Comments on: OBG08 Revisited: Hitters http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html Blogging the San Diego Padres baseball club. Established 1997. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:08:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: SDSUBaseball http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300388 SDSUBaseball Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:51:54 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300388 #18@<a href="#comment-300244" rel="nofollow">Geoff Young</a>: Ya, I realized it wasn't directly from Scholm, I was just curious how, after this year, anyone could see CF as our biggest need.<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300388">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> #18@Geoff Young: Ya, I realized it wasn’t directly from Scholm, I was just curious how, after this year, anyone could see CF as our biggest need.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: Geoff Young http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300244 Geoff Young Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:14:23 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300244 #17@<a href="#comment-300238" rel="nofollow">SDSUBaseball</a>: That sentiment actually comes from BA's analysis. I think the short answer is that somebody at BA didn't look real closely at the Padres system.<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300244">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> #17@SDSUBaseball: That sentiment actually comes from BA’s analysis. I think the short answer is that somebody at BA didn’t look real closely at the Padres system.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: SDSUBaseball http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300238 SDSUBaseball Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:40:26 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300238 #8@<a href="#comment-300117" rel="nofollow">Schlom</a>: Just curious, but how is CF San Diego's biggest need?<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300238">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> #8@Schlom: Just curious, but how is CF San Diego’s biggest need?

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: Didi http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300211 Didi Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:22:56 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300211 15: I used to have a gazillion dollars but the past two weeks had whittled it down to only 20 bucks. What the heck, I'll throw in my 200 dimes with you.<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300211">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> 15: I used to have a gazillion dollars but the past two weeks had whittled it down to only 20 bucks. What the heck, I’ll throw in my 200 dimes with you.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: Lance Richardson http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300148 Lance Richardson Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:08:56 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300148 I am choosing this moment to announce my intention to purchase the San Diego Padre franchise. It's certainly possible that I may need additional investors to accumulate the necessary funds. Anybody got a few hunnerd million dollars?<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300148">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> I am choosing this moment to announce my intention to purchase the San Diego Padre franchise. It’s certainly possible that I may need additional investors to accumulate the necessary funds.

Anybody got a few hunnerd million dollars?

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: Loren http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300138 Loren Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:34:38 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300138 If the Padres remain part of Moores' property going into the divorce settlement then its quite plausible that the stock owned by John Moores will be seen as community property and split down the middle between Becky and John. Only way that won't happen is if John keeps that but gives Becky something to make up the difference in cost. Either way that doesn't speak well for the potential financial future of the Padres<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300138">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> If the Padres remain part of Moores’ property going into the divorce settlement then its quite plausible that the stock owned by John Moores will be seen as community property and split down the middle between Becky and John. Only way that won’t happen is if John keeps that but gives Becky something to make up the difference in cost. Either way that doesn’t speak well for the potential financial future of the Padres

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: Geoff Young http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300136 Geoff Young Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:40:18 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300136 #10@<a href="#comment-300119" rel="nofollow">PF4L</a>, #12@<a href="#comment-300123" rel="nofollow">Lawboy</a>: From <a href="http://sandiego.padres.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20081009&content_id=3606389&vkey=pr_sd&fext=.jsp&c_id=sd" rel="nofollow">Padres.com</a>: <blockquote>No decision regarding the Padres has been made, and the divorce proceedings are the subject of confidential mediation.</blockquote><p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300136">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> #10@PF4L, #12@Lawboy:

From Padres.com:

No decision regarding the Padres has been made, and the divorce proceedings are the subject of confidential mediation.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: Lawboy http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300123 Lawboy Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:21:09 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300123 Looks like Moores is going to sell 49% of the Padres as part of his divorce settlement. Any thoughts? 2 possible San Diego families are interested in purchasing. Does Moores own 100% Might be a dumb question. http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/17672806/detail.html<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300123">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> Looks like Moores is going to sell 49% of the Padres as part of his divorce settlement. Any thoughts? 2 possible San Diego families are interested in purchasing. Does Moores own 100% Might be a dumb question.

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/new.....etail.html

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: LynchMob http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300122 LynchMob Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:01:38 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300122 #6@<a href="#comment-300091" rel="nofollow">Pat</a>: I'm not seeing "OPS+" at the link Schlom provided ... What I do see is "sOPS+" and "tOPS+" ... and if you click on the column header, you get these definitions ... tOPS+ - OPS+ of this split relative to the player or team's overall OPS sOPS+ - OPS+ of this split relative to the major league OPS for this split So the pitchers had an sOPS+ = 138 ... which I interp to mean they hit 38% better than the average pitchers across MLB ... The tOPS+ = 19 just means that they hit 81% worse than then non-pitchers on the Padres ... which really only means that the tOPS+ values for non-pitchers are inflated because they include some relativity to the pitchers ...<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300122">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> #6@Pat: I’m not seeing “OPS+” at the link Schlom provided …

What I do see is “sOPS+” and “tOPS+” … and if you click on the column header, you get these definitions …

tOPS+ - OPS+ of this split relative to the player or team’s overall OPS

sOPS+ - OPS+ of this split relative to the major league OPS for this split

So the pitchers had an sOPS+ = 138 … which I interp to mean they hit 38% better than the average pitchers across MLB …

The tOPS+ = 19 just means that they hit 81% worse than then non-pitchers on the Padres … which really only means that the tOPS+ values for non-pitchers are inflated because they include some relativity to the pitchers …

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]> By: PF4L http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2008/10/obg08-revisited-hitters.html/comment-page-1#comment-300119 PF4L Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:33:56 +0000 http://ducksnorts.com/blog/?p=2878#comment-300119 I just heard the Padres are up for sale on the station AM 600<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-300119">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p> I just heard the Padres are up for sale on the station AM 600

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

]]>