<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html</link>
	<description>Blogging the San Diego Padres baseball club. Established 1997.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-92</guid>
		<description>GY - you gonna startup a Ducksnorts group at Yahoo for the March Madness?&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-92"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GY - you gonna startup a Ducksnorts group at Yahoo for the March Madness?
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-92">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick G.</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Hey guys -- check this out from the Boston Herald. Apparently, with the retirement of ex-Padre John Flaherty, the Sox are interested in re-aquiring Doug Mirabelli.

http://redsox.bostonherald.com/redSox/view.bg?articleid=130265&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-91"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys &#8212; check this out from the Boston Herald. Apparently, with the retirement of ex-Padre John Flaherty, the Sox are interested in re-aquiring Doug Mirabelli.</p>
<p><a href="http://redsox.bostonherald.com/redSox/view.bg?articleid=130265" rel="nofollow">http://redsox.bostonherald.com.....eid=130265</a>
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-91">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 06:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Anthony - I agree that the Padres have recognized their relatively poor farm system and are taking steps to improve it ... 2005 draft was step in right direction ... assuming Headley and Hundley take steps forward in their development this season ... there's plenty more steps to be taken ...&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-90"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony - I agree that the Padres have recognized their relatively poor farm system and are taking steps to improve it &#8230; 2005 draft was step in right direction &#8230; assuming Headley and Hundley take steps forward in their development this season &#8230; there&#8217;s plenty more steps to be taken &#8230;
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-90">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Apparently Time Warner doesn't carry ESPN Deportes.  Particularly galling because I work for Cox and get all the channels for free.  Too bad Kearney Mesa is a TW area.

Is the Padres farm system really that bad?  Worst in baseball?  How does a lowish revenue team let their player development fall so far?  At least they seem to recognize it and have been taking steps to remedy the situation.&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-89"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Time Warner doesn&#8217;t carry ESPN Deportes.  Particularly galling because I work for Cox and get all the channels for free.  Too bad Kearney Mesa is a TW area.</p>
<p>Is the Padres farm system really that bad?  Worst in baseball?  How does a lowish revenue team let their player development fall so far?  At least they seem to recognize it and have been taking steps to remedy the situation.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-89">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Friberg</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Friberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Anyone watching Japan v. USA on ESPN Deportes? Peavy gave up a lead-off HR to Ichiro then 2 more in the second. Had A-Rod been playing 3B instead of Chipper, it might be a closer score (3-1 after 4 innings). Peavy has settled down and has his typically sick stuff, he's been pinched a bit though...&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-88"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone watching Japan v. USA on ESPN Deportes? Peavy gave up a lead-off HR to Ichiro then 2 more in the second. Had A-Rod been playing 3B instead of Chipper, it might be a closer score (3-1 after 4 innings). Peavy has settled down and has his typically sick stuff, he&#8217;s been pinched a bit though&#8230;
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-88">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Here's a summary of BP's PECOTA view of farm systems ... warning: this is pretty ugly for the Padres ...

Organization Ratings 

It’s a straightforward application of the individual player rankings to evaluate the relative strength of different farm systems. Here’s what we get by summing the ratings within each organization for all "true" (pre-MLB) prospects with a combined PECOTA peak score of 100 or higher. 

Best Farm Systems 

1. Dodgers        2820.0
2. Indians        2608.7
3. Angels         2280.6
4. Marlins        2097.5
5. Brewers        2008.7
6. Twins          1970.7
7. Diamondbacks   1873.0
8. Devil Rays     1747.5
9. Tigers         1674.7
10. Pirates       1609.8
11. Yankees       1580.7
12. Rockies       1423.2
13. A's           1407.4
14. Giants        1399.2
15. Braves        1365.2
16. Red Sox       1338.7
17. Royals        1331.7
18. Rangers       1321.6
19. Mets          1225.2
20. Mariners      1223.9
21. Phillies      1212.6
22. Nationals     1189.6
23. Orioles       1180.6
24. Cardinals     1152.7
25. Cubs          1024.1
26. Blue Jays      954.6
27. Astros         784.6
28. Padres         734.3
29. White Sox      680.3
30. Reds           653.3

These numbers are really quite consistent with the BA organizational talent ratings, and the rest of the expert consensus on the depth of different systems. A lot of the noise cancels out when you’re dealing with entire systems, rather than individual prospects; PECOTA might like Andy LaRoche a bit less than BA and Joel Guzman a bit more, but either way it recognizes that the Dodgers are loaded. One exception is that pitching-rich organizations like the Red Sox and Cubs do notably poorer by PECOTA’s reckoning. 

We can also look at the 24-and-under talent within each organization, without regard to prospect status. For a number of reasons, this is probably the fairer way to do things. 

Best 24-and-Under Talent 

1. Devil Rays     3893.2
2. Marlins        3601.1
3. Dodgers        3554.5
4. Angels         3503.3
5. Braves         3362.5
6. Mariners       3250.7
7. Indians        3173.7
8. Brewers        3100.2
9. Twins          3098.8
10. Royals        2979.1
11. Diamondbacks  2606.1
12. Mets          2582.5
13. Tigers        2202.6
14. A's           2074.4
15. Red Sox       1985.6
16. Pirates       1938.7
17. Cubs          1857.9
18. Yankees       1857.7
19. Rangers       1739.0
20. Reds          1734.9
21. Blue Jays     1695.1
22. Phillies      1610.6
23. Orioles       1530.9
24. Cardinals     1518.9
25. Nationals     1512.6
26. Giants        1405.5
27. Rockies       1360.2
28. White Sox     1334.5
29. Astros        1322.6
30. Padres         914.0

Don’t wait: book your tickets now for the 2012 Trans-Everglades Classic. Hurricane-safe lodging still available. 

Finally, we can disregard the age requirement entirely, to get a sense for present medium-to-long-term organizational health. 

Overall Talent Stock 

1. A’s            8015.3
2. Dodgers        7609.6
3. Angels         7515.5
4. Indians        7488.5
5. Twins          7275.6
6. Yankees        7194.5
7. Braves         7047.1
8. Cardinals      7029.9
9. Red Sox        6904.1
10. Brewers       6670.8
11. Devil Rays    6660.4
12. Mets          6554.8
13. Pirates       6544.0
14. Phillies      6543.5
15. Blue Jays     6525.1
16. Mariners      6502.5
17. Cubs          6420.5
18. Diamondbacks  6390.0
19. Rangers       6378.9
20. Tigers        6322.0
21. Reds          5969.9
22. Rockies       5785.6
23. Royals        5726.6
24. Orioles       5623.3
25. Astros        5475.3
26. Marlins       5302.3
27. White Sox     5278.6
28. Giants        4873.8
29. Nationals     4843.7
30. Padres        4581.1&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-86"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a summary of BP&#8217;s PECOTA view of farm systems &#8230; warning: this is pretty ugly for the Padres &#8230;</p>
<p>Organization Ratings </p>
<p>It’s a straightforward application of the individual player rankings to evaluate the relative strength of different farm systems. Here’s what we get by summing the ratings within each organization for all &#8220;true&#8221; (pre-MLB) prospects with a combined PECOTA peak score of 100 or higher. </p>
<p>Best Farm Systems </p>
<p>1. Dodgers        2820.0<br />
2. Indians        2608.7<br />
3. Angels         2280.6<br />
4. Marlins        2097.5<br />
5. Brewers        2008.7<br />
6. Twins          1970.7<br />
7. Diamondbacks   1873.0<br />
8. Devil Rays     1747.5<br />
9. Tigers         1674.7<br />
10. Pirates       1609.8<br />
11. Yankees       1580.7<br />
12. Rockies       1423.2<br />
13. A&#8217;s           1407.4<br />
14. Giants        1399.2<br />
15. Braves        1365.2<br />
16. Red Sox       1338.7<br />
17. Royals        1331.7<br />
18. Rangers       1321.6<br />
19. Mets          1225.2<br />
20. Mariners      1223.9<br />
21. Phillies      1212.6<br />
22. Nationals     1189.6<br />
23. Orioles       1180.6<br />
24. Cardinals     1152.7<br />
25. Cubs          1024.1<br />
26. Blue Jays      954.6<br />
27. Astros         784.6<br />
28. Padres         734.3<br />
29. White Sox      680.3<br />
30. Reds           653.3</p>
<p>These numbers are really quite consistent with the BA organizational talent ratings, and the rest of the expert consensus on the depth of different systems. A lot of the noise cancels out when you’re dealing with entire systems, rather than individual prospects; PECOTA might like Andy LaRoche a bit less than BA and Joel Guzman a bit more, but either way it recognizes that the Dodgers are loaded. One exception is that pitching-rich organizations like the Red Sox and Cubs do notably poorer by PECOTA’s reckoning. </p>
<p>We can also look at the 24-and-under talent within each organization, without regard to prospect status. For a number of reasons, this is probably the fairer way to do things. </p>
<p>Best 24-and-Under Talent </p>
<p>1. Devil Rays     3893.2<br />
2. Marlins        3601.1<br />
3. Dodgers        3554.5<br />
4. Angels         3503.3<br />
5. Braves         3362.5<br />
6. Mariners       3250.7<br />
7. Indians        3173.7<br />
8. Brewers        3100.2<br />
9. Twins          3098.8<br />
10. Royals        2979.1<br />
11. Diamondbacks  2606.1<br />
12. Mets          2582.5<br />
13. Tigers        2202.6<br />
14. A&#8217;s           2074.4<br />
15. Red Sox       1985.6<br />
16. Pirates       1938.7<br />
17. Cubs          1857.9<br />
18. Yankees       1857.7<br />
19. Rangers       1739.0<br />
20. Reds          1734.9<br />
21. Blue Jays     1695.1<br />
22. Phillies      1610.6<br />
23. Orioles       1530.9<br />
24. Cardinals     1518.9<br />
25. Nationals     1512.6<br />
26. Giants        1405.5<br />
27. Rockies       1360.2<br />
28. White Sox     1334.5<br />
29. Astros        1322.6<br />
30. Padres         914.0</p>
<p>Don’t wait: book your tickets now for the 2012 Trans-Everglades Classic. Hurricane-safe lodging still available. </p>
<p>Finally, we can disregard the age requirement entirely, to get a sense for present medium-to-long-term organizational health. </p>
<p>Overall Talent Stock </p>
<p>1. A’s            8015.3<br />
2. Dodgers        7609.6<br />
3. Angels         7515.5<br />
4. Indians        7488.5<br />
5. Twins          7275.6<br />
6. Yankees        7194.5<br />
7. Braves         7047.1<br />
8. Cardinals      7029.9<br />
9. Red Sox        6904.1<br />
10. Brewers       6670.8<br />
11. Devil Rays    6660.4<br />
12. Mets          6554.8<br />
13. Pirates       6544.0<br />
14. Phillies      6543.5<br />
15. Blue Jays     6525.1<br />
16. Mariners      6502.5<br />
17. Cubs          6420.5<br />
18. Diamondbacks  6390.0<br />
19. Rangers       6378.9<br />
20. Tigers        6322.0<br />
21. Reds          5969.9<br />
22. Rockies       5785.6<br />
23. Royals        5726.6<br />
24. Orioles       5623.3<br />
25. Astros        5475.3<br />
26. Marlins       5302.3<br />
27. White Sox     5278.6<br />
28. Giants        4873.8<br />
29. Nationals     4843.7<br />
30. Padres        4581.1
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-86">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-85</guid>
		<description>BP's Team Health Report ... http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=4840 ... it ain't pretty ...&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-85"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP&#8217;s Team Health Report &#8230; <a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=4840" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballprospectus......cleid=4840</a> &#8230; it ain&#8217;t pretty &#8230;
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-85">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I just followed the first link to padres.com (aka padres.mlb.com) ... noticed they had video highlights for each spring game ... with jerry/ted doing play-by-play ... good stuff.&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-84"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just followed the first link to padres.com (aka padres.mlb.com) &#8230; noticed they had video highlights for each spring game &#8230; with jerry/ted doing play-by-play &#8230; good stuff.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-84">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Here's a few pics from my trip ...

1. Tagg Bozied, etc ... 

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Tagg%20@%20BP.jpg

2. Cesar Carillo ...

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Cesar%20&#38;%20Walter.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Cesar%20&#38;%20Walter%202.jpg

3. WBC ...

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Pregame%20Pagentry%20@%20WBC.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/The%20Ole%20Boys.jpg

A fun trip ... the 15-10 loss to Rangers yesterday (Friday) was not fun ... it was a cold/windy day ... LOTS of errors ... Leone show'd his rough side booting a couple of nearly-routine balls ... got to see Walter mash a ball on the RCF berm ... Matt Bush didn't show anything with bat or glove ... but then again, neither did Mike Cameron ... Ian Kinsler can mash ... and I saw why the Rangers didn't need Adrian Gonzalez, Jason Botts is a STUD (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pecota/bottsja01.php) ... Sledge look'd good hitting the ball, he smoked one into the RF corner that'd be a triple when his legs get healthy (he clearly wasn't running 100%) ...&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-83"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a few pics from my trip &#8230;</p>
<p>1. Tagg Bozied, etc &#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Tagg%20@%20BP.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://photos1.blogger.com/blo.....@%20BP.jpg</a></p>
<p>2. Cesar Carillo &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Cesar%20&amp;%20Walter.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://photos1.blogger.com/blo.....Walter.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Cesar%20&amp;%20Walter%202.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://photos1.blogger.com/blo.....er%202.jpg</a></p>
<p>3. WBC &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/Pregame%20Pagentry%20@%20WBC.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://photos1.blogger.com/blo.....%20WBC.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5110/932/1600/The%20Ole%20Boys.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://photos1.blogger.com/blo.....20Boys.jpg</a></p>
<p>A fun trip &#8230; the 15-10 loss to Rangers yesterday (Friday) was not fun &#8230; it was a cold/windy day &#8230; LOTS of errors &#8230; Leone show&#8217;d his rough side booting a couple of nearly-routine balls &#8230; got to see Walter mash a ball on the RCF berm &#8230; Matt Bush didn&#8217;t show anything with bat or glove &#8230; but then again, neither did Mike Cameron &#8230; Ian Kinsler can mash &#8230; and I saw why the Rangers didn&#8217;t need Adrian Gonzalez, Jason Botts is a STUD (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pecota/bottsja01.php) &#8230; Sledge look&#8217;d good hitting the ball, he smoked one into the RF corner that&#8217;d be a triple when his legs get healthy (he clearly wasn&#8217;t running 100%) &#8230;
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-83">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Young</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/friday-links-2.html#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Anthony. Here's a &lt;a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/padres/20060310-9999-1s10padnotes.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;link to the Brazelton article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;p class="top-comments"&gt;Current score: &lt;span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-81"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Anthony. Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/padres/20060310-9999-1s10padnotes.html" rel="nofollow">link to the Brazelton article</a>.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-81">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
