IGD: Padres @ Cubs (16 Apr 07)

first pitch: 5:05 p.m. PT
television: Channel 4SD
matchup: Clay Hensley (0-2, 9.00 ERA) vs Jason Marquis (0-1, 3.27 ERA)

previews: Padres.com | SI.com

After suffering their first series loss of 2007, the Padres head to Chicago for two with the Cubs. Clay Hensley starts for the Pads in the opener. Pay no attention to his poor numbers to date; assuming he has a plate umpire that knows the strike zone and a defense that can make plays behind him, Hensley will be fine.

The Cubs, meanwhile, have started the season 4-7. Probably not what the Tribune Company had in mind after throwing $300 million at players over the winter and putting the team up for sale, but oh well. Mark DeRosa has more homers than Derrek Lee, Aramis Ramirez, and Alfonso Soriano combined. Yeah, that’s totally bogus, but it’s probably the only chance I’ll ever get to say it, so there you go.

Speaking of power numbers and small samples, have you noticed that the Padres are outhomering the opposition, 12-4, so far? The Padres haven’t done that over a full season since 1998. Again, it’s way early, but this bears watching.

I feel like I should say something else here — something really motivational to pick us up after Sunday night’s debacle. All I can come up with is, “Please don’t send Dwight”; does that qualify?

157 Comments

  1. LynchMob
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    dprat – thanks for the link/pointer to BP article which says Padres ‘07 payroll = $58,235,567 … I was driving late last night and caught some of “Coach John” on the radio … a caller called in pissed about this, giving this specific number … to which Coach said he truely believed the Padres exec (KT?) who told him the number is $70 million … perhaps the difference includes Todd Walker’s salary and stuff like that …

  2. Posted April 16, 2007 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    It was Sandy Alderson who quoted $70 million. He said that included incentives that the club expects will be met. Maybe I’m too trusting but I don’t think Sandy would flat out lie and give a hard number like that. I expected him to answer the question vaguely, say something like “We project it will be 5 to 10 million higher” or something to that effect. He threw out the $70 million figure on his own. He did qualify it by saying that’s what they expect it will be by the ned of the year, not opening day payroll. Maybe he’s factoring in the money they expect to spend on a deadline deal for Ichiro?

    $12 million seems like a lot of incentives. How many guys are on incentive-laden contracts? I believe Wells is, maybe Trevor has some. I think Maddux is all guaranteed money.

  3. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Call it a sign of limited imagination, but I’m a little dumbfounded by Blum playing SS and batting 2nd…

  4. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    Looks like some big changes in the lineup tonight.. No KG, no Cameron, no Bowen. In their place: Blum (batting 2nd), Cruz (batting 7th), and LaForest (batting 8th). I like getting Cameron a day’s rest and I can see getting KG a day off too. Surprising to bat Blum so early in the lineup (why not Cruz in the 2-hole?) and clearly Bud doesn’t see much of a drop-off between Bowen and LaForest… should be interesting tonight.

  5. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Whoops, forgot to mention Kouz gets the night off too. Branyan hitting 6th behind Sledge…

  6. Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    Where’s Randy Johnson when you need him?

  7. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    This is not a good start.

  8. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Our bats better be big tonight.

  9. Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Well that was fortunate. Clay is not looking good at all.

  10. Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    Wow, great grab by OG.

  11. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    Dayam!

  12. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Looked like Tony G. climbing that wall.

  13. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Very close to being interference there as well..

  14. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    two games in a row that Hensley has failed to get the bunt down…. very surprising considering he usually appears to have a pretty good approach at the plate (for a pitcher)… still, Clay – how ’bout a little bunting practice!

  15. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    Riddle me this Batman: Why can’t most pitchers bat? When I played in H.S. and pitched, I and my fellow teamates could bat. WTF?

  16. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    ok .. 24hrs and I am back … got booted off last night and could not get this blog to come back on ….. hoping this game is batter … GO PADRES

  17. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    because they don’t bat in the minors .. most of our minor leages us the DH

  18. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    15: lack of practice. seriously, it is just that. most pitchers in the majors were actually good hitters in high school, but as they began to “specialize” as pitchers, they stopped getting regular at-bats, both in practice and, of course, games. it’s pretty silly, though, as some of my college teammates were unceremoniously dumped into the “pitcher” side of practice despite being REALLY good hitters.

  19. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    Not a fun start, though Clay looked a bit sharper in the second. I like our players, love them at times, but I doubt few contending teams can be so collectively cold so often.

  20. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    17: That’s why I hate the American League. I feel if you are gonna play the game, then get with the game.

  21. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    From what I have seen pitchers do not hit for themselves in the Padres Minor Leagues until they hit AAA …

  22. Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    15: and batting is hard in the major leagues, you have to practice it every day. That said, I raised the question last season of whether it would be a strategic advantage to have pitchers work more on hitting. I think the consensus was the amount of time it takes to improve would cut into their other duties.

    No reason they can’t improve bunting though. That’s like shooting free throws, it just takes practice.

  23. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Clay looks like he may be in a groove … now the Padres need to find bats that can hit

  24. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    I knew this might be a rough game as soon as I saw the unis…seriously, the sand-on-sand set is arguably the worst in the majors right now.

  25. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    Nice job Clay

  26. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    I’m contentious in thinking that the catcher and pitcher have the best eye for a pitch. Ergo, they should have the best slugging percentage.

  27. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    Think hit the ball ……………. Think hit the ball ………………………….

  28. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    27: I’m with Sue on that.

  29. Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    26: They also have the most to think about outside of hitting. Like Yogi says, 90% of hitting is half mental.

  30. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Clay got a call in the Theriot AB, but so far a very tight zone, but seemingly consistently called between the teams.

  31. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

    ok … third walk …. rumor has it lead off walks score most at least 75% of the time ….. taking bets on where Giles ends up ……

  32. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

    At least they are showing some plate discipline up there…

  33. Sean Callahan
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    The score line isn’t in our favor, but you have to like the pitch counts through three:

    Pitches-strikes: Hensley 33-22, Marquis 50-30.

    Keep going Clay, the bats will come around….

  34. Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    In case anyone is wondering, here’s what Mark Grant did at Wrigley Field during his career:

    http://tinyurl.com/3588c8

  35. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:58 pm | Permalink

    29: Oh please. My 20 year old daughter can do her college class work, talk on the phone, text message, and IM, without missing a beat. And you are talking about throwing a ball and swining a piece of wood.

  36. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    35: swinging

  37. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    hmmmmm Giles still on first ……..

  38. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    No hit through 4. This can be so frustrating…

  39. Sean Callahan
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    31: So what odds were you offering? Sigh

  40. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    Yet another mediocre starter shutting down our lineup. The roster of tomato cans who have done that this year is alarming…Cook, Morris, now Marquis.

  41. Sean Callahan
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:03 pm | Permalink

    Hey Geoff

    Do we need to have a IGC (in game contest) – what inning will the Padres get their 1st hit??

    I’ll pick the 6th

  42. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    41: I’ll take the 8th after we sing take me out to the ball game they might figure out they are at a ball game …

    not pretty but we gor the double play

  43. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:10 pm | Permalink

    OK i AM FEELING TO NEGATIVE … need to get back to basics

    Lets Go Padres Lets Go (clap) (clap)

  44. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Nicely done … now lets get the bats going

  45. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    We are now 44 runs Padres, 44 runs opponents.

  46. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    #40: Cook is a good pitcher. Getting shut down by Marquis is a bit embarrassing.

  47. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Clay’s pitches just don’t have the usual movement tonight. His control isn’t there either. He’s lucky the damage hasn’t been worse.

  48. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Clay is off, putting guys on with BB’s, but the Cubs BA with RISP is pretty damns good, also somewhat fortunate for them. Hopefully some of the hits will come around for us.

    A HIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  49. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Finally!

  50. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Crudge rocks

  51. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    That’s the way Cruz

  52. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

    Cruz looking like a great pick up…

  53. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    Cruz seems like a great diversification within our portfolio of hitters… seems like everytime the rest of our lineup is “down”, he’s “up”…

  54. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    OK, let’s go Pepe LePue!

  55. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    Pierre looks a little like Klesko up there. All he needs is the crooked soul patch and to wear his helmet cocked at a jaunty angle. And the helicopter swing.

  56. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    53 – it’s the stirrups

  57. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Mark just said ‘Ducksnort’

  58. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Thank goodness the Cubs don’t have a big-league center fielder out there.

  59. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Nice Clay …… hmmm .ot sure on the call

  60. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    that definitely bounced

  61. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    It bounced into his glove.

  62. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    The locals don’t like it, but most of them are too sauced to know what inning it is :-)

  63. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:20 pm | Permalink

    definitely bounced….and we got a run..

  64. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    Being a former Chicagoan, I have to agree with Clayton!

  65. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    OK baby G … lets go …

  66. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    Clay bringing the lumber. I think in the game last year when he shut down the Cubs in a complete game, I think Clay had at least 4, maybe 5 K’s; nice to see the hit.

  67. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    im confused as hell…my tv said 2 outs when NOG was up…

  68. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    CLAY STOLE A BASE !!!!!!

  69. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    66 – and the wheels! I didn’t see that one coming baby!

  70. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Wow, that was Rickeyesque.

  71. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    wow…that was impressive…

  72. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Best stolen base ever.

  73. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    71: impressive and waisted

  74. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    RE #15, the great why can’t pitchers hit debate. Hitting a baseball and pitching a baseball are very different skills. Why would you expect that someone could have truly world-leading talent for both?

  75. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    ….and leave it to Bellhorn, I mean Blum, to screw it up

  76. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    70: And Ricky always gets on.

  77. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    How cool is Clay’s SB? Coolest, perhaps not smartest, base running this year.

  78. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Their pitcher can hit better than our pitcher…

  79. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    74: I think they chose to not exel. The Bambino could do both and he didn’t do steroids.

  80. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:32 pm | Permalink

    79: no…his “supplements” were hot dogs and beer…

  81. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    That is an out 99% of the time. WTF?

  82. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Yuck, terrible turn by NOG.

  83. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    $%#@@+%&*%&** @!!!!!!!!!!!

  84. Big Mike
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    wow……wow…..

  85. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Watched the replay in slo-mo, normally called an out, but NOG’s throw was not good.

  86. Sue
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    this is getting out of controll

  87. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    Charge those last three runs to NOG.

  88. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    This is not looking good.

  89. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    damn – that reminds me a bit of the 400 foot shot he hit off of me once…. nice kid, but a bastard at the plate. couldn’t throw a thing by him!

  90. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    well…this has been fun… at what point this year do we start to think that Hensley just doesn’t have it?

  91. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

    90: Um, when his defense plays well behind him and he still gives up runs.

  92. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

    Also, I still think it was a bad feed by Blum.

  93. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    Other than the last 3…he still gave up 4 runs in 5 innings. And I have a hard time not blaming him for giving up a 50000 foot HR, despite the defense not turning the DP.

  94. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    A .371 BABIP against Hensley coming into today. That’s just bad fielding/luck.

  95. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

    what does BABIP stand for?

  96. Big Mike
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    someone wanna tell OG that if it’s a strike the first time, it’ll be a strike the next time as well. Swing the Bat!

  97. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    95: Batting Average on Balls In Play.

  98. Ben B.
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    Even if these bad starts are his fault, we’re giving up on the guy after 3 starts?

  99. jay
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    I am out; hopefully I was bringing some sort of curse that I am now taking away. Go Pads.

  100. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    98: No. You’d have to be an idiot to do that.

  101. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    98: I just asked the question as to how long you stick with a guy who last looked horrid in his first 3 starts.

    His ERA has got to be pretty high at this point..

  102. Big Mike
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

    hahahaha anyone above 30 probably just missed that impersonation

  103. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

    80: Says something for dogs and beer!

  104. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    101: A lot longer than three starts and he hasn’t looked horrid. You have to take the play of his defense into account. Also, you have to consider that he had a blister.

  105. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    And just when does the hemoraging stop?

  106. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    His mechanics do look bad tonight, though.

  107. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    RE 101, even if we did give up on Hensley, who’s a better option? Vanilla Mike? Ted Stauffer? Maybe Wells would be better pitching two days out of five…

  108. Big Mike
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    he’s gettin shelled….maybe the blister is still a problem, or he’s bein too careful about throwin hard with that finger

  109. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    I agree that we’re nowhere near giving up on Hensley for the season (not even close), but, um… shouldn’t he be done for the night?!?!?

  110. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

    This is looking like Friday night.

  111. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

    107: Tim not Ted.

  112. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    109: I think Black was trying to save the bullpen a little because the game had already been blown open.

  113. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    #110: Or last night. :-(

  114. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    I wasn’t saying that we do give up on him….just wondering at what point do we think about someone else in his spot?

  115. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:54 pm | Permalink

    This officially sucks.

  116. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    111: Quite right, sorry ’bout that…

  117. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    hmmm….nice pitch there…

  118. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    This game is over. No excuses for this one. Yikes.

  119. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    geez, call this one off on the mercy rule

  120. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    I seem to remember us blowing out the cubbies early last year at Wrigley. I guess this is payback.

  121. Bruce
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    I ask again: why is Thompson on this team? He’s been skating on thin ice all season.

  122. Big Mike
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    wow…..again….wow…..

  123. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    maybe a fight would help…

  124. Big Mike
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    im outta here this blows…seinfeld time

  125. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    We look like the Raiders tonight.

  126. Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    Notes from AP

    SAN DIEGO: RHP Greg Maddux will make his first start Tuesday against the Cubs since his second stint with them ended with a trade to the Los Angeles Dodgers last July 31. He is 1-1 with a 3.18 ERA. “I don’t throw hard enough to hurt anymore,” Maddux said. Pitching against the Cubs is nothing new for Maddux, who spent 11 seasons in Atlanta after breaking in with Chicago. He is 11-3 with a 2.38 ERA against the Cubs. … C Josh Bard’s left groin is improving, and manager Bud Black expects to have Bard back soon. “He’s progressing,” Black said. “We seem to think he’ll be ready when his time (on the disabled list) is up.” … Geoff Blum, batting .111 with no homers and one RBI, started at shortstop instead of Khalil Greene.

  127. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    125: that’s an insult to the Raiders

  128. clyde
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    It is no fun when the Padres stink.

  129. Richard
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    121: Perhaps because of what he did last year as the emergency starter and they felt they’d like to keep him in long relief which is fairly low leverage and doesn’t really matter that much.

  130. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    127: That’s OK, I take pleasure in insulting the Raiders.

  131. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    We are now 45-53 for runs this year.

  132. Bruce
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Watching our pitching implode the past few days has not been fun, but I am more worried about our hitting at the moment.

  133. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    you know that Thompson is stuck out there to finish this game on his own no matter how bad it gets..

  134. Marsh
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    yup, I’m done. check please?!?!

  135. Stephen
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Guess it didn’t hurt playing six games against the Giants.

  136. Mark O
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Thompson should get released after a brain dead stupid ass play like the one he just made…

  137. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

    I’d just let ‘em hit. We’re not getting out of this one. Let them rack up the runs.

  138. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    Ok, time to take bets on which Padres position player pitches in this one…PMac?

  139. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    Geoff, I know you run a respectable blog. #137 was overboard.

  140. Bruce
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    129: I realize what he did last year was valuable, but let’s not let get carried away. His numbers when adjusted for norms were not all that good. He’s a long reliever on a team carrying 12 pitchers. If we keep pitching like this he has a role otherwise he’s wasting a roster spot.

  141. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    141: Geoff has your e-mail you idiot. Go lock up your trailer.

  142. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    Zito no runs and 2 hits through 5…rats, hoping he’d be a total bust for SF this year.

  143. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    RE 143: I’m with Rick on this one. Earth to Geoff…

  144. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    145: You are truly exibiting your youth, lack of intelegence, and lack of education. I consider you a product of bad parenting. Go smack your parents (if you know who they are) and tell them they should have raised you with better values.

  145. dprat
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    How about just ignoring inappropriate behavior?

  146. Clayton
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    The outlook for the month of April has taken a dire turn the last 4 days. Thought we were breaking trend and starting strong out of the gate, ala ‘98. Right now we look overmatched on offense, and the pitching, with the exception of Peavy, looks shaky. Need to keep perspective of course, but I was really excited thinking we were going to take the division by the throat early on.

  147. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    150: Didn’t they tell you? Spelling doesn’t count in life.

  148. Rick Schroder
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Geoff, you have a juvinile problem here. I’ll come back when it is gone. Later…

  149. Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    A summary of the worst day of my life:
    - Wake up ass crack early to get to my new job
    - Walk a half mile in the worst rain ever (at least I wasn’t running 26 miles, I guess)
    - Wait an hour in the lobby for my new supervisor to come get me
    - Sit at a computer all day with nothing to do because my new supervisor is busy
    - Eat lunch in a crowded south station next to the smelliest homeless person ever
    - Get super detoured coming home because of flooding
    - Watch the worst Padres game ever
    - Lose at online backgammon after being ahead 4-0
    - Eat a gross banana

  150. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    This is what publicity gets us…

  151. Posted April 16, 2007 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    Sorry ’bout the spam, folks. I’d given up on the game and left the IGD. It’s been resolved.

    #145: Good call, dprat.

  152. BZ
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Geoff…

  153. TheGrandHatching
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    One of the worst games I’ve seen the Pads play in a long time. As far as I’m concerned, Black threw in the towel before he even turned in the lineup card. All in all, a disappointing night at Wrigley.

  154. LynchMob
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    73 – Sue … are you talking about David Wells? If not, then I guess it’s just a typo :-)

  155. LynchMob
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    Not to step on PF’s toes … too much … but …

    Stansberry is off to a good start for AAA Portland … http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2007_04_16_freaaa_poraaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb

  156. LynchMob
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    A nice showing by our boys at AA San Antonio tonight … http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2007_04_16_wicaax_sanaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

  157. LynchMob
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    Cedric (the Great) with his first HR of the season … http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2007_04_16_dayafx_ftwafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*