OBG08: Jake Peavy

Mon, Feb 4, 2008Ballhype: hype it up!
by Geoff Young

Jake PeavyBefore we get to the projections, a quick note on the Khalil Greene deal that happened over the weekend. I’ve already discussed Greene’s situation at length, so I’ll just say now that I’m glad both sides worked together to get something done.

The contract isn’t as long as I (or the Padres) would have liked, but at least it eliminates the need for arbitration. It also gives the two sides a little more time to figure out whether an even longer term arrangement might be mutually beneficial.

Optimal? Perhaps not. Better than going to arbitration this year and next? Definitely.

Back to the projections. Today we turn to the pitchers, starting with ace Jake Peavy. The 2007 Cy Young Award winner has been brilliant in three of the past four seasons and is in his prime. I’ll assume a slight dropoff from last year’s performance: 210 IP, 2.85 ERA.

What are your expectations? We’re looking for IP, ERA, and a brief explanation. Talk to me…

Picking up where last year's version left off, the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual provides in-depth analysis of and commentary on the San Diego Padres. Get your copy today.

Possibly Related Posts

29 Responses to “OBG08: Jake Peavy”

  1. Steve C Says:

    205 IP .275 ERA 17-5

    Current score: 0
  2. Bryan S Says:

    210 IP, 3.20 ERA, 220 K. He’ll regress a little bit; as dominant as he was last year, I don’t think that can hold up for long. He’ll still be very, very good, and hopefully he’ll be a little better against Colorado this year. :-)

    Current score: 0
  3. Phantom Says:

    224 IP, 3.04 ERA, 210K

    I’m really hoping that Jake learns to be more economical this year, which is the basis for my projection. I know that he didn’t improve his P/PA last year (in fact the highest of his career if I remember from the DS 08 Annual), but I really think he’s pitching more intelligently now. Hopefully next year he can sacrifice some Ks for more IPs.

    Current score: 0
  4. Oside Jon Says:

    I’m also hoping his pitch counts will come down this year. He’s still coming into his prime in my opinion. I even think he can do better than last year!! 215 IP, .268 ERA, 20-5, 200K’s.

    AND on the joking side….

    105 PA’s .400/.400/.400 HA HA HA

    Current score: 0
  5. Trav Says:

    Jake is entering his age 27 season, and has been durable over the past three seasons. Both of those facts tend to predict future health and productivity, so we should be optimistic he can repeat 2007s numbers: 30 - 35 starts, 210 - 220 IP, >1K/IP. ERA may rise a bit - to around 2.80 or 3.00 - because his HR rate in 2007 was way out of line with his track record.

    Final guess:
    34 starts, 221 IP, 233K, 2.83 ERA

    (Predicting W/L is a fool’s errand, IMHO.)

    Current score: 0
  6. Ben B. Says:

    Peavy’s line: 219 1/3 IP, 237 K’s, 2.87 ERA.

    Current score: 0
  7. Geoff Young Says:

    With seven precincts reporting: 215 IP, 2.89 ERA.

    Current score: 0
  8. Brian G. Says:

    Catching up with yet another fantastic Padre 1st round draft pick (1999, if memory serves): “26 year-old Vincent Faison, a walk on for The University of Tennessee football team, was arrested for DUI in Knoxville this weekend.”

    Current score: 0
  9. SDSUBaseball Says:

    205 IP, 2.65 ERA i think we just saw the beginning of Jakes prime. He is learning to pitch when his stuff isnt there by still getting guys out in a Maddux-esque style.

    Current score: 0
  10. MB Says:

    212 innings, 3.01 era … a few more fly balls land over the fences than last year.

    Current score: 0
  11. Ian C. Says:

    210 Inn 2.93 ERA 245 SO’s

    Current score: 0
  12. Matthew Thompson Says:

    Peavy: 210 / 2.55 / 232 K

    Don’t know how many baseballthinkfactory readers there are here, but I thought this entry on the Calphalon Awards page would be of interest here:

    >>The NL had a godawful catcher – Josh Bard and his 121 SBs allowed while catching ten runners. He managed –14 DRS in his 927 innings. Bard should be moved. The collection of Cub/Padre catchers, the Cadre of catchers, including Rob Bowen, Michael Barrett, Jason Kendall and Bard caught 2400 innings and were -31 DRS. That’s just abominable. If you can’t catch, at least hit, gentlemen!<<

    I had no idea that he was THAT bad, and I already thought he was pretty lackluster back there. Here is the link:

    http://www.baseballthinkfactor.....nfielders/

    Current score: 0
  13. Marsh Says:

    12: Hardly a Padres starter does a decent job holding runners. That is, a lot of the blame goes to the Padres staff.

    Current score: 0
  14. Ben B. Says:

    Peavy’s line for next year: 78 PA, .193/.217/.255. Some regression from his career year at the plate last year, but still good production for a pitcher.

    Current score: 0
  15. Mark Ase Says:

    They continue to baby Jake and while many had high hopes for Zona(try to win so much with that run differential again, I dare you) and Colorado(come on they were really only good for a month) I wouldn’t be surprised to see both the Padres and Dodgers make the playoffs early enough for Jake to miss a start or two down the stretch….

    180 IP 3.02 202K’s

    Current score: 0
  16. Rain Delay Says:

    . If you can’t catch, at least hit, gentlemen!

    That sentence bugs the crap out of me. They can catch just fine it seems to me, but throwing out runners thats another story. But hey they left out the fact most of the Pad’s pitching staff have such big delivery’s that it’s not all that hard to swipe a bag or 20.

    Current score: 0
  17. Steve C Says:

    Re: 12

    “If you can’t catch, at least hit, gentlemen!”

    .285/.364/.404 isn’t all that bad

    Current score: 0
  18. Anthony Says:

    I’m going to take the unrealistically optimistic view and say Jake will actually be better next year: 210 IP, 2.12 ERA, 240 Ks, 21-4 and another Cy Young award.

    Current score: 0
  19. Geoff Young Says:

    #18: Love the gutsy call.

    With 13 precincts reporting: 210 IP, 2.81 ERA.

    Current score: 0
  20. Schlom Says:

    215 IP 2.65 ERA 230 K’s

    I think he’ll be about as good as last season but the OF defense won’t be as good so that will hurt his numbers slightly.

    Current score: 0
  21. Didi Says:

    202 IP, 2.62 ERA, 221 Ks, 2CG.

    Current score: 0
  22. Masticore317 Says:

    I think rather than Mike Sweeney we should look at Craig Wilson. Sure, he’s never had the success Sweeney had.

    They’re both righties but Wilson is used to the “bench” role and can also play LF/RF as well as emergency catcher. And would likely be a lot cheaper too.

    Current score: 0
  23. sdpadrefan.com Says:

    I expect Peavy to win a few less games (mostly due to the team’s lack of offense, plus the fact that their NL West opponents have very good rotations) but I think Jake will work to get his pitch count down, which will allow him to complete a few games in ‘08. He had zero complete games in ‘07. As the staff ace, Peavy needs to work into the 8th and 9th innings more often. If he improves in this area, his IP will increase and his K’s will decrease and his bullpen will be fresh.

    I’m also predicting big things from Jake the next time the Pads make the playoffs, whenever that time comes again.

    17-8, 2.66 ERA, 245 IP, 238 K

    Current score: 0
  24. Richard Says:

    215 IP, 3.00 ERA, 225 K

    Current score: 0
  25. Masticore317 Says:

    I say 215 IP, 2.75 ERA, 225 K

    Current score: 0
  26. Geoff Young Says:

    With 18 precincts reporting: 212 IP, 2.79 ERA, 226 K.

    Current score: 0
  27. Friar Phil Says:

    202 IP, 2.90 era

    16 wins.

    Current score: 0
  28. Lance Richardson Says:

    195 IP / 2.90 ERA / 215 K

    Pitches well when healthy, and finishes top 5 in Cy Young voting, but misses three starts with forearm tightness.

    Current score: 0
  29. Brian Says:

    222IPs, ERA: 3.13, SOs :233, 18-9, under the tutelage of Maddux, Peavy learns to cut down on IP/PA a bit, but the league is getting used to his approach, so his ERA goes up a little bit. Still, I think the Pads are better off with more innings of Peavy, even if he is a bit less effective

    Current score: 0

Leave a Reply

Your comments are welcome and encouraged. However, they are subject to moderation, which means that only the best will be published. By submitting comments, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to abide by the Ducksnorts Community Guidelines and Moderation Policy.