IGD: Padres @ Phillies (26 Aug 07)

Game #129
time: 10:35 a.m. PT
tv: 4SD
sp: Tim Stauffer (0-0, 17.18) vs Kyle Kendrick (6-3, 4.06)
pre: Padres.com, SI.com, B-R.com

Four things:

  1. Glad to see Doug Brocail take care of business with Carlos Ruiz. Plunking the punk in the hip won’t hasten Marcus Giles‘ return from the DL, but it’s good to know that guys have each other’s backs. And Ruiz is still an idiot.
  2. Craig Stansberry, recalled from Triple-A Portland, whacked the first pitch he saw in the big leagues just over the outstretched glove of Philadelphia second baseman Tadahito Iguchi for a single. Stansberry was batting for Rob Mackowiak, who had been announced for Brocail but who was lifted when lefty J.C. Romero entered for the Phillies with one on and two out in the seventh. Congrats to Stansberry, who also becomes the first ever big-league player born in Saudi Arabia.
  3. Milton Bradley is a unique talent and a unique individual. His style of play is infectious, but I’d be lying if I said I didn’t have any concerns. The home run he hit on a 3-0 fastball from Tom Gordon in the eighth to tie the game went halfway up the second deck. There are no bonus points for distance, but that was impressive. Chirping at fans who had been heckling him from behind the plate afterwards… Look, I can’t remember a guy (and maybe I’m missing someone) who has put on a Padres uniform in the past 15-20 years who would’ve done something like that. Randy Myers? Not a hitter, but he’s the only player I can think of that might have been as intense as Bradley appears to be. I guess I’m just hoping Bradley can keep his energy channeled on the right things, because we sure do need him. Still, how can you not love this quote about his exchange with fans behind the plate?

    They’re telling me I’m no good, I’m telling them I am that good. It feels good to come through and help this team win.

    I mean, it’s a bit obnoxious, but the man has a point. He is that good.

  4. Citizens Bank Park is fun, in a Coors Field kind of way, but I would hate to see my team play half its games there. Brett Myers was at least half right in claiming that the two homers he served up in the ninth were “just pop ups.” Kevin Kouzmanoff’s looked legit to me, but how did the ball Terrmel Sledge hit even come close? Judging from the type of swing he took and the trajectory of the ball, I’m guessing it doesn’t reach the warning track at Petco. Hey, we’ll take it.

Whatever the outcome of Sunday’s game, the Padres have won consecutive road series against playoff contenders and they’ve done it with lots of hitting. Can they keep it going and get the sweep in Philly behind Tim Stauffer? The matchup would appear to favor the home team, but after seeing Sledge’s pop up clear the left field fence on Saturday, I’m not ruling out anything.

Go Padres!

95 Comments

  1. j.armstrong
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 6:18 am | Permalink

    put the padres in a park that is conducive to the long ball and they can hit it just like everybody else!
    petco, like most new things, needs some tinkering and adjusting to make it a baseball friendly stadium.
    the words ‘cavernous’ and ’spacious’ should never be used to describe the outfield!

  2. LaMar
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 8:14 am | Permalink

    There is an interview between Scott and BR and Milton Bradley at:
    http://www.xxsportsradio.com/.

    He sounds like a great guy. Not nearly as flamboyant as he is on the field. One quote that he made was that you can celebrate good individual plays in football and basketball, why not baseball?

    Well, because it’s baseball. Don’t get me wrong, the enthusiasm is great, but I’ve got a haunting feeling that there’s a perfect storm brewing and that there’s retaliation coming Milton’s way.

  3. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    2: As long as Milton doesn’t get hurt with any retaliation, any retaliation is just going to fire us up even more. Unlike the Padres, who were supremely justified yesetrday in hitting Ruiz, the Phillies have a tougher time trying to justify hitting Bradley. Just because the guy has ripped three shots off you in the series doesn’t mean you autmoatically get to him him. I’m pretty sure that had the Padres been playing in a less incendiary atmosphere, Milty’s exuberance would have been diminished and less likely to occur.

  4. MaryO
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    Not a position player but Kevin Brown was known to jaw to the crowd, and we all know how destructive he could be to the clubhouse. Intense is one of those things that can go from helpful to destructive in a new york minute.
    That said, a winning team does need a little swagger and Milton brings that every day.

  5. Posted August 26, 2007 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Mary: Ah, of course; I had a feeling I was forgetting someone obvious. Thanks for the reminder!

  6. Keith
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    I love this blog! I’m a Padre fan who lives in New Jersey and I was at the game last night (Saturday 8-25) in Philly and sat in the lower deck in left field. I haven’t been to a million ball games like some, but honestly I have never seen a player (Bradley) take that much abuse and venom on the first pitch of the bottom of the first and continue until Rowand struck out on Hoffy’s change-up in the bottom of the ninth. Of course I am biased being a San Diego fan, but I must say Milton did not instigate a single thing in left field. Obviolsly he had some responses later in the game behind home plate. My wife had to cover her ears at points because the abuse/noise toward Milton in left during every Padre pitch was nonstop (I could only imagine what Bonds got in left all over the country this summer).
    To illustrate the complete ignorance and subhuman quality of the Philadelphia crowd, they also booed Brian Giles all night, as the guy next to me told me how “he totally faked the injury” on Friday night when Ruiz slid into him. Poor guy (and seemingly many others in Phillies garb) failed to realize Brian plays RF and Marcus was 2B in the incident who wasn’t even on the field for warmups.
    Here’s hoping Milton stays hot at the plate.

  7. Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Sweet! We get the Padres feed again!

    This weekend kicks ass.

  8. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    7: Agreed, I love me some Padres feed. I miss Matty though :-(

  9. Marsh
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    Keith, thanks for posting. Really interesting stuff. Glad to see Jenga was just living in the moment…..

  10. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    7: Has anyone noticed the Padre feed is considerably worse quality than other teams feeds?

  11. BZ
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    5: I recall a few incidents from a certain Phil Nevin, including obscene gestures and throwing objects on the field. I’d say you probably forgot two, GY…

  12. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    8: Agreed. i cant stand Steve Quis

  13. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Poor Blum can’t even get a HR here.

  14. Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    8: Seriously. What’s the deal with Matty? He’s off doing national broadcasts?

    You think next year he’ll be taken from us altogether? I’d be glad to see him get some big time success, but of course miss him ragging on MG

  15. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Triple by Blummer haha! Maybe Stauffer will get some first inning support

  16. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Damn, poor AB by Milty.

  17. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    I loved how Milty smiled after the crowd so heartily reacted to him making an out. He is having fun out there.

  18. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    Leaving a guy stranded at 3rd hasnt been like the Padres of late. Bummer

  19. Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    #11: For whatever reason I never attributed Nevin’s antics to “intensity” but that’s me…

  20. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    2: That was a great interview with Bradley. He seems to me like he just loves what he’s doing and is pretty down to earth and reconizes mistakes he made.

  21. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    This doesnt look good already

  22. BZ
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    Ugh. Stauffer’s 17+ ERA going UP

  23. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    Before we all jump on Tim, the ball Burrell hit was a great pitch. He just went down and got it. Also, you can’t defend against the bunt by Rollins and Iguchi just found a hole. He’s not pitching poorly.

    Nice K Tim!

  24. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    He might get himself out of this. He lucked out with Burrell’s hit being a ground rule double. it would be nice if he took advantage of it and got out of here with just 1 run.

  25. Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    Ugh. What’s the over/under on how many innings Ledezma works today?

  26. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    25: Last time Stauffer pitched Cassel came in and pitched well. Why didnt he get considered for this start?

  27. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    Tim Staupher looks like he belongs in AAA.

  28. Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    Were people just chanting “You suck Bradley”?

  29. Ben B.
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    Well, he struck out two guys and only threw 30 pitches, despite all that mess. And, uh, no one dropped dead in the field or got hurt or anything. So in that regard that inning was a success.

  30. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    Stauffer just doesn’t have the stuff for the bigs.

  31. Ben B.
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    30: I think that’s a bit of a sweeping conclusion for 5 total innings of work. He managed to strike two guys out that inning despite not having big league stuff.

  32. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    Yeah, the Phillies BABIP is .800 right now. There’s certainly an element of luck in that. Stauffer made some good pitches, and the Phillies put good swings on them.

  33. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    OK, I digress. However, his presence doesn’t seem CY like in attitude.

  34. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    Ugh. Sledge doesn’t help out at all.

  35. SDSUBaseball
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    30: I agree

  36. Ben B.
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    We actually can probably conclude that Stauffer isn’t going to be a good major league pitcher, but not based on his five innings with the big league club this year. His minor league track record is pretty mediocre, so that gives us a pretty good indication of the type of pitcher he is. Certainly one inning shouldn’t change any evaluation of him.

  37. Bruce
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Inexcusable Mr. Stauffer. You don’t walk the pitcher on 4 pitches and succeed in the big leagues.

  38. Ben B.
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    That Stauffer appears to be getting squeezed is not helping anything.

  39. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    43 pitches in 2 innings? WTF?

  40. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Yeah, he’s walking way too many people.

  41. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    38: Agreed, he’s thrown some pretty good pitches.

  42. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    Get Stauffer the f*ck out of here and send him back down to High School!!!

  43. Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    This looks as bad in reality as it did on paper. I’m off to grab some lunch…

  44. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    At least we had a pretty good road trip still.

  45. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    And yet we are still not out of this one, even down by 6.

  46. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    #38 Squeezed ? He got two strike calls in the 2nd with balls that were letter high.

  47. Mark Lucas
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    Anybody think Randy Jones can still pitch? I’d feel better giving a double A pitcher this shot on a one time basis than continuing to put Stauffer out there.

  48. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    I can’t believe that Black is going send Stauffer back out in this inning.

  49. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    48: Why not? 5 runs is a lot to make up, and there’s no point in decimating your bullpen right before a 4 game set with AZ.

  50. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    If we can get three scoreless innings from Stauffer and go into the last 4 frames down by 2 or 3, then we may just again slice this brutal Phil’s bullpen and sneak out of here with a win, all the while not burning our bullpen with a big 4 game series coming up and no off days.

  51. Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    Well I’m sticking around and seeing this game through. Not because I think we have a shot to win, not because I want to keep tabs on our offense, and not even because of a love for the game.

    It’s because I simply can’t wait to hear more Steve Quis stories about Tuffy the Toro.

  52. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    #49: Good point. I didn’t think about that. OK, rock & roll.

  53. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    What you think a 5 run deficit in the T-4 in this ballpark is insurmountable ?

  54. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    Mini rally forming…

  55. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    Nice clutch AB by Sledge. That looks pretty painful though.

  56. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    This is where our bats need to get hot.

  57. Mark Lucas
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    I’ve always wanted to see Stauffer do well, given the integrety he showed fessing to the shoulder injury. It just isn’t likely going to happen, at least not here.

  58. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    Damnit Adrian!

    That’s a freaking sac fly!

  59. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    LaForest sucks as well and now Stauffer is up with bases loades and 2 outs. Of course we can’t score one run. GRRRRRRRR.

  60. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    59: Dude, that was not Pete’s fault. The 2-0 pitch was a joke, and when Kendrick went right back there on the 2-1, LaForest had to go after it. Crap umpiring in that AB.

  61. Phantom
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    G’day all. I’m turning her off today.

  62. Bruce
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    I see that the top of the fourth was a clear signal that Bud is content to go home 4-2. Bases loaded, a great opportunity to get back in the game, and he sends Stauffer up there to finish off the inning. I guess he didn’t want to burn through the bullpen before the key games against the division. Still what’s the difference between Ledezma with no outs and Ledezma in relief of Stauffer with one out and another run added to the Phillies tally?

  63. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    OK, let me get this straight. We are going to sacrifice this game to go after the DBs. Is it going to work?

  64. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Now it’s a fucking laugher. Anybody else wanna stand up for Stauffer?

  65. Tom Waits
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    A poorly umpired game all the way through.

    I can’t fault Black for not burning any arm when we don’t score with the bases loaded and no outs. Pull as many regulars as we can. Mac in LF, Ensberg at 1b, Stansberry at SS.

  66. Rick Schroder (Turbine Dude)
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    I’m out.

  67. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Of course the other risk by letting Stauffer take one for the team is that his confidence is shattered forever. I am not sure I agree with this move. Ledezma is as fresh as can be –we not let someone with a little more experience –”take one for the team”

  68. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, lets give the vets a rest now. No break for a long time and 2 hours out of the humidity. This might be a blessing in the long run.

  69. Tom Waits
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    67: I don’t much care. Stauffer’s future is as a middle reliever on a non-contending team or as a rotation mainstay somewhere in AAA.

    It’s not that I dislike Stauffer, but if the choice is between Stauffer’s confidence and having Ledezma or anyone else fresh for even one key at-bat versus the DBax, I go for option 2. If we weren’t so shy of position players or it was closer to the 8th inning I’d put Blum on the mound.

  70. Tom Waits
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    70: I don’t understand Bradley even hitting here, unless he asked Black not to take him out before his last at-bat. Nothing good can come of letting the key guys stay in, and Bradley is as key as we’ve got.

  71. Zagz
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    Staufer + Ledezma = Phillies taking a shot at that 30 run record.

  72. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    #69 You’re probably right on this one. Stauffer is no longer anything close to a prospect- my heart just sank when I saw Cla warming up so yes, maybe it was alright to sacrifice Stauffer and get 4 innings out of him no matter what.

    Ledezma is not a major leaguer now either. No use saving him for future key at bats. I don’t see any reason to keep him on a post season roster.

  73. Bruce Bochy
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    I wish I was still in SD….

  74. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Lately I have been praying nightly that T.Sledge is not on the post season roster. He has zero bat control and rarely walks – no speed and sub par defensively.

    I cringed last night when his routine fly ball got out of Citizen’s last night. That homerun guaranteed him another 30 at bats down the stretch. If Hairston is not ready, bring up Brady Clark !

  75. Posted August 26, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    #57: Yeah, it’s sad. Stauffer pitched reasonably well for us at times in ‘05 but never was able to build on that initial success. He might kick around a while longer, but I don’t think this is what anyone imagined when the Padres drafted him. Too bad.

    #69: I’m with you, TW. The series has been won; no use burning up arms that could help against Arizona this coming week. Now everyone except Hampson and possibly Meredith should be ready on Monday. With luck, Peavy will go fairly deep and give those two a breather. Black is setting up his pitching staff for the showdown. I’ve got no problem with that at all.

    Great road trip. I think this team may have opened some eyes back east.

  76. Oside Jon
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    #74: I agree about Sledge. Get rid of him.

  77. Posted August 26, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    #74: The only current Padre with at least 100 PA who has more unintentional walks per plate appearance than Sledge is Milton Bradley:

    Bradley: .139
    Sledge: .112
    OG: .107
    Bard: .099
    Cameron: .098
    NOG: .089
    Blum: .085
    Adrian: .084
    Kouz: .055
    KG: .045
    Barrett: .010

    His defense is terrible and he has trouble making consistent contact, but Sledge actually does draw walks.

  78. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    #77 I stand to be corrected. His (Sledge) OBP is certainly not terrible and there may not be a better option at Portland. Brady Clark has hardly been setting the world on fire over the last 2+ years at the mlb level and regardless of whether they were cheapies or not, he delivered a big homer last night and doubled off lefty Wagner in a big game.

    It would be a huge boost to get a healthy Hairston back and we will bide our time and I guess I could lay off Sledge.

  79. malcolm
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    A little sequence & distribution analysis ala S.Baxamusa of THT.

    Sledge % Padres %
    BB 23 434
    batting 8 6 26 54 12
    4 pitch walks 10 43 104 24
    2 out walks 12 52 166 38
    2 out rsp 8 35 76 18
    -2,-3 7 30 65 15

  80. malcolm
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Sorry this came out so twisted. #77 I come to the conclusion that Sledge’s BB total is less impressive than the raw stat would indicate. Do you agree? Somewhat?

  81. Steve C
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    sorry if you guys talked about this alreadu but since the padres sent down hensley and they cant recall him for 8 days who are they going to start in hs spot of the rotation?

  82. Posted August 26, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    #80: Hard to say. Depends on what Sledge would have done in those PAs had he not walked (unknowable) and how his distro compares to those of other Padres hitters (which you’ve already hinted at with team totals). It is probably true that some of those walks in the #8 hole were of the “unintentional intentional” variety.

    #81: I have been wondering the same thing. No inside information here, but my best guess, based on simple process of elimination, would be Jack Cassel.

  83. Steve C
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Re: 82 man I hope its not Ledezma. The Pads need to decide what they are going to do with him, DFA him if your not going to have him come out of the pen, he is turinging into the post all-star K-cam and they can use the roster spot.

  84. Posted August 26, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    #83: My take on Ledezma is that he’s here for next year. Remember that rosters expand on Saturday, so his presence shouldn’t be a burden much longer.

    If CY is good to go, then he could take Hensley’s spot on Thursday, with Peavy possibly moving up to Friday. Then on Saturday, they should be able to recall Hensley again (unless I’m mistaken on procedure — I believe a player can be recalled before 15 days have passed once roster expansion hits, but can anyone confirm?).

    If CY isn’t ready, all bets are off…

  85. malcolm
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    I thought I heard on 1090, that if CY goes on the DH, Hensley can be recalled. Not a pleasant thought.

  86. malcolm
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Make that DL.

  87. Posted August 26, 2007 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    #85: Ah, good point. Yeah, that would suck.

  88. LynchMob
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Madfriars reports that Mitch Canham got promoted to Lake Elsinore yesterday … yup, there he is in today’s Storm box score …

    http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2007_08_26_lesafa_inlafa_1

    … which at the moment shows David Freese with HR #17.

  89. LynchMob
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Cedric Hunter with HR #6 and SB #8 today …

    http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2007_08_26_souafx_ftwafx_1

    … it’s not much, but it’s something …

  90. Ben B.
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    David Wells bunted for a base hit against the Mets, starting a two run rally.

  91. Oside Jon
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    Wells will haunt us until he gives up 8 runs with his 72 mph fastball. Love the guy but that’s the truth.

  92. LynchMob
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    90 … and the Dogs had the good sense to take Wells out after 5 innings … hey, why didn’t *we* think of that??? :-(

  93. JP
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    #92 Wells hasn’t pitched in what, a month or so ? So most in this situation would be pulled after 5.

    Instead of giving Cassel a spot start, what about Casey Fossum ?

  94. malcolm
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    LM: I was amused to see that they stuck with him in that 5th inning throughout a IF single, BB,BB . He unexpectedly escaped with a K. I cant give credit to LA for sitting through that sequence.

  95. Ben B.
    Posted August 26, 2007 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    And they stuck with him to face Moises Alou, who kills lefties.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*