IGD: Padres @ Mets (19 Jul 2005)

first pitch: 4:10 p.m., PT
television: Channel 4
matchup: Brian Lawrence (5-9, 4.27 ERA) vs Kris Benson (6-3, 3.57 ERA)
previews: ESPN | Padres.com

Oh, goody. Games on the east coast. Games that I don’t get home in time to watch.

Lawrence’s starts this year by runs allowed:

     G   IP  H  R ER HR BB SO GB FB Pit
0-2  8 60.0 41 11 11  0 11 30 83 61 788
3-4  7 47.1 49 24 24  5 11 25 82 44 642
5+   4 19.0 36 23 23  6  7  7 27 22 335

Gross oversimplification: Give Lawrence five starts, and two will be good, two will be okay, and one will be bad.

As for Benson, the Mets overpaid for him, but so far it isn’t killing them. He was hurt in April, and although he’s been reasonably effective since then, his strikeout rate (5.4 per 9 innings) is uncomfortably low. Benson has never been real good or real healthy. Career numbers for he and Lawrence:

            G    IP  ERA  H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9
Benson    151 938.1 4.21 9.13 0.93 3.24 6.30
Lawrence  148 860.2 3.96 9.36 0.94 2.37 5.56

Very similar lines. Lawrence is younger and has been healthier, yet Benson will earn about three times as much this year. Can you guess which guy is a former first-round pick?

Other Stuff

  • Over at San Diego Spotlight, Peter makes his case for not re-signing Ramon Hernandez. He also chats with John Sickels to get the prospect guru’s take on the state of the Padres system. Good stuff.
  • At Friar Faithful, Richard looks at the rookie season of Tim Stauffer (which reminds me, I have photos of him throwing in the bullpen before Sunday’s game that I need to post). Richard is trying out new methods of analyzing pitcher performance, so swing on by and give him some feedback.
  • Metstradamus previews the series. Gotta respect the Eric Nolte shout out. That is old school.
  • Mets Geek also serves up a preview. A few commenters are calling sweep. In favor of the Mets. Right, that’s what I said, too.

Enjoy the game. Go Pads!

54 Comments

  1. LynchMob
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    Anyone of youse guyse got a BP Premium subscription? I’m too cheap …

    Here’s what my BP email said today …

    Under The Knife
    The Heat Is On

    by Will Carroll

    Updates come hot and heavy in July, as Will checks in with news on Adam Eaton, Milton Bradley and the Red Sox infield.

    http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=4231

    … so if you can read this Will Carroll article, I’d be interested to hear what he’s saying about Adam Eaton … thanks.

  2. Posted July 19, 2005 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    “Adam Eaton isn’t getting significantly better. That’s a real problem for the Padres, since they were counting on having Eaton back in the #2 slot soon. A second cortisone shot hasn’t taken effect yet, though if it does, it shouldn’t take much time for Eaton to find his breaking ball. Bruce Bochy was quoted as saying that Eaton’s return will be more about pain management than anything else. The Pads are looking at short-term pitchers just in case Eaton isn’t able to return effectivel”

  3. Didi
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Agreed on not signing Ramon Hernandez. As much as I enjoy watching him play and call games, it’s not worth it to have him signed for more than $7 mil/year up to 3 years with options.

    As for Burroughs, I would like to have him sent down to AAA to work out his hitting with the new stance. So far, it hasn’t affected his fielding but I’m sure it’ll be a problem at some point this season. In the meantime, let DJ work the hot corner and Nady at first and center/left everyday.
    That’s 3 more regular games for Nady plus Sunday starts.

    If Eaton is not coming back, what options do we have? Start Hensley?

  4. Posted July 19, 2005 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Hensley should probably get the start in Eaton’s absence.

  5. Nick
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    BTF just posted an AP story saying the Red Sox and Padres have made a minor trade. Adam Hyzdu goes to the Sox (again) in exchange for AAA reliever Scott Cassidy. Cassidy had a 4.05 ERA in 60 IP for Pawtucket, with 66 Ks and 23 BBs. Hyzdu was actually hitting pretty well in Portland. Cassidy had made 3 starts in AAA, so he may be another contestant for “Who will fill Eaton’s Shoes This Week?”

  6. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    Here is a link to the AP trade story: http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=ap-padres-redsoxtrade&prov=ap&type=lgns

  7. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    The lineup:
    CF Roberts
    2B Loretta
    RF Giles
    LF Klesko
    1B Nevin
    C  Hernandez
    3B Jackson
    SS Greene
    P  Lawrence

    Not bad. At least Jackson’s starting at third and it’s nice to have Lo back even if he brough Nevin with him.

  8. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    If you’re Benson, do you walk Klesko feeling assured that Nevin will GIDP?

  9. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Benson is working sloooow….

  10. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Benson’s location is off out of the zone, it’s only a matter of time before he misses in the zone.

  11. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Here’s hoping Nevin continues to enjoy success in Shea.

  12. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Well, he’s battling. He was late on a fat fastball, though.

  13. Brian G.
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Eric Nolte is old school? Ollie Brown, yes. Steve Arline, Joe McIntosh, sure. Barry Evans (Lance), probably. But Eric Nolte?

  14. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Ramon again shows why “good-hitting catcher” isn’t synonymous with “good hitter.”

  15. Brian G.
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Sorry for the Arlin typo.

  16. hank
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    What I wonder, if they(Bochy) know that Ramon will be subpar offensively because of a sore wrist but still want him in the lineup because of his defense, why bat him up in the order?

    I would think 8th would be more appropriate?

  17. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Good point, Hank.

  18. Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    B-Law is looking very good so far.

  19. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Nice grab by Roberts.

  20. LynchMob
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    The Padres aren’t the only ones with problems in San Diego …

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/19/national/19sandiego.html

    Headline: 2 San Diego Officials Are Found Guilty of Corruption

    … I assume this isn’t a reference to Bochy and Towers :-)

  21. hank
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    its encouraging that both of our returnees seem to be getting decent wood on the ball. right now we seem to be running true to form, lots of noise but no runs..

    always(nearly always) missing that one big hit to bust things open.

    hopefully we will get there.

  22. LynchMob
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    Lawrence thru 3 …

    Pitches-strikes – B Lawrence 34-24
    Ground balls-fly balls – B Lawrence 4-3

    … lookin’ good!

  23. Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    Brian: Nolte has been out of MLB for 14 years. Greg Riddoch was the manager of the Padres when Nolte last pitched for them. The team played in Jack Murphy Stadium. That ain’t “ancient school,” but I think at this point it’s old school.

    LM: We are down to our third-string mayor at the moment.

  24. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    Roberts: another great grab. Getting it done in the field tonight.

  25. LynchMob
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Nady for Mayor!

  26. LynchMob
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    Lawrence thru 4 …

    Pitches-strikes – B Lawrence 43-29
    Ground balls-fly balls – B Lawrence 4-6

  27. Brian G.
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    ‘Spose it’s all relative, GY. To me, any one who came around after I turned legal drinking age doesn’t qualify for old school.

  28. Brian G.
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Anybody else “viewing” this game via Yahoo’s gamechannel? They’re struggling to match the photos to the names. Mark Loretta currently has Brian Lawrence’s face. Last inning, Carlos Beltran was Mike Cameron.

  29. Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    I hear ya Brian. But then, we’re old school. ;-)

  30. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

    Nevin takes foul ball off leg in on-deck circle in first game back.

  31. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    According to ESPN Insider, the Padres and Twins are interested in Joe Randa. He is having a good season.

  32. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    Great double play started by Nevin. threw to second, then Linebrink covered first.

  33. LynchMob
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Lawrence’s final numbers … 6.1 IP, 5 H, 0 BB, 1 ER, 4 Ks …

    Pitches-strikes – B Lawrence 75-52
    Ground balls-fly balls – B Lawrence 6-9
    Batters faced – B Lawrence 24

    … GREAT JOB!

  34. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    The hitters have let Lawrence down of late.

  35. Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

    Tied in the eighth. I might get to watch some of this game after all…

  36. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Damn, Roberts gets thrown out by Piazza.

  37. Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    Guess it was wishful thinking that the Padres might pinch-hit for Nevin…

  38. Brian G.
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    You mean like with a LH 1B whose complete professional reputation is based on his remarkable ability as a PH?

  39. Bruce
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Richard I was just yelling at the TV for that very reason. But I guess we are the only ones who think that perhaps Nevin is not at his best after missing significant time.

  40. Bruce
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    And now Bochy replaces Nevin! *Sigh*

  41. Lance
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Aki gets out of it. Now that Nevin’s out of the game, what is our win probability, Richard?

  42. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Free baseball.

  43. DVM
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    why isnt Burroughs in for defense?

  44. Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    And they’re afraid to let Nady play third. Sigh…

  45. DVM
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    booted by Blum

  46. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    I don’t get taking Loretta out, putting Blum in, moving Jackson. The defense is worse.

  47. hank
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    its the sign of a manager that is addicted to the double switch. I hear he is attending meetings but hasnt kicked it yet

  48. Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    Well, so much for that. Home run Chris Woodward. The Mets are acting like they’ve won the pennant. I’m acting like I’m sick.

  49. Kevin
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    That was great. That homer was in the air, just as the power flickered here. Glad I missed it. Fitting end to a crap game.

  50. Lance
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Well, that just sucked.

  51. jay
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Given our often punchless offense, I am getting absolutely livid about Nady. The guy has the 4th best OPS on the team (OPS is the best measure of a player’s offensive worth that I know of), behind Giles, Klesko and Sweeney. Sweeney is a platoon guy, so arguably he is the 3rd best hitter. His splits are not bad (.807 vs RHP, .912 LHP), so he can play everyday.

    Arguments against Nady: slow July (OPS .756; slow but not horrid). But, if you follow that logic, then why are you playing Roberts? (OPS in July: .395; no that is not a batting average)

    So how can he justify not using him? It is astonishing that he can be paid this much but continue to follow a dumb policy that is so easy to show is wrong.

    It is like a guy deciding what engines will go in a race car: one goes 250 MPH, another 220 MPH. The guy keeps going with the 220 MPH engine because he feels more comfortable doing it. That guy would be fired in a second, but not in baseball.

  52. jay
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    I am hoping that Towers knows this when he is thinking about trades. Nady is classic trade bait, but am fearful they trade him away for a some less potent, more veteran and more expensive player. I would love if they would trade for Cameron to the Mets, but throw in Nevin in the deal, plus someone from our farm system. The absolute worst would be to give up Nady for someone like Cameron. Offensivly, they are similar players (Cameron a bit stronger this year, but not for his career). Move Klesko to 1B, Nady to left. If you pick up Randa somehow, then you actually have some punch.

  53. hank
    Posted July 19, 2005 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    looks like Nady will get some starts next two days according to a bochy quote on the Padres web site:

    With lefties Tom Glavine and Kaz Ishii scheduled to start the next two games of the series, Bochy said he’d try to figure out a way to get a right-handed bat or two in the lineup, notably Xavier Nady.

    “Nady will be in there,” Bochy said. “We’ll see if we can get something going.”

  54. Posted July 20, 2005 at 7:25 am | Permalink

    Jay: If it helps, Towers indicated at the Prospectus Pizza Feed that he’s a big Nady fan. And given the general tone of KT’s remarks that night, I feel pretty confident that he wasn’t blowing smoke.

    Obviously that doesn’t make the lack of PT any better but I don’t see Towers trading Nady for peanuts.