Review the Preview: Hitters
Thu, Oct 4, 2007
by Geoff Young
Back in April, I wrote my annual “Looking Forward to…” piece on the Padres over at Baseball Think Factory. In the interest of holding myself accountable, and maybe learning something in the process, I thought we should do a quick review. We’ll cover the position players today and the pitchers on Monday.
Marcus Giles, 2B
What I said: “…he should provide the Padres with a nice mix of on-base skills and gaps power. On balance, Giles probably is no worse an option than last year’s starter, Josh Barfield.”
What happened: Technically this last statement was true, but only because Barfield had a disastrous season in Cleveland. Giles hit .229/.304/.317 and eventually lost his starting job to Geoff Blum. Giles had a terrific April (.327/.376/.459) and played solid defense, but a .191/.277/.268 line over 340 plate appearances from May 8 onward killed his season. On-base skils? Gaps power? No, and no.
Brian Giles, RF
What I said: “At age 36, we shouldn’t expect anywhere near a full rebound [to his performance in Pittsburgh]. A return to somewhere between his ‘04 and ‘05 levels, however, isn’t out of the question.”
What happened: He basically repeated his ‘06 season, sacrificing a little in the on-base department to make minimal power gains. For the second straight season, Giles notched a career-low OBP. This doesn’t necessarily bode well for the future. On the bright side, after being sidelined for much of the first half, he hit .266/.353/.461 after the All-Star break. Giles isn’t a star at this stage in his career, and folks need to get over that. He still provides decent value on offense and does a very nice job negotiating a difficult right field at Petco Park.
Adrian Gonzalez, 1B
What I said: “Gonzalez’ power numbers may have taken some observers by surprise, but with his ability to drive the ball hard to all fields, those most likely are the result of real growth and not a fluke.”
What happened: Well, his ISO increased from .186 to .220. As we’ve already noted, Gonzalez’ drop in batting average this year has masked his growth in the power and on-base departments. Needless to say, ‘06 was not a fluke.
Josh Bard, C
What I said: “Bard won’t repeat that [2006] performance in expanded duties this year, but he should do a pretty nice Johnny Estrada impression (with a chance of pushing into Michael Barrett/Ramon Hernandez territory), which isn’t too shabby.”
What happened: I underestimated Bard…
| Player | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistics are courtesy of Baseball-Reference. | ||||
| Bard, 2007 | .285 | .364 | .404 | 105 |
| Estrada, career | .280 | .320 | .406 | 86 |
| Barrett, career | .266 | .322 | .426 | 88 |
| Hernandez, career | .263 | .328 | .423 | 98 |
If you think it’s unfair that I present Bard’s ‘07 against those other guys’ career numbers, know that if I used their ‘07 stats, this would look even worse.
Mike Cameron, CF
What I said: “At age 34, Cameron hasn’t yet experienced any appreciable decline. To the contrary, last year he finished with a career-best .482 SLG despite his slow start and the fact that he plays half his games in a pitchers’ park.”
What happened: I didn’t really commit to any predictions with Cameron, which was a mistake. In my head, I thought he would repeat his ‘06 performance, but in fact, he slipped quite a bit. Cameron’s batting average dropped 26 points, but that could be due to anything. More disconcerting are the 25 point swoon in ISO and the 22 point rise in K/PA. Normally I’m more in the “strikeouts don’t matter” camp, but when the power goes down and the inability to make contact goes up, that raises some red flags for me. Cameron still is an above-average center fielder who should command plenty on the open market this winter, but I’m not sure that it’s in the Padres’ best interest to be the ones flipping the bill.
Khalil Greene, SS
What I said: “He still looks like a good candidate to bust out with a few Rich Aurilia/Jose Valentin type campaigns.”
What happened: Sort of, but not really…
| Player | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistics are courtesy of Baseball-Reference. | ||||
| Greene, 2007 | .254 | .291 | .468 | 98 |
| Valentin, 1996 | .259 | .336 | .475 | 99 |
| Aurilia, 1999 | .281 | .336 | .444 | 106 |
The OBP is miserable, of course, but I like to focus more on what a player can do than what he cannot. What Greene did is knock 74 extra-base hits, play a solid shortstop (this was the first year that both his fielding percentage and his range factor were better than league average), and most importantly, stay healthy enough to play 153 games. Any discussion of Greene runs the risk of turning into a religious debate about his value to the Padres, but if we focus on his actual contributions, we see a useful player. Greene is not as good as his most ardent supporters would have you believe, nor is he as bad as his detractors might claim. He is, like Valentin and Aurilia before him, an above-average shortstop with flaws in his game.
Kevin Kouzmanoff, 3B
What I said: “There’s cause for enthusiasm with Kouzmanoff, although it should be tempered somewhat by the fact that he’s already 25 years old. Think of guys like Mike Lowell and Todd Zeile — not stars, but useful players…”
What happened: Kouzmanoff hit .275/.329/.457. His line stood at .121/.178/.209 through May 13 but manager Bud Black, in one of his finer moments, stuck with Kouz, who hit .310/.364/.514 from that point forward. Baseball-Reference hasn’t come out with their latest version of comparable players yet, but Kouzmanoff’s ‘07 looks a lot like Lowell’s ‘01 (.283/.340/.448). Lowell was two years older and a much better defender than Kouz, but that doesn’t detract from the overall point, which is that there’s a lot to like in Kouzmanoff’s rookie campaign.
Terrmel Sledge, LF
What I said: “Sledge could end up being a real nice surprise in 2007 and make the deal with Texas look even more lopsided than it already is.”
What happened: BBBBBBBBBBZZZZZZZZTTTTTTTTTTTT…….. Sledge was terrible. Sometimes you give a guy a chance and he doesn’t do anything with it. Sledge showed some power and on-base skills, but his inability to make consistent contact or play the outfield negated those. I don’t know what exactly I’d expected, but what I got was another Mark Bellhorn.
Geoff Blum, UT
What I said: “He hasn’t seen an OBP north of .300 since 2002 and his range isn’t great, so you don’t want to see him in the lineup more than once or twice a month, but he won’t kill you if used in moderation. Unfortunately, if the previous two seasons are any indication, Blum most likely will see close to 300 plate appearances.”
What happened: He broke the .300 OBP barrier (.319) and notched 370 plate appearances. Blum finished the season starting at second base, which is to say that finding a more permanent solution at the position remains a priority.
There you have it. We’ll get the pitchers next week…
Picking up where last year's version left off, the Ducksnorts 2008 Baseball Annual provides in-depth analysis of and commentary on the San Diego Padres. Get your copy today.
October 4, 2007 at 8:23 am
G.Y. Great job! I love that you brought back your predictions from April (like what you did at KC).
I have to give it to B(l)um he did a nice job at 2B this year (post ASB) his D was terrible but he filled the big gapping hole in the lineup. And this is coming from one of the biggest anti-b(l)um guys that post here.
October 4, 2007 at 8:39 am
baseballthinkfactory.org has a link to UZR numbers for 2007. it only lists the top and bottom 3 for each league at each position. NOG was the third best second baseman defensively in the NL at 6 saved runs per 150 games. No Padre was in the bottom 3 at any position.
October 4, 2007 at 8:42 am
Sometimes it would help if I read the ends of threads from yesterday. What Ben B said last night at 1 am.
October 4, 2007 at 8:42 am
I know we’ve had this discussion already, but what precisely is our most pressing need for next year? How does the market affect that?
I’d say our needs are two-fold: We need credible back of the rotation starters, but we also need a defensive-minded CF. The pitching concerns me less because KT seems to always find diamonds in the rough (although honestly, if you’re a GM and KT asks for pitchers, how do you let them go?)
The CF situation worries me. We could go with stop-gap like Lofton, which wouldn’t be awful, but doesn’t exactly solve the organizational need. We could pursure the Rowand/Cameron/Hunter-types, but it’s almost guaranteed they’ll command stupid money.
I like the idea of trying to trade for Crisp. Would anyone do Headley/Crisp straight up? Do we think our CF is more important than a potential slugging corner IF/OF? I’d also like to pry something from Tampa. Maybe they’d bite on a K-Cam/Jared Wells for someone trade (reportedly, they are looking for relievers)?
October 4, 2007 at 8:42 am
Nice review, Geoff.
Yup, Silent L: MVUP, most valuable utility player, despite his lack of glove. NOG was a big disappointment with the stick.
Looking forward to the pitchers’ entry.
Meanwhile, another funny:
http://www.thebrushback.com/
October 4, 2007 at 9:12 am
4: I think Crisp is the best fit for this club: cheap-ish, very good range, a little speed. Of course I’d prefer Hunter or Jones but they’re likely to be way out of budget. Personally I think Headley is too much to give up for Crisp, and I probably value prospects less than most of the DS commenters. I just think we can get Crisp for less and if we’re going to let Headley go we need to get back a decent young starting pitcher.
I’d love to see Moores open up his Scrooge McDuck bank vault and bring in Tori Hunter. I’d also love to win the lottery; unfortunately there’s a better chance I’ll be cashing that megabucks check than there is of seeing Hunter in a Padres uniform.
On another note, I’m part of an OOTP7 (http://www.ootpbaseball.net/) startup league that’s looking for owners. It’s a 16 team fictional international league with a sense of humor and lots of trash talking. Contact me via the contact form at friarwatch.com if interested.
October 4, 2007 at 9:16 am
4: You gotta assume the the BoSox would be interested in Headley in that situation. I dont think they really would be.
But I agree, and i think that is what most of us have been saying. We NEED 2 SP and a legit CF definesively.
October 4, 2007 at 9:16 am
Is Buster Olney drunk on Vermont tea:
His blog links today: • There is some debate in Baltimore about whether the O’s should pursue Andruw Jones, writes Roch Kubatko. The more likely landing spot for him, I’d bet, would be San Diego, where a good friend and Boras client — Greg Maddux — is already entrenched, and could serve as a lure. The O’s outrighted three players to their Class AAA roster.
October 4, 2007 at 9:24 am
7:If Lowell gets away, they’ll probably have some interest in third-base depth. They can move Youklis back to third, but he hasn’t played there in a while.
October 4, 2007 at 9:24 am
Re: 8 some team will offer Jones a 4-5 year deal, he is still a young guy and there are alot of dumb teams out there.
October 4, 2007 at 9:29 am
Hey everybody. Just wanted to apologize if I got a little carried away on Tuesday. I’m sure as DS readers you can relate to being passionate about the team and about the game, so hopefully you can forgive me if I got out of line.
Here’s to a fun off season! Thanks to Geoff for providing a great forum and to all the folks who contribute comments and analysis and share ideas. Cheers!
October 4, 2007 at 9:42 am
GY, Thanks for taking the time to compile that. Can’t wait to see what the Padres do this offseason.
October 4, 2007 at 9:45 am
#11: No worries, Pat. That was a difficult time for all of us. Personally I’d rather see passion than indifference. Thanks, as always, for your contributions!
October 4, 2007 at 10:23 am
7 - Lowell’s not getting younger, not sure what the BoSox organizational depth is like at 3B. But I also agree with Anthony that we as a team can’t just make that trade straight up, need some pitcher back too (always get an arm per KT).
We need 2 good SP, we’ll get one and KT will roll the dice with the Germano/Cassel/Tomko pupu platter, mark my words.
Looking at Barfield two years ago and Kouz this year, KT isn’t afraid to go young to plug a hole. He’ll plug Antonelli in at 2B provide he doesn’t completely embarrass himself in spring training, backed by keeping Blum in the Bellhorn “supposed safety net” role.
Crystal ball here, but I see LF being Hairston/Bradley only. KT will feel ok with Hairston while Bradley heals and then them sharing the spot once MB’s back. I don’t see KT spinning his wheels on the much-hoped for “big bat” in LF when he’s got those options (and i know MB’s a FA, but I don’t see much hot pursuit of him out there).
So, it’s all about CF and SP this offseason. I do expect KT to pull a couple relievers out of his magic hat too, as per usual. If it’s only those 2 positions, what Moores ok’s for spending might fund a more expensive guy, who knows.
October 4, 2007 at 10:29 am
Re: 14 I don’t think Moores cares what position the budget is allocated towards I think he just cares what the budget is. The one nice thing I do have to say about Moores is that he lets his FO make most of the baseball decisions.
October 4, 2007 at 10:29 am
LF could be more interesting then that simply because of the Headley/Kouz situation at 3B. Depending on how they grade Kouz’s defense both this year and his ability to improve in the future he may be moving to LF(he won’t be able to ever handle RF defensively in Pertco)
If Kouz/Headley move to LF then I don’t see any reason to bother with resigning Bradley as long as Hairston is on the roster.
SP is a need and they are going to have to spend for a decent CF, especially if they have 2 rookies starting at 3b/2b.
Mark
October 4, 2007 at 10:32 am
Re: 16 I think Kouz’s bat has put him at 3B next year and I think Hairston’s Heroics in LF has put him in that spot to start the year, leaving Headley in AAA or on the trading block.
October 4, 2007 at 10:41 am
14: I wasn’t sure how valuable we see Headley as being. I think an arm + Crisp for Headley would be a decent call.
No way we could get Bucholz, right? Especially after he threw the no-hitter?
October 4, 2007 at 10:43 am
Re: 18 RSN would riot
October 4, 2007 at 10:46 am
18: We’re not going to get a lot more than Crisp for Headley. One below-average hitter/excellent defensive CF in the majors for a very solid prospect. We’re not going to sniff Bucholz unless we’re giving up someone like Bell or CY. Maybe not then.
If we’re not going to move Kouz, we need to seriously consider trading Headley now or next year. He’s one sprained knee away from losing a lot of value.
October 4, 2007 at 10:49 am
I would be really supprised if they Moved Kouz to LF, He’s just not quick enough to play in Petco.
October 4, 2007 at 10:49 am
4: I think the most pressing need for us in the offseason is addressing the almost total lack of team speed (and by extension, OBP). CF is the most visible area to me where the FO has a big decision ahead of it.
Outside of Mike Cameron, what running threat do we have on this team? Speed works on both offense and defense, and we’re looking at losing the only speed threat we have to free agency. Do I believe that Mike Cameron should be brought back? That is a tough argument - here’s the ‘for’ side as I see it:
1) Only speed threat we have in the lineup.
2) His clubhouse presence and 110% effort every day.
2) Gold-glove caliber defense playing in a big outfield.
3) No depth in the system to fill that position, meaning we’d have to go to trade or another FA.
The ‘against’ side: offensively, I think he’s on the downside of his career…he’s a career .250 hitter who will strike out a lot - and you don’t improve on that as a 35 year old player. He will be looking for a multi-year deal (say 3 years?) and from a financial standpoint it just doesn’t make sense for this team IMHO.
I’ve heard names like Hunter (another natural team leader) or Crisp (who plays very good D, has speed, and who I’m sure the Red Sox would like to move with Ellsbury ready to play). However, whichever way they go in the CF debate still leaves out speed at pretty much every other position. Can’t do anything about that at C, 1B, SS, 3B, or RF, so that only leaves LF and 2B. I don’t know enough about Shrek and his speed, as his major league stats don’t show enough to give me an opinion one way or the other.
I’m no stats expert, and I’m not a ‘moneyball’ guy, but I lean against bringing back Cameron, but only if you can get an equivalent (and younger) talent coming to us via FA or trade. In any case, this is going to be a very interesting offseason for the Pads.
October 4, 2007 at 10:51 am
Re: 22 how much does the FO value speed?
October 4, 2007 at 10:55 am
re 23: Speed is nice to have, but I doubt it is part of the evaluation process.
Andruw Jones isn’t the fastest guy, doesn’t steal bases but has been an all time great defensive CF over his career. Positioning and getting a good jump are more important then foot speed for outfield defense….Giles is a much better defensive outfielder then people give him credit for.
October 4, 2007 at 10:55 am
17.
I think you are right about Kouz in 2008 at 3rd to start the year but if his defense is an issue early in the season I don’t think he is cemented there. Especially if Headley is raking in AAA. It will be interesting to see what happens when Scott Hairston goes back to being Scott Hairston as well. I agree with his heroics this season he has probably earned himself a nod in LF for 2008 but chances are he won’t keep hitting bombs like he did last month. He doesn’t appear to be a real good avg. guy and he strikes out a lot as well.
October 4, 2007 at 10:55 am
23: Not much. This year’s team was the slowest of the last 3 and won more games.
22: The Red Sox may be willing to trade Crisp, but they don’t need to. They have plenty of money to keep him around and Drew/Manny spend weeks on the DL every year. They’re not just going to hand him over.
October 4, 2007 at 10:56 am
Depends on how many homers the speedster can hit. A Coco Crisp deal might work. Wasn’t it just last year that people were dissing his defense?
October 4, 2007 at 10:58 am
23: Steve, I’m not sure they do, but I do
I think it matters that you have a team that can’t run especially since we saw too many times this year this team having a problem in scoring runs. It’s great when your offense can string together a bunch of hits and get the 3-run bomb, but that isn’t an everyday occurence for this team - manufacturing runs takes good situational hitting and the ability to run in favorable situations, neither of which we did well at all for much of the year.
Maybe I am a Moneyball guy…
October 4, 2007 at 11:00 am
25: Hairston always hit in the minors. He was a monster, hitting for average, getting on, hitting for power. He’s only had 1 season’s worth of major league at-bats spread across 4 years, I’d be willing to give him a shot. Unless we acquire Cabrera, and then he’s on the express train to Bench City.
October 4, 2007 at 11:00 am
20.
I think I am begining to feel the same way about Peavy. I think his trade value is going to be about as high as it’s going to get as soon as the CY Young is announced. I would hate to see the rotation without him but he is also probably our best shot at getting any top prospect/s back before he leaves as a free agent or starts having arm issues.
October 4, 2007 at 11:04 am
27: Yes. I haven’t looked up Crisp in any standardized measure, but you’re right, last year he was being savaged for his glovework.
28: In the 4 seasons that Petco has been open, we’ve scored the most runs with the fewest stolen bases. More speed would be nice, as long as the players can do other things well.
October 4, 2007 at 11:12 am
22: Speed has little to do with OBP. I won’t say nothing, but it’s not as important as plate discipline and the ability to recognize pitches. See Josh Bard for a case study on how someone with absolutely no speed can still have a respectable OBP.
The only people that speed really helps OBP wise are guys like Tavarez, Matsui, et al.
Given that we’ve pretty much settled it would be Crisp for Headley straight up, do we do the deal? I also agree that with Kouz at third, we should probably deal Headley for something valuable while we still can.
October 4, 2007 at 11:14 am
If they move headley I would rather see them do it for a younger CF with more upside than Crisp. I would not mind seeing the Pads trade for Crisp bu I just would rather not trade our best prospect for him.
October 4, 2007 at 11:15 am
32.
If you are sold that Kouz is going to be a better big league 3rd baseman than Kouz yes you probably want to move him while his value is still pretty high.
October 4, 2007 at 11:20 am
Crisp’s OPS+ the last two years has been 80 and 86. He’s Juan Pierre with fewer steals and better defense. I’d much, much rather resign Cameron, who is a better player, doesn’t cost talent to acquire, and I’m guessing won’t command anywhere near the money of Jones or Hunter. If it requires three years to get it down, so be it; there’s a solid chance he’s still better than Crisp in three years.
October 4, 2007 at 11:21 am
31: Crisp vs. Cameron (07 & Career). I don’t know much about the different defensive metrics, so this is strictly fielding, ZR, and RF with OBP and OPS mixed in for a more complete perspective.
Crisp 2007
Fielding Pctg: .998
ZR: .911
RF: 3.07
OBP: .330
OPS: .712
Cameron 2007
Fielding Pctg: .987
ZR: .877
RF: 2.52
OBP: .328
OPS: .759
Crisp Career
Fielding Pctg: .993
ZR: .875
RF: 2.65
OBP: .329
OPS: .738
Cameron Career
Fielding Pctg: .985
ZR: .901
RF: 2.87
OBP: .341
OPS: .786
October 4, 2007 at 11:25 am
Do we all agree that Cameron took a step back this year both in the feild and at the plate?
October 4, 2007 at 11:29 am
35: Good points.
October 4, 2007 at 11:31 am
Just for fun, what would everybody here pay for Andruw? More importantly, what would the FO? Just $15 mil for one year? Sabernomics posted a compelling (to this dope, anyway) defense of Jones after Jayson Stark’s “Overrated” thing came out.
October 4, 2007 at 11:33 am
Jones hits well at petco but there is no way I would give him a deal longer than 3 years at $15/mil.
Anyone thing that moving Headley + other to the Indians for a young OF (Franklin Gutierrez or Louis Franciscoand) and Lee might be able to work.
October 4, 2007 at 12:07 pm
I wouldn’t move Headley for anyone who has been mentioned yet, in fact I’d just stick Headley at 3B at the start of the year and worry about it again in 2014 when he is a FA.
Yes, that means I’d move Kouz to LF. We’ve seen tons of defensive metrics, they all show him to be from Bobby Bonilla bad to somewhere around bad.
Given those totals it would be hard for Kouz to be a worse defensive outfielder then he is a 3B just based on the number of plays that he’s be required to make every game.
The team would also be able to take him out late in the game for a defensive replacement.
Lastly it would be important for KT to find an elite defensive CF to help cover the gap in left center.
October 4, 2007 at 12:08 pm
On Andruw Jones, I’d be willing to go around 4/60 without thinking twice about it.
October 4, 2007 at 12:44 pm
If it was my money, I’d even go as high as 16-18 million per year to get Jones. Might be a lot next year, but with the way salaries are going, by the end of the contract it will be a bargain, especially if he gets back to pre-2007 Jones.
October 4, 2007 at 12:52 pm
A. Jones will probably get at least a 5 or 6 year deal with someone, I’m personally not really high on that length.
I heard the Orioles may be wanting to move Brian Roberts (via trade). That would be a real nice fit, I think… fill that hole at 2B and bat lead-off, move B. Giles to the 2-hole.
October 4, 2007 at 12:58 pm
Re: 44 Move Antonelli to CF?
October 4, 2007 at 12:59 pm
#41
Where does Ryan Klesko bad fall on your scale? If Kouz is physically and mentally capable of playing LF better than Klesko did, then run him out there for a while in the spring, with Headley at 3B, and see what happens.
October 4, 2007 at 12:59 pm
44: Antonelli in 09?
October 4, 2007 at 1:04 pm
Re: 46 Jose Conseco bad, I kept wating to see a ball bounce off of his head
October 4, 2007 at 1:07 pm
#48
So that explains the Rhino hats…they were protection, not fashion.
October 4, 2007 at 1:11 pm
Re: 49 Exactly
October 4, 2007 at 1:37 pm
Matsui just hit a two-out grand slam to put the Rox back on top 6-3 in the 4th.
If Matsui had done that against us, I would have shed tears. That’s a second baseman, hitting a grand slam. The Rox are just en fuego.
October 4, 2007 at 1:41 pm
Remember when people thought the NL West sucked this season?
October 4, 2007 at 1:59 pm
52: What do you mean? We were totally the weakest division in baseball. Nothing like the Central, where the Cubs valiantly fought the Brewers to see who would get elimintated first.
October 4, 2007 at 2:14 pm
God, is it time for the Winter Meetings yet?
October 4, 2007 at 2:30 pm
#51
According to the box score on ESPN.com, Matsui is a single away from the cycle.
October 4, 2007 at 2:40 pm
Speak of the devil, from a BP chat yesterday:
Tony (Stillwater): Crisp to San Diego for Kouzmanoff? San Diego replaces Cameron and Boston replaces Lowell.
Christina Kahrl: Perhaps, but Kouzmanoff won’t be a third baseman for too many years into the future. Better that they move Youkilis back across the diamond and add a first baseman.
No offense, but why would the Padres want to pay 5M extra a year for a worse player? Serious east coast bias, the NL West is just a farm system for the east coast teams right? Just look at the Rockies/Phillies and DBacks/Cubs…..wait no that doesn’t work.
October 4, 2007 at 2:48 pm
I’d be very wary of signing Torii Hunter because of his performance history. Here’s his OPS+ since 1999: 72/77/102/126/97/105/107/112/120. Guess which two years were his free agent years? He’s also played in just 84% of games since then and has only been over 148 games twice in that time (this year and 2003). And he’s two years older than Jones. Crisp has a lot of value as he’s coming into his prime (turns 28 in November), cheap ($4.75m next year, $5.75m in 2009, $8m club option in 2010), and considered great defensively. He’s certainly a more cost effective option than Cameron (not counting what you have to give up to get him).
As far as leftfield goes I think that they should give Hairston a shot as he’s been very successful in the minors and in his short time here. I also think they will bring Bradley back as I can’t imagine there will be much of a market for him and the team should probably feel obligated as Black was the one that ultimately injured him.
For 2B, I’d like them to sign someone like Loretta as a temporary stopgap solution until they bring up Antonelli. The better the temp does, the longer they can leave Antonelli in the minors.
It shouldn’t be that hard to find good pitchers as free agents should be falling over themselves trying to come here (in the same way that it’s going to be very difficult to lure hitters here).
October 4, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Re: 56 maybe they are factoring the Mirabelli for Bard/Meredith trade in as well?
October 4, 2007 at 2:53 pm
56: Kahrl is in Chicago and has always struck me as fair-minded. I don’t think she looked at the values of the players involved after seeing that it was predicated on Kouz staying at third.
57: Testify on Hunter. Cameron’s career is substantially better and Hunter may make nearly twice as much before he retires.
57: It depends on what Cameron wants. Cameron at 9m is more expensive, but he’s also a much better hitter and has always been a great defender, unlike Crisp.
October 4, 2007 at 3:05 pm
re 59: She did answer “perhaps” like it was something both teams would have to think about.
The Padres wouldn’t even think about that deal considering salaries or player performance.
October 4, 2007 at 3:05 pm
If Hoffy and Maddux both decide not to come back next year and the Pads decide to re-tool do you think they could get anything of value for Giles?
October 4, 2007 at 3:14 pm
61: Giles had microfracture knee surgery. The story says Monday, but I doubt he went from the Colorado game to the operating table.
http://tinyurl.com/334rq2
October 4, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Padres release Brady Clark sorry GY no USD love
October 4, 2007 at 3:40 pm
62 … story now says Wednesday …
Padres right fielder Brian Giles had microfracture knee surgery on Wednesday in an attempt to stimulate cartilage growth and provide cushion for the 36-year-old leadoff man, who reported stubborn pain in the right knee dating to late April.
October 4, 2007 at 3:41 pm
Rox are Jox … now up 2-0 on Philly …
October 4, 2007 at 3:43 pm
I hate Colorado!
October 4, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Holy Cow! Clay Condrey sighting, and in the post season no less. Pitched 1.2 and gave up a bunch of hits but only 1 run. I have a feeling he let a few of Joe Table’s inherited runners to score though.
October 4, 2007 at 3:53 pm
Sounds like Giles was hurt much worse then anyone let on
October 4, 2007 at 4:08 pm
64: I believe that microfracture surgery is what Greg Oden had, which has sidelined him for the season. I wonder what the timeline is for OG’s return?
As for Crisp’s defense, he is beloved up here in RedSox Nation now. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Crisp stick in center for at least another year in Boston. Ellsbury is ready to go, but with Manny being Manny and JD being JD (read: fragile), they’re going to want four starting outfielders on that team. They’ll spend their money elsewhere than the outfield.
October 4, 2007 at 4:18 pm
#63: Ah, well; he was only a temporary solution anyway. Too bad Clark had such a horrible game in Colorado; he’d been doing a great job for us until then.
October 4, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Based on the defensive zone ratings of the hardball times, Kouz was actually very close to average this year. UZR (mentioned above in post 2) didn’t have Kouz in the bottom 3 for NL third basemen, so he was better than -12 runs in that system as well.
THT’s zone system also really liked Hairston’s defense, both in San Diego and in Arizona, rating him as a combined +9.
http://spreadsheets.google.com.....&gid=0
UZR rated Cameron as the third best centerfielder in the NL. In the numbers released at about the halfway point of the season, he was slightly below average, so it looks like he bounced back well from his slow start.
October 4, 2007 at 4:31 pm
#71: Good stuff, Ben. The numbers on Cameron match my perception of his defense from a visual standpoint.
October 4, 2007 at 4:49 pm
71, 72: Am I reading that right in that Cameron’s -0.2 in the yellow column is below average?
October 4, 2007 at 5:08 pm
73: Yes. By RZR (revised zone rating) he’s -.2 runs. Which basically means he’s average (again … by that system).
October 4, 2007 at 5:18 pm
Padres.com says that Giles will be 100% by opening day.
October 4, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Thuuuuuuuuuuuuh Yankees Lose … the day just got better … and, don’t get me wrong, I think that Alex Rodriquez is the best player in the game today, but I prefer games when he 0-fer’s … like this one!
One other note … Mariano did get a blown save … eh … can’t have everything, I s’pose …
October 4, 2007 at 7:36 pm
Here’s what I felt like after the game last Saturday … and again on Monday night …
http://farm2.static.flickr.com.....d336_o.png
… oooffff!
(compliments of uniwatch.com)
October 4, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Here’s some followup to yesterday’s brief discussion about the All Blacks …
http://www.rugbyheaven.co.nz/4224589a22775.html
… quite a row, eh mate!
October 4, 2007 at 7:49 pm
45 & 47… I assumed Antoneli wouldn’t be ready by opening day next year.
October 4, 2007 at 7:50 pm
Here’s a *very* interesting tidbit to keep an eye/ear out for more details …
http://www.philly.com/philly/h.....ockie.html
… Corpas cheating?
October 4, 2007 at 7:52 pm
I think Antonelli is closer than people think. A strong AFL performance and spring … he could win that job.
October 6, 2007 at 7:12 am
[...] you’re a Padres fan, check out Geoff Young’s year-end review of his pre-season predictions. It’s nice to see people owning up like [...]