In-Game Discussion: Padres vs Braves (18 May 2005)

Wed, May 18, 2005Ballhype: hype it up!
by Geoff Young

first pitch: 12:35 p.m., PT
television: none
matchup: Adam Eaton (5-1, 3.42 ERA) vs Horacio Ramirez (2-2, 3.47)

Pads have won six in a row and 15 of their last 18. Every day it’s the same story: Fall behind early, stay close through the middle innings, have someone step up late to win it. Tuesday night’s hero was Khalil Greene, dropping the bat head on an 0-2 offering from Braves closer Dan Kolb to serve up a bases-loaded single with one out in the ninth. John Smoltz shut down the Friars most of the night, but Darrell May limited the Braves to one run over five innings to keep them within striking distance.

Akinori Otsuka surrendered a solo homer to Andruw Jones in the top of the eighth to extend Atlanta’s lead to 2-0, but the Padres answered with a run of their own off Smoltz in the bottom half. And then, after holding serve in the top of the ninth, the Friars went to work against Kolb:

Ryan Klesko: walk on 4 pitches
Brian Giles: ground single to right on 2-2 pitch
Phil Nevin: chopper off the plate to shortstop on 2-2 pitch, Klesko scores
Ramon Hernandez: ground single to left-center on 3-1 pitch, Giles to third
Sean Burroughs: intentional walk
Greene: line single to left-center on 0-2 pitch, Giles scores, good night everybody

With the Diamondbacks losing to Houston, the Padres now have first place to themselves in the NL West.

Pads wrap up the homestand Wednesday afternoon with a chance to sweep their second straight series against a tough NL East foe. No television today, but feel free to drop on by and chat during the game. The matchup:


                           AB   BA  OBP  SLG
Eaton vs current Braves    57 .281 .339 .456
Ramirez vs current Padres  21 .333 .417 .619

Not a lot of at-bats against Eaton. The only homer belongs to Chipper Jones (.500/.556/1.125 in just 8 AB). Even fewer at-bats against Ramirez. Homers from Burroughs and Hernandez.

So, are you starting to feel it yet? Maybe just a little bit?

Picking up where last year's version left off, the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual provides in-depth analysis of and commentary on the San Diego Padres. Get your copy today.

Possibly Related Posts

146 Responses to “In-Game Discussion: Padres vs Braves (18 May 2005)”

  1. Daniel Says:

    I think you guys have got to be feeling it — the Dodgers are slumping and seem to want to prove all the preseason critics right all at once, the Giants are no better than a .500 team without Bonds, Schmidt, and Benitez, and the D-Backs, while likely a solid team, are not good enough to pull away with the division even if the opportunity presented itself…

    …leaving the Padres in a nice position currently atop the division standings. I think a .560 winning percentage is a very good bet to take the NL West, and the Padres are definitely capable of doing that.

    Current score: 0
  2. Nick Says:

    I know it’s a completely different team. And a completely different year. But it’s starting to feel a little like ‘98 for me.
    That season was a blur, but I remember a lot of comebacks, a lot of good pitching performances, and a lot of clutch hits.
    Peavy is starting to prove himself to be a true #1 starter, Eaton is finally showing some consistency — and those are the two most important SPs in my mind. If we’ve got two good guys at the top of the rotation, we’ve got a chance in every game.
    By the way, even though he’s not flashy, you gotta love Dave Roberts. He’s bringing some energy to the lineup every night.

    Current score: 0
  3. jay Says:

    They are playing really well. Not crushing people which might make me think is a dominant team, but keeping it close and through skill and luck, winning. Luck is a big part of our winning all these tight games, but the cool thing is that luck is in the bank. Things may even out a bit, but unless we get exceptionally unlucky later in the season, we ought to be end up a healthy chunk of wins above our pythagorean projections. Let us hope.

    Not to jinx anything, but we have a filthy bullpen. And I think both Linebrink and Otsuka can improve slightly.

    My only gripe is that Bochy seems to be managing the offense by superstition and/or stubborness. The runs have come from a variety of sources, but they have not come from Nevin and Roberts. Their OPS during May is .703 and .680 respectively (team, including the pitchers, was .793). So we have been winning despite Bochy’s insistence on running the same starters out there every night. I think he is afraid of changing the line up and breaking the streak. Maybe something is to be said for consistency, but when you have Sweeney hitting 1.358 and Nady hitting .932 in May, you are just making the team weaker by not playing them.

    Gripe, gripe. One thing I do like about Bochy is his management of pitchers. Rarely lets the starters get too far past 100 pitches, and very even inning allotment across the relievers. I very glad we don’t have Dusty Baker who rides his starters up to 130 pitches or counts on a few relievers in every tight situation. He does have a tendency to put not so great relievers into tight spots (Tankersly last year in a one run game in Philly; he blew up; overuse of Eddie Oropesa in the early part of last year; Falkenburg last night, but it worked OK).

    Not that others are interested, but my girlfriend’s back (agreement that I give it a massage while watching my Tivo of the game) is now 9 for 9. I am nervous about today’s day game; no chance for the ritual. That said, I have in my head that Adam Eaton is going to throw the first Padre no-hitter at some point. Today maybe? I also had it my head that Kahlil Greene was going to hit the first Padre home run at Petco (wrong), so not exactly a reliable prediction system.

    Current score: 0
  4. Geoff Young Says:

    Agreed about Bochy’s use of his pitchers. Some of that is due to knowing he can rely on his bullpen. We can thank Kevin Towers for going out and building a very solid bullpen on the cheap.

    Here’s hoping that Eaton can keep it going, and that maybe X can get more involved. Seems a shame to keep that kind of talent on the bench, but I guess if it’s working…

    Current score: 0
  5. Kevin Says:

    Still not buying all the talk of luck. They have scored 185 runs, given up 173 runs. The Padres record is 24-16. Their Pythagorean is 21-19. That means they are +3. That’s certain within the margin of error. That doesn’t seem to be extremely lucky or unlucky.

    Only one team in the major has more than a three-game difference either way. That’s Arizona, which is +5. The Diamondbacks are 23-17. Their Pythagorean is 18-22. They are the frauds.

    Here’s another thing: Sometimes it takes quite some time for the Pythagorean to catch up to reality. Last season, the Yankees quite a bit above their Pythagorean, mostly on the strength of a strong bullpen. They were the first 100-win team to not have a 15-game winner.

    The Red Sox performed about the same or just below their Pythagorean last season. But none of this caught up to reality until Rivera showed he was mortal in Game 4 of the ALCS.

    Current score: 0
  6. Jay Says:

    My luck comment is driven by our extraordinarily good 1 run game record. We are playing some very good teams very tight. That is skill. To consistently win those games is a bit lucky. Not all of it, but decent amount it. But I will take it. Also, I do think this team can be more offensively potent, so am hopeful that we can start winning a bit more decisively.

    Arizona is crazy to have net negative runs and have such a strong record.

    Current score: 0
  7. p.friberg Says:

    How about these numbers:

    36.1 IP, 36 H, 14 BB, 15 SO

    Ramirez is not a dominant pitcher and has a .265 BA against… We could destroy him…

    Is Chipper in their lineup? If not, we could roll!

    Current score: 0
  8. p.friberg Says:

    How about these numbers:

    36.1 IP, 36 H, 14 BB, 15 SO

    Ramirez is not a dominant pitcher and has a .265 BA against… We could destroy him…

    Is Chipper in their lineup? If not, we could roll!

    Current score: 0
  9. p.friberg Says:

    How about these numbers:

    36.1 IP, 36 H, 14 BB, 15 SO

    Ramirez is not a dominant pitcher and has a .265 BA against… We could destroy him…

    Is Chipper in their lineup? If not, we could roll!

    Current score: 0
  10. p.friberg Says:

    Sorry about the triple-post, my work computer is jacked up…

    Current score: 0
  11. Nick W. Says:

    Does anyone have a Loretta update?

    Current score: 0
  12. Eric Says:

    Jay: “I do think this team can be more offensively potent…”

    Is this because Nevin and Greene have yet to hit near their normal levels, which isn’t likely to continue? because I’d argue that a few of our bench guys have combined for a full lineup slot’s worth of all-star caliber offense, which is also not likely to continue, balancing out any improvement from Nevin/Greene. The offense has been similar to last year thus far, and I predict it’ll stay about the same.

    Current score: 0
  13. Jay Says:

    Eric, that is a good point, that our bench has been stronger than we can hope for the rest of the season. My hope for increased potency comes from either better numbers out of Nevin/Roberts, or, at least, Sweeney/Nady getting a bigger share of their AB’s and thus producing better numbers. The season is just kind of starting for Greene; he my come down a bit from last year, but expect his numbers to increase from where he is now. I also remain hopeful on Burroughs and Loretta. Both have OPS below .800, but I think both can be above .800. Nevin/Roberts have a combined 250 ABs (roughly 20% of all or our ABs), while Sweeney/Nady have had about half that at 120. You need to let veterans play through (with Nevin) but you cannot just keep running guys out without checking the stats.

    Current score: 0
  14. funkinstein Says:

    They gave a semi-update of Loretta in the pregame talk. They said that he will not go on the DL, which of course is good. Blum is being activated, and I believe will start at second today, and Faulkenborg has been sent back to Portland.

    Current score: 0
  15. p.friberg Says:

    weird lineup for Atlanta…

    Current score: 0
  16. p.friberg Says:

    walk, nice! not that they count for anything… right McKeon?

    Current score: 0
  17. p.friberg Says:

    10 pitch inning by Eaton, keep that count down…

    Current score: 0
  18. Kevin Says:

    Padres bullpen ERA: 2.76

    Current score: 0
  19. funkinstein Says:

    Tasty.

    Current score: 0
  20. Lance Says:

    DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!DONG!!!

    Current score: 0
  21. Kevin Says:

    Bomb! Padres, 3-0. Greene may be getting hot.

    Current score: 0
  22. p.friberg Says:

    rollin’ rollin’ rollin’ - let’s keep these doggies rollin’!

    Current score: 0
  23. Kevin Says:

    Hernandez is hitting .304. One day, everyone is going to wake up and say, man, Hell of a player. Not A’s or Padres fans, because they know. Maybe we can vote this guy on the All-Star team.

    Current score: 0
  24. Eric Says:

    aahhh…..an early lead, for a change.

    Current score: 0
  25. p.friberg Says:

    I voted for him last night - check out my article over at http://padres.mostvaluablenetwork.com - scroll down to “Walks, Rankings, and All Star Ballots”

    Will the Padres know what to do with a lead? ;-)
    Nice problem to have!

    Current score: 0
  26. Geoff Young Says:

    My wife is at the game, she just left a message on my vmail that Greene’s homer went upper tank in the Western Metal Supply Co. Bldg.

    Current score: 0
  27. funkinstein Says:

    It took a 405 shot for him to hit that balcony last year.

    Khalil’s back, Eaton’s locked in. And I’m trying not to get overly excited this early in the game…

    Current score: 0
  28. Kevin Says:

    Greene has done that twice. And some opposing player did it recently. I think those are only ones to go upper level at the Supply.

    Current score: 0
  29. p.friberg Says:

    Yeah, Rich Campbell is there too, he said the same thing - It’s not just a series sweep, but a homestand sweep in the works…

    Current score: 0
  30. p.friberg Says:

    opposing pitcher breaks up the no-no

    Current score: 0
  31. Eric Says:

    doh, there goes the no-no. sorry Jay ;)

    Current score: 0
  32. Kevin Says:

    One year ago today the Big Unit pitched a perfect game vs. Atlanta.

    Current score: 0
  33. Geoff Young Says:

    Hey Peter, good to see you here. Welcome!

    Current score: 0
  34. funkinstein Says:

    Cabrerra hit that balcony when the Marlins were in town. You’re right on, Kevin, Khalil’s been there twice, and Cabrerra once.

    Not your prototypical huge, muscular guys you’d think would hit up there, but both have some amazing power for their size when they get all of a ball.

    Current score: 0
  35. funkinstein Says:

    Looks like changing the changing of his stance is doing Khalil some good, btw. Last night after the game, he said he’s going back to “what feels natural” instead of thinking about too much.

    Natural is good.

    Current score: 0
  36. Kevin Says:

    Fox South just played an interview with Marcus Giles. He says he is lobbying Atlanta to sign Brian when he is a free agent. He says Brian would like nothing more than to finish his career with me.

    Current score: 0
  37. Kevin Says:

    Did Marcus tank that for his brother? ;) For the kids at home, that looks like a line drive in the boxscore.

    Current score: 0
  38. funkinstein Says:

    I’ve heard that quite a bit, Kevin. If I were Atlanta, I’d tell Marcus to start lobbying Brian to take a paycut to sign with them, and they’ll consider his request.

    Giles will get have three things to choose from next year: Playing at home, playing with his brother, or going to the highest bidder. I don’t see either the Padres or the Braves being that highest bidder, honestly.

    Current score: 0
  39. Geoff Young Says:

    Nevin pops up on the infield. Ugh.

    Current score: 0
  40. p.friberg Says:

    good analysis Funk

    Current score: 0
  41. Kevin Says:

    Right, I agree. The Padres and Atlanta look to be winners, so that helps them. The Padres have to get younger in their starting eight at some point, but I’m not saying that means saying goodbye to Giles.

    Current score: 0
  42. Eric Says:

    if it wasn’t a line drive, what was it? Why not an error?

    Current score: 0
  43. Bruce Says:

    I just got here, and missed Khalil’s bomb, but this is funny to watch the Braves fail to catch infield pops!

    Current score: 0
  44. p.friberg Says:

    nice!

    Current score: 0
  45. Geoff Young Says:

    Yahoo says “R. Hernandez singled to pitcher, D. Jackson scored, B. Giles to third.” Can someone who’s watching explain what happened?

    Current score: 0
  46. Bruce Says:

    Wow another HR from Khalil. I think he’s back. 6 RBI!

    Current score: 0
  47. Bruce Says:

    Guys, on both pop ups, they were high pops, straight into the sun. The Braves fielders could not find the balls, and they both fell harmlessly to the ground.

    Current score: 0
  48. Geoff Young Says:

    Sweet!

    Current score: 0
  49. Eric Says:

    If it’s lost in the sun it’s not an error?

    Current score: 0
  50. Kevin Says:

    Everyone in the infield watched a pop up fall on that play, Geoff. It counts as a hit.

    Current score: 0
  51. Bruce Says:

    M Giles had what appeared to be a good bead on the ball, but at the last second, he lost it, cringed and the ball fell to his right. On Ramon’s pop, LaRoche had the best bet, but there also appeared to be some confusion amongst the Braves has to who was calling for it. That and the sun.

    Current score: 0
  52. p.friberg Says:

    Rich just called again: Khalil 6, Braves 0

    Current score: 0
  53. p.friberg Says:

    Almost feel bad for the pitcher, almost….

    Current score: 0
  54. Kevin Says:

    On an error, the ball has to be misplayed. If someone hits a ball and everyone stands there, it’s a hit. It’s stupid, but it’s true.

    Current score: 0
  55. Geoff Young Says:

    Cool. Thanks for the info, guys. I gotta get back to work. Carry on…

    Current score: 0
  56. Bruce Says:

    I guess the sun counts the same as a ball hitting a pebble and taking a bad hop, the mound, a base etc. Natural event as opposed to a player misplaying it.

    Current score: 0
  57. Kevin Says:

    Remember the scene in Bad News Bears where the opposing pitcher fields a comebacker and holds it even when his own teammates are tackling him? The fat kids rounds the bases on an infield hit. That’s a home run. No error there.

    Current score: 0
  58. p.friberg Says:

    “stupid” that’s for sure, Kev. did you check out my article from last night?

    Current score: 0
  59. funkinstein Says:

    In other news, Boomer is pulled from the Sox / A’s game. His line:

    1.1 IP, 9 H, 7 ER

    Current score: 0
  60. Kevin Says:

    It has nothing to do with the sun. If everyone just stands there in a comma and the ball rolls to the wall, it’s a hit.

    Current score: 0
  61. Kevin Says:

    I didn’t read the article. Are you talking about the All-Stars and stuff?

    Current score: 0
  62. funkinstein Says:

    Ooooh oooooh, Jerry’s about to say what he did today.

    This should be good!

    Current score: 0
  63. funkinstein Says:

    Ooooh oooooh, Jerry’s about to say what he did today.

    This should be good!

    Current score: 0
  64. Bruce Says:

    I was just replying to Eric’s question about whether a ball lost in the sun and then not caught is an error. I agree that it is a hit from an official scoring point of view, and the reason it would be would be the same as if a ball took a deflection off a base, pebble, or the mound and then is not played for whatever reason.

    Current score: 0
  65. p.friberg Says:

    yeah, I broke down my selections - among other things - (Ramon was my NL catcher)

    Current score: 0
  66. Kevin Says:

    OK, Bruce. My bad. Go, Bears!

    Current score: 0
  67. p.friberg Says:

    Get Fick, Ojeda, and Sweeney in there to get some ABs

    Current score: 0
  68. Bruce Says:

    No worries Kevin.

    Current score: 0
  69. Kevin Says:

    Hernandez is hitting .309 now. Peter, those selections are probably on the money. But I’ll probably fill out my ballot with all Padres.

    Current score: 0
  70. Brian G. Says:

    Sorry if I’m asking a question that may have already asked — What’s the report on Mark Loretta?

    Current score: 0
  71. Eric Says:

    Eaton is still somewhat frustrating to watch, even in a game like this.

    Current score: 0
  72. Kevin Says:

    I think someone asked about Loretta, but there is no answer as of yet.

    Current score: 0
  73. Kevin Says:

    Here is the Union-Tribune story on Loretta. It says he might be out 3-4 days, they might DL him.

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/.....moves.html

    Current score: 0
  74. p.friberg Says:

    I love our Padres but I’m too big of a ‘baseball’ fan to not go with deserving players - even if they play for the hated Yankees.

    Current score: 0
  75. funkinstein Says:

    Eaton is somewhat frustrating. He hasn’t been very efficient today, 85 pitches in 5 innings. But it’s hard to argue with the results, he’s getting the job done today.

    Current score: 0
  76. Brian G. Says:

    Thank you, Kevin.

    Current score: 0
  77. Kevin Says:

    Yeah, I can see that, Peter. I think fans should do whatever they want. But I see your point on people being called “All-Stars” forever. I would like to see managers look at the best players from the past year and a half.

    Current score: 0
  78. Kevin Says:

    Four pitches that inning.

    Current score: 0
  79. Bruce Says:

    Eaton’s middle name is frustration. But I will take that easy four pitch inning any day.

    Current score: 0
  80. p.friberg Says:

    Through 6.0 IP, no BB and @ 89 pitches. Good work Adam!

    Current score: 0
  81. Brian G. Says:

    A four pitch inning — How’s that for efficiency? Must be get-away day.

    Current score: 0
  82. p.friberg Says:

    Sorry Kev, I’m not trying to criticize or be condescending, just saying I can’t bring myself to vote all one way…

    “But I see your point on people being called “All-Stars” forever. I would like to see managers look at the best players from the past year and a half.” - EXACTLY!

    Current score: 0
  83. Kevin Says:

    Frustration is better than Kobe Bryant’s middle name. His is Bean.

    Current score: 0
  84. Eric Says:

    What’s most impressive about Wilson Betemit’s arm is that his throws look so effortless. I’ve seen three plays this series where I thought he was lobbing it to first, but the ball flew across the diamond like a bullet. Kinda like a Mariano Rivera reverse-changeup kinda thing.

    Current score: 0
  85. Kevin Says:

    Sorry Kev, I’m not trying to criticize or be condescending, just saying I can’t bring myself to vote all one way… — I didn’t think you were.

    Current score: 0
  86. p.friberg Says:

    Anyone notice Giles’ OPS is back up over .900?

    (.286/.414/.496)

    Current score: 0
  87. Brian G. Says:

    Ted Leitner said that Giles is hitting .525 over the past 10 games or so.

    Current score: 0
  88. p.friberg Says:

    “For Love of the Game” quote:

    “Let’s get out of here before we get our asses kicked twice in one night.”

    Should we expect another quick inning?

    Current score: 0
  89. Kevin Says:

    Reports are saying Kolb is done as the closer.

    Current score: 0
  90. Kevin Says:

    I told everyone this offseason that I wished the Padres could trade Nevin and some parts for Andruw Jones.

    Current score: 0
  91. p.friberg Says:

    Wow, a fan in front of me last night voiced that same opinion. I thought he was being a bit quick. Any idea of who they plan to use? Smoltz? (jk)

    Current score: 0
  92. Eric Says:

    seems like when Eaton misses location, it’s always over the middle of the plate.

    Current score: 0
  93. p.friberg Says:

    He’d fit well here

    Current score: 0
  94. Kevin Says:

    SAN DIEGO — Danny Kolb was moved out of the closer’s role by Atlanta Braves manager Bobby Cox on Wednesday, a day after the right-hander was charged with his third blown save and his fourth loss.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn.....id=2063235

    Current score: 0
  95. p.friberg Says:

    Apparently we’re not the only west coast team beating up on an east coast one A’s 10 - Red Sox 1

    Current score: 0
  96. Kevin Says:

    The announcers just said they will go by matchups and such, although they said the most logical choice would be Reitsma.

    Current score: 0
  97. Kevin Says:

    Franco is going to pinch hit here. If the Padres were going with matchups, they would bring back Orosco.

    Current score: 0
  98. Kevin Says:

    ESPN.com says Brian Lawrence is coming in. Does that make any sense? Throwing between starts?

    Current score: 0
  99. Kevin Says:

    ESPN.com was all wrong. Idiots!

    Current score: 0