<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barfield Takes Second</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick G.</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-317</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, the Phillies website says 1975. We should probably go with that. Sure would be nice if he was 26, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, the Phillies website says 1975. We should probably go with that. Sure would be nice if he was 26, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Waits</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Waits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-315</guid>
		<description>1980 would make a big difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1980 would make a big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan S.</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Whoops, he seems to have Dominican multiple age syndrome. Baseball cube lists him as being born in 1980 (hence my comment), everyone else shows 1975.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, he seems to have Dominican multiple age syndrome. Baseball cube lists him as being born in 1980 (hence my comment), everyone else shows 1975.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Waits</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Waits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Yes, let&#039;s be fair.

Andrade is 2 years YOUNGER than Lopez. He was drafted in 2001. Climbing to the majors in 4 seasons is a reasonable pace. 

He strikes out 4 for every 1 he walks. Better than Lopez, but not by a bunch (3.75). 

He strikes out 13, that&#039;s 13, per 9. That&#039;s much better than Lopez&#039;s 9.6.

His minor league WHIP is .94. Again, substantially better than Lopez&#039;s 1.14. 

Seems like the only minor league numbers you want to use are the ones that make Lopez look a little better. You can&#039;t on one hand promote Lopez&#039;s major league experience as a plus but turn a blind eye to his major league walk rate. But let&#039;s say that Lopez and Andrade were the same. Why is Scott Cassidy still around? They&#039;re both better than Cassidy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, let&#8217;s be fair.</p>
<p>Andrade is 2 years YOUNGER than Lopez. He was drafted in 2001. Climbing to the majors in 4 seasons is a reasonable pace. </p>
<p>He strikes out 4 for every 1 he walks. Better than Lopez, but not by a bunch (3.75). </p>
<p>He strikes out 13, that&#8217;s 13, per 9. That&#8217;s much better than Lopez&#8217;s 9.6.</p>
<p>His minor league WHIP is .94. Again, substantially better than Lopez&#8217;s 1.14. </p>
<p>Seems like the only minor league numbers you want to use are the ones that make Lopez look a little better. You can&#8217;t on one hand promote Lopez&#8217;s major league experience as a plus but turn a blind eye to his major league walk rate. But let&#8217;s say that Lopez and Andrade were the same. Why is Scott Cassidy still around? They&#8217;re both better than Cassidy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan S.</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be a bit fair:

Andrade is 2 years older than Lopez, has pitched a total of 13 innings at AAA and 3.0 BB/9 in the minors. He had never pitched more than 61 innings in a year

Lopez has 100+ major league innings, 14 saves. 2.55BB/9 in the minors. 

Given they would have had to keep Andrade on the 25 man roster all year, I think the decision is reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be a bit fair:</p>
<p>Andrade is 2 years older than Lopez, has pitched a total of 13 innings at AAA and 3.0 BB/9 in the minors. He had never pitched more than 61 innings in a year</p>
<p>Lopez has 100+ major league innings, 14 saves. 2.55BB/9 in the minors. </p>
<p>Given they would have had to keep Andrade on the 25 man roster all year, I think the decision is reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Waits</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Waits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-310</guid>
		<description>We couldn&#039;t use Andrade, but we trade for an older reliever who walks 4.5 per 9?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We couldn&#8217;t use Andrade, but we trade for an older reliever who walks 4.5 per 9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Young</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Weird bullpen happenings. Padres have traded for Aquilino Lopez:

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=citadel-2_514146_315&amp;prov=citadel&amp;type=story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird bullpen happenings. Padres have traded for Aquilino Lopez:</p>
<p><a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=citadel-2_514146_315&amp;prov=citadel&amp;type=story" rel="nofollow">http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=citadel-2_514146_315&amp;prov=citadel&amp;type=story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Young</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Bruce: No misprint, Andrade has been claimed by the Royals.

LM: I can&#039;t remember what exactly sparked the conversation other than the Pads were down 10-2 in the eighth and it was time to talk about something other than the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce: No misprint, Andrade has been claimed by the Royals.</p>
<p>LM: I can&#8217;t remember what exactly sparked the conversation other than the Pads were down 10-2 in the eighth and it was time to talk about something other than the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-306</guid>
		<description>At further risk of further straying from Garvey ... here&#039;s a note from a Kevin Goldstein article @ BP today ... about spring good&#039;s &amp; bad&#039;s ...

Disappointing: Dallas McPherson, 3B/DH. While he&#039;s no longer officially a prospect, McPherson is anything but an established big leaguer either, and now he&#039;s an injury-plagued slugger returning to Triple-A. The trend lines are all going in the wrong direction here. 

PLAYER          AVG  OBP  SLG AB  R  H 2B 3B HR BB SO
D. McPherson   .161 .235 .226 31  3  5  0  1  0  3 11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At further risk of further straying from Garvey &#8230; here&#8217;s a note from a Kevin Goldstein article @ BP today &#8230; about spring good&#8217;s &amp; bad&#8217;s &#8230;</p>
<p>Disappointing: Dallas McPherson, 3B/DH. While he&#8217;s no longer officially a prospect, McPherson is anything but an established big leaguer either, and now he&#8217;s an injury-plagued slugger returning to Triple-A. The trend lines are all going in the wrong direction here. </p>
<p>PLAYER          AVG  OBP  SLG AB  R  H 2B 3B HR BB SO<br />
D. McPherson   .161 .235 .226 31  3  5  0  1  0  3 11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynchMob</title>
		<link>http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html/comment-page-1#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>LynchMob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducksnorts.com/blog/2006/03/barfield-takes-second.html#comment-305</guid>
		<description>At the risk of further straying from Garvey ... here&#039;s a note for y&#039;all in SD ... Nate Silver, of Baseball Prospectus, will be the radio down there tonight, on XPRS 1090 AM (The Mighty 1090), Tuesday, March 28th, 8:35pm PT ... I&#039;ll bet he&#039;ll be interesting ... I know his writing is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of further straying from Garvey &#8230; here&#8217;s a note for y&#8217;all in SD &#8230; Nate Silver, of Baseball Prospectus, will be the radio down there tonight, on XPRS 1090 AM (The Mighty 1090), Tuesday, March 28th, 8:35pm PT &#8230; I&#8217;ll bet he&#8217;ll be interesting &#8230; I know his writing is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
