Padres Month in Review: June 2006

The Padres had a 14-12 record in June. That may not sound great, but it sure beats their 10-17 record during the same month last year.

You may remember June 2005. The Pads scored 91 runs in 27 games and allowed 123. Brian Falkenborg, Darrell May, Tim Redding, and Dennys Reyes worked 45 innings between them. Xavier Nady was the offensive star, hitting .250/.304/.615 and pacing the club with five homers.

Bombs Bursting in Air

This season, the man for whom Nady was traded, Mike Cameron, led the way in June. Cameron hit .300/.398/.640, with eight home runs. Only four players in the NL — David Wright, Ken Griffey, Adam Dunn, and Ryan Howard — hit more bombs during the month.

The Padres as a team outhomered their opposition, 29-25, in June. This marked just the fifth time in 15 months since moving to Petco Park that the Friars hit more home runs than their opponents in a month. In fact, only twice had the Padres hit a greater percentage of all homers in their games during a single month: August 2005 (.575) and April 2005 (.545).

Percentage of home runs hit by Padres during their games, by month, Apr 2004 - Jun 2006

And only twice had the Pads hit more home runs in a single month since the beginning of 2004, knocking an even 30 in each of September 2004 and May 2006. Incidentally, if you’re looking for reasons to be optimistic about the Padres’ offense, the fact that two of their top four home run months since moving to Petco have occurred in each of the past two months might not be a bad place to start.

The trend line for homers also is a lot stronger over the first three months this year than it was in 2004 or 2005. In those first two seasons at Petco Park, opponents saw an upward trend over the first three months. The Padres also saw an upward trend in 2004, albeit at a laughably lower level. And in 2005, the Padres’ trend was in the opposite direction.

Percentage of home runs hit by Padres during their games, by month, Apr - Jun 2004

Percentage of home runs hit by Padres during their games, by month, Apr - Jun 2005

Percentage of home runs hit by Padres during their games, by month, Apr - Jun 2006

Home runs are only one statistical category, and three half-seasons aren’t a lot of data points, but this at least looks like progress. We’ll know more after the season. Call it a good indicator for now.

Slide Rules

So, Cameron had a nice month. Who else? The other major contributor on offense was Adrian Gonzalez, who hit .330/.356/.560 in June. The downside is 19 strikeouts against just three walks, but he produced so we’ll let that slide for now.

What we won’t let slide is Vinny Castilla. A lot of folks talked about his improvement in June, but that’s mainly a function of two things:

  1. he hit .280, and people can be mesmerized by batting average;
  2. he was absolutely putrid for the first two months, so even somewhat below average seems pretty good in comparison.

Yes, Castilla gets credit for the eight extra base hits, which brought his SLG to a semi-respectable .440 for the month. But he also gets credit for drawing zero walks, resulting in an OBP of .276 — lower than his batting average — in June. Castilla still is killing this team, but he’s doing a better job of hiding it.

Perpetual black hole at third base notwithstanding, the offense continued to produce reasonably well, compiling numbers (.273/.331/.436) similar to those in May (.268/.337/.422). A little more batting average and power, a little less OBP (they actually were outwalked by the opposition, 78-74, after having thoroughly dominated in that category the previous month).

Despite the good numbers, however, the Padres weren’t as lucky in June as they had been in May. As we’ve just seen, the club’s batting lines in each of the last two months are nearly identical. But whereas those numbers translated into plenty of runs in May, the Pads weren’t nearly as efficient in June:

Month BA OBP SLG RC/27 R/G
May .268 .337 .422 5.31 5.12
June .273 .331 .436 4.88 4.12
Stats courtesy of ESPN.

In May, the Padres scored more runs than they theoretically should have. In June, not so much. Despite outwardly similar numbers, they dropped from third in the NL in runs scored to 15th. This may be one reason former hitting coach Dave Magadan didn’t survive the month. The injury to Dave Roberts, a driving force in May and one of Magadan’s greatest success stories, may also have been — indirectly — a contributing factor. [Kevin reminds me in the comments that Magadan's dismissal came before Roberts' injury, so scratch that theory. Sorry for the mistake, and thanks for catching it!]

Work Smarter, Not Harder

On the pitching side, the Padres were led by the man who will represent the club at the All-Star Game in Pittsburgh (Trevor Hoffman) and the man who should represent the club (Chris Young). Hoffman worked 11 innings, allowing two runs and saving all eight of his opportunities. Young, meantime, went 3-0 with a 1.17 ERA and 34 strikeouts in 30 2/3 innings.

As a group, the staff posted a 3.61 ERA during June. This was roughly the same as the 3.58 ERA in May, two notable (and encouraging) differences being an increase in strikeouts (7.14 K/9 vs 6.88) and a decrease in home runs allowed (0.97 HR/9 vs 1.21). The opponent OPS was actually a little better in June (685) than in May (707). The outstanding K/BB ratio (2.94) of the previous month slipped to merely very good (2.36).

On the downside, Brian Sweeney (0.90 K/9) and Clay Hensley (2.70) had trouble punching guys out, while Jake Peavy (5.28 ERA) and Jon Adkins (5.59) didn’t do the best job of keeping them from scoring. And on a team level, nobody worked harder to get batters out, as the Padres led MLB with 3.93 pitches per plate appearance in June.

What Next?

Overall, June 2006 was a pretty average month. The Padres didn’t do anything particularly well, but neither did they lose ground. At the conclusion of the month, they had a 42-37 record and were in first place by 1 game. Contrast this with 2005, when the Pads were 43-36 and in first place by 4 1/2 games. Factor in that the team’s run differential of +19 is actually better than the +11 they enjoyed at the same time last year, and it’s pretty easy to see that the Padres are doing a solid job of defending their NL West title.

On the other hand, the division hasn’t been setting the world on fire of late. On June 4, the Pads were 4 games out of first place with a 30-26 record. Although they only went 12-11 during the rest of the month, the Padres picked up 5 games in the standings and took the NL West lead. You can thank the Diamondbacks and their 8-20 tour bus wreck of a month for that.

Going forward, the first order of business is to get Dave Roberts healthy. Since he’s been in San Diego, the Padres have played better when he’s in the lineup. Having Woody Williams back in the rotation will help as well (he threw six strong innings in his return from the DL on Saturday).

Third base continues to be a disaster, with the Padres trailing MLB in OPS (607) at the position despite improvement from main culprit Vinny Castilla in June. If you listen very closely, you can hear the anguished screams of runners being left on base. Or maybe that’s the ocean. Either way, there aren’t a whole lot of realistic options out there, so it looks like we’re stuck with Vinny for a while.

To end on an up note, as I prefer to do if possible, the Padres still are playing pretty good ball. They could be better, of course, but the same can be said of everyone else in the NL West. The division this season is a lot like it was last season, only without a really lousy team for everyone to pound (that would be the Central, and they’ve got two of ‘em).

I said at the beginning of the season that the Padres would win 80 games and finish second in the division. For them to reach that total would require the club to go 37-43 the rest of the way. Honestly, based on what I’ve seen of these guys this year, I think they’re better than that. Then again, the Pads did go 10-17 last June, so anything is possible.

As of today, I’m guardedly optimistic that my preseason prognostication erred on the side of caution. The offense isn’t going to drive the club, but if the pitching keeps up (and it should — nobody, with the possible exception of Scott Cassidy — is having a fluky season), the Padres should continue to win games. Do that enough times and they’re back in the playoffs. Then, after the season is over, a bunch of contracts come off the books and the Padres can continue to streamline the roster with an eye toward the future.

Seemed like a good plan in March, and it still seems like a good plan now.

20 Responses »

  1. Wow, GY, you should work in the Padre front office crunching player/performance stats, er maybe you do. I think we can do better then 37-43 the rest of the way, as they say in the markets, past performance is indicative of future results. No wait, past performance is NOT indicative of future results. Crap. Anyway, we seem a solid team without the ups and downs of last year. Any idea what happens when Klesko returns. We basically don’t want him (unless he can play third) and don’t want to send another player down so Huey can sit on the bench. BTW, the best to Mike Thompson for his work while he was here. I hope that guys can stick somewhere. He has proven he can pitch in the majors, at least as a 4 or 5.

  2. Shoot, just noticed a problem with that last graphic. As in the two above it, the dashed line represents the Padres and the solid line represents the opposition. I’ll fix that tonight.

  3. MattA update … a routine 2-for-4 night … currently sitting at .326 / .483 / .395 … that’s no typo … he’s got 13 walks in only 43 ABs … but only 1 2B and 1 3B … but also only 4 Ks … and 6/0 SB/CS …

  4. GY – nice review!

    For those not at the Feed, Sandy made it clear that he reads the blogs sometimes … I’ll bet he’ll read this review … and take something out of it! Good job, Geoff … I interpret that to mean that your writing does have an impact on the Padres! … a *positive* impact! Do you believe that? I sure do! Keep it up, bud!

  5. Meanwhile, at Portland, Paul McAnulty went 2-for-4 with a walk and a double yesterday … now at .321 / .410 / .538 … which seems like numbers that oughta translate to a job in MLB … dude’s a hitter! Sures seems like he’d be a better person to have on the roster than EY … not that I’m bitter about his GIDP in the 2nd inning yesterday …

  6. LM, I’ll be bitter enough for both of us. I’m not against Young being on the roster. I think he can still hit lefties and pinch-run, even if his speed isn’t what it was. I’m bitter about him starting, and about a very passive approach to the roster. If Ben Johnson’s shoulder hurts so bad that he can’t swing a bat, then he goes on the DL and you bring up McAnulty or Sledge or even Cust.

  7. I am not a Magadan fan, but he was fired BEFORE Roberts injury in Anaheim.

  8. Also, CY was named pitcher of the month in June. You can vote for him for the All-Star Game as well:

    http://tinyurl.com/hmoll

    Kevin: Thank you for the correction — I had the two events lumped together in my mind but didn’t double check; Roberts was hurt three days after Magadan’s dismissal.

  9. According to Padres.com Klesko is due for a rehab assignment in early August, after that they are going to place him on waivers and see if they can get any one to pick him up, If there are no takers do the Padres clear out a bench player to make room for him on the roster? If so who? Belhorn, Blum, EY, Bard, Bowen? Is Klesko a better option then any of them?

  10. They sound like they’d give Klesko away just to be rid of him. That’s a a shame. We could do a lot worse, if his shoulder is healthy, than have him on the bench in September.

  11. Hmmm, it sure seems like Klesko couldn’t be worse than EY …

    WC @ BP reported this today … Dave Roberts made a rehab appearance at Single-A, showing no problems. He’ll be activated for the Pads next series.

    … yup, that’s good news, that’ll be fewer ABs for EY.

    I don’t know much about BJ’s sore shoulder … can anyone elaborate? With Paul McAnulty, aka The Hammer, on fire at AAA, it sure seems like a no-brainer to have him in that roster spot if BJ’s not 100% (I actually think it makes sense to have him in that roster spot anyway, but I understand BJ’s upside is higher).

  12. Here’s a link to the Lake Elsinore box from yesterday … http://tinyurl.com/khmsz … DR went 1-for-3 from the leadoff position … with 2 K’s in his other ABs …

  13. Hey tell me if you guys think I’m crazy but what if the pads could get Soriano somewhat cheap from the nats (Thompson, PTBN) would you plug him in at 3B for the rest of the year?

    Soriano played 10 games at 3B with the Yankees but had 4 errors, would the offensive production be worth the defensive liability?

  14. Just finished voting for Chris Young.
    Nice meeting everyone at the BP Feed game.

    So, looks like the Padres are stuck with Vinny for now. I hope Klesko will be healthy enough to be bench player when he comes back. I sure hope that AGon will be the de facto starter at 1B.

    EY was used effectively on Friday night but then ineffectively as starting LF in two other games. I didn’t hear anything about Ben Johnson’s shoulder. What’s up?

    PMac probably won’t come up as there is not spot for him to start, especially if the Doc is ready to come back. Anybody knows any AL team with a youngish third baseman in AAA that’s tearing it up with decent glove?

  15. Good article, Geoff. You are the source to read. Thanks for writing such exceptional articles.

  16. Didi

    Andy Marte is the only on I can think of but it will take alot more than P Mac to get him.

  17. Allen Embry injured. Any interest in Oliver Perez (recently demoted to triple A? I haven’t heard whether it’s physical or something else. This would be a great chance for Darren Balsley to work his magice.
    Great column, Geoff.

  18. Did anyone else see/hear the report that we had a deal on the table for a 3B but the other team wanted Linebrink and we wouldn’t part w/ him?

  19. Peter I think this was at the beginning of the season when Embree, Sweeny and Cassidy were all question marks, and they did not want to part with one of thier two know performers. Im sure they would make the deal today.

  20. Good point Steve… Although I’ve been of the thought that once the playoffs start bullpens are almost more important that deep rotations.

    I think a lot of it is who is the 3B. If we had an opportunity to get Miguel Cabrerra, Linebrink wouldn’t be an obstacle, Aaron “freakin” Boone on the other hand…