Padres relievers allowed five of the 10 baserunners inherited from Stauffer to score.

    Just a few numbers to keep an eye on today.

  7. Posted July 28, 2005 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Thanks, IC, for the report. Fascinating stuff as always.

  8. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    Nevin or Fick today, anyone know?

    And is that combination officially the worst defensive catching tandem in the major leagues?

  9. Posted July 28, 2005 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    Lineups posted at ESPN:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/preview?gameId=250728125

    It’s Nevin, despite Carpenter’s dominance against righties. Sweeney at first, no surprise.

  10. funkinstein
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Those are similie’s at the beginning of the blog today, Geoff. You used the word “like”.

    Rally time, baby!!!

  11. Posted July 28, 2005 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Just back from Yoga, ahhhh, nice and relaxed. Hey three doubles in one inning. My goodness. And of course, Phil strikes out.

    Come on Padres!

  12. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Phil in the lineup? What the heck Bochy?

  13. Posted July 28, 2005 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Stauffer out. He is just a rookie.

  14. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    What was that single to catcher play by Pujols?

  15. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    A bunt single (fielded too late by our stellar defensive catcher), perhaps?

  16. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Anybody else see this bunch pounding out five more runs off Carpenter?

  17. LynchMob
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Thru 4, Carpenter’s at 71 pitches … so he won’t be going 9 … the sooner we can chase him, the more likely we’ll get the 5 runs!

  18. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Yup, if K-evin is off the lineup.
    We need him to hit lots of hard balls, just so we can ship him to Anaheim for one of the Molina brothers.

    Until then, guess more Phil ’showcase’.

  19. LynchMob
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    And I’m OK with the strategy of walking Carpenter with 2 outs … to make him run the bases in the sun a bit :-)

  20. LynchMob
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Oooo, and making Carpenter run to 2nd on a wild pitch was a nice touch!

  21. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Where is the double switch with Fick in for Nevin?
    Lefty-righty matchup, Bochy?

  22. LynchMob
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Why not PH for Hensley there?

  23. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Yup, all that baserunning really effected Carpenter. Another 10 pitch inning.

  24. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    1-2-3 inning.
    Nobody is taking pitches. 9 pitches, 3 outs.

  25. LynchMob
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Rats … and 8 pitch inning for Carpenter … now at 80 thru 5 … are we done yet? (note: this is just an echo of Brian G’s previous question :-( )

  26. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Another triple. Two in two days.
    Where is the OF defense?

  27. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    Anybody up in the bullpen?

  28. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    95 pitches through six.

  29. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Cardinals with 14 hits through 6 innings. The last time the Padres had that many in a game was June 18 vs. Minnesota (16).

    Nearly six weeks ago.

  30. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Make that 15 Cardinals hits through 6 innings and one batter…

  31. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Cardinals have a chance to make a mirror on the scorecard.

    So far, they scored
    3 1 1 2 0 2 1 through 7 innings.

  32. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    All Cardinals batters has hit except the pitcher who reached base through a BB.

  33. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    They also have a chance to have everyone in their lineup have at least two hits today.

  34. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Blum? That’s our best option off the bench?
    Bochy is insane.

  35. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Oh, good. No chance for the mirror scoreboard now.
    Let’s score some runs, Padres.

  36. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Memo to Mark Loretta: No more heaadfirst slides, please!

  37. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Let’s go Randa.

  38. Kevin
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    That sucks.

  39. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Trailing 10-3 and we have a guy thrown out at the plate by 5 feet? Are they for real?

  40. hank
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    well, picolo figured better to send him than let nevin strike out with the bases loaded.

  41. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Ouch. What the heck?
    Was it a good throw? Bad call for running?
    Urrgh.

    K-evin is up.

  42. hank
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    of course, there is always the outside chance that phil slams em

  43. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Of course, it’s a slim chance.
    But a chance, nonetheless. Or, PH for him. Geesh!
    Down 7 runs and sending the runner.
    What are the Padres playing for then?

    Looks like Even Steven again.

  44. Didi
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    So, now Fick is catching.
    Why not earlier or PH last inning?

  45. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Nevin got thrown out arguing balls and strikes.

    That’s why you can’t use Fick (or whoever your backup catcher is) as a pinch hitter earlier in the game.

  46. Brian G.
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    17 hits, 6 walks allowed.

    But only two wild pitches and just ONE guy thrown out at the plate by a mile!

  47. Kevin
    Posted July 28, 2005 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    This just moved:

    SAN DIEGO (AP) — A day after starting catcher Ramon Hernandez elected to have surgery on his injured left wrist, the San Diego Padres obtained catcher David Ross from the Pittsburgh Pirates on Thursday for minor league shortstop J.J. Furmaniak.

  48. Posted July 28, 2005 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    Sweet! Now we can move Nevin back to 1B and Nady back to the bench…

  49. Posted July 28, 2005 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Not a bad deal. Trading a fringe prospect like Furmaniak for David Ross when they know you need a catcher isn’t terrible.