Monday Links

What a great title. It’s like Friday Links, only Monday…

  • Padres to host inaugural FriarFest (Padres.com). For $5, fans can set foot on the Petco Park playing field and “interact with their favorite Padres personalities.” Brian Giles, Eric Young, and Mike Cameron are mentioned among those scheduled to attend.
  • Cactus League (via Baseball Musings). The official site of spring training in Arizona features schedules, tickets, etc. Padres open against the Mariners at Peoria on Thursday, March 2.
  • Chan-ho Clashes Online With Fan (Korea Times). In Park’s defense, his detractor seems a little, um… Well, he thinks Park would do better if he cut his hair shorter.
  • Colletti Baez A Reliever (6-4-2). The Dodgers have dealt away two promising young pitchers for two decent relievers. This is why I don’t stress too much over the Padres’ moves this winter. Nobody else in the NL West is doing much to help themselves either.
  • Percentiles for Offensive Production Measures (Tiger Tales). Friend of Ducksnorts Lee Panas takes a good look at offensive production and provides a handy chart to show, among other things, that an 803 OPS is roughly equivalent in magnitude to 6.0 RC/G. Good stuff.
  • Bruce Sutter and the Hall of Fame – Another Look (TigerBlog). Brian looks at how former Tiger John Hiller compares with Sutter.
  • Weighted Park Factors, 2003-2005 (BTF). Dan Szymborski has posted (okay, it was over a month ago) “3-year weighted park factors for all active major and minor league teams, not counting rookie league teams.” If anyone is doing translations or other research involving minor league stats, this could be quite useful.

Former Padres

That’s all for now. We’ll get back to more regular posting soon.

17 Comments

  1. Tom Waits
    Posted January 16, 2006 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    More cowbell? Sorta.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch.php?v=zLElfJ9YCh0

  2. Didi
    Posted January 16, 2006 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Interesting business side of payroll.
    A mention about money paid to the Padres for Cirillo.

    http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/thiel/255225_thiel11.html

    Hmmm…I’d like to see what the Padres’ payroll looks like.

  3. Nick G.
    Posted January 17, 2006 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    Some Wells stuff to chew on:

    http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2006/01/15/a_true_big_game_pitcher/?page=2

    Looks like he’s lobbying to come to SD. A trade to LA fell through last week . . .

  4. Posted January 17, 2006 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Wasn’t Eaton upset at the long-term deal the Padres were offering him?

    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/13645580.htm

    Looks like he’s trying what Matt Morris did last year. Seems to me that strategy is likely to work better in St. Louis than in Arlington…

  5. Nick G.
    Posted January 17, 2006 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    Good link Geoff

    I’m totally puzzled by that Eaton thing. Unless the Rangers did it with a wink that they would try to get a long term deal done with him at some point during the season.

  6. Tom Waits
    Posted January 17, 2006 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    This is Eaton’s last arbitration year. He was always going to sign a contract with the Rangers. It was only a question of it whether the two parties would agree to it beforehand or allow it to be set by an arbitrator.

  7. Posted January 17, 2006 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    Good point, TW. Still interesting that Eaton doesn’t seem to be making much noise about a long-term deal now that he’s in Texas. I have no way of knowing for sure but I get the impression that he wouldn’t have been real happy with a contract like this in a Padres uniform.

  8. Nick G.
    Posted January 17, 2006 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    TW — I understand that he was going to be signed this year regardless — just wondering about the “noise” factor that Geoff mentioned.

  9. Nick G.
    Posted January 18, 2006 at 6:08 am | Permalink

    The daily Wells update. This indicates why the trade probably has not happened yet: The Padres will give up Roberts, but only if the Sox take on Woody Williams.

    http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2006/01/18/sox_arroyo_working_on_deal/?page=2

  10. Posted January 18, 2006 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Thanks, Nick, for the update. I hope KT and co. stick to their guns on this one.

  11. Nick G.
    Posted January 18, 2006 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Something from the NC times on Petco’s fences:

    http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/01/18/sports/professional/padres/21_54_321_17_06.txt

  12. Posted January 18, 2006 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Padres uni numbers (hat tip Baseball Musings):

    http://sandiego.padres.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060117&content_id=1297168&vkey=news_sd&fext=.jsp&c_id=sd

    A little suprised that guys like Baugh, Etherton, and LaForest have numbers under 60.

  13. Nick G.
    Posted January 18, 2006 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    It will be very weird to see anyone other than Lawrence wearing #50 — looks like Brian Sikorski got it.

    And Barfield is #60.

  14. Pat
    Posted January 18, 2006 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Barfield wears 60? Anyone know why? Just becauase he’s a rookie, perhaps?

  15. Posted January 19, 2006 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    The Padres have claimed Walter Young off waivers from the Orioles. He’s listed at 6-5, 322 lbs. Here’s a picture:

    http://www.jnevitt.com/Images/Walter-Young-first-hit.jpg

    Big dude.

  16. Pat
    Posted January 19, 2006 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Walter looks like he just ate Mo Vaughn! I hope he’s a backup catcher.

  17. Tom Waits
    Posted January 19, 2006 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Huh. Why? Claim Young when we’re jammed up at first base, don’t claim Branyan when Castilla is older than dirt and the next 3b in the chain will play at Elsinore this season?