Since the only thing I posted yesterday was pictures of teddy bears, I figured I’d go all out today and tackle everything else. Well, maybe not everything, but a lot.
I’m currently researching the 1998 Padres World Series team for the book. In a bit of serendipity, a couple of transactions have taken place that indirectly link back to that ‘98 team.
Brocail Remains with Padres
The Padres have re-signed right-handed reliever Doug Brocail to a 1-year, $500,000 deal. Brocail, originally drafted by the Pads in 1986, was part of a December 1994 trade with the Houston Astros that brought, among others, third baseman Ken Caminiti and Steve Finley to San Diego. Caminiti and Finley, of course, would become centerpieces of the 1996 NL West championship club (with Caminiti winning league MVP honors) as well as the 1998 World Series team. This deal was one of many engineered by former GM Randy Smith that helped lay the foundation for what remains one of the brightest periods in franchise history.
As for Brocail, blockage of the left anterior descending artery derailed his 2006 season, limiting him to just 25 appearances. Brocail, who turns 40 in May, actually pitched pretty well when healthy. His ERA was a tad high at 4.76, but he held opposing batters to a respectable .252/.302/.346 line.
Keep expectations to a minimum — commensurate with the Padres’ investment (and bearing in mind that Mike Stanton will be paid $5.5 million over the next two seasons) — and there’s virtually no chance of disappointment. Either Brocail pitches well and is a bargain, or he doesn’t and the Pads are out one-tenth of Octavio Dotel’s salary.
Klesko, Like Everyone Else, Signs with Giants
Ryan Klesko has inked a 1-year deal with San Francisco for an undisclosed amount. He’ll back up ex-Padre Rich Aurilia at first base and see some time in the outfield as well (personally I’m looking forward to the Barry Bonds/Dave Roberts/Klesko configuration — that could be fun).
Klesko turns 36 in June and, due to a shoulder injury that kept him on the DL most of the year, had only six plate appearances during the 2006 season. He reached base in five of those, and hit a screaming line drive to Albert Pujols in the other. Klesko also had two hits in three post-season at-bats. Anecdotally, the guy looked great at the plate. Klesko’s eye and bat speed appeared to be at full strength, and it’s reasonable to think that he still can contribute given the right situation.
That said, San Francisco might not be the right situation. A poor defender even when he was young and healthy, Klesko probably belongs in the American League at this stage of his career. Having him spell one of the regulars here and there should be fine, but if Klesko ends up playing more than 30 or so games in the field in 2007, the Giants could have problems. Not that I’d mind, of course.
Klesko’s role in the ‘98 World Series? It’s twofold, really. First, he was the guy the Padres supposedly were after when they shipped Fred McGriff to the Atlanta Braves as part of the 1993 Fire Sale. (Melvin Nieves; thanks for bringing that up again.) Second, when Klesko did come to San Diego, it was in a deal that sent two of the regulars from the ‘98 squad — first baseman Wally Joyner and second baseman Quilvio Veras — to the House That Ted Turner Built.
Klesko’s problem is that he hasn’t aged well at all. He went from being darned good at ages 28-31, to pretty good at ages 32-34, to seriously hurt at age 35. He gets a bad rap in San Diego for being “pretty good” when people remembered and expected him to be “darned good.”
Well, that and the Boot World commercials.
Anyway, the trade that brought Klesko to the Padres worked out extremely well for the club in terms of value. It’s unfortunate that his time here coincided with some pretty down years, and I can’t help but wonder if some of the feelings toward Klesko are better directed at the organization as a whole. Was it Klesko’s fault the Pads stunk in 2002? Seems to me Deivi Cruz, D’Angelo Jimenez, and Bobby Jones — among many others — could take exception to that.
Point is, Klesko is one of the best players in franchise history. We don’t have to like that, anymore than we have to like gravity. It just is. Klesko ranks second all time in walks; fourth in runs scored, doubles, and RBI; fifth in home runs; and seventh in hits. He’s a lot more deserving of a retired number than certain Steve Garveys ever will be.
Now the last link to guys like Andy Benes, Greg Keagle, and Gene Harris is gone. It was a great ride, and I’m sorry the Padres as a team couldn’t enjoy more success during Klesko’s stay here. He deserved better.
Then again, didn’t we all…

36 Comments
Great stuff on Klesko. Didn’t we get a massage therapist out of that deal too?
Agreed, Marsh, nice retro/perspective on Ryno. He was a very good player for us at times, has some longevity with the franchise, and ranks in the top 10 in essentially every offensive category (including ranking ahead of both Gwynn and Winfield in OPS+, albeit in fewer PA’s). Unfortunately a lot of people have watched him over the last few years as he has struggled with injuries and perhaps let that cloud their judgement.
2001 was one of the best offenses in Padre history. Klesko deserves as much credit for that as anyone.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/padres/20061221-9999-1s21padres.html
Oooookaaaayyyy…..
the “Now you boys get to shower together again” comment from Mrs. Giles is seriously weird. I think we just upped the “awkwardly uncomfortable” rating for the Pads several notches…
Clayton, two things struck me about the photo in the UT link you provided. First was how much fun they seem to have being with each other. Second was how descriptive the nicknames “OG” and “NOG” are.
More stuff from ‘98. Remember how dominant Andy Ashby was for the first four months?
http://tinyurl.com/svdcg
Wow…
GY, forgot to give you a compliment on this piece about Klesko. My immediate memories are of him hitting home runs in the 8th or 9th with nobody on when we were behind 9-2. But, thinking back and trying to get that visual of that crooked soul patch out of my head from the Boot World commercial, he did have a productive career in SD and, through the lean years, he and Nevin were unfairly given the responsibility of shouldering the team, an unfair burden of which neither of them was capable, no matter how much they wanted to be able to do it.
Can’t say as I’ll miss Ryan “Bad to the Bone” Klesko, though.
#7: Thanks, LaMar. One memory I have of Klesko that I forgot to mention is the walk-off homer he hit just fair off the WMSC building against Matt Mantei in Petco Park’s first year. The place erupted. I think that marked the start of baseball in San Diego becoming fun again.
Geoff, good article on Klesko. I’m thankful that he and Nevin was doing well for the Padres’ teams from 2001-02. They were additional reasons to see the team played.
I’m surprise that he signed with an NL team given how bad his back was the last two seasons in San Diego. It can’t be that good that he’ll be able to man 1B all season. That platoon with Aurilia, hopefully, will keep Klesko from going back on the DL.
#8: Yes, I remember that game. It was a monster blast.
On another note: Aki got demoted. I feel really bad for him.
http://tinyurl.com/y3quog
re 9
Sucks for Aki, but as far as Gagne being as good as new, I’ll believe it when I see it. Very plausible scenario would be for Gagne to not be able to get his groove back so easily and Aki ends up closing again.
We have to see how well gagne pitches without the extra help he was getting.
Just remembered why Quilvio Veras used to drive me crazy. His monthly OPS from ‘98:
Mar/Apr: 806
May: 557
Jun: 920
Jul: 604
Aug: 795
Sep: 631
Sigh…
I have Klesko rated on the sixth best player in team history on my site. I don’t think that’s a sexy selection. Most people have fonder memories of Nate Colbert. But I think it’s correct selection.
RE: 12
Yeah, Geoff – I don’t have any numbers to back this up, but I distinctly remember that during the 98 season it seemed like Veras would hit a homerun and then spend the next couple weeks “swinging for the fences.” Which, of course, would usually results in pop-ups to shallow center
One of the most dominant starts ever by a Padres pitcher:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/SDN/SDN199808161.shtml
Actually, a 2001 model Ryan Klesko would really complete the Padres offseason nicely. He was such a fascinating player to watch. Controlled the strike zone despite a seemingly out-of-control swing; Stole 25 bases even though he was shaped like an offensive tackle…
Geoff,
As for ex-Padres-now-Giants, you forgot to mention that the person Klesko displaced as poor-fielding 1B/worse-fielding LF is Mark Sweeney.
re: 15 … gotta nominate this one: http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B08042SDN1974.htm
Here’s an interesting comparison:
Ryan Klesko (thru 2006) 280/372/507, OPS+ of 131
Alfonso Soriano (thru 2006) 280/325/510, OPS+ of 115
Soriano has played in better hitter’s parks throughout his career, and these numbers also include Klesko’s decline phase.
Would Ryan Klesko have been worth 126 million dollars 6 years ago? And does anyone think that, in 6 years, Soriano’s numbers are going to be significantly better than they are now? (Keep in mind he’s 30, and just had his best season, in which his OBP was 336 without intentional walks)
Interesting, huh?
Ryan spent his best years playing for bad teams, and he’s apparently going to spend his golden years playing for another one. I always liked him as a player – he has always been better than the likes of Geoff Jenkins or Trot Nixon, but for some reason those guys are always more favorably noted and revered. I hope he does well against everybody but San Diego.
Klesko did not fit into our club, and savvy that they offered arbitration so I guess they would get more picks. Is that right? Anyway, if he was a RHB, I could see him getting some games at 1B, maybe a few in left here and there.
I think it is a good pick up for the Giants. He has been hurt, and although it was a small sample size, his bat sure looked fine in his pinch hitting for us late last season. I would not be surprised if he is a “comeback” candidate next season. I still think it is right to let him go, given how solid AGon is, but wish he was not on a division rival.
He was a great player for us; too bad he is such a bad defender despite being such a good athlete. If he was tolerable in left, I would have held onto him.
#18, Equally interesting in that game is Gene Locklear with 6 put outs. Not one of the games great fielders to say the least.
Alfonso Soriano is not very good, if you look beyond home runs and stolen bases. That is fairly obvious.
#22
Yep. I agree with you. I am amazed that GMs of baseball teams can’t get past the HRs and SBs.
15
Equally as impressive was Ruben Rivera’s two hits.
Padres are part of Time Magazine’s 10 Best Sports Moments of 2006 … http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570820,00.html … be forewarned, you’re not gonna like it!
25: Thankfully it didn’t end up mattering. I didn’t click the link, but I am pretty confident that I know what it is.
SAN DIEGO (AP) — Former big league manager Tony Muser was hired as skipper of the Padres’ rookie-level team in Peoria, Ariz., on Thursday.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=Ajqo7cqQtcJ5qlApSBOv110m0bYF?slug=ap-padres-muser&prov=ap&type=lgns
27: Oh well.
Kevin, thanks for pointing out your rankings. I enjoyed looking through them. I think your pick on Klesko is very good.
I was surprised by the pitching selections you made, or didn’t make though. After Trevor and RJ, you have to go all the way to 27th before finding another pitcher (behind Jack Clark?) and it ends up being Bruce Hurst.
What about Eric Show? Not as dominant as Hurst, but he certainly had his moments and had tremendous longevity with the team.
Butch Metzger? There are at least four or five relievers who were better than him and were with the team for much longer periods. Perhaps it’s time to revisit the pitcher ratings for your Pantheon?
Looks like Burroughs has signed a minor league contract with Seattle. http://www.denverpost.com/rockies/ci_4881520
Report also is that Boomer wants a $3 mill guaranteed contract, with incentives. I think we could live with that. http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/sports_columnists/article/0,1299,DRMN_83_5230635,00.html
I’d not seen this anywhere in this thread, but the Friars also grabbed former Pirate infielder Craig Stansberry off waivers.
He’s a guy on whom Pirates’ A-ball play-by-play man Jon Schaeffer was fairly high at that level, but he appears to have hit a little bit of a wall past advanced A. He’s got a quick enough bat, but I wonder if he can regain his form in San Antonio or Portland.
Craig’s career: http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/S/Craig-Stansberry.shtml
Also, the Reds have DFA’ed Brendan Harris. You’d figure someone will claim him; there are enough teams with needs for utility guys (the Braves just signed Chris Woodward, for instance).
Link is broken on that Time article, LM. What was the dubious honor the Padres enjoyed?
Clayton, you did notice it was Brian who said that, not his mother, right? I know he was purporting to be quoting his mother, but I bet it’s just his twisted sense of humor.
PM … sorry about the link … it’s not broken, so it must be ’subscriber only’ … I think RBW (#26) knows what it is … it was the Dodgers getting 4 HRs in the 9th … and if I put on my “unbiased” hat, I’d have to agree that that was quite a moment!
34: Might have been his mom. The Gileses are an odd family.
One Trackback
[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]