Friday Links (21 Mar 08)
Fri, Mar 21, 2008
by Geoff Young
Reminder to folks here in San Diego: I’ll be on “SportsWrap” this Sunday evening at 11:35 p.m. PT. Tune to NBC 7/39 for your chance to see a real-live baseball dork on television.
To the links…
- Bill Center at the U-T takes a look at roster possibilities. According to this, Glendon Rusch will be in the bullpen and Wil Ledezma (who is out of options) likely will be on the staff in some capacity. In related news, Jim Edmonds is
optimistichopeful he’ll be ready for Opening Day. - Tom Krasovic at the U-T offers encouraging news on rehabbing pitchers Mark Prior and Clay Hensley (h/t LynchMob):
The surgeon’s work is enabling Prior to throw with proper form, to repeat the same release point that he had before injuries led to compensation issues and degraded his silky delivery.
He said he is able to get the extension and angle needed to hit the low-outside portion of the strike zone, or just wide of it. Last spring training, Prior said, he wasn’t able to smoothly get that done. “I’d come around the ball,” he said, tilting his right hand inward.
Proof is in the proverbial pudding (is that like tapioca?), but this at least sounds promising.
- I loved watching the games in China, but I’m kinda bummed we didn’t get to see Jet Li throw out the ceremonial first pitch before Game 2.
- We also didn’t get to see the cheerleaders.
- There are a couple of new Padres blogs out there worth visiting. Planet Padres has a bunch of cool photos from Peoria (h/t LynchMob), while the Swinging Friar interviews Padres.com beat writer Corey Brock. Stop by and say hey, if you haven’t already.
- Also, FriarBall has moved. These will all be updated at PadreBlogs.com within the next day or two.
- Keeping with this theme, MB of Friar Forecast fame has joined San Diego Spotlight, and his first post there is a dandy. Among other things, we learn that Greg Maddux throws a much higher percentage of fastballs than Jake Peavy does.
- Mark Thoma at the Riverside Press-Enterprise has written a nice article on Chase Headley (h/t Pat). Among other things, Headley talks about his approach at the plate:
…the biggest thing is learning what pitch you can drive rather than going up there and hitting a pitch that you can put in play but not hit for power. Strikeouts are a product of seeing a lot of pitches.
- Calling my own number, I’ve penned a Padres preview over at Razzball. It has a fantasy slant and is mostly review material for readers o’ the ’snort.
- Dirk Hayhurst’s latest “Non-Prospect Diary” is up at Baseball America. This time he talks about winning a championship at Double-A San Antonio last season:
I know it takes more then one person to play this sport. I know there are nine positions on a baseball field. But the concept of team is more then the numbers required to fill locations. I’d be a fool to tell you money doesn’t talk in this world of ours, and be lying if I said I don’t want to beat all comers to a spot in the bigs. Yet, in my heart, I still believe this is a team game. Not because of what old coaches preach, what numbers say, or what Disney movies evoke. I believe this is a team game because I know what its like to lose with a team, and win with one . . .
Maybe he’ll win with the Padres one day.
- Rich at Baseball Analysts examines pitchers (starters | relievers) based on their strikeout and groundball rates (h/t Jim Parish). As if we needed further evidence that Cla Meredith is superfreaky, yow…
- My esteemed colleague Rob McQuown ranks prospects at Baseball Digest Daily (h/t Pat). Among hitters, Chase Headley checks in at #25, Kyle Blanks at #29, and Matt Antonelli at #34. Will Inman is #14 among pitchers, which may come as a bit of a shock to some folks (okay, me).
- Brandon Isleib at Hardball Times examines Bert Blyleven’s career, specifically how much fan (and media) exposure he received during his playing days. In light of our recent discussion on marquee players, I found this an interesting line of inquiry. As Yogi Berra might say, It’s hard to be famous if nobody knows who you are.
- I would kill to have a business like MLB. No matter how much you screw things up, people keep coming back for more (h/t LynchMob). Really, where’s the incentive to improve the product?
That otter do it. Have a happy Friday, and be excellent…
Picking up where last year's version left off, the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual provides in-depth analysis of and commentary on the San Diego Padres. Get your copy today.
March 21, 2008 at 8:17 am
Stolen from GLB, but a great article on Khalil from AZ Central: http://www.azcentral.com/sport.....s0320.html
Also, looks like Edmonds won’t be ready: http://sandiego.padres.mlb.com.....mp;c_id=sd
March 21, 2008 at 9:21 am
Edmonds won’t be ready? I’m shocked! Shocked, I say!!
March 21, 2008 at 9:43 am
2: I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
March 21, 2008 at 9:47 am
Love Hayhurst’s stuff! I’m going to keep my eye on him this year, kinda like I’ve been doing with Chris Coste for a few years now. After reading Chris’ first book, I couldn’t help but follow his path to the Majors. heh I think I even drafted him as my back up catcher in this years Ducksnorts Fantasy Baseball League.
March 21, 2008 at 10:16 am
1 … the last line from the link to the update on Edmonds says this …
Edmonds’ tenuous status has left Towers and manager Bud Black several options for the start of the season. On Thursday, Scott Hairston started in center field with Jody Gerut in left, which could be a preview of Opening Day on March 31 against Houston.
… this appears to be reality … and I’m OK with this … I liked what I saw from Gerut … and I like sending Headley down to AAA for a while … and I like have McAnulty on the bench …
The biggest concern, obviously, is if Edmonds can shake this calf problem … he really needs to take his time on this. It was my understanding that he came into camp “in great shape” … so how/why did this happen? And given that it did, it just seems like a deal-breaker … ie. an injury that will be nag’ing him all season … and I think he needed to be near 100% to be productive …
March 21, 2008 at 10:23 am
5: where are gene kingsale and freddy guzman when you need them????????????
March 21, 2008 at 10:28 am
5: I would suggest, this shows the folly of training with a non baseball traininer, then declaring yourself “Fit.” There is a big difference between being in shape to play a 162 MLB season, and being in shape as defined by a SWAT officer. Improper training can just easily set you up injury, as prepare you to play baseball.
March 21, 2008 at 10:42 am
Two things from that article in the UT today scare me:
Figure Ledezma, who is out of options, has earned a spot in either the rotation or the bullpen. The Padres refuse to rule out Estes, who they say is pitching better than his spring numbers in his return from 2006 elbow reconstruction surgery.
I don’t know if I can watch a team that starts Shawn Estes. Any team that has Estes or Wil Ledezma in key roles isn’t going to compete.
March 21, 2008 at 10:45 am
Loved this bit from the UT:
>>Geoff Blum, who could capably play every infield position and still be a threat at the plate. <<
A threat to which team?
March 21, 2008 at 10:53 am
Bill Center’s article also left Carlos Guevara off. I would think that his potential is as high as Wil Ledezma’s and he’s “out of options” as well.
March 21, 2008 at 11:13 am
6: Don’t forget Kerry Robinson
March 21, 2008 at 11:19 am
In regards to the Ronald Blum article can you imagin what the price of tix are going to increase when the new stadiums are opened in NY.
March 21, 2008 at 11:46 am
The 2005 Astros, duh!
March 21, 2008 at 11:47 am
(that was re: #9)
March 21, 2008 at 12:18 pm
11: Don’t forget Mike Darr. Wait, never mind.
March 21, 2008 at 12:27 pm
OT … Crisp has been hurt for the BoSox …
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/ne.....;type=lgns
March 21, 2008 at 12:30 pm
OT … it’s “upset day” in the NCAA’s … http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaab … 2 of the first 4 games today … and that doesn’t count Miami’s W over St Mary’s (which the Sagarin Rankings say was an upset) … it’s madness!
March 21, 2008 at 12:35 pm
It’s refreshing to see a national sports writer say that the D’Backs are in no way a lock this season: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.c.....ml?eref=T1
March 21, 2008 at 12:42 pm
9: Perfect! He was also “capably” playing the middle infield positions for the opposition. I wonder how many times the phrase “just past Blum” were uttered by Padre broadcasters the last 2 years?
8: Agree. What does Estes have to do to be ruled out? Be caught in bed with the daughter or wife of a Padre executive? Six straight years of below-average or injury-crippled baseball aren’t enough, a below-average career on whole isn’t enough, a bad spring isn’t enough.
March 21, 2008 at 1:04 pm
17: Not sure if Davidson winning was an upset. They were ranked in the top 25 and have one of the top 15 players in the country in Stephen Curry. He scored 40 points and made it look pretty easy.
March 21, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Kouz puts the Padres up 1-0 in the top of the first with a solo shot to dead center. Peavy’s on the hill for us today against the Brewers.
March 21, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Jay Jaffe @ BP comes up with a new acronym … MISERs (Maximum Impact SEtup Relievers) … http://www.baseballprospectus......cleid=7258 (sub only) … and after determining a method for ranking relief pitchers to determine who the MISERs have been since 2001 (essentially = expected wins added per nine innings (WXRL/9)), he says this …
it’s really Kevin Towers who deserves the applause; Linebrink, Cla Meredith, Akinori Otsuka, Heath Bell, Clay Hensley, and Steve Reed give the Padres impressively consistent representation here.
… yup, Jay gets it!
March 21, 2008 at 1:14 pm
21 … “live” box …
http://sandiego.padres.mlb.com.....b_milmlb_1
… but it doesn’t yet have KK’s HR …
March 21, 2008 at 1:15 pm
23 … I guess if the Padres get a big rally going in the 1st inning, they don’t want Jake to participate in it … they’ve got Parrino listed in the 9th spot in the starting lineup
March 21, 2008 at 1:23 pm
3: Outstanding!
March 21, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Jake not having a good first inning. 2 walks + 3-run bomb to Braun. Not good. He’s definitely struggling with his command.
March 21, 2008 at 1:29 pm
5 & 7: He may very well have been in great shape, but he’s 37, nearly 38, and he’s played a demanding game, in terms of its wear and tear on the body, professionally since he was 18.
True, if the trainer trained him like he was a SWAT officer, but we don’t know that. He may be a very qualified trainer and worked with Edmonds in a sport specific manner. But Jim is old (see above) and it could very well just have been an old man’s injury.
March 21, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Matthew, I loved that line as well. I think it was clearly the Padres who were threatened by Silent L.
March 21, 2008 at 1:31 pm
Can you imagine if they open the season with Estes, Rusch, and Ledezma as pitchers? 25% of your staff looking more like the Royals pitching staff (I can’t even rip on the Pirates here since they won’t even have that many stiffs in their staff).
I’ve been pretty critical of their infatuation with Jody Gerut but at least his good season was this decade (nevermind that he’s hasn’t shown a thing since then) but Estes last (and only) good year was 10 years ago! Not sure exactly what in his profile screams “Breakout Candidate.”
March 21, 2008 at 1:32 pm
17 … being “upset” day, it’s a good day for USD to play …
http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaab/.....0803210129
… they are up 34-29 at the half!
March 21, 2008 at 1:36 pm
8: “Any team that has Estes or Wil Ledezma in key roles isn’t going to compete.”
Really? One player/pitcher is going to ruin an entire team’s ability to compete? Sure, it would be great to have someone stronger in the 5th spot, and 99% of the rest of MLB teams feel the same way. But to think that having a horrendous number 5 is going to prevent the Padres from being competitive is just wrong.
Now combine that with a highly unsettled OF situation and it’s more of a concern, but on its own it isn’t a season killer.
March 21, 2008 at 1:39 pm
26: Is Jake pitching? The box score is sowing Parrino.
March 21, 2008 at 1:51 pm
32 … I think “Parrino” is a minor-league catcher …
March 21, 2008 at 1:52 pm
23 … mlb.com’s live box now shows Peavy in the game … and Peavy/Bard as having CS’d Mike Cameron
March 21, 2008 at 1:54 pm
34: Pretty sure that didn’t happen.
March 21, 2008 at 1:55 pm
McAnulty with a run-scoring double in the first … must have been a deep double ’cause it scored Tony Clark from 1B … even with 2-outs, that’s gotta be rare
March 21, 2008 at 1:56 pm
34: In fact, Cameron stole off that combo.
Schlom, what’s the point of bringin this up again? We get it. You think our rotation sucks. Thanks for that. There’s nothing to be done about it.
March 21, 2008 at 1:58 pm
36: He ripped it down the line. Took third on the throw home.
March 21, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Man, people are teeing off on Jake today. Kendall and Fielder have almost gone deep today.
March 21, 2008 at 2:03 pm
The box score lists these as the umps for today’s game …
Umpires: HP: Bob Davidson. 1B: Derryl Cousins. 2B: Jim Joyce. 3B: Mike Winters.
… is the guy on 3B Milton’s friend? Man, it doesn’t seem right that that guy is still an MLB ump …
March 21, 2008 at 2:03 pm
#29: Schlom, how many wins are you predicting for the Padres this year? I’m going with 86 or 87.
Everyone else: I’ve created a new poll asking this very question. Go nuts.
March 21, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Chase with an assist, nailing Fielder at home. Described as a perfect 1-hop throw.
March 21, 2008 at 2:08 pm
37 … my bad … thanks for the correction … wishful reading/thinking on my part … Cameron did indeed SB (rather than CS) on Peavy/Bard …
March 21, 2008 at 2:10 pm
Home Opener 2008:
in 10 days, 13 hours, 56 minutes
… but who among us is counting? (hint: I *am*
)
March 21, 2008 at 2:11 pm
43: Hah, no worries. If it makes you feel any better, Kouz’s homer went right over Cameron’s head.
Chase with 2 Ks today
March 21, 2008 at 2:12 pm
42 … cool-e-o … Chase won’t be at AAA for long … I’ll be out of town during this opening home stand, so won’t get to see them until April 19th … wonder if he’ll still be there?
March 21, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Originally I thought they should win about the same as last year. Now I’m not so sure. When you are close enough to competing for the division title, why throw roster spots (and games) away? You would think that they would have learned from last year where the lack of effective starters outside of the top 3 cost them the division title. They sort of fixed it by signing Randy Wolf but why are they messing around with Estes, Ledezma and Rusch? At least Germano is young.
Also, the Opening Day outfield is going to be one of the worst in the majors, especially defensively. Some of their roster choices (if they happen) make me think that the Padres aren’t trying to compete this season.
If Shawn Estes or Wil Ledezma is the 5th starter in the beginning of the season, I’m going to predict around 80 wins.
March 21, 2008 at 2:54 pm
30 … USD misses a layup at the buzzer … going to OT …
March 21, 2008 at 2:54 pm
USD is going into overtime. Missed a layup at the buzzer and they couldn’t put it away at the free throw line at the end as they only made 2 of 4.
March 21, 2008 at 2:55 pm
#47: Okay. When is the last time the Royals or the Pirates won 80 games in a season?
March 21, 2008 at 2:56 pm
This game shows how hard it will be for Memphis to win the National Championship. It’s nearly impossible to win a close game when you can’t make your free throws.
March 21, 2008 at 3:12 pm
Congrats to USD. I hate basketball, but I’ll have to watch the next round.
March 21, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Warning for USD fans … Western Kentucky is good … just sayin’ … congrats to Torero’s! It’s madness at its finest!
March 21, 2008 at 3:18 pm
#53: UConn was good, too. This is insane. It’s probably the biggest sports moment in school history.
March 21, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Yeah. Go Toreros!
March 21, 2008 at 3:24 pm
I didn’t say they say they were the Royals or Pirates, just some of their roster decision sound like something those two teams would do.
Here’s what I think a GM should do every off-season. You should look at your core (the players you have signed) and try to figure out how many wins you think you should have. Based on last season, I would figure the Padres to be around 85 wins or so. Then you have to figure out how many wins it will take to compete for a playoff spot. In the NL West, it’s probably around 90. So the Padres would need to find about 5 more wins. I suspect the core will be about the same (I could give a rundown but then the post will be too long).
Do you think the moves they made are good enough to improve the team? As bad as Germano and Wells were last season, will Estes and Ledezma be an improvement? Cameron to Edmonds is a big drop while LF will probably be worse too (2B will likely be better though). And the players they’ve brought in are either aging or have major injury question marks (or more seriously both).
I guess my broader point is why waste the prime years of their young core? If they aren’t going to spend any money now what are they going to do when their core players start aging? Is this going to be an Oakland A’s situation where we are going to look back and think what might have been? At least the A’s won more then one playoff game in their run. What happens if their prospects don’t pan out? They are going to have to rely on Towers to make magnificent trades (how many trades in baseball history have been as one-sided as the one with the Rangers? That doesn’t seem like something to rely on.
The Padres might go into the season with 3 players on their 25 man roster that were non-roster invitees (Estes, Rusch, Gerut) plus at least one or two Rule V guys (Crabbe, Guevara). By definition, those are all players not good enough to be on any teams 40 man roster (broadly, they aren’t among the best 1200 players in baseball). Do people feel comfortable about that? (Let me say I’m perfectly fine with Crabbe and stashing Guevara in the bullpen as they really won’t be expected to contribute much).
March 21, 2008 at 3:32 pm
I’m not trying to be too negative here but I’m just trying to figure out what their rational is for some of the moves they are making. If they have hopes for competing for a playoff spot (and I think that they do), shouldn’t you be able to come up with something better then Jody Gerut as the Opening Day LF and Shawn Estes or Wil Ledezma in the rotation? I’d rather have Wade Leblanc in there, at least he has potential. Same thing with Headley in LF. But it seems like the Padres would rather slow down their arbitration clock than win — although that didn’t work out so well for Milwaukee last season, did it?
March 21, 2008 at 3:33 pm
At the risk of starting another money-based string of discussion, check out what MLB is doing to the Cape Cod League …
http://www.capecodonline.com/a...../-1/SPORTS
March 21, 2008 at 3:44 pm
#56: The trouble is, you’re not giving the Padres much credit for not being the Royals or Pirates.
First off, it’s not Estes and Ledezma that are replacing Wells and Germano, it’s Wolf and one of Estes/Ledezma/Germano. I’m pretty confident that Wolf will be better than Wells. If Germano sticks at #5, then we’re in the same position as last year. If it’s Estes or Ledezma, well, obviously that’s a problem.
I’ll give you center field, but I don’t believe that left will be worse than last year. The combination of Hairston, Gerut, and Headley should produce about as much as last year’s plethora.
As for Towers, it’s not that he made one great trade, it’s that he’s exhibited a pattern of making great trades. You cite Gerut’s past in talking about his future, but you won’t extend the same courtesy to Towers. I’m at a loss to explain why.
March 21, 2008 at 3:52 pm
56: There’s a big difference between “not being among the best 1200″ and “not being considered to be among one team’s best 40 players.” Even then it won’t always be judged on “best,” because of the Rule 5 situation, a team may choose to protect a player who can’t contribute for a couple of years and risk losing someone else. The Brewers risked losing a utility player. We risked and lost on Soria.
I don’t see a big difference between this year’s squad and last year’s, which doesn’t make me all that happy, but certainly doesn’t make me think the season is over before it begins.
We had Rule 5 relievers both years.
Crabbe is going to be at least as valuable as Blum, in all likelihood. i don’t care where he came from, waivers, Rule 5, trade.
Cameron to Edmond is a downgrade.
NOG to Iguchi is an upgrade.
Peavy to Peavy is a likely downgrade.
I really wish they’d done something about the back of the rotation besides filling it with garbage, piling dirt on top, and calling it a park. But that’s what we did last year and we won 89 games, so it’s survivable. Not optimal, but survivable.
I don’t see why a team trying to compete and not waste the years of its core would be better off with LeBlanc, who is at least as likely to struggle as he is to contribute, than with Germano or Rusch. Estes, I give you, he looks like a terrible decision if he’s on the roster. There’s not much else he could do badly over the past 5 years and yet he’s still in the running.
March 21, 2008 at 3:56 pm
re: LF … on page 32 of the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual (a book I can heartily recommend
), it says that the the 2007 Padres got 4 Win Shares from LF … this matches my perception … but I think the conversation here over the off-season is that LF’ers did better than the consensus of observers, and I think that’s a mistake … perhaps because players like Cruz contributed some of their good stats while playing RF? … or PHing?
My point being that I think between Hairston + Gerut + McAnulty and Headley, I’m thinking that plethora is a lock for more than 4 WSs in 2008!
March 21, 2008 at 4:03 pm
54: We beat UConn? Holy Cow! That is huge for USD.
March 21, 2008 at 4:03 pm
54: We beat UConn? Holy Cow! That is huge for USD.
March 21, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Padres lose 4-3 to Brewers … scoreless innings from Rusch, Thatcher and Bass … hmmm, Bass, queue Masticore! …
Headley with 3 Ks … “Perry” in LF? Who? Cedric Hunter with another AB (and another K, but he’s an A-ball guy for sure) …
March 21, 2008 at 4:10 pm
The problem is that the Padres are relying on a lot of ifs. If Wolf can stay healthy. If Prior can contribute. If CY doesn’t get hurt again. If Germano can pitch like he did in the 1st half rather then the 2nd. If Edmonds can stay healthy and play a decent defensively CF. If Giles is healthy and can slug above .400. If Headley can jump from AA and can hit in the majors and handle LF. If Hairston can play CF or play everyday in LF. That seems like a lot of ifs, doesn’t it? More then a contender should have. It’s not like the Padres are in the AL East either, the other teams in our division are good but it’s not like they are juggernauts.
The problem is that it’s probably not possible to have a low payroll and win unless you have a ton of young players on your team — and the Padres haven’t drafted well enough lately.
March 21, 2008 at 4:14 pm
65: Leave the horse alone; it’s been dead for days now.
March 21, 2008 at 4:18 pm
I said I have no problem with Crabbe or Guevara (or anyone in the bullpen for that matter) as they won’t play enough in key roles for it to likely matter.
Go back and look at Gerut or Rusch’s career stats — what exactly is in there that would make you think that they could contribute? Remember, were not the Royals or Pirates who can afford to give 400 ABs or 150 IP to players like that since it doesn’t really matter one way or the other.
Last season, LF hit 252/340/462 with 28 2B, 5 3B, 30 HR. I don’t think that it’s likely that the group they have now will improve much on that. Even 2B probably won’t have that much of an improvement (247/320/342) when you figure that Iguchi is moving from two of the best hitters parks to Petco.
March 21, 2008 at 4:23 pm
The Padres have consistently had a lower, usually much lower, payroll than the Dodgers and Giants, yet have posted winning records for four straight years, including 2 division titles, and 1 game out of the playoffs last year. Your constant reminders of how low their payroll is are really getting tiresome.
You are being way too harsh on a team with limited resources and trying to overcome a recent history of poor drafting (02-04) in terms of what you “expect” the team to have in its stables. All teams have questions; the Padres can be expected to have more than other teams, less than a few. Yet they still have managed to be competitive four years running. They are doing much more right than wrong.
Your criticism of their starting rotation is particularly silly. Most teams do not have a reliable 5th starter, let alone a reliable 4th starter. Most teams hope for a league average 4th starter and slightly below league average 5th starter, and that is if they are fortunate. The Padres have a good shot at matching expectations there. It could turn out better if Prior and Rusch and Hensley come back from their injuries. Estes doesn’t bother me at all but I don’t see him making the team just yet; if he is willing to accept AAA and finds his velocity and location, he could be a typical 5th starter, not much to write home about. The team is a lot deeper in the pitching rotation than it has been in a while; it is not ideal depth but they aren’t the Yankees or Red Sox (oops, 2 big time starters down) or the Dodgers.
The Padres have done a fine job of making do with what they have.
And big props to USD for making do with what they had.
March 21, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Why does it matter that other teams hope to have a decent 4th or 5th starter? What does that have to do with the Padres? Basically your argument is that since other teams have crappy pitching, it’s OK for the Padres? Beating out the Giants or Dodgers isn’t really saying that much as they’ve both made some horrible roster decisions over the past few years.
Are you kidding that pitching Estes doesn’t bother you? Look at his stats again
http://www.baseball-reference......sh01.shtml
March 21, 2008 at 4:46 pm
GY … in your book, you have 2007 Padres LFers down for 4 WSs … do you have the details / stats behind that?
Schlom … in 67, you said “Last season, LF hit 252/340/462 with 28 2B, 5 3B, 30 HR” … how did you figure that?
I think this has been a common misunderstanding of ours … I’m interested to get us aligned on the facts … because I’m really liking our 2008 LF situation better than I liked our 2007 LF situation (I *never* liked Jose Cruz, Jr) …
March 21, 2008 at 4:47 pm
OK, I’ll be the first to admit when I’m wrong.
Shawn Estes is the worst option for the Padres rotation:
http://www.baseballmusings.com.....+THEN+27.0*EarnedRuns%2FFractionalInnings+ELSE+0.0+END&SortDir=desc&MinPA=162&MinDEC=0&MinG=0&MinGS=100&MinCG=0&MinGF=0&MinW=0&MinL=0&MinSV=0&MinSHO=0&MinH=0&MinR=0&MinER=0&MinHR=0&MinBB=0&MinK=0&MinHP=0&MinBK=0&MinWP=0
March 21, 2008 at 4:49 pm
Wow, that link didn’t work at all, not sure why. Anyway, it was the worst ERA for a pitcher with at least 100 Games Started since 2002. Estes was 2nd with a 5.42 ERA, Casey Fossum was worst with a 5.49.
LynchMob, I just took the splits from the team page on Baseball Reference.
http://www.baseball-reference......;year=2007
March 21, 2008 at 4:51 pm
69 … cool the jets a bit, Schlom … TF didn’t say what you quote him to say … he said “Estes doesn’t bother him” because he’s not expecting him to make the team … you quote him as “pitching Estes doesn’t bother you?” … see the difference? I think the consensus is that if Estes pitches for the Padres in the opening series, we will all be bothered … if he goes down to AAA and magic happens and he can earn a callup to replace an injured long-reliever (or even starter) and make a contribution, then I think we’ll all be happy … that’s all … I think we’re all with you on Estes … he’s a long-shot … but then again, so was USD
March 21, 2008 at 4:57 pm
72 … THANKS for the link … very good stats there! I don’t browse the B-R PI enough …
GY … what’s your source for the WSs? Seems like the WS don’t align with this cut of data from B-R PI …
March 21, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Except the comparable Estes longshot would be the New Jersey Institute of Technology beating UCLA!
I guess I’m just confused on why they are bothering. It’s true he’s not the worst option out there, they could throw me out there and I’d be worse by a ton, but he’s pretty close to it. Are they gambling on a return to his form from 11 years ago? The same thing with Jody Gerut, why even bother. Either Headley is the best option or he’s not. What’s the point of screwing around with Gerut? Isn’t that the same thing that we did in the beginning of last season? As we saw last season one game makes a huge difference. Why are we going into the season with lesser options? Not addressing the 4th and 5th starter positions last season ended up costing them a playoff spot — and who knows what would have happened?
March 21, 2008 at 5:10 pm
Low round draft pick Robert Perry hit .317 at AZL Padres last year. Gets an at bat in SpTraining game. Remember this kid, he may get 3 starts this year in centerfield.
March 21, 2008 at 5:12 pm
64: Bass Bass Bass!
March 21, 2008 at 5:14 pm
If you look at espn.com stats you can actually rank them by team (which you can’t do on BR). The Padres LF was actually 15th in the majors in OPS which is pretty impressive considering park effects aren’t taking into consideration. That’s why I don’t think LF will be improved much.
The by position stats are kind of interesting, who knew that the Padres DH’s just barely outhit the pitchers? 393 vs. 382 (only 27 PAs for DHs though). Comparing the Padres to other teams, the strength last year was at catcher (111 OPS+) and pitcher (110 OPS+). They were also above average at 1B (106) and CF (102). As expected, 2B (76 OPS+), RF (86) and 3B (93) really dragged down the offense.
March 21, 2008 at 5:17 pm
75 … I think I’ve answered the “why bother” question before … the Padres have done something that I don’t think you’ve done … they’ve seen these guys play VERY RECENTLY … and I’ll be they think that’s a pretty good predictor of how they will do in the near-term. I’m kinda glad you’re lumping Estes and Gerut together, because they show the extremes … I think we all agree that Estes seems to be VERY unlikely to be able to contribute to the 2008 Padres (which I presume is your point of “why bother”) … but I think the answer lies in players like Gerut … who I think *will* contribute to the 2008 Padres … I think that’s ‘nuf said … if a team “bothers” to take 10 long-shot crap-shoots and comes up with 1 or 2 players that contribute more Win Shares than they’d get if they didn’t bother, then isn’t that a good thing?
March 21, 2008 at 5:19 pm
77 … I knew you’d check in! Sure seems like that kid is still in the running for a spot in the ‘pen … and worst case scenario would seem to be a job in AAA with an open ticket back to SD if/when a need arises … cool beans!
March 21, 2008 at 5:24 pm
78 … hmmm, I’m confused by the “3B (93)” figure (ie. I don’t know what that means nor how it was calc’d)? KK’s OPS+ was 109, per http://www.baseball-reference......ke01.shtml … and he played 136 games at 3B … did whomever played 3B the other 27 games suck that bad? Eh, I’ll be Blum was a lot of those … so perhaps so …
March 21, 2008 at 5:31 pm
http://www.baseball-reference......jo01.shtml
What in there makes you think he’d contribute? He’s shown even less then Termel Sledge and Jose Cruz Jr and that cost us last season. Gerut was good in 2003 but in 2004 he was the 2nd worst RF’er in baseball. And he’s been even worse since then. I guess it’s possible that he starts off the season on fire and the Padres are able to trade him and then install Headley but the odds seem very low.
I’m concerned since it seems like the team hasn’t learned the lessons from the previous seasons. Last year we lost because we didn’t have adequate replacements beyond the top 3 starters after injuries and ineffectiveness. We also tried a cheap, low potential platoon in LF. Won’t everyone be very disappointed if the same thing plays out this season?
March 21, 2008 at 5:35 pm
From BR:
sOPS+ - OPS+ of this split relative to the major league OPS for this split: 100*((split OBP/ML avg. OBP of split) + (split SLG/ML avg. SLG of split) - 1)
The definition is saying both OPS and OPS+ so I’m not sure which one they use.